3 Quick things...

Faust

New member
Ok here we go...Some thoughts i've had recently:


#1 I was watching a documentary on the human body, reproduction, attraction, etc. They said that one of the biggest contributing factors to who we choose as a sexual partner/mate are people who we feel are best to reproduce with via the other persons gene expresion pheromones. The pheromones exist in our sweat, and while all people of the opposite sex detect them, only the people who somehow would genetically benefit from mating with the person, is genuinely powerfully attracted. Of course there is some attraction factors towards outright physical looks, but this documentary was putting a ton of percentage into the whole aspect of attraction into our pheromones, and our genetic map expressing in those pheromones. Which begs the question from a CF perspective, how could we as a terminally ill, multi mutation having sick person attract a healthy person due to them detecting our genes via our pheromones? It would seem, on a strictly genetic aspect (if this expression aspect is true, which they believe it is) no one would find us attractive due to us being a poor choice of mate genetically. Obviously people who aren't diseased still find diseased people attractive (Myself and many others on here are examples of that), so I have a theory that would explain this anomoly: I think that there must be a stronger expression within our genes that overpowers/hides our obvious mutations that would make us a poor choice. Maybe some other genes that make us a desirable choice. Maybe a CF patient with multiple mutations that would be a poor choice for a mate, would have a strong anti-cancer gene present...Or anti-parkinsons, or any one of countless examples. That is one possibility. The other possibility that I have thought about that would explain CF's having mates is our extremely strong empathetic nature towards everyone around us, and play on that persons obvious (to us anyways) need/weakness. As an example, I have always been told I am extremely funny and have a great sense of humor. When i was single and there was a female I liked in a social setting with me, I would turn my humor knob from a static 3, to a 9 or 10 and direct it more at her, when I noticed she was down in the dumps/had a bad day/generally not being receptive towards me and others around her.


Anyways, something interesting in my opinion to think about. It's very weird to know that we are able to detect and generally screen out/accept our partners by the pheromones of others of the opposite sex expressing their genetic code...Trips me out, and the more I live the more the human body/mind/functions of those trip me out even more...


#2 I finished my 2 weeks of maxipime and levoquin. I stopped all supplements besides a multivitamin and vitamin k during my treatment (near the end I started my fizz nac up again though). Remember this was the same doc that basically told me to fug off and go elsewhere if I didn't like him saying he wouldn't give me a CT scan first, then go IV's. Well during my treatment I had 4 or 5 instances of blood in my mucous during/after my vest treatment/nebs. It wasn't like it was before like when i would lay down or exert myself, being explosive massive bleeding, but splotches/streaks. I chalked it up to just freaky crap/residual bleeding due to the infection clearing out etc/whatever. I finished the treatments last thursday. Since then, I had 2 or 3 more episodes of the same thing (the splotches/streaks). I called his assistant this morning and told her (praphrasing) "Ok, i've done what he wanted me to do. I do feel much better in general, but (and explained how many times with the non serious bleeds) has been happening X amount of times, and I feel I really need some form of diagnostic scan to see if there is something else wrong, because this is just not right. *IF* the doctor still refuses to give me a proper scan like a CT scan, I want his refusal in writing, and that is a legal right I have to request"...Well about 2 hrs later, she called me up with a very prompt appointment to get a CT scan with contrast...I just find it beyond crazy that this doc, knowing my history with bleeding, has never wanted to do a CT scan on me, and refused to do it when I wanted it done before my antibiotic treatment, just to kill two birds with one stone...Our country is in a very sad state when you have to threaten legal action to get a logical diagnostic, that your insurance would pay for anyway, all due to someones EGO (and sadly, aside from this BS, he is a great doc).




#3 Ok I have been thinking a ton about changing my career path in life. I went criminal justice, and while I am in great shape, I will run into a ton of brick walls in this field, considering where I am trying to go. I also have to be honest with myself, especially if this bleeding becomes a major part of my life from this point on. If so I won't be able to do some physical things, which are needed in this field. I have been doing research and the medical field is suffering big time for people, and will only get more so in the future. I have always been a techy oriented guy, and even though the thought of going back to school makes my testes pound with agony, I have been thinking of becoming certified in either one of: surgical technologist, hystotechnology, or ultrasound technology. Basically, get a certification in any of several possible areas in healthcare that is kind of easy going, decent pay, and benefits. Here is my question: I saw the thread earlier about the CF patient with MRSA and being paranoid of giving it to others...Responders mentioned pretty much EVERYONE in a hospital has MRSA/has been exposed to it. I personally don't have MRSA, but if i were to go into any of these specialties, i'd of course be in some form of hospital setting, which would include these bugs all around me. Is this a bad idea? Im sure each specialty uses precautions, but we all know how super sensitive we are to constracting these different bugs. I'm just curious what your thoughts are on this. If my current field doesn't turn into anything I want, and the hospital based tech specialty isn't a good idea...I seriously don't know what else to do that I would even vaguely be interested in. And i'm finding out now that you can only tolerate a non interesting "paycheck" for so long, even if that paycheck supplies all that you need $$ wise.


So anyways, read my 3 things and give feedback, i'd appreciate it.
 

