Has anyone used the Frequencer

Louis

New member
Hi,
My name is Louis Plante, I am from Québec, Canada, I'm CF 30 year Old Patient, I'm the one that invented the Frequencer. I read what questions you have raised and I'm more than willing to answer them.

First of all, the Frequencer has been introduced to the USA not more than 3 months ago. so, it's firly new on the market.

By the way

ej0820 wrote : <div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>I myself have not tried the frequencer. I haven't had the opportunity. However, at my last doc appointment, I inquired about it out of sheer curiousity and the nurse I asked about it told me she's heard nothing but bad things about it. She said she's spoken to many patients that said it didn't do a whole lot for them. I still want to try one, but after what she's heard about it, it doesn't seem like it's worth the money. Hope my input helped. </end quote></div>

I know that Dymedso have concentrate in the california region. What is the clinic you spoke of??? 'cause to this day only a handfull of american had the opportunity to try it and the result were good...


I had the idea in 2002... a long time of developing, engeneering and paper work for somebody waiting for a transplant. (I had my transplant on november 2006)... feels great


Second, since you ask about the specs...
Here are the true specs of the Frequencer :

<b><UL>There is No ultrasound involve in the treatment.</UL>
<UL>There is no gel or anything like that to put on the skin.</UL>
<UL>You don't have to be on bare skin to do the treatment.</UL>
<UL>There are no RF or Electro Magnetic Field generated by the apparetus that is purpously directed to the thorax. </UL>
<UL>The only EMF or RF component would come from the power supply just like a normal apparetus that is using an external power supply. It's perfectly safe to use it... UL accreditation and FDA and Health Canada approoved.</UL>
<UL>The Frequencer generates a low hum. Much like a cat's purr. </UL>
<UL>It's not ultrasound. It's more like Bass music in a dance club. </UL>
<UL>The sound presure level (dBA ) of the Frequencer during a normal treatment is not dangerous to the human ear. In fact you could do over 48h of continuous treatment without causing damages to your ears. It's perfectly safe. The study at the FDA, UL and Health Canada sustain these facts.</UL>
<UL>While the treatment is going on somebody can hold a conversation while being beside the apparetus, you don't have to scream out. It's quiet. You can listen to the TV... To give an idea : it's less noisy than a oxygen concentrator or a nebulisator... </UL>
<UL>One of the key point of the Frequencer is that you can realy target
area of the lungs that cause more problems. </UL>
<UL>Dymedso has only a Rep in the USA (in california) that is covering the states it is possible for the patients who want to give it a try to contact Dymedso via their

Web site <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.dymedso.com">www.dymedso.com</a>
or E-Mail <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="mailto:info@dymedso.com">info@dymedso.com</a>.

Dymedso cannot sell directly to the patient, they have to go through your clinic. With the clinic Dymedso can arrange some trial period. Even better: I know that Stanford University has started clinical trials using the Frequencer on CF patients longer than a few treatment.</UL></b>
I have used the Frequencer ~3.5 years before my transplant (in november 2006) and it got me healthy to my transplant.

Since the device is a first to use this technology on the market, I suggest you try it for at least a week. Even if the treatment is very intuitive, you'll be able to be get use to it and optain the maximum benifit out of it.

Dymedso is currently checking with health insurance in the US to have it covered so that patient that need it won't pay a dime for it. So I suggess that you try it with your clinic have your doc / nurse to call Dymedso, there is a Toll free number. They can arrange to have a Frequencer at your clinic, so you can try it.

The more mucus you have the more cleaning potential there is. If your FEV1 is over 90% ... well it might not do a lot... if you're in the 50% and lower you might benifit from it a lot. Also some Antibiotic "dry out" our lungs, I've noticed that when I got infection treated with linezolide - Zyvoxam - and other intraveinous antibiotic my mucus level dropped down in a matter of few days, in that time the Frequencer was less effective. But a few days after the antibiotherapy and I was back expectorating 30-40 cc of mucus within 15 minutes. That was how much it worked for me. I was doing it 2-3 times a day. The result may vary depending on your condition.

