It appears our friends in Europe have decided that an 6 to 8 percent improvements in lung function (2 clinical trials) in over 600 CF patients over a 12 months is not an sufficient improvement in FEV1 to justify approving the dry powder for marketing approval in Europe. You have to wonder why authorities are not supporting these decent increases in FEV1. What am i missing?
Mannitol is a dry powder derived from suger, which have shown to be effective in moving mucus, when used twice daily over 6, 12 and 18 month periods. Its quick to use, derived from a natural substance, and two to three times more effective than nebulized saline.
Why is this product being denied to Europeans? I hope the FDA will be more supportive. There are too many drug companies, with complicated medical therapies, so no wonder a quasi natural product development is being blocked, and why is the CF Foundation not lending any support. Do they have to much vested interested in other drug companies they are associated with?
Mannitol is a dry powder derived from suger, which have shown to be effective in moving mucus, when used twice daily over 6, 12 and 18 month periods. Its quick to use, derived from a natural substance, and two to three times more effective than nebulized saline.
Why is this product being denied to Europeans? I hope the FDA will be more supportive. There are too many drug companies, with complicated medical therapies, so no wonder a quasi natural product development is being blocked, and why is the CF Foundation not lending any support. Do they have to much vested interested in other drug companies they are associated with?