mom2lillian
New member
I re-iterate what has been said
Actual DAMAGE can't be reversed however there is NO WAY to tell what % is damage and what % is mucous, plugs, inflammation etc until you put in some time
Excercise, adherence to therapies, nutrition, and the like can go a LONG way to improving your lungs a huge % when it may be believed it is damage when in fact it is inflammation and sputum. If you are doing everythign perfectly and there is not change over course of a long time then it may be safe to assume that lung function is lost otherwise there is hope.
When I was dx my #'s were in 60's. I immediately started proper adherence to <u>all therapeis </u>and by years end I was at 100% lung function and at dx that was not though possible since it was ASSUMED it was DAMAGE from 20+years of no treatments. Of course I still have bronchiectasis damage but functions are great. I realize this is not normal and I have a 'mild' case but I am only using it as an example to show that you just can't ASSUME it's damage and give up.
Actual DAMAGE can't be reversed however there is NO WAY to tell what % is damage and what % is mucous, plugs, inflammation etc until you put in some time
Excercise, adherence to therapies, nutrition, and the like can go a LONG way to improving your lungs a huge % when it may be believed it is damage when in fact it is inflammation and sputum. If you are doing everythign perfectly and there is not change over course of a long time then it may be safe to assume that lung function is lost otherwise there is hope.
When I was dx my #'s were in 60's. I immediately started proper adherence to <u>all therapeis </u>and by years end I was at 100% lung function and at dx that was not though possible since it was ASSUMED it was DAMAGE from 20+years of no treatments. Of course I still have bronchiectasis damage but functions are great. I realize this is not normal and I have a 'mild' case but I am only using it as an example to show that you just can't ASSUME it's damage and give up.