It won't hurt to try it that is for sure.

For me it realy worked well, that's why I've pushed the Frequencer since its creation. It helped me and seems to help other pulomnary problems also (the Frequencer is undergoing other clinical trials at the moment and the result are not published yet). I've never used any Vest because these device are not approoved by our gouvernement agency in Canada.

With my transplant I had a lot of Stenosis, mucus got stock behind the stenosis and it was difficult to cleared up. Since the Scar, the Sternum and the whole rib cage is VERY fragile after the surgery, direct clapping to the front of the chest is out of the question OUCH!!, I, myself, decided to used my Frequencer a couple of time to clear up my new lungs.

To my suprise, it worked wonderfully, and I was amazed with the results I didn't expect a lot but a lot of mucus got cleared in a matter of about few minutes...

If you use the Frequencer well and pinpoint the right Frequency (you feel the mucus vibrate inside the lungs) the more you get closer to that Frequency the less effort it takes to get the sticky stuff out.

Before my transplant : sometimes... NOT ALWAYS... Sometimes at the beginig of my treatment, I got very little cought.. like U..HUM.. And a great deal of mucus got out. Than I could feel the air getting in specific place in the lungs... That is an amazing feeling. I know that some CF patients have experience that "clearance level" while using the Frequencer.

If you have any questions let me know I'll be glad to answer it.

Louis
 

Louis

New member
Hi,
My name is Louis Plante, I am from Québec, Canada, I'm CF 30 year Old Patient, I'm the one that invented the Frequencer. I read what questions you have raised and I'm more than willing to answer them.

First of all, the Frequencer has been introduced to the USA not more than 3 months ago. so, it's firly new on the market.

By the way

ej0820 wrote : <div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>I myself have not tried the frequencer. I haven't had the opportunity. However, at my last doc appointment, I inquired about it out of sheer curiousity and the nurse I asked about it told me she's heard nothing but bad things about it. She said she's spoken to many patients that said it didn't do a whole lot for them. I still want to try one, but after what she's heard about it, it doesn't seem like it's worth the money. Hope my input helped. </end quote></div>

I know that Dymedso have concentrate in the california region. What is the clinic you spoke of??? 'cause to this day only a handfull of american had the opportunity to try it and the result were good...


I had the idea in 2002... a long time of developing, engeneering and paper work for somebody waiting for a transplant. (I had my transplant on november 2006)... feels great


Second, since you ask about the specs...
Here are the true specs of the Frequencer :

<b><UL>There is No ultrasound involve in the treatment.</UL>
<UL>There is no gel or anything like that to put on the skin.</UL>
<UL>You don't have to be on bare skin to do the treatment.</UL>
<UL>There are no RF or Electro Magnetic Field generated by the apparetus that is purpously directed to the thorax. </UL>
<UL>The only EMF or RF component would come from the power supply just like a normal apparetus that is using an external power supply. It's perfectly safe to use it... UL accreditation and FDA and Health Canada approoved.</UL>
<UL>The Frequencer generates a low hum. Much like a cat's purr. </UL>
<UL>It's not ultrasound. It's more like Bass music in a dance club. </UL>
<UL>The sound presure level (dBA ) of the Frequencer during a normal treatment is not dangerous to the human ear. In fact you could do over 48h of continuous treatment without causing damages to your ears. It's perfectly safe. The study at the FDA, UL and Health Canada sustain these facts.</UL>
<UL>While the treatment is going on somebody can hold a conversation while being beside the apparetus, you don't have to scream out. It's quiet. You can listen to the TV... To give an idea : it's less noisy than a oxygen concentrator or a nebulisator... </UL>
<UL>One of the key point of the Frequencer is that you can realy target
area of the lungs that cause more problems. </UL>
<UL>Dymedso has only a Rep in the USA (in california) that is covering the states it is possible for the patients who want to give it a try to contact Dymedso via their

Web site <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.dymedso.com">www.dymedso.com</a>
or E-Mail <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="mailto:info@dymedso.com">info@dymedso.com</a>.