Faust

New member
Ok here we go...Some thoughts i've had recently:


#1 I was watching a documentary on the human body, reproduction, attraction, etc. They said that one of the biggest contributing factors to who we choose as a sexual partner/mate are people who we feel are best to reproduce with via the other persons gene expresion pheromones. The pheromones exist in our sweat, and while all people of the opposite sex detect them, only the people who somehow would genetically benefit from mating with the person, is genuinely powerfully attracted. Of course there is some attraction factors towards outright physical looks, but this documentary was putting a ton of percentage into the whole aspect of attraction into our pheromones, and our genetic map expressing in those pheromones. Which begs the question from a CF perspective, how could we as a terminally ill, multi mutation having sick person attract a healthy person due to them detecting our genes via our pheromones? It would seem, on a strictly genetic aspect (if this expression aspect is true, which they believe it is) no one would find us attractive due to us being a poor choice of mate genetically. Obviously people who aren't diseased still find diseased people attractive (Myself and many others on here are examples of that), so I have a theory that would explain this anomoly: I think that there must be a stronger expression within our genes that overpowers/hides our obvious mutations that would make us a poor choice. Maybe some other genes that make us a desirable choice. Maybe a CF patient with multiple mutations that would be a poor choice for a mate, would have a strong anti-cancer gene present...Or anti-parkinsons, or any one of countless examples. That is one possibility. The other possibility that I have thought about that would explain CF's having mates is our extremely strong empathetic nature towards everyone around us, and play on that persons obvious (to us anyways) need/weakness. As an example, I have always been told I am extremely funny and have a great sense of humor. When i was single and there was a female I liked in a social setting with me, I would turn my humor knob from a static 3, to a 9 or 10 and direct it more at her, when I noticed she was down in the dumps/had a bad day/generally not being receptive towards me and others around her.


Anyways, something interesting in my opinion to think about. It's very weird to know that we are able to detect and generally screen out/accept our partners by the pheromones of others of the opposite sex expressing their genetic code...Trips me out, and the more I live the more the human body/mind/functions of those trip me out even more...


#2 I finished my 2 weeks of maxipime and levoquin. I stopped all supplements besides a multivitamin and vitamin k during my treatment (near the end I started my fizz nac up again though). Remember this was the same doc that basically told me to fug off and go elsewhere if I didn't like him saying he wouldn't give me a CT scan first, then go IV's. Well during my treatment I had 4 or 5 instances of blood in my mucous during/after my vest treatment/nebs. It wasn't like it was before like when i would lay down or exert myself, being explosive massive bleeding, but splotches/streaks. I chalked it up to just freaky crap/residual bleeding due to the infection clearing out etc/whatever. I finished the treatments last thursday. Since then, I had 2 or 3 more episodes of the same thing (the splotches/streaks). I called his assistant this morning and told her (praphrasing) "Ok, i've done what he wanted me to do. I do feel much better in general, but (and explained how many times with the non serious bleeds) has been happening X amount of times, and I feel I really need some form of diagnostic scan to see if there is something else wrong, because this is just not right. *IF* the doctor still refuses to give me a proper scan like a CT scan, I want his refusal in writing, and that is a legal right I have to request"...Well about 2 hrs later, she called me up with a very prompt appointment to get a CT scan with contrast...I just find it beyond crazy that this doc, knowing my history with bleeding, has never wanted to do a CT scan on me, and refused to do it when I wanted it done before my antibiotic treatment, just to kill two birds with one stone...Our country is in a very sad state when you have to threaten legal action to get a logical diagnostic, that your insurance would pay for anyway, all due to someones EGO (and sadly, aside from this BS, he is a great doc).




#3 Ok I have been thinking a ton about changing my career path in life. I went criminal justice, and while I am in great shape, I will run into a ton of brick walls in this field, considering where I am trying to go. I also have to be honest with myself, especially if this bleeding becomes a major part of my life from this point on. If so I won't be able to do some physical things, which are needed in this field. I have been doing research and the medical field is suffering big time for people, and will only get more so in the future. I have always been a techy oriented guy, and even though the thought of going back to school makes my testes pound with agony, I have been thinking of becoming certified in either one of: surgical technologist, hystotechnology, or ultrasound technology. Basically, get a certification in any of several possible areas in healthcare that is kind of easy going, decent pay, and benefits. Here is my question: I saw the thread earlier about the CF patient with MRSA and being paranoid of giving it to others...Responders mentioned pretty much EVERYONE in a hospital has MRSA/has been exposed to it. I personally don't have MRSA, but if i were to go into any of these specialties, i'd of course be in some form of hospital setting, which would include these bugs all around me. Is this a bad idea? Im sure each specialty uses precautions, but we all know how super sensitive we are to constracting these different bugs. I'm just curious what your thoughts are on this. If my current field doesn't turn into anything I want, and the hospital based tech specialty isn't a good idea...I seriously don't know what else to do that I would even vaguely be interested in. And i'm finding out now that you can only tolerate a non interesting "paycheck" for so long, even if that paycheck supplies all that you need $$ wise.


So anyways, read my 3 things and give feedback, i'd appreciate it.
 

