good news

anonymous

New member
Australia's government has been debating this topic for a while now, but two day's ago they decided to overturn the ban on theraputic cloning (stem cell research).

I just thought that was great news to share with you guy's. I think they will resume studies, as of next year.<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif" border="0">

Hope everyone is well.
 

anonymous

New member
Australia's government has been debating this topic for a while now, but two day's ago they decided to overturn the ban on theraputic cloning (stem cell research).

I just thought that was great news to share with you guy's. I think they will resume studies, as of next year.<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif" border="0">

Hope everyone is well.
 

anonymous

New member
Australia's government has been debating this topic for a while now, but two day's ago they decided to overturn the ban on theraputic cloning (stem cell research).

I just thought that was great news to share with you guy's. I think they will resume studies, as of next year.<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif" border="0">

Hope everyone is well.
 

Jennifer1981

New member
GREAT!!! Thanks for the posting anon. It's good to know that I can count on Australia to find a cure since my home country (U.S.) could care less.

Jennifer 24/CF
 

Jennifer1981

New member
GREAT!!! Thanks for the posting anon. It's good to know that I can count on Australia to find a cure since my home country (U.S.) could care less.

Jennifer 24/CF
 

Jennifer1981

New member
GREAT!!! Thanks for the posting anon. It's good to know that I can count on Australia to find a cure since my home country (U.S.) could care less.

Jennifer 24/CF
 

anonymous

New member
That's balogne! The US cares about medical research. They also care about ethics, at least some of us do. Experimenting w/ human embryos is slippery slope to further experimentation with human beings who are considered less than human. Further, nothing has been accomplished in the field of embryonic stem cell research, whereas adult stem cell reserach has been very successful including the growth of a liver from umbelical(sp) cord blood.
 

anonymous

New member
That's balogne! The US cares about medical research. They also care about ethics, at least some of us do. Experimenting w/ human embryos is slippery slope to further experimentation with human beings who are considered less than human. Further, nothing has been accomplished in the field of embryonic stem cell research, whereas adult stem cell reserach has been very successful including the growth of a liver from umbelical(sp) cord blood.
 

anonymous

New member
That's balogne! The US cares about medical research. They also care about ethics, at least some of us do. Experimenting w/ human embryos is slippery slope to further experimentation with human beings who are considered less than human. Further, nothing has been accomplished in the field of embryonic stem cell research, whereas adult stem cell reserach has been very successful including the growth of a liver from umbelical(sp) cord blood.
 

anonymous

New member
Bush is the first President to federally fund stem cell research....existing lines and adult stem cells. Also, there is no medical proof embryonic stem cells work for anything.....they are having major success with adult stem cells.
 

anonymous

New member
Bush is the first President to federally fund stem cell research....existing lines and adult stem cells. Also, there is no medical proof embryonic stem cells work for anything.....they are having major success with adult stem cells.
 

anonymous

New member
Bush is the first President to federally fund stem cell research....existing lines and adult stem cells. Also, there is no medical proof embryonic stem cells work for anything.....they are having major success with adult stem cells.
 

anonymous

New member
Check the terminology: therapeutic cloning is not synonymous with stem cells, although the two are often mentioned in close proximity. Therapeutic cloning can be done with somatic cells and doesn't necessarily require the use of embryonic stem cells.

Therapeutic cloning involves something called somatic cell nuclear transfer or SCNT. I don't see anything unethical about removing the DNA from a single cell, which is what this process does. Beyond that, it's anyone's guess.
 

anonymous

New member
Check the terminology: therapeutic cloning is not synonymous with stem cells, although the two are often mentioned in close proximity. Therapeutic cloning can be done with somatic cells and doesn't necessarily require the use of embryonic stem cells.

Therapeutic cloning involves something called somatic cell nuclear transfer or SCNT. I don't see anything unethical about removing the DNA from a single cell, which is what this process does. Beyond that, it's anyone's guess.
 

anonymous

New member
Check the terminology: therapeutic cloning is not synonymous with stem cells, although the two are often mentioned in close proximity. Therapeutic cloning can be done with somatic cells and doesn't necessarily require the use of embryonic stem cells.