Dymedso cannot sell directly to the patient, they have to go through your clinic. With the clinic Dymedso can arrange some trial period. Even better: I know that Stanford University has started clinical trials using the Frequencer on CF patients longer than a few treatment.</UL></b>
I have used the Frequencer ~3.5 years before my transplant (in november 2006) and it got me healthy to my transplant.

Since the device is a first to use this technology on the market, I suggest you try it for at least a week. Even if the treatment is very intuitive, you'll be able to be get use to it and optain the maximum benifit out of it.

Dymedso is currently checking with health insurance in the US to have it covered so that patient that need it won't pay a dime for it. So I suggess that you try it with your clinic have your doc / nurse to call Dymedso, there is a Toll free number. They can arrange to have a Frequencer at your clinic, so you can try it.

The more mucus you have the more cleaning potential there is. If your FEV1 is over 90% ... well it might not do a lot... if you're in the 50% and lower you might benifit from it a lot. Also some Antibiotic "dry out" our lungs, I've noticed that when I got infection treated with linezolide - Zyvoxam - and other intraveinous antibiotic my mucus level dropped down in a matter of few days, in that time the Frequencer was less effective. But a few days after the antibiotherapy and I was back expectorating 30-40 cc of mucus within 15 minutes. That was how much it worked for me. I was doing it 2-3 times a day. The result may vary depending on your condition.

It won't hurt to try it that is for sure.

For me it realy worked well, that's why I've pushed the Frequencer since its creation. It helped me and seems to help other pulomnary problems also (the Frequencer is undergoing other clinical trials at the moment and the result are not published yet). I've never used any Vest because these device are not approoved by our gouvernement agency in Canada.

With my transplant I had a lot of Stenosis, mucus got stock behind the stenosis and it was difficult to cleared up. Since the Scar, the Sternum and the whole rib cage is VERY fragile after the surgery, direct clapping to the front of the chest is out of the question OUCH!!, I, myself, decided to used my Frequencer a couple of time to clear up my new lungs.

To my suprise, it worked wonderfully, and I was amazed with the results I didn't expect a lot but a lot of mucus got cleared in a matter of about few minutes...

If you use the Frequencer well and pinpoint the right Frequency (you feel the mucus vibrate inside the lungs) the more you get closer to that Frequency the less effort it takes to get the sticky stuff out.

Before my transplant : sometimes... NOT ALWAYS... Sometimes at the beginig of my treatment, I got very little cought.. like U..HUM.. And a great deal of mucus got out. Than I could feel the air getting in specific place in the lungs... That is an amazing feeling. I know that some CF patients have experience that "clearance level" while using the Frequencer.

If you have any questions let me know I'll be glad to answer it.

Louis
 

Louis

New member
Hi,
My name is Louis Plante, I am from Québec, Canada, I'm CF 30 year Old Patient, I'm the one that invented the Frequencer. I read what questions you have raised and I'm more than willing to answer them.

First of all, the Frequencer has been introduced to the USA not more than 3 months ago. so, it's firly new on the market.

By the way

ej0820 wrote : <div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>I myself have not tried the frequencer. I haven't had the opportunity. However, at my last doc appointment, I inquired about it out of sheer curiousity and the nurse I asked about it told me she's heard nothing but bad things about it. She said she's spoken to many patients that said it didn't do a whole lot for them. I still want to try one, but after what she's heard about it, it doesn't seem like it's worth the money. Hope my input helped. </end quote>

I know that Dymedso have concentrate in the california region. What is the clinic you spoke of??? 'cause to this day only a handfull of american had the opportunity to try it and the result were good...