Faust

New member
Ok here we go...Some thoughts i've had recently:


#1 I was watching a documentary on the human body, reproduction, attraction, etc. They said that one of the biggest contributing factors to who we choose as a sexual partner/mate are people who we feel are best to reproduce with via the other persons gene expresion pheromones. The pheromones exist in our sweat, and while all people of the opposite sex detect them, only the people who somehow would genetically benefit from mating with the person, is genuinely powerfully attracted. Of course there is some attraction factors towards outright physical looks, but this documentary was putting a ton of percentage into the whole aspect of attraction into our pheromones, and our genetic map expressing in those pheromones. Which begs the question from a CF perspective, how could we as a terminally ill, multi mutation having sick person attract a healthy person due to them detecting our genes via our pheromones? It would seem, on a strictly genetic aspect (if this expression aspect is true, which they believe it is) no one would find us attractive due to us being a poor choice of mate genetically. Obviously people who aren't diseased still find diseased people attractive (Myself and many others on here are examples of that), so I have a theory that would explain this anomoly: I think that there must be a stronger expression within our genes that overpowers/hides our obvious mutations that would make us a poor choice. Maybe some other genes that make us a desirable choice. Maybe a CF patient with multiple mutations that would be a poor choice for a mate, would have a strong anti-cancer gene present...Or anti-parkinsons, or any one of countless examples. That is one possibility. The other possibility that I have thought about that would explain CF's having mates is our extremely strong empathetic nature towards everyone around us, and play on that persons obvious (to us anyways) need/weakness. As an example, I have always been told I am extremely funny and have a great sense of humor. When i was single and there was a female I liked in a social setting with me, I would turn my humor knob from a static 3, to a 9 or 10 and direct it more at her, when I noticed she was down in the dumps/had a bad day/generally not being receptive towards me and others around her.


Anyways, something interesting in my opinion to think about. It's very weird to know that we are able to detect and generally screen out/accept our partners by the pheromones of others of the opposite sex expressing their genetic code...Trips me out, and the more I live the more the human body/mind/functions of those trip me out even more...


#2 I finished my 2 weeks of maxipime and levoquin. I stopped all supplements besides a multivitamin and vitamin k during my treatment (near the end I started my fizz nac up again though). Remember this was the same doc that basically told me to fug off and go elsewhere if I didn't like him saying he wouldn't give me a CT scan first, then go IV's. Well during my treatment I had 4 or 5 instances of blood in my mucous during/after my vest treatment/nebs. It wasn't like it was before like when i would lay down or exert myself, being explosive massive bleeding, but splotches/streaks. I chalked it up to just freaky crap/residual bleeding due to the infection clearing out etc/whatever. I finished the treatments last thursday. Since then, I had 2 or 3 more episodes of the same thing (the splotches/streaks). I called his assistant this morning and told her (praphrasing) "Ok, i've done what he wanted me to do. I do feel much better in general, but (and explained how many times with the non serious bleeds) has been happening X amount of times, and I feel I really need some form of diagnostic scan to see if there is something else wrong, because this is just not right. *IF* the doctor still refuses to give me a proper scan like a CT scan, I want his refusal in writing, and that is a legal right I have to request"...Well about 2 hrs later, she called me up with a very prompt appointment to get a CT scan with contrast...I just find it beyond crazy that this doc, knowing my history with bleeding, has never wanted to do a CT scan on me, and refused to do it when I wanted it done before my antibiotic treatment, just to kill two birds with one stone...Our country is in a very sad state when you have to threaten legal action to get a logical diagnostic, that your insurance would pay for anyway, all due to someones EGO (and sadly, aside from this BS, he is a great doc).




#3 Ok I have been thinking a ton about changing my career path in life. I went criminal justice, and while I am in great shape, I will run into a ton of brick walls in this field, considering where I am trying to go. I also have to be honest with myself, especially if this bleeding becomes a major part of my life from this point on. If so I won't be able to do some physical things, which are needed in this field. I have been doing research and the medical field is suffering big time for people, and will only get more so in the future. I have always been a techy oriented guy, and even though the thought of going back to school makes my testes pound with agony, I have been thinking of becoming certified in either one of: surgical technologist, hystotechnology, or ultrasound technology. Basically, get a certification in any of several possible areas in healthcare that is kind of easy going, decent pay, and benefits. Here is my question: I saw the thread earlier about the CF patient with MRSA and being paranoid of giving it to others...Responders mentioned pretty much EVERYONE in a hospital has MRSA/has been exposed to it. I personally don't have MRSA, but if i were to go into any of these specialties, i'd of course be in some form of hospital setting, which would include these bugs all around me. Is this a bad idea? Im sure each specialty uses precautions, but we all know how super sensitive we are to constracting these different bugs. I'm just curious what your thoughts are on this. If my current field doesn't turn into anything I want, and the hospital based tech specialty isn't a good idea...I seriously don't know what else to do that I would even vaguely be interested in. And i'm finding out now that you can only tolerate a non interesting "paycheck" for so long, even if that paycheck supplies all that you need $$ wise.


So anyways, read my 3 things and give feedback, i'd appreciate it.
 

