I only wish that 13 years ago my baby was tested when he had digestive and respiratory problems. I was questioned about "making" him sick. He was diagnosed 2 years ago at the age of 11. His specialist has told me that now it is routine to rule out CF when certain problems arise in the health of babies and they are trying to make a mandatory new born test like Sickle Cell is. An OB/GYN doctor that I met asked if she could use my story with her patients in trying to get their babies tested at birth. She told me that she offers it and very few have the test done because they feel it doesn't apply to them or they just don't want to know. Just because one is having the test done, doesn't mean that the child will be CF positive, it is to rule out and move on to find the cause. I, myself, don't see why 5 out of 50 babies wouldn't be tested if there are symptoms. There is no case of CF on either side of my family but yet, by chance, my husband and I are carriers and we didn't know it. Thank God my son is healthy, has now gained weight, height and he no longer gets sick since being diagnosed and is being treated.
Char