I had the idea in 2002... a long time of developing, engeneering and paper work for somebody waiting for a transplant. (I had my transplant on november 2006)... feels great


Second, since you ask about the specs...
Here are the true specs of the Frequencer :

<b><UL>There is No ultrasound involve in the treatment.</UL>
<UL>There is no gel or anything like that to put on the skin.</UL>
<UL>You don't have to be on bare skin to do the treatment.</UL>
<UL>There are no RF or Electro Magnetic Field generated by the apparetus that is purpously directed to the thorax. </UL>
<UL>The only EMF or RF component would come from the power supply just like a normal apparetus that is using an external power supply. It's perfectly safe to use it... UL accreditation and FDA and Health Canada approoved.</UL>
<UL>The Frequencer generates a low hum. Much like a cat's purr. </UL>
<UL>It's not ultrasound. It's more like Bass music in a dance club. </UL>
<UL>The sound presure level (dBA ) of the Frequencer during a normal treatment is not dangerous to the human ear. In fact you could do over 48h of continuous treatment without causing damages to your ears. It's perfectly safe. The study at the FDA, UL and Health Canada sustain these facts.</UL>
<UL>While the treatment is going on somebody can hold a conversation while being beside the apparetus, you don't have to scream out. It's quiet. You can listen to the TV... To give an idea : it's less noisy than a oxygen concentrator or a nebulisator... </UL>
<UL>One of the key point of the Frequencer is that you can realy target
area of the lungs that cause more problems. </UL>
<UL>Dymedso has only a Rep in the USA (in california) that is covering the states it is possible for the patients who want to give it a try to contact Dymedso via their

Web site <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.dymedso.com">www.dymedso.com</a>
or E-Mail <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="mailto:info@dymedso.com">info@dymedso.com</a>.

Dymedso cannot sell directly to the patient, they have to go through your clinic. With the clinic Dymedso can arrange some trial period. Even better: I know that Stanford University has started clinical trials using the Frequencer on CF patients longer than a few treatment.</UL></b>
I have used the Frequencer ~3.5 years before my transplant (in november 2006) and it got me healthy to my transplant.

Since the device is a first to use this technology on the market, I suggest you try it for at least a week. Even if the treatment is very intuitive, you'll be able to be get use to it and optain the maximum benifit out of it.

Dymedso is currently checking with health insurance in the US to have it covered so that patient that need it won't pay a dime for it. So I suggess that you try it with your clinic have your doc / nurse to call Dymedso, there is a Toll free number. They can arrange to have a Frequencer at your clinic, so you can try it.

The more mucus you have the more cleaning potential there is. If your FEV1 is over 90% ... well it might not do a lot... if you're in the 50% and lower you might benifit from it a lot. Also some Antibiotic "dry out" our lungs, I've noticed that when I got infection treated with linezolide - Zyvoxam - and other intraveinous antibiotic my mucus level dropped down in a matter of few days, in that time the Frequencer was less effective. But a few days after the antibiotherapy and I was back expectorating 30-40 cc of mucus within 15 minutes. That was how much it worked for me. I was doing it 2-3 times a day. The result may vary depending on your condition.

It won't hurt to try it that is for sure.

For me it realy worked well, that's why I've pushed the Frequencer since its creation. It helped me and seems to help other pulomnary problems also (the Frequencer is undergoing other clinical trials at the moment and the result are not published yet). I've never used any Vest because these device are not approoved by our gouvernement agency in Canada.

With my transplant I had a lot of Stenosis, mucus got stock behind the stenosis and it was difficult to cleared up. Since the Scar, the Sternum and the whole rib cage is VERY fragile after the surgery, direct clapping to the front of the chest is out of the question OUCH!!, I, myself, decided to used my Frequencer a couple of time to clear up my new lungs.

To my suprise, it worked wonderfully, and I was amazed with the results I didn't expect a lot but a lot of mucus got cleared in a matter of about few minutes...

If you use the Frequencer well and pinpoint the right Frequency (you feel the mucus vibrate inside the lungs) the more you get closer to that Frequency the less effort it takes to get the sticky stuff out.