Faust

New member
Ok here we go...Some thoughts i've had recently:


#1 I was watching a documentary on the human body, reproduction, attraction, etc. They said that one of the biggest contributing factors to who we choose as a sexual partner/mate are people who we feel are best to reproduce with via the other persons gene expresion pheromones. The pheromones exist in our sweat, and while all people of the opposite sex detect them, only the people who somehow would genetically benefit from mating with the person, is genuinely powerfully attracted. Of course there is some attraction factors towards outright physical looks, but this documentary was putting a ton of percentage into the whole aspect of attraction into our pheromones, and our genetic map expressing in those pheromones. Which begs the question from a CF perspective, how could we as a terminally ill, multi mutation having sick person attract a healthy person due to them detecting our genes via our pheromones? It would seem, on a strictly genetic aspect (if this expression aspect is true, which they believe it is) no one would find us attractive due to us being a poor choice of mate genetically. Obviously people who aren't diseased still find diseased people attractive (Myself and many others on here are examples of that), so I have a theory that would explain this anomoly: I think that there must be a stronger expression within our genes that overpowers/hides our obvious mutations that would make us a poor choice. Maybe some other genes that make us a desirable choice. Maybe a CF patient with multiple mutations that would be a poor choice for a mate, would have a strong anti-cancer gene present...Or anti-parkinsons, or any one of countless examples. That is one possibility. The other possibility that I have thought about that would explain CF's having mates is our extremely strong empathetic nature towards everyone around us, and play on that persons obvious (to us anyways) need/weakness. As an example, I have always been told I am extremely funny and have a great sense of humor. When i was single and there was a female I liked in a social setting with me, I would turn my humor knob from a static 3, to a 9 or 10 and direct it more at her, when I noticed she was down in the dumps/had a bad day/generally not being receptive towards me and others around her.


Anyways, something interesting in my opinion to think about. It's very weird to know that we are able to detect and generally screen out/accept our partners by the pheromones of others of the opposite sex expressing their genetic code...Trips me out, and the more I live the more the human body/mind/functions of those trip me out even more...


#2 I finished my 2 weeks of maxipime and levoquin. I stopped all supplements besides a multivitamin and vitamin k during my treatment (near the end I started my fizz nac up again though). Remember this was the same doc that basically told me to fug off and go elsewhere if I didn't like him saying he wouldn't give me a CT scan first, then go IV's. Well during my treatment I had 4 or 5 instances of blood in my mucous during/after my vest treatment/nebs. It wasn't like it was before like when i would lay down or exert myself, being explosive massive bleeding, but splotches/streaks. I chalked it up to just freaky crap/residual bleeding due to the infection clearing out etc/whatever. I finished the treatments last thursday. Since then, I had 2 or 3 more episodes of the same thing (the splotches/streaks). I called his assistant this morning and told her (praphrasing) "Ok, i've done what he wanted me to do. I do feel much better in general, but (and explained how many times with the non serious bleeds) has been happening X amount of times, and I feel I really need some form of diagnostic scan to see if there is something else wrong, because this is just not right. *IF* the doctor still refuses to give me a proper scan like a CT scan, I want his refusal in writing, and that is a legal right I have to request"...Well about 2 hrs later, she called me up with a very prompt appointment to get a CT scan with contrast...I just find it beyond crazy that this doc, knowing my history with bleeding, has never wanted to do a CT scan on me, and refused to do it when I wanted it done before my antibiotic treatment, just to kill two birds with one stone...Our country is in a very sad state when you have to threaten legal action to get a logical diagnostic, that your insurance would pay for anyway, all due to someones EGO (and sadly, aside from this BS, he is a great doc).




#3 Ok I have been thinking a ton about changing my career path in life. I went criminal justice, and while I am in great shape, I will run into a ton of brick walls in this field, considering where I am trying to go. I also have to be honest with myself, especially if this bleeding becomes a major part of my life from this point on. If so I won't be able to do some physical things, which are needed in this field. I have been doing research and the medical field is suffering big time for people, and will only get more so in the future. I have always been a techy oriented guy, and even though the thought of going back to school makes my testes pound with agony, I have been thinking of becoming certified in either one of: surgical technologist, hystotechnology, or ultrasound technology. Basically, get a certification in any of several possible areas in healthcare that is kind of easy going, decent pay, and benefits. Here is my question: I saw the thread earlier about the CF patient with MRSA and being paranoid of giving it to others...Responders mentioned pretty much EVERYONE in a hospital has MRSA/has been exposed to it. I personally don't have MRSA, but if i were to go into any of these specialties, i'd of course be in some form of hospital setting, which would include these bugs all around me. Is this a bad idea? Im sure each specialty uses precautions, but we all know how super sensitive we are to constracting these different bugs. I'm just curious what your thoughts are on this. If my current field doesn't turn into anything I want, and the hospital based tech specialty isn't a good idea...I seriously don't know what else to do that I would even vaguely be interested in. And i'm finding out now that you can only tolerate a non interesting "paycheck" for so long, even if that paycheck supplies all that you need $$ wise.


So anyways, read my 3 things and give feedback, i'd appreciate it.
 

