my response to that Amy would be that they dont have a choice with a desease like that, it's just too powerful and above them to treat with how it progresses fast and so intensely. maybe I should've stated that I believe it all depends on the desease we are dealing with, something like that they had to come up with something to stop it in it's track before people got it because once people contracted the desease they couldn't do anything about it, and people know that so the money is in the vaccine since people know they cant do anything for you if you catch it and if you do catch it you'll die, it all depends on the desease I think. And with that said I do believe that scientists are fully capable of curing it but it all goes back to who pays them to do what and mess around with what substance/drug, and one example why I believe this is that they will never use something natural and experiment with it unless they concoct it in some way that they can have a patent and make money, pharmaceutical companies will never tell you "oh you have scurvey! that's because your lacking Vitamin C in your diet eat more oranges" nope! there's no money in that for them, but of coarse veryone knows British people got the name "Limey" because in old days when they would sail alot and get scurey they would eat limes to get rid of it and also keep from getting it.
Another thing that really makes me think is that for instance HIV everybody knows that if you get that then it will develop to AIDS probly in 2-5 years and that's I think is being generous, or well that's what we are told. But how long has the famous 'Magic Johnson' had HIV and (to the best of my knowledge) it still hasn't devoloped to full AIDS yet?! He either has access to stuff the general public don't because ha can pay for it or he took matters into his own hands and researched to find alternative treatment which I believe may be out there but not publicised enough, who knows but that is something that always makes me wonder and lean more toward my opinion, but that was a good point you made.
Nice debate we have going here! I like it!
Another thing that really makes me think is that for instance HIV everybody knows that if you get that then it will develop to AIDS probly in 2-5 years and that's I think is being generous, or well that's what we are told. But how long has the famous 'Magic Johnson' had HIV and (to the best of my knowledge) it still hasn't devoloped to full AIDS yet?! He either has access to stuff the general public don't because ha can pay for it or he took matters into his own hands and researched to find alternative treatment which I believe may be out there but not publicised enough, who knows but that is something that always makes me wonder and lean more toward my opinion, but that was a good point you made.
Nice debate we have going here! I like it!