gsh and valerie hudson

dramamama

New member
Just wanted to post this. It is an update from the utah valley institute site....it is the one that Valerie Hudson created when she started the whole gsh broohaha. I have been using it for three and a half years and love it.

<b>This is an update on her three boys who are on gsh and have been for years...two of them since birth.</b>

It is hard to believe it, but we are going on 8 and 1/2 years using glutathione (GSH) with our children with CF! The first of our children with CF began GSH when he was almost 2 years old, and the others have started on it almost immediately after birth. I can honestly say that if I was only allowed to bring one thing with our family to a desert island, I would bring GSH for our children with CF.
The change in our lives was most dramatic with our first child with CF, of course. He was diagnosed when he was 8 months old (after two months of complete bewilderment on the part of the doctors). He is a delF508 homozygote, as are all our children with CF. He was not even on the weight chart, had temporal wasting, presented with Pseudo-Bartter's Syndrome and a severe Vitamin K deficiency which left him with huge black bruises all over his torso. They initially thought he had leukemia. When they first admitted him to the hospital, his electrolyetes were so out of whack they did not understand why he was not in a coma.

After he was put on enzymes, he got up to the 5th percentile for weight. We created a special food concoction which we would feed him by oral syringe every few hours, and with that we got him up to the 30th percentile. When he was diagnosed, he cultured Staph. He had virtually no saliva, so all his food had to be moistened for him.

We were not satisfied with the vision of his future we were given by the CF Clinic. I began to study CF in a serious fashion, even though it required a lot of bootstrapping. One legacy of this is that you will continue to find the most recent abstract summaries from both the North American and European CF conferences on my listserv, the wlgroup2 (a yahoogroup) to this day.

In the fall of 1998, it became clear to us that GSH was a very large part of the CF puzzle. GSH is one of the body's most important substances, acting in many roles and regulating many processes, including inflammation. You can read more about that on the UVICF's page on glutathione research. (<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://members.tripod.com/uvicf/index.htm">http://members.tripod.com/uvicf/index.htm</a> and then click on research, and then click on glutathione.)

At the end of October 1998, we were ready to try glutathione with our first son with CF (the others hadn't been born yet!). We used a mix of one inhalation and several oral doses a day. We began to see changes within a few days--the first thing we noticed was that he now had saliva. He drooled for the first time in his life--what a beautiful sight!

And then the weight gain started. He developed the appetite of a horse, and with each passing month his weight percentile got higher and higher. He is now at the 95th percentile for weight and according to our pediatrician, is now slightly overweight! His stools, which had alternated between constipating chalk-like feces and fatty stools, became almost normal. Most impressively, his need for enzymes decreased. At 10 years old, he takes 1 CREON 5 per meal. Yes, one enzyme of the smallest possible dose.

We also noticed that instead of being chronically sick with a cold or flu, he now rarely became ill, and when he did, he got better faster than anyone else in the family. He stopped culturing Staph. He cultures nothing to this day. He has boundless energy and stamina, and is stronger than his older brother who does not have CF.

Our other children with CF are doing just as well. One is at the 50th percentile for weight (he has my husband's build), and the other is at the 90th percentile for weight. None culture anything, and are equally healthy and strong. We thank God for GSH!

GSH is not the only way we help our children, of course. Our kitchen looks like a health food store's supplement section. Even with the usual supplementation, levels of D, E, and K, are inadequate, so we use additional doses of these vitamins. We use DHA, MSM, alpha-lipoic acid, boron, calcium, magnesium, zinc, curcumin, NAC, Co Q-10, folic acid, acidophilus, and a few other things with our children on a daily basis. (We use a lot of the GSH-Curc Caps by Theranaturals; www.theranaturals.com) We use enzymes, of course, though a smaller dose than what would be considered usual, because their weight and stools are doing well on the smaller dose. They are routinely cultured, so we keep on top of their bacterial status. We keep up with the latest medical literature on CF so that when something promising comes along, we can jump on it for our children.