Faust

New member
Ok here we go...Some thoughts i've had recently:


#1 I was watching a documentary on the human body, reproduction, attraction, etc. They said that one of the biggest contributing factors to who we choose as a sexual partner/mate are people who we feel are best to reproduce with via the other persons gene expresion pheromones. The pheromones exist in our sweat, and while all people of the opposite sex detect them, only the people who somehow would genetically benefit from mating with the person, is genuinely powerfully attracted. Of course there is some attraction factors towards outright physical looks, but this documentary was putting a ton of percentage into the whole aspect of attraction into our pheromones, and our genetic map expressing in those pheromones. Which begs the question from a CF perspective, how could we as a terminally ill, multi mutation having sick person attract a healthy person due to them detecting our genes via our pheromones? It would seem, on a strictly genetic aspect (if this expression aspect is true, which they believe it is) no one would find us attractive due to us being a poor choice of mate genetically. Obviously people who aren't diseased still find diseased people attractive (Myself and many others on here are examples of that), so I have a theory that would explain this anomoly: I think that there must be a stronger expression within our genes that overpowers/hides our obvious mutations that would make us a poor choice. Maybe some other genes that make us a desirable choice. Maybe a CF patient with multiple mutations that would be a poor choice for a mate, would have a strong anti-cancer gene present...Or anti-parkinsons, or any one of countless examples. That is one possibility. The other possibility that I have thought about that would explain CF's having mates is our extremely strong empathetic nature towards everyone around us, and play on that persons obvious (to us anyways) need/weakness. As an example, I have always been told I am extremely funny and have a great sense of humor. When i was single and there was a female I liked in a social setting with me, I would turn my humor knob from a static 3, to a 9 or 10 and direct it more at her, when I noticed she was down in the dumps/had a bad day/generally not being receptive towards me and others around her.


Anyways, something interesting in my opinion to think about. It's very weird to know that we are able to detect and generally screen out/accept our partners by the pheromones of others of the opposite sex expressing their genetic code...Trips me out, and the more I live the more the human body/mind/functions of those trip me out even more...


#2 I finished my 2 weeks of maxipime and levoquin. I stopped all supplements besides a multivitamin and vitamin k during my treatment (near the end I started my fizz nac up again though). Remember this was the same doc that basically told me to fug off and go elsewhere if I didn't like him saying he wouldn't give me a CT scan first, then go IV's. Well during my treatment I had 4 or 5 instances of blood in my mucous during/after my vest treatment/nebs. It wasn't like it was before like when i would lay down or exert myself, being explosive massive bleeding, but splotches/streaks. I chalked it up to just freaky crap/residual bleeding due to the infection clearing out etc/whatever. I finished the treatments last thursday. Since then, I had 2 or 3 more episodes of the same thing (the splotches/streaks). I called his assistant this morning and told her (praphrasing) "Ok, i've done what he wanted me to do. I do feel much better in general, but (and explained how many times with the non serious bleeds) has been happening X amount of times, and I feel I really need some form of diagnostic scan to see if there is something else wrong, because this is just not right. *IF* the doctor still refuses to give me a proper scan like a CT scan, I want his refusal in writing, and that is a legal right I have to request"...Well about 2 hrs later, she called me up with a very prompt appointment to get a CT scan with contrast...I just find it beyond crazy that this doc, knowing my history with bleeding, has never wanted to do a CT scan on me, and refused to do it when I wanted it done before my antibiotic treatment, just to kill two birds with one stone...Our country is in a very sad state when you have to threaten legal action to get a logical diagnostic, that your insurance would pay for anyway, all due to someones EGO (and sadly, aside from this BS, he is a great doc).




#3 Ok I have been thinking a ton about changing my career path in life. I went criminal justice, and while I am in great shape, I will run into a ton of brick walls in this field, considering where I am trying to go. I also have to be honest with myself, especially if this bleeding becomes a major part of my life from this point on. If so I won't be able to do some physical things, which are needed in this field. I have been doing research and the medical field is suffering big time for people, and will only get more so in the future. I have always been a techy oriented guy, and even though the thought of going back to school makes my testes pound with agony, I have been thinking of becoming certified in either one of: surgical technologist, hystotechnology, or ultrasound technology. Basically, get a certification in any of several possible areas in healthcare that is kind of easy going, decent pay, and benefits. Here is my question: I saw the thread earlier about the CF patient with MRSA and being paranoid of giving it to others...Responders mentioned pretty much EVERYONE in a hospital has MRSA/has been exposed to it. I personally don't have MRSA, but if i were to go into any of these specialties, i'd of course be in some form of hospital setting, which would include these bugs all around me. Is this a bad idea? Im sure each specialty uses precautions, but we all know how super sensitive we are to constracting these different bugs. I'm just curious what your thoughts are on this. If my current field doesn't turn into anything I want, and the hospital based tech specialty isn't a good idea...I seriously don't know what else to do that I would even vaguely be interested in. And i'm finding out now that you can only tolerate a non interesting "paycheck" for so long, even if that paycheck supplies all that you need $$ wise.


So anyways, read my 3 things and give feedback, i'd appreciate it.
 

