CFRD

AnD

New member
Interestingly enough, I saw a study on tv about diabetes and blood sugar levels, where they were checking to see if diabetics benefitted from keeping their blood sugar levels lower, like a non-diabetic's would be, or at the ranges that are used now. They stopped the study because the death rate among the the people in the lower blood sugar levels were dying at a higher rate than the ones who had them at the regular advised levels, and they needed to find out why. If I can find the study, I'll put it up.

I also tend to err on the higher side (try to keep it under 170, but am still working on getting these insulin levels straightened out. When I had gestational diabetes, as long as it was under 170, my doctor was happy.

Here's a news article about the study:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020601787.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/...6/AR2008020601787.html</a>
 

AnD

New member
Interestingly enough, I saw a study on tv about diabetes and blood sugar levels, where they were checking to see if diabetics benefitted from keeping their blood sugar levels lower, like a non-diabetic's would be, or at the ranges that are used now. They stopped the study because the death rate among the the people in the lower blood sugar levels were dying at a higher rate than the ones who had them at the regular advised levels, and they needed to find out why. If I can find the study, I'll put it up.

I also tend to err on the higher side (try to keep it under 170, but am still working on getting these insulin levels straightened out. When I had gestational diabetes, as long as it was under 170, my doctor was happy.

Here's a news article about the study:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020601787.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/...6/AR2008020601787.html</a>
 

AnD

New member
Interestingly enough, I saw a study on tv about diabetes and blood sugar levels, where they were checking to see if diabetics benefitted from keeping their blood sugar levels lower, like a non-diabetic's would be, or at the ranges that are used now. They stopped the study because the death rate among the the people in the lower blood sugar levels were dying at a higher rate than the ones who had them at the regular advised levels, and they needed to find out why. If I can find the study, I'll put it up.

I also tend to err on the higher side (try to keep it under 170, but am still working on getting these insulin levels straightened out. When I had gestational diabetes, as long as it was under 170, my doctor was happy.

Here's a news article about the study:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020601787.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/...6/AR2008020601787.html</a>
 

AnD

New member
Interestingly enough, I saw a study on tv about diabetes and blood sugar levels, where they were checking to see if diabetics benefitted from keeping their blood sugar levels lower, like a non-diabetic's would be, or at the ranges that are used now. They stopped the study because the death rate among the the people in the lower blood sugar levels were dying at a higher rate than the ones who had them at the regular advised levels, and they needed to find out why. If I can find the study, I'll put it up.

I also tend to err on the higher side (try to keep it under 170, but am still working on getting these insulin levels straightened out. When I had gestational diabetes, as long as it was under 170, my doctor was happy.

Here's a news article about the study:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020601787.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/...6/AR2008020601787.html</a>
 

AnD

New member
Interestingly enough, I saw a study on tv about diabetes and blood sugar levels, where they were checking to see if diabetics benefitted from keeping their blood sugar levels lower, like a non-diabetic's would be, or at the ranges that are used now. They stopped the study because the death rate among the the people in the lower blood sugar levels were dying at a higher rate than the ones who had them at the regular advised levels, and they needed to find out why. If I can find the study, I'll put it up.
<br />
<br /> I also tend to err on the higher side (try to keep it under 170, but am still working on getting these insulin levels straightened out. When I had gestational diabetes, as long as it was under 170, my doctor was happy.
<br />
<br />Here's a news article about the study:
<br />
<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020601787.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/...6/AR2008020601787.html</a>
 

lightNlife

New member
Here's an article about the HA1c blood test that measures your blood sugars. There are some links at the end of the article for more info about CFRD.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/07/blood-draws-hemoglobin-a1c.html">Understanding HA1c for Diabetes Screening</a>

And this article is about the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/06/diabetes-screening.html">Diabetes Screening: OGTT</a>
 

lightNlife

New member
Here's an article about the HA1c blood test that measures your blood sugars. There are some links at the end of the article for more info about CFRD.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/07/blood-draws-hemoglobin-a1c.html">Understanding HA1c for Diabetes Screening</a>

And this article is about the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/06/diabetes-screening.html">Diabetes Screening: OGTT</a>
 

lightNlife

New member
Here's an article about the HA1c blood test that measures your blood sugars. There are some links at the end of the article for more info about CFRD.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/07/blood-draws-hemoglobin-a1c.html">Understanding HA1c for Diabetes Screening</a>

And this article is about the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/06/diabetes-screening.html">Diabetes Screening: OGTT</a>
 

lightNlife

New member
Here's an article about the HA1c blood test that measures your blood sugars. There are some links at the end of the article for more info about CFRD.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/07/blood-draws-hemoglobin-a1c.html">Understanding HA1c for Diabetes Screening</a>

And this article is about the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/06/diabetes-screening.html">Diabetes Screening: OGTT</a>
 

lightNlife

New member
Here's an article about the HA1c blood test that measures your blood sugars. There are some links at the end of the article for more info about CFRD.
<br />
<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/07/blood-draws-hemoglobin-a1c.html">Understanding HA1c for Diabetes Screening</a>
<br />
<br />And this article is about the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
<br />
<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://understandingcysticfibrosis.blogspot.com/2007/06/diabetes-screening.html">Diabetes Screening: OGTT</a>
 
Top