tedandjulie
New member
I have just about had it with getting questions answered from the medical community! My wife and I are CF carriers and recently gave birth to our daughter. We opted against the amnio test for CF prior to birth. I inquired at length prior to the birth about getting the baby tested immediately after birth. I was told the state screen would check to see if the baby had both genes for CF. We waited anxiously for 14 days to get the results. A nurse called and said everything came back normal and that the baby wasn't even a carrier. Of course we were very happy! Well, wouldn't you know the doctor called us last night and said that the nurse misinformed us and that the state screen didn't cover genetics. Now, he advised a sweat test to be done ASAP. I am aggravated that we were misinformed about the health of our child and also that the screen didn't check for genetics after we were advised it would! I realize sweat tests aren't reliable and that the DNA test is the best. We will persue this but are confused as we thought the state screen would cover that.
My question is: Is it normal for the state screen to not check for genetics? (i.e. does the newborn have the CF gene?) I can't seem to get straight answers here in NJ. This information came directly from our CF center in NJ. I know that most of you in the CF community would know. Thanks.
My question is: Is it normal for the state screen to not check for genetics? (i.e. does the newborn have the CF gene?) I can't seem to get straight answers here in NJ. This information came directly from our CF center in NJ. I know that most of you in the CF community would know. Thanks.