Before my transplant : sometimes... NOT ALWAYS... Sometimes at the beginig of my treatment, I got very little cought.. like U..HUM.. And a great deal of mucus got out. Than I could feel the air getting in specific place in the lungs... That is an amazing feeling. I know that some CF patients have experience that "clearance level" while using the Frequencer.

If you have any questions let me know I'll be glad to answer it.

Louis
 

Louis

New member
Hi,
My name is Louis Plante, I am from Québec, Canada, I'm CF 30 year Old Patient, I'm the one that invented the Frequencer. I read what questions you have raised and I'm more than willing to answer them.

First of all, the Frequencer has been introduced to the USA not more than 3 months ago. so, it's firly new on the market.

By the way

ej0820 wrote : <div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>I myself have not tried the frequencer. I haven't had the opportunity. However, at my last doc appointment, I inquired about it out of sheer curiousity and the nurse I asked about it told me she's heard nothing but bad things about it. She said she's spoken to many patients that said it didn't do a whole lot for them. I still want to try one, but after what she's heard about it, it doesn't seem like it's worth the money. Hope my input helped. </end quote>

I know that Dymedso have concentrate in the california region. What is the clinic you spoke of??? 'cause to this day only a handfull of american had the opportunity to try it and the result were good...


I had the idea in 2002... a long time of developing, engeneering and paper work for somebody waiting for a transplant. (I had my transplant on november 2006)... feels great


Second, since you ask about the specs...
Here are the true specs of the Frequencer :

<b><UL>There is No ultrasound involve in the treatment.</UL>
<UL>There is no gel or anything like that to put on the skin.</UL>
<UL>You don't have to be on bare skin to do the treatment.</UL>
<UL>There are no RF or Electro Magnetic Field generated by the apparetus that is purpously directed to the thorax. </UL>
<UL>The only EMF or RF component would come from the power supply just like a normal apparetus that is using an external power supply. It's perfectly safe to use it... UL accreditation and FDA and Health Canada approoved.</UL>
<UL>The Frequencer generates a low hum. Much like a cat's purr. </UL>
<UL>It's not ultrasound. It's more like Bass music in a dance club. </UL>
<UL>The sound presure level (dBA ) of the Frequencer during a normal treatment is not dangerous to the human ear. In fact you could do over 48h of continuous treatment without causing damages to your ears. It's perfectly safe. The study at the FDA, UL and Health Canada sustain these facts.</UL>
<UL>While the treatment is going on somebody can hold a conversation while being beside the apparetus, you don't have to scream out. It's quiet. You can listen to the TV... To give an idea : it's less noisy than a oxygen concentrator or a nebulisator... </UL>
<UL>One of the key point of the Frequencer is that you can realy target
area of the lungs that cause more problems. </UL>
<UL>Dymedso has only a Rep in the USA (in california) that is covering the states it is possible for the patients who want to give it a try to contact Dymedso via their

Web site <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.dymedso.com">www.dymedso.com</a>
or E-Mail <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="mailto:info@dymedso.com">info@dymedso.com</a>.

Dymedso cannot sell directly to the patient, they have to go through your clinic. With the clinic Dymedso can arrange some trial period. Even better: I know that Stanford University has started clinical trials using the Frequencer on CF patients longer than a few treatment.</UL></b>
I have used the Frequencer ~3.5 years before my transplant (in november 2006) and it got me healthy to my transplant.

Since the device is a first to use this technology on the market, I suggest you try it for at least a week. Even if the treatment is very intuitive, you'll be able to be get use to it and optain the maximum benifit out of it.

Dymedso is currently checking with health insurance in the US to have it covered so that patient that need it won't pay a dime for it. So I suggess that you try it with your clinic have your doc / nurse to call Dymedso, there is a Toll free number. They can arrange to have a Frequencer at your clinic, so you can try it.