Faust

New member
BTW talk about synchronicity...The above post of mine, was my 2012's post. Earlier tonight I was listening to a program where the Mayan's stopped adding onto their calendar (as accurate as ours today), and stopped at the year 2012. Many people think this will either be the end of the world, or a great change in what we call the world. It's little things like this that trip me out. I hadn't paid attention to my post count forever...And when I do notice, it's the exact same number as the shows main topic I was listening to tonight...
 

Faust

New member
BTW talk about synchronicity...The above post of mine, was my 2012's post. Earlier tonight I was listening to a program where the Mayan's stopped adding onto their calendar (as accurate as ours today), and stopped at the year 2012. Many people think this will either be the end of the world, or a great change in what we call the world. It's little things like this that trip me out. I hadn't paid attention to my post count forever...And when I do notice, it's the exact same number as the shows main topic I was listening to tonight...
 

Faust

New member
BTW talk about synchronicity...The above post of mine, was my 2012's post. Earlier tonight I was listening to a program where the Mayan's stopped adding onto their calendar (as accurate as ours today), and stopped at the year 2012. Many people think this will either be the end of the world, or a great change in what we call the world. It's little things like this that trip me out. I hadn't paid attention to my post count forever...And when I do notice, it's the exact same number as the shows main topic I was listening to tonight...
 

Faust

New member
BTW talk about synchronicity...The above post of mine, was my 2012's post. Earlier tonight I was listening to a program where the Mayan's stopped adding onto their calendar (as accurate as ours today), and stopped at the year 2012. Many people think this will either be the end of the world, or a great change in what we call the world. It's little things like this that trip me out. I hadn't paid attention to my post count forever...And when I do notice, it's the exact same number as the shows main topic I was listening to tonight...
 

Faust

New member
BTW talk about synchronicity...The above post of mine, was my 2012's post. Earlier tonight I was listening to a program where the Mayan's stopped adding onto their calendar (as accurate as ours today), and stopped at the year 2012. Many people think this will either be the end of the world, or a great change in what we call the world. It's little things like this that trip me out. I hadn't paid attention to my post count forever...And when I do notice, it's the exact same number as the shows main topic I was listening to tonight...
 

Allisa35

Member
Well, I don't know about that theory. I don't want kids and didn't want kids when I met my husband. But he also doesn't want kids, so maybe that was the attraction (although I didn't know that he didn't want kids and vice-versa initially).

I don't really have any suggestions as far as working goes. Isn't there something in the criminal justice field that doesn't require a lot of activity? I think the ultrasound technician sounds kind of interesting. Do you think that is something you could do at a physician's office instead of the hospital? Just a thought. I guess it just depends on how badly you want to work in that profession. I know it's a tough call. My husband works in the hospital and luckily has never brought anything home to me. However, he doesn't work directly with the patients. Wish I had more advise to give you.

Good luck with your CT results.
 

Allisa35

Member
Well, I don't know about that theory. I don't want kids and didn't want kids when I met my husband. But he also doesn't want kids, so maybe that was the attraction (although I didn't know that he didn't want kids and vice-versa initially).

I don't really have any suggestions as far as working goes. Isn't there something in the criminal justice field that doesn't require a lot of activity? I think the ultrasound technician sounds kind of interesting. Do you think that is something you could do at a physician's office instead of the hospital? Just a thought. I guess it just depends on how badly you want to work in that profession. I know it's a tough call. My husband works in the hospital and luckily has never brought anything home to me. However, he doesn't work directly with the patients. Wish I had more advise to give you.

Good luck with your CT results.
 

Allisa35

Member
Well, I don't know about that theory. I don't want kids and didn't want kids when I met my husband. But he also doesn't want kids, so maybe that was the attraction (although I didn't know that he didn't want kids and vice-versa initially).

I don't really have any suggestions as far as working goes. Isn't there something in the criminal justice field that doesn't require a lot of activity? I think the ultrasound technician sounds kind of interesting. Do you think that is something you could do at a physician's office instead of the hospital? Just a thought. I guess it just depends on how badly you want to work in that profession. I know it's a tough call. My husband works in the hospital and luckily has never brought anything home to me. However, he doesn't work directly with the patients. Wish I had more advise to give you.

Good luck with your CT results.
 

Allisa35

Member
Well, I don't know about that theory. I don't want kids and didn't want kids when I met my husband. But he also doesn't want kids, so maybe that was the attraction (although I didn't know that he didn't want kids and vice-versa initially).

I don't really have any suggestions as far as working goes. Isn't there something in the criminal justice field that doesn't require a lot of activity? I think the ultrasound technician sounds kind of interesting. Do you think that is something you could do at a physician's office instead of the hospital? Just a thought. I guess it just depends on how badly you want to work in that profession. I know it's a tough call. My husband works in the hospital and luckily has never brought anything home to me. However, he doesn't work directly with the patients. Wish I had more advise to give you.

Good luck with your CT results.
 

Allisa35

Member
Well, I don't know about that theory. I don't want kids and didn't want kids when I met my husband. But he also doesn't want kids, so maybe that was the attraction (although I didn't know that he didn't want kids and vice-versa initially).

