CHANGE!!!

M

Mockingbird

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>

Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????
they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote></div>

... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.
 
M

Mockingbird

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>

Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????
they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote></div>

... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.
 
M

Mockingbird

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>

Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????
they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote></div>

... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.
 
M

Mockingbird

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>

Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????
they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote>

... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.
 
M

Mockingbird

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>
<br />
<br />Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????
<br /> they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote>
<br />
<br />... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.
<br />
<br />
 
D

dbtoo

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>
A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote></div>

Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)

Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!
 
D

dbtoo

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>
A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote></div>

Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)

Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!
 
D

dbtoo

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>
A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote></div>

Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)

Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!
 
D

dbtoo

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>
A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote>

Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)

Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!
 
D

dbtoo

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>
<br />A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote>
<br />
<br />Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)
<br />
<br />Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!
<br />
 
B

bittyhorse23

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>dbtoo</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>

A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote></div>



Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)



Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!</end quote></div>


I like that idea!!!!
 
B

bittyhorse23

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>dbtoo</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>

A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote></div>



Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)



Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!</end quote></div>


I like that idea!!!!
 
B

bittyhorse23

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>dbtoo</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>

A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote></div>



Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)



Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!</end quote></div>


I like that idea!!!!
 
B

bittyhorse23

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>dbtoo</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>

A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote>



Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)



Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!</end quote>


I like that idea!!!!
 
B

bittyhorse23

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>dbtoo</b></i>
<br />
<br /><div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>
<br />
<br />A candidate may promise change in Washington but the stink remains.</end quote>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Which is why I believe that the president should not be an elected position coming from any political party. It should be a hired position where the pay is a percentage of the improvement of the national 'debt' (or lack thereof.)
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Turn it over to private industry, you'll see change!</end quote>
<br />
<br />
<br />I like that idea!!!!
<br />
<br />
 
B

Brad

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Mockingbird</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>



Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????

they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote></div>



... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.</end quote></div>

Well,maybe not all republicans, but george W,MUST,,,,


updated 10:22 a.m. ET, Wed., Oct. 3, 2007

WASHINGTON - President Bush, in a sharp confrontation with Congress, on Wednesday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have dramatically expanded children's health insurance.

It was only the fourth veto of Bush's presidency, and one that some Republicans feared could carry steep risks for their party in next year's elections. The Senate approved the bill with enough votes to override the veto, but the margin in the House fell short of the required number.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., decried Bush's action as a "heartless veto."


Lets see if W can veto raising gas prices,< maybe he can
ask his dad and his buddies in TX. to stop raising the cost of gas.. there is no shortage of oil at this time.
they get away with it because W is one of them.......

shame shame W......
 
B

Brad

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Mockingbird</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>



Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????

they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote></div>



... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.</end quote></div>

Well,maybe not all republicans, but george W,MUST,,,,


updated 10:22 a.m. ET, Wed., Oct. 3, 2007

WASHINGTON - President Bush, in a sharp confrontation with Congress, on Wednesday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have dramatically expanded children's health insurance.

It was only the fourth veto of Bush's presidency, and one that some Republicans feared could carry steep risks for their party in next year's elections. The Senate approved the bill with enough votes to override the veto, but the margin in the House fell short of the required number.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., decried Bush's action as a "heartless veto."


Lets see if W can veto raising gas prices,< maybe he can
ask his dad and his buddies in TX. to stop raising the cost of gas.. there is no shortage of oil at this time.
they get away with it because W is one of them.......

shame shame W......
 
B

Brad

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Mockingbird</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>



Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????

they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote></div>



... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.</end quote></div>

Well,maybe not all republicans, but george W,MUST,,,,


updated 10:22 a.m. ET, Wed., Oct. 3, 2007

WASHINGTON - President Bush, in a sharp confrontation with Congress, on Wednesday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have dramatically expanded children's health insurance.

It was only the fourth veto of Bush's presidency, and one that some Republicans feared could carry steep risks for their party in next year's elections. The Senate approved the bill with enough votes to override the veto, but the margin in the House fell short of the required number.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., decried Bush's action as a "heartless veto."


Lets see if W can veto raising gas prices,< maybe he can
ask his dad and his buddies in TX. to stop raising the cost of gas.. there is no shortage of oil at this time.
they get away with it because W is one of them.......

shame shame W......
 
B

Brad

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Mockingbird</b></i>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>



Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????

they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote>



... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.</end quote>

Well,maybe not all republicans, but george W,MUST,,,,


updated 10:22 a.m. ET, Wed., Oct. 3, 2007

WASHINGTON - President Bush, in a sharp confrontation with Congress, on Wednesday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have dramatically expanded children's health insurance.

It was only the fourth veto of Bush's presidency, and one that some Republicans feared could carry steep risks for their party in next year's elections. The Senate approved the bill with enough votes to override the veto, but the margin in the House fell short of the required number.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., decried Bush's action as a "heartless veto."


Lets see if W can veto raising gas prices,< maybe he can
ask his dad and his buddies in TX. to stop raising the cost of gas.. there is no shortage of oil at this time.
they get away with it because W is one of them.......

shame shame W......
 
B

Brad

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Mockingbird</b></i>
<br />
<br /><div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Brad</b></i>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Vote Republican!! Are you kidding????
<br />
<br /> they don't care about people who are sick and will do NOTHING for research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</end quote>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />... and we hate children and poor people, right? Republicans are human just as much as democrats are; I don't know why people have to always make republicans out to be evil. We both care about poeple, we just have different opinions on how best to help them.</end quote>
<br />
<br />Well,maybe not all republicans, but george W,MUST,,,,
<br />
<br />
<br />updated 10:22 a.m. ET, Wed., Oct. 3, 2007
<br />
<br />WASHINGTON - President Bush, in a sharp confrontation with Congress, on Wednesday vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have dramatically expanded children's health insurance.
<br />
<br />It was only the fourth veto of Bush's presidency, and one that some Republicans feared could carry steep risks for their party in next year's elections. The Senate approved the bill with enough votes to override the veto, but the margin in the House fell short of the required number.
<br />
<br />Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., decried Bush's action as a "heartless veto."
<br />
<br />
<br /> Lets see if W can veto raising gas prices,< maybe he can
<br /> ask his dad and his buddies in TX. to stop raising the cost of gas.. there is no shortage of oil at this time.
<br /> they get away with it because W is one of them.......
<br />
<br /> shame shame W......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top