The more mucus you have the more cleaning potential there is. If your FEV1 is over 90% ... well it might not do a lot... if you're in the 50% and lower you might benifit from it a lot. Also some Antibiotic "dry out" our lungs, I've noticed that when I got infection treated with linezolide - Zyvoxam - and other intraveinous antibiotic my mucus level dropped down in a matter of few days, in that time the Frequencer was less effective. But a few days after the antibiotherapy and I was back expectorating 30-40 cc of mucus within 15 minutes. That was how much it worked for me. I was doing it 2-3 times a day. The result may vary depending on your condition.

It won't hurt to try it that is for sure.

For me it realy worked well, that's why I've pushed the Frequencer since its creation. It helped me and seems to help other pulomnary problems also (the Frequencer is undergoing other clinical trials at the moment and the result are not published yet). I've never used any Vest because these device are not approoved by our gouvernement agency in Canada.

With my transplant I had a lot of Stenosis, mucus got stock behind the stenosis and it was difficult to cleared up. Since the Scar, the Sternum and the whole rib cage is VERY fragile after the surgery, direct clapping to the front of the chest is out of the question OUCH!!, I, myself, decided to used my Frequencer a couple of time to clear up my new lungs.

To my suprise, it worked wonderfully, and I was amazed with the results I didn't expect a lot but a lot of mucus got cleared in a matter of about few minutes...

If you use the Frequencer well and pinpoint the right Frequency (you feel the mucus vibrate inside the lungs) the more you get closer to that Frequency the less effort it takes to get the sticky stuff out.

Before my transplant : sometimes... NOT ALWAYS... Sometimes at the beginig of my treatment, I got very little cought.. like U..HUM.. And a great deal of mucus got out. Than I could feel the air getting in specific place in the lungs... That is an amazing feeling. I know that some CF patients have experience that "clearance level" while using the Frequencer.

If you have any questions let me know I'll be glad to answer it.

Louis
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Hi Louis,

Thank you for the reply. I'm living in Japan, so I doubt it will be available here in a short time.
However, I wonder if this was the result to the Idea I had about a month ago while at a rock concert (ASIA reunion to be exact!)
The deep bass from the drums would resonate in my rib cage, and that lead me to thinking whether that was a good method of PD.
Since you mentioned that it was like a deep bass, I'm lead to beleive that my thought was already invented by you, but am curious as to whether you came up with the same idea in the same, or similar, manner?
Also, in relation to what's being absorbed into the chest, if it's not ultrasound frequencies, or even electromagnetic energy, then what is it? is it basically a low frequency resonance vibrating the air in the lungs?
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Hi Louis,

Thank you for the reply. I'm living in Japan, so I doubt it will be available here in a short time.
However, I wonder if this was the result to the Idea I had about a month ago while at a rock concert (ASIA reunion to be exact!)
The deep bass from the drums would resonate in my rib cage, and that lead me to thinking whether that was a good method of PD.
Since you mentioned that it was like a deep bass, I'm lead to beleive that my thought was already invented by you, but am curious as to whether you came up with the same idea in the same, or similar, manner?
Also, in relation to what's being absorbed into the chest, if it's not ultrasound frequencies, or even electromagnetic energy, then what is it? is it basically a low frequency resonance vibrating the air in the lungs?
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Hi Louis,

Thank you for the reply. I'm living in Japan, so I doubt it will be available here in a short time.
However, I wonder if this was the result to the Idea I had about a month ago while at a rock concert (ASIA reunion to be exact!)
The deep bass from the drums would resonate in my rib cage, and that lead me to thinking whether that was a good method of PD.
Since you mentioned that it was like a deep bass, I'm lead to beleive that my thought was already invented by you, but am curious as to whether you came up with the same idea in the same, or similar, manner?
Also, in relation to what's being absorbed into the chest, if it's not ultrasound frequencies, or even electromagnetic energy, then what is it? is it basically a low frequency resonance vibrating the air in the lungs?
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Hi Louis,

