You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
What are normal numbers
- Thread starter amyr
- Start date
M
Mommafirst
Guest
I only know what the GI told us, I have done no research on this.
Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
M
Mommafirst
Guest
I only know what the GI told us, I have done no research on this.
Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
M
Mommafirst
Guest
I only know what the GI told us, I have done no research on this.
Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
M
Mommafirst
Guest
I only know what the GI told us, I have done no research on this.
Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
M
Mommafirst
Guest
I only know what the GI told us, I have done no research on this.
<br />
<br />Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
<br />
<br />My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.
<br />
<br />Our GI said that normal people have numbers in the 500's. That anything under 200 is considered pancreatic insufficient -- thus needing enzymes. MANY CFers hover closer to the 100 mark, though.
<br />
<br />My dd is on enzymes, but her numbers were just over 200. I think in the 240's.