CF is something different to us now than it was at our first son's diagnosis. We used to think of CF as something that would kill them, probably in their mid 20's. We now think of CF more on the lines of diabetes: it is a chronic condition about which one must be exceedingly vigilant. But with due vigilance and prudence, we fully expect them to live a normal and reasonably healthy lifespan. Our lives have indeed changed dramatically--and for the better--since that fateful day almost 8 and 1/2 years ago when our first son with CF took his first dose of GSH!
 

dramamama

New member
Just wanted to post this. It is an update from the utah valley institute site....it is the one that Valerie Hudson created when she started the whole gsh broohaha. I have been using it for three and a half years and love it.

<b>This is an update on her three boys who are on gsh and have been for years...two of them since birth.</b>

It is hard to believe it, but we are going on 8 and 1/2 years using glutathione (GSH) with our children with CF! The first of our children with CF began GSH when he was almost 2 years old, and the others have started on it almost immediately after birth. I can honestly say that if I was only allowed to bring one thing with our family to a desert island, I would bring GSH for our children with CF.
The change in our lives was most dramatic with our first child with CF, of course. He was diagnosed when he was 8 months old (after two months of complete bewilderment on the part of the doctors). He is a delF508 homozygote, as are all our children with CF. He was not even on the weight chart, had temporal wasting, presented with Pseudo-Bartter's Syndrome and a severe Vitamin K deficiency which left him with huge black bruises all over his torso. They initially thought he had leukemia. When they first admitted him to the hospital, his electrolyetes were so out of whack they did not understand why he was not in a coma.

After he was put on enzymes, he got up to the 5th percentile for weight. We created a special food concoction which we would feed him by oral syringe every few hours, and with that we got him up to the 30th percentile. When he was diagnosed, he cultured Staph. He had virtually no saliva, so all his food had to be moistened for him.

We were not satisfied with the vision of his future we were given by the CF Clinic. I began to study CF in a serious fashion, even though it required a lot of bootstrapping. One legacy of this is that you will continue to find the most recent abstract summaries from both the North American and European CF conferences on my listserv, the wlgroup2 (a yahoogroup) to this day.

In the fall of 1998, it became clear to us that GSH was a very large part of the CF puzzle. GSH is one of the body's most important substances, acting in many roles and regulating many processes, including inflammation. You can read more about that on the UVICF's page on glutathione research. (<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://members.tripod.com/uvicf/index.htm">http://members.tripod.com/uvicf/index.htm</a> and then click on research, and then click on glutathione.)

At the end of October 1998, we were ready to try glutathione with our first son with CF (the others hadn't been born yet!). We used a mix of one inhalation and several oral doses a day. We began to see changes within a few days--the first thing we noticed was that he now had saliva. He drooled for the first time in his life--what a beautiful sight!

And then the weight gain started. He developed the appetite of a horse, and with each passing month his weight percentile got higher and higher. He is now at the 95th percentile for weight and according to our pediatrician, is now slightly overweight! His stools, which had alternated between constipating chalk-like feces and fatty stools, became almost normal. Most impressively, his need for enzymes decreased. At 10 years old, he takes 1 CREON 5 per meal. Yes, one enzyme of the smallest possible dose.

We also noticed that instead of being chronically sick with a cold or flu, he now rarely became ill, and when he did, he got better faster than anyone else in the family. He stopped culturing Staph. He cultures nothing to this day. He has boundless energy and stamina, and is stronger than his older brother who does not have CF.

Our other children with CF are doing just as well. One is at the 50th percentile for weight (he has my husband's build), and the other is at the 90th percentile for weight. None culture anything, and are equally healthy and strong. We thank God for GSH!

GSH is not the only way we help our children, of course. Our kitchen looks like a health food store's supplement section. Even with the usual supplementation, levels of D, E, and K, are inadequate, so we use additional doses of these vitamins. We use DHA, MSM, alpha-lipoic acid, boron, calcium, magnesium, zinc, curcumin, NAC, Co Q-10, folic acid, acidophilus, and a few other things with our children on a daily basis. (We use a lot of the GSH-Curc Caps by Theranaturals; www.theranaturals.com) We use enzymes, of course, though a smaller dose than what would be considered usual, because their weight and stools are doing well on the smaller dose. They are routinely cultured, so we keep on top of their bacterial status. We keep up with the latest medical literature on CF so that when something promising comes along, we can jump on it for our children.

