<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>anonymous</b></i>
Then there is another group ( I chose not to name them) who loves drama, loves to argue, need their egos stroked, loves to say they are leaving the forum so people will beg them to stay.</end quote></div>
<i>You can choose not to name them, but I'm sure they'd appreciate being named. In other words, if you mean me, just say so. What is everyone so afraid of telling me off for? Everyone needs to be told off now and again.</i>
Anyway, back to Charlotte. Let me throw this at you:
I was born in 1984. They didn't even specify the CF gene until 1989. This was like back in the dark ages of CF. Hahaha. When I was born in 1984, my parents were told I'd probably not see past 18, and if I did, it wouldn't be much longer. I'm 22 now (SO THERE!), and still have 65-70% lung function, give or take. And in my 22 years, the life expectancy has gone from 18 to 35. It's just about doubled. It changed so fast, especially after they discovered the CF gene. You daughter, I believe, is still fairly young (I mean... under 5 or so). That gives her WORLDS of advantages over us old CF farts (hah get it... farts... <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif" border="0">). I didn't start any neb until I was 9 years old. That's 9 years of unchecked untreated damage. That makes a fairly big difference. Those of us who were born 80s or earlier are the ones that are generally dragging down the CF life span average. If they just looked at people born in the 90s or more recently, the average, I can guess, would be a lot higher. That means your daughter.
CF is no picnic. I know this, you know this. I would never tell you otherwise. There are times your daughter will want to scream at the world. And she has that right. BUT it's getting better and better. Chances are, and I'd be willing to bet, she'll do a lot better than some of us currently floating around.
-Emily (Emily65Roses, at school, not signed in)