Therapeutic cloning involves something called somatic cell nuclear transfer or SCNT. I don't see anything unethical about removing the DNA from a single cell, which is what this process does. Beyond that, it's anyone's guess.
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>anonymous</b></i>

Check the terminology: therapeutic cloning is not synonymous with stem cells, although the two are often mentioned in close proximity. Therapeutic cloning can be done with somatic cells and doesn't necessarily require the use of embryonic stem cells.



Therapeutic cloning involves something called somatic cell nuclear transfer or SCNT. I don't see anything unethical about removing the DNA from a single cell, which is what this process does. Beyond that, it's anyone's guess.</end quote></div>

Therapeutic cloning<b> is</b> cloning. You are creating human life then destroying it. Using the word therapeutic just makes it sound acceptable. In essense you are creating a twin of the person you are cloning. But if this embryo was implanted it would grow as any other human would. Life begins at conception so this is unacceptable to those who respect all life especially the most innocent. <img src="i/expressions/heart.gif" border="0">
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>anonymous</b></i>

Check the terminology: therapeutic cloning is not synonymous with stem cells, although the two are often mentioned in close proximity. Therapeutic cloning can be done with somatic cells and doesn't necessarily require the use of embryonic stem cells.



Therapeutic cloning involves something called somatic cell nuclear transfer or SCNT. I don't see anything unethical about removing the DNA from a single cell, which is what this process does. Beyond that, it's anyone's guess.</end quote></div>

Therapeutic cloning<b> is</b> cloning. You are creating human life then destroying it. Using the word therapeutic just makes it sound acceptable. In essense you are creating a twin of the person you are cloning. But if this embryo was implanted it would grow as any other human would. Life begins at conception so this is unacceptable to those who respect all life especially the most innocent. <img src="i/expressions/heart.gif" border="0">
 

anonymous

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>anonymous</b></i>

Check the terminology: therapeutic cloning is not synonymous with stem cells, although the two are often mentioned in close proximity. Therapeutic cloning can be done with somatic cells and doesn't necessarily require the use of embryonic stem cells.



Therapeutic cloning involves something called somatic cell nuclear transfer or SCNT. I don't see anything unethical about removing the DNA from a single cell, which is what this process does. Beyond that, it's anyone's guess.</end quote></div>

Therapeutic cloning<b> is</b> cloning. You are creating human life then destroying it. Using the word therapeutic just makes it sound acceptable. In essense you are creating a twin of the person you are cloning. But if this embryo was implanted it would grow as any other human would. Life begins at conception so this is unacceptable to those who respect all life especially the most innocent. <img src="i/expressions/heart.gif" border="0">
 

anonymous

New member
wikipedia reference below:

Proposals to use Nucleus Transfer techniques in human stem cell research raise a set of concerns beyond the moral status of any created embryo. These have led to some individuals and organizations who are also opposed to human embryonic stem cell research to be concerned about, or opposed to, SCNT research.

One concern is that blastula creation in human stem cell research will lead to the reproductive cloning of humans. Both processes use the same first step: the creation of a nuclear transferred embryo, most likely via SCNT. Those who hold this concern often advocate for strong regulation of SCNT to preclude implantation of any derived products for the intention of human reproduction. [11], or its prohibition.[12]

A second concern is the appropriate sourcing of the eggs that are needed. SCNT requires human eggs, which can only be obtained from women. The most common source of these eggs today are eggs that are produced and in excess of the clinical need during IVF treatment. This is a minimally invasive procedure, but it does carry some health risks, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and in very rare instances even death.
 

anonymous

New member
wikipedia reference below:

Proposals to use Nucleus Transfer techniques in human stem cell research raise a set of concerns beyond the moral status of any created embryo. These have led to some individuals and organizations who are also opposed to human embryonic stem cell research to be concerned about, or opposed to, SCNT research.

One concern is that blastula creation in human stem cell research will lead to the reproductive cloning of humans. Both processes use the same first step: the creation of a nuclear transferred embryo, most likely via SCNT. Those who hold this concern often advocate for strong regulation of SCNT to preclude implantation of any derived products for the intention of human reproduction. [11], or its prohibition.[12]

A second concern is the appropriate sourcing of the eggs that are needed. SCNT requires human eggs, which can only be obtained from women. The most common source of these eggs today are eggs that are produced and in excess of the clinical need during IVF treatment. This is a minimally invasive procedure, but it does carry some health risks, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and in very rare instances even death.
 
Top