CF is something different to us now than it was at our first son's diagnosis. We used to think of CF as something that would kill them, probably in their mid 20's. We now think of CF more on the lines of diabetes: it is a chronic condition about which one must be exceedingly vigilant. But with due vigilance and prudence, we fully expect them to live a normal and reasonably healthy lifespan. Our lives have indeed changed dramatically--and for the better--since that fateful day almost 8 and 1/2 years ago when our first son with CF took his first dose of GSH!
 

dramamama

New member
Just wanted to post this. It is an update from the utah valley institute site....it is the one that Valerie Hudson created when she started the whole gsh broohaha. I have been using it for three and a half years and love it.

<b>This is an update on her three boys who are on gsh and have been for years...two of them since birth.</b>

It is hard to believe it, but we are going on 8 and 1/2 years using glutathione (GSH) with our children with CF! The first of our children with CF began GSH when he was almost 2 years old, and the others have started on it almost immediately after birth. I can honestly say that if I was only allowed to bring one thing with our family to a desert island, I would bring GSH for our children with CF.
The change in our lives was most dramatic with our first child with CF, of course. He was diagnosed when he was 8 months old (after two months of complete bewilderment on the part of the doctors). He is a delF508 homozygote, as are all our children with CF. He was not even on the weight chart, had temporal wasting, presented with Pseudo-Bartter's Syndrome and a severe Vitamin K deficiency which left him with huge black bruises all over his torso. They initially thought he had leukemia. When they first admitted him to the hospital, his electrolyetes were so out of whack they did not understand why he was not in a coma.

After he was put on enzymes, he got up to the 5th percentile for weight. We created a special food concoction which we would feed him by oral syringe every few hours, and with that we got him up to the 30th percentile. When he was diagnosed, he cultured Staph. He had virtually no saliva, so all his food had to be moistened for him.

We were not satisfied with the vision of his future we were given by the CF Clinic. I began to study CF in a serious fashion, even though it required a lot of bootstrapping. One legacy of this is that you will continue to find the most recent abstract summaries from both the North American and European CF conferences on my listserv, the wlgroup2 (a yahoogroup) to this day.

In the fall of 1998, it became clear to us that GSH was a very large part of the CF puzzle. GSH is one of the body's most important substances, acting in many roles and regulating many processes, including inflammation. You can read more about that on the UVICF's page on glutathione research. (<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://members.tripod.com/uvicf/index.htm">http://members.tripod.com/uvicf/index.htm</a> and then click on research, and then click on glutathione.)

At the end of October 1998, we were ready to try glutathione with our first son with CF (the others hadn't been born yet!). We used a mix of one inhalation and several oral doses a day. We began to see changes within a few days--the first thing we noticed was that he now had saliva. He drooled for the first time in his life--what a beautiful sight!

And then the weight gain started. He developed the appetite of a horse, and with each passing month his weight percentile got higher and higher. He is now at the 95th percentile for weight and according to our pediatrician, is now slightly overweight! His stools, which had alternated between constipating chalk-like feces and fatty stools, became almost normal. Most impressively, his need for enzymes decreased. At 10 years old, he takes 1 CREON 5 per meal. Yes, one enzyme of the smallest possible dose.

We also noticed that instead of being chronically sick with a cold or flu, he now rarely became ill, and when he did, he got better faster than anyone else in the family. He stopped culturing Staph. He cultures nothing to this day. He has boundless energy and stamina, and is stronger than his older brother who does not have CF.

Our other children with CF are doing just as well. One is at the 50th percentile for weight (he has my husband's build), and the other is at the 90th percentile for weight. None culture anything, and are equally healthy and strong. We thank God for GSH!

GSH is not the only way we help our children, of course. Our kitchen looks like a health food store's supplement section. Even with the usual supplementation, levels of D, E, and K, are inadequate, so we use additional doses of these vitamins. We use DHA, MSM, alpha-lipoic acid, boron, calcium, magnesium, zinc, curcumin, NAC, Co Q-10, folic acid, acidophilus, and a few other things with our children on a daily basis. (We use a lot of the GSH-Curc Caps by Theranaturals; www.theranaturals.com) We use enzymes, of course, though a smaller dose than what would be considered usual, because their weight and stools are doing well on the smaller dose. They are routinely cultured, so we keep on top of their bacterial status. We keep up with the latest medical literature on CF so that when something promising comes along, we can jump on it for our children.