I don't really have any suggestions as far as working goes. Isn't there something in the criminal justice field that doesn't require a lot of activity? I think the ultrasound technician sounds kind of interesting. Do you think that is something you could do at a physician's office instead of the hospital? Just a thought. I guess it just depends on how badly you want to work in that profession. I know it's a tough call. My husband works in the hospital and luckily has never brought anything home to me. However, he doesn't work directly with the patients. Wish I had more advise to give you.

Good luck with your CT results.
 

Bumblebee

New member
Hiya...


<br><br>


I think your idea about the argument of attraction to sexual partners is a bit mis-directed. In terms of evolution then yes, survival of the species says we pick the optimal mate (good genes etc). However in terms of us CFers, realistically we are not supposed to mate (in an evolutionary sense), as naturally most of us would die before puberty. We're also not supposed live long enough to get parkinsons, cancer or most things anyway. It is only our techonolgies that have allowed us to live long enough to attract anyone in the first place and to mate. However there are theories as to how being a carrier of the disease is an advantage. Evolutionary, it would have to be an advantage to be a carrier for the faulty gene to still be in the population, thousands of years after it emerged. Evidence is starting that being a carrier is in some way beneficial against cholera, TB or dirrohea (don't quote me which one's, i can't remember). So during great endemics people who are carriers of CF would be selected to survive. Our exsistance then as people with CF is just a by product of this natural selection towards being a carreir in times of plague, etc.




<br><br>


So why are people attracted to us if we are more than likely, not supposed to mate. I think it is like you said, a natural tendancy for empathy and love. Clearly we as a species have evolved to experience love to a partner (to ensure they stick around to raise offspring), and love to a child, to ensure you stick around the child to care for it, and so ensuring the survival of your genes. Obviously this love can misfire and you end up loving someone that evolutionary, makes no sense (adoption for example, as you are not ensuring the survival of your genes (i'm so not saying this is wrong or anything like that by the way)). However having love and empathy and all that is clearly an advantage to the species as a whole. So the empathy and love towards us, those who have "faulty" genes, could also be a missfire of love (but love nonetheless of course).



<br><br>



Just thoughts anyway, and yes i've recently read the God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, for those who recognise the concepts. Very good book for explaining these kind of things.




<br><br>


I really don't mean to offend anyone by what i have said here, just putting forward an evolutionary idea for the love and attraction to us CFers (though i may not be fully correct in terms of my evolution, please feel free to correct me
).


<br><br>




xxxx
 

Bumblebee

New member
Hiya...


<br><br>


I think your idea about the argument of attraction to sexual partners is a bit mis-directed. In terms of evolution then yes, survival of the species says we pick the optimal mate (good genes etc). However in terms of us CFers, realistically we are not supposed to mate (in an evolutionary sense), as naturally most of us would die before puberty. We're also not supposed live long enough to get parkinsons, cancer or most things anyway. It is only our techonolgies that have allowed us to live long enough to attract anyone in the first place and to mate. However there are theories as to how being a carrier of the disease is an advantage. Evolutionary, it would have to be an advantage to be a carrier for the faulty gene to still be in the population, thousands of years after it emerged. Evidence is starting that being a carrier is in some way beneficial against cholera, TB or dirrohea (don't quote me which one's, i can't remember). So during great endemics people who are carriers of CF would be selected to survive. Our exsistance then as people with CF is just a by product of this natural selection towards being a carreir in times of plague, etc.




<br><br>


So why are people attracted to us if we are more than likely, not supposed to mate. I think it is like you said, a natural tendancy for empathy and love. Clearly we as a species have evolved to experience love to a partner (to ensure they stick around to raise offspring), and love to a child, to ensure you stick around the child to care for it, and so ensuring the survival of your genes. Obviously this love can misfire and you end up loving someone that evolutionary, makes no sense (adoption for example, as you are not ensuring the survival of your genes (i'm so not saying this is wrong or anything like that by the way)). However having love and empathy and all that is clearly an advantage to the species as a whole. So the empathy and love towards us, those who have "faulty" genes, could also be a missfire of love (but love nonetheless of course).



<br><br>



Just thoughts anyway, and yes i've recently read the God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, for those who recognise the concepts. Very good book for explaining these kind of things.




<br><br>


I really don't mean to offend anyone by what i have said here, just putting forward an evolutionary idea for the love and attraction to us CFers (though i may not be fully correct in terms of my evolution, please feel free to correct me
).


<br><br>




xxxx
 

Bumblebee

New member
Hiya...


<br><br>


I think your idea about the argument of attraction to sexual partners is a bit mis-directed. In terms of evolution then yes, survival of the species says we pick the optimal mate (good genes etc). However in terms of us CFers, realistically we are not supposed to mate (in an evolutionary sense), as naturally most of us would die before puberty. We're also not supposed live long enough to get parkinsons, cancer or most things anyway. It is only our techonolgies that have allowed us to live long enough to attract anyone in the first place and to mate. However there are theories as to how being a carrier of the disease is an advantage. Evolutionary, it would have to be an advantage to be a carrier for the faulty gene to still be in the population, thousands of years after it emerged. Evidence is starting that being a carrier is in some way beneficial against cholera, TB or dirrohea (don't quote me which one's, i can't remember). So during great endemics people who are carriers of CF would be selected to survive. Our exsistance then as people with CF is just a by product of this natural selection towards being a carreir in times of plague, etc.