CF is something different to us now than it was at our first son's diagnosis. We used to think of CF as something that would kill them, probably in their mid 20's. We now think of CF more on the lines of diabetes: it is a chronic condition about which one must be exceedingly vigilant. But with due vigilance and prudence, we fully expect them to live a normal and reasonably healthy lifespan. Our lives have indeed changed dramatically--and for the better--since that fateful day almost 8 and 1/2 years ago when our first son with CF took his first dose of GSH!
 

NoExcuses

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>dramamama</b></i>

We now think of CF more on the lines of diabetes: it is a chronic condition about which one must be exceedingly vigilant. But with due vigilance and prudence, we fully expect them to live a normal and reasonably healthy lifespan. </end quote></div>


With a 4 year old CFer on this site about ready for a lung transplant and other young CFers on this site with FEV1's in the 40s & 50s, I consider this statement a slap in the face. They aren't my kids but they're part of our CF family here...

Anyway, I do believe NAC has had positive effects on my health as my blog has detailed. But do I now consider CF to be equivalent to diabetes? No, I'm not in <b> severe denial </b> even though my FEV1 is 95%. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif" border="0">
 

NoExcuses

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>dramamama</b></i>

We now think of CF more on the lines of diabetes: it is a chronic condition about which one must be exceedingly vigilant. But with due vigilance and prudence, we fully expect them to live a normal and reasonably healthy lifespan. </end quote></div>


With a 4 year old CFer on this site about ready for a lung transplant and other young CFers on this site with FEV1's in the 40s & 50s, I consider this statement a slap in the face. They aren't my kids but they're part of our CF family here...

Anyway, I do believe NAC has had positive effects on my health as my blog has detailed. But do I now consider CF to be equivalent to diabetes? No, I'm not in <b> severe denial </b> even though my FEV1 is 95%. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif" border="0">
 

NoExcuses

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>dramamama</b></i>

We now think of CF more on the lines of diabetes: it is a chronic condition about which one must be exceedingly vigilant. But with due vigilance and prudence, we fully expect them to live a normal and reasonably healthy lifespan. </end quote></div>


With a 4 year old CFer on this site about ready for a lung transplant and other young CFers on this site with FEV1's in the 40s & 50s, I consider this statement a slap in the face. They aren't my kids but they're part of our CF family here...

Anyway, I do believe NAC has had positive effects on my health as my blog has detailed. But do I now consider CF to be equivalent to diabetes? No, I'm not in <b> severe denial </b> even though my FEV1 is 95%. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif" border="0">
 

dramamama

New member
amy-
as always, I can count on you to respond.

I have been on gsh, not NAC, and have seen my whole blood gsh, and plasma gsh jump three hundred points on onw scale and 200 an another. My fev1 went from the 40's to 61% in a matter of months.....when it had been there for over one year. I am REALLy tired of you telling people that there is no room for hope and change....guess what? Sometimes things do get better. And, if you had bothered to do the research on children who have been on gsh for several years, you will find that most do get better. Of course, there are those who do not....but suppose, one person reads this and decides to try it and heshe gets better.....is it worth it???? According to you no. According to me yes.

It is inexcusable to tell people only NAC works to increase gsh in the body...that gsh cannot be absorbed..which you have done once or twice. That is simply not true. You have your whole little thing on the eflow, which is great. Of course, initially you didn't even believe that the makers of TOBI tried to sue eflow and block it from coming to the market because it would hurt the sales of TOBI...now, you are 100% on board for the eflow. Why? Because you did the research.

Well, I apologize in advance to all the people on this website who I "slap in the face" with a message of hope. Next time would you please apologize in advance for your messages that are insensitive...I am sure many of us would appreciate it.

MODERATORS
If you want to move this feel free....I was only trying to give alittle POSITIVE info.
 

dramamama

New member
amy-
as always, I can count on you to respond.

I have been on gsh, not NAC, and have seen my whole blood gsh, and plasma gsh jump three hundred points on onw scale and 200 an another. My fev1 went from the 40's to 61% in a matter of months.....when it had been there for over one year. I am REALLy tired of you telling people that there is no room for hope and change....guess what? Sometimes things do get better. And, if you had bothered to do the research on children who have been on gsh for several years, you will find that most do get better. Of course, there are those who do not....but suppose, one person reads this and decides to try it and heshe gets better.....is it worth it???? According to you no. According to me yes.

It is inexcusable to tell people only NAC works to increase gsh in the body...that gsh cannot be absorbed..which you have done once or twice. That is simply not true. You have your whole little thing on the eflow, which is great. Of course, initially you didn't even believe that the makers of TOBI tried to sue eflow and block it from coming to the market because it would hurt the sales of TOBI...now, you are 100% on board for the eflow. Why? Because you did the research.

Well, I apologize in advance to all the people on this website who I "slap in the face" with a message of hope. Next time would you please apologize in advance for your messages that are insensitive...I am sure many of us would appreciate it.

MODERATORS
If you want to move this feel free....I was only trying to give alittle POSITIVE info.
 

dramamama

New member
amy-
as always, I can count on you to respond.

I have been on gsh, not NAC, and have seen my whole blood gsh, and plasma gsh jump three hundred points on onw scale and 200 an another. My fev1 went from the 40's to 61% in a matter of months.....when it had been there for over one year. I am REALLy tired of you telling people that there is no room for hope and change....guess what? Sometimes things do get better. And, if you had bothered to do the research on children who have been on gsh for several years, you will find that most do get better. Of course, there are those who do not....but suppose, one person reads this and decides to try it and heshe gets better.....is it worth it???? According to you no. According to me yes.

It is inexcusable to tell people only NAC works to increase gsh in the body...that gsh cannot be absorbed..which you have done once or twice. That is simply not true. You have your whole little thing on the eflow, which is great. Of course, initially you didn't even believe that the makers of TOBI tried to sue eflow and block it from coming to the market because it would hurt the sales of TOBI...now, you are 100% on board for the eflow. Why? Because you did the research.

Well, I apologize in advance to all the people on this website who I "slap in the face" with a message of hope. Next time would you please apologize in advance for your messages that are insensitive...I am sure many of us would appreciate it.

MODERATORS
If you want to move this feel free....I was only trying to give alittle POSITIVE info.
 

kybert

New member
oh risa, you are just delusional. it wasnt the gsh. it must have been the way the sun and moon were aligned. it couldnt of been the gsh! gsh is harmless! even if it does causes diarrhea in high doses. havent you been told? lol. [sarcasm for those who dont know]

anyway, ditto to what risa said. dont take it if you are a tx patient and dont expect miracles.
 

kybert

New member
oh risa, you are just delusional. it wasnt the gsh. it must have been the way the sun and moon were aligned. it couldnt of been the gsh! gsh is harmless! even if it does causes diarrhea in high doses. havent you been told? lol. [sarcasm for those who dont know]

anyway, ditto to what risa said. dont take it if you are a tx patient and dont expect miracles.
 

kybert

New member
oh risa, you are just delusional. it wasnt the gsh. it must have been the way the sun and moon were aligned. it couldnt of been the gsh! gsh is harmless! even if it does causes diarrhea in high doses. havent you been told? lol. [sarcasm for those who dont know]

anyway, ditto to what risa said. dont take it if you are a tx patient and dont expect miracles.
 

dramamama

New member
Totally agree with you Risa!!! Hi....hope you are well<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">

I am not encouraging anyone to take it.....I think doing the research and making an informed decision is key. I did it without my doctor's permission or support and it took three years to FINALLY hear a "Good Job" from him. He is head of transplant at Southwestern and is clearly against it for transplant patients.... However, I am not a transplant patient....not yet anyway<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> Anyway, he told me he was astonished at the consistency of my pft's and my overall health...even after the tragic deathe of my brother. He told me just last week he coould not believe my health is where it is now...he figured I would be much sicker judging from when he took ovr my care at 21...now I am 34. He told me whatever I am doing I am doing a good job. That job includes the usual stuff...but also, gsh, curcumin, magnesium, calcium, probiotics, coQ10, DHA, Omega 3's, no sugar, healthy food (because of you Risa!!!) and the daily workouts.