<br><br>


So why are people attracted to us if we are more than likely, not supposed to mate. I think it is like you said, a natural tendancy for empathy and love. Clearly we as a species have evolved to experience love to a partner (to ensure they stick around to raise offspring), and love to a child, to ensure you stick around the child to care for it, and so ensuring the survival of your genes. Obviously this love can misfire and you end up loving someone that evolutionary, makes no sense (adoption for example, as you are not ensuring the survival of your genes (i'm so not saying this is wrong or anything like that by the way)). However having love and empathy and all that is clearly an advantage to the species as a whole. So the empathy and love towards us, those who have "faulty" genes, could also be a missfire of love (but love nonetheless of course).



<br><br>



Just thoughts anyway, and yes i've recently read the God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, for those who recognise the concepts. Very good book for explaining these kind of things.




<br><br>


I really don't mean to offend anyone by what i have said here, just putting forward an evolutionary idea for the love and attraction to us CFers (though i may not be fully correct in terms of my evolution, please feel free to correct me
).


<br><br>




xxxx
 

Bumblebee

New member
Hiya...


<br><br>


I think your idea about the argument of attraction to sexual partners is a bit mis-directed. In terms of evolution then yes, survival of the species says we pick the optimal mate (good genes etc). However in terms of us CFers, realistically we are not supposed to mate (in an evolutionary sense), as naturally most of us would die before puberty. We're also not supposed live long enough to get parkinsons, cancer or most things anyway. It is only our techonolgies that have allowed us to live long enough to attract anyone in the first place and to mate. However there are theories as to how being a carrier of the disease is an advantage. Evolutionary, it would have to be an advantage to be a carrier for the faulty gene to still be in the population, thousands of years after it emerged. Evidence is starting that being a carrier is in some way beneficial against cholera, TB or dirrohea (don't quote me which one's, i can't remember). So during great endemics people who are carriers of CF would be selected to survive. Our exsistance then as people with CF is just a by product of this natural selection towards being a carreir in times of plague, etc.




<br><br>


So why are people attracted to us if we are more than likely, not supposed to mate. I think it is like you said, a natural tendancy for empathy and love. Clearly we as a species have evolved to experience love to a partner (to ensure they stick around to raise offspring), and love to a child, to ensure you stick around the child to care for it, and so ensuring the survival of your genes. Obviously this love can misfire and you end up loving someone that evolutionary, makes no sense (adoption for example, as you are not ensuring the survival of your genes (i'm so not saying this is wrong or anything like that by the way)). However having love and empathy and all that is clearly an advantage to the species as a whole. So the empathy and love towards us, those who have "faulty" genes, could also be a missfire of love (but love nonetheless of course).



<br><br>



Just thoughts anyway, and yes i've recently read the God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, for those who recognise the concepts. Very good book for explaining these kind of things.




<br><br>


I really don't mean to offend anyone by what i have said here, just putting forward an evolutionary idea for the love and attraction to us CFers (though i may not be fully correct in terms of my evolution, please feel free to correct me
).


<br><br>




xxxx
 

Bumblebee

New member
Hiya...


<br><br>


I think your idea about the argument of attraction to sexual partners is a bit mis-directed. In terms of evolution then yes, survival of the species says we pick the optimal mate (good genes etc). However in terms of us CFers, realistically we are not supposed to mate (in an evolutionary sense), as naturally most of us would die before puberty. We're also not supposed live long enough to get parkinsons, cancer or most things anyway. It is only our techonolgies that have allowed us to live long enough to attract anyone in the first place and to mate. However there are theories as to how being a carrier of the disease is an advantage. Evolutionary, it would have to be an advantage to be a carrier for the faulty gene to still be in the population, thousands of years after it emerged. Evidence is starting that being a carrier is in some way beneficial against cholera, TB or dirrohea (don't quote me which one's, i can't remember). So during great endemics people who are carriers of CF would be selected to survive. Our exsistance then as people with CF is just a by product of this natural selection towards being a carreir in times of plague, etc.




<br><br>


So why are people attracted to us if we are more than likely, not supposed to mate. I think it is like you said, a natural tendancy for empathy and love. Clearly we as a species have evolved to experience love to a partner (to ensure they stick around to raise offspring), and love to a child, to ensure you stick around the child to care for it, and so ensuring the survival of your genes. Obviously this love can misfire and you end up loving someone that evolutionary, makes no sense (adoption for example, as you are not ensuring the survival of your genes (i'm so not saying this is wrong or anything like that by the way)). However having love and empathy and all that is clearly an advantage to the species as a whole. So the empathy and love towards us, those who have "faulty" genes, could also be a missfire of love (but love nonetheless of course).



<br><br>



Just thoughts anyway, and yes i've recently read the God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, for those who recognise the concepts. Very good book for explaining these kind of things.




<br><br>


I really don't mean to offend anyone by what i have said here, just putting forward an evolutionary idea for the love and attraction to us CFers (though i may not be fully correct in terms of my evolution, please feel free to correct me
).


<br><br>




xxxx
 
Top