I am very fortunate in that I have an alternative doctor who tests for everything. Since taking all of these supplements, my c-reactive protein and my homocysteine level have dropped significantly. Both of the these are good indicators for inflamation in the body. My cf doc took a look at my blood tests the other day and said I was an idiot for paying for so many tests....he then saw my c-reactive protein level and homocystiene and was STUNNED. He could not believe that my anti-oxidant status and inflammation within normal range.

I know that gsh was bad for you Risa. But, one of the things it does is modulate the immune system...make it function properly. Clearly, that is not a good thing when you take immune suppressing drugs for transplant. I hope you don't think I am pushing it on anyone. I guess this would have been better in a blog.
 

dramamama

New member
Totally agree with you Risa!!! Hi....hope you are well<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">

I am not encouraging anyone to take it.....I think doing the research and making an informed decision is key. I did it without my doctor's permission or support and it took three years to FINALLY hear a "Good Job" from him. He is head of transplant at Southwestern and is clearly against it for transplant patients.... However, I am not a transplant patient....not yet anyway<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> Anyway, he told me he was astonished at the consistency of my pft's and my overall health...even after the tragic deathe of my brother. He told me just last week he coould not believe my health is where it is now...he figured I would be much sicker judging from when he took ovr my care at 21...now I am 34. He told me whatever I am doing I am doing a good job. That job includes the usual stuff...but also, gsh, curcumin, magnesium, calcium, probiotics, coQ10, DHA, Omega 3's, no sugar, healthy food (because of you Risa!!!) and the daily workouts.

I am very fortunate in that I have an alternative doctor who tests for everything. Since taking all of these supplements, my c-reactive protein and my homocysteine level have dropped significantly. Both of the these are good indicators for inflamation in the body. My cf doc took a look at my blood tests the other day and said I was an idiot for paying for so many tests....he then saw my c-reactive protein level and homocystiene and was STUNNED. He could not believe that my anti-oxidant status and inflammation within normal range.

I know that gsh was bad for you Risa. But, one of the things it does is modulate the immune system...make it function properly. Clearly, that is not a good thing when you take immune suppressing drugs for transplant. I hope you don't think I am pushing it on anyone. I guess this would have been better in a blog.
 

dramamama

New member
Totally agree with you Risa!!! Hi....hope you are well<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">

I am not encouraging anyone to take it.....I think doing the research and making an informed decision is key. I did it without my doctor's permission or support and it took three years to FINALLY hear a "Good Job" from him. He is head of transplant at Southwestern and is clearly against it for transplant patients.... However, I am not a transplant patient....not yet anyway<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> Anyway, he told me he was astonished at the consistency of my pft's and my overall health...even after the tragic deathe of my brother. He told me just last week he coould not believe my health is where it is now...he figured I would be much sicker judging from when he took ovr my care at 21...now I am 34. He told me whatever I am doing I am doing a good job. That job includes the usual stuff...but also, gsh, curcumin, magnesium, calcium, probiotics, coQ10, DHA, Omega 3's, no sugar, healthy food (because of you Risa!!!) and the daily workouts.

I am very fortunate in that I have an alternative doctor who tests for everything. Since taking all of these supplements, my c-reactive protein and my homocysteine level have dropped significantly. Both of the these are good indicators for inflamation in the body. My cf doc took a look at my blood tests the other day and said I was an idiot for paying for so many tests....he then saw my c-reactive protein level and homocystiene and was STUNNED. He could not believe that my anti-oxidant status and inflammation within normal range.

I know that gsh was bad for you Risa. But, one of the things it does is modulate the immune system...make it function properly. Clearly, that is not a good thing when you take immune suppressing drugs for transplant. I hope you don't think I am pushing it on anyone. I guess this would have been better in a blog.
 

LouLou

New member
This is absolutely placed where it should be. It is not blog material. Plus, it is something that people research from time to time so it's good that it is in the archives. Remember that stuff in blogs is not searchable. My opinion, only personal opinion, accounts and stories should be in blog - the rest is cf information that should be shared and searchable.
 

LouLou

New member
This is absolutely placed where it should be. It is not blog material. Plus, it is something that people research from time to time so it's good that it is in the archives. Remember that stuff in blogs is not searchable. My opinion, only personal opinion, accounts and stories should be in blog - the rest is cf information that should be shared and searchable.
 
Top