Thank you for the reply. I'm living in Japan, so I doubt it will be available here in a short time.
However, I wonder if this was the result to the Idea I had about a month ago while at a rock concert (ASIA reunion to be exact!)
The deep bass from the drums would resonate in my rib cage, and that lead me to thinking whether that was a good method of PD.
Since you mentioned that it was like a deep bass, I'm lead to beleive that my thought was already invented by you, but am curious as to whether you came up with the same idea in the same, or similar, manner?
Also, in relation to what's being absorbed into the chest, if it's not ultrasound frequencies, or even electromagnetic energy, then what is it? is it basically a low frequency resonance vibrating the air in the lungs?
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Hi Louis,

Thank you for the reply. I'm living in Japan, so I doubt it will be available here in a short time.
However, I wonder if this was the result to the Idea I had about a month ago while at a rock concert (ASIA reunion to be exact!)
The deep bass from the drums would resonate in my rib cage, and that lead me to thinking whether that was a good method of PD.
Since you mentioned that it was like a deep bass, I'm lead to beleive that my thought was already invented by you, but am curious as to whether you came up with the same idea in the same, or similar, manner?
Also, in relation to what's being absorbed into the chest, if it's not ultrasound frequencies, or even electromagnetic energy, then what is it? is it basically a low frequency resonance vibrating the air in the lungs?
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Hi Louis,

Thank you for the reply. I'm living in Japan, so I doubt it will be available here in a short time.
However, I wonder if this was the result to the Idea I had about a month ago while at a rock concert (ASIA reunion to be exact!)
The deep bass from the drums would resonate in my rib cage, and that lead me to thinking whether that was a good method of PD.
Since you mentioned that it was like a deep bass, I'm lead to beleive that my thought was already invented by you, but am curious as to whether you came up with the same idea in the same, or similar, manner?
Also, in relation to what's being absorbed into the chest, if it's not ultrasound frequencies, or even electromagnetic energy, then what is it? is it basically a low frequency resonance vibrating the air in the lungs?
 

Louis

New member
Hey!
Well, as I mention, the Frequencer generates low acoustic frequency. When I was doing my treatment I used between 30Hz - 45Hz.

The ultrasound spectrum starts over 20 000Hz. Basicaly the normal human ear don't hear these vibration. see <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound">Wikipedia information on ultrasound</a>

As for ElectroMagnetic Energy it is generated through any wire that act as an antena. Just like a CB, Radio, Cell Phones... It's not the case with the Frequencer.

On the contrary, the Frequencer generates frequency in the acoustic range of 20Hz to 100Hz. The normal human ear usualy starts to perceive sounds around 35Hz.

I had the idea when I remembered -years after- when I was young, sitting in front of a VERY loud speaker that was generating low frequency and me coughing like crazy - It's a very long story made very short here... You're right about the resonant frequency. The closer to the resonant frequency you get, the easyest is the treatment...

Since the sound wave goes through the body, you can treat the back from the front... it makes things easyer. But remember that the closer the frequencer is from an area to treat, the best results you get out of it... That is because the sound wave looses great deal of kynetic energy while travelling.

Louis
 

Louis

New member
Hey!
Well, as I mention, the Frequencer generates low acoustic frequency. When I was doing my treatment I used between 30Hz - 45Hz.

The ultrasound spectrum starts over 20 000Hz. Basicaly the normal human ear don't hear these vibration. see <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound">Wikipedia information on ultrasound</a>

As for ElectroMagnetic Energy it is generated through any wire that act as an antena. Just like a CB, Radio, Cell Phones... It's not the case with the Frequencer.

On the contrary, the Frequencer generates frequency in the acoustic range of 20Hz to 100Hz. The normal human ear usualy starts to perceive sounds around 35Hz.

I had the idea when I remembered -years after- when I was young, sitting in front of a VERY loud speaker that was generating low frequency and me coughing like crazy - It's a very long story made very short here... You're right about the resonant frequency. The closer to the resonant frequency you get, the easyest is the treatment...

Since the sound wave goes through the body, you can treat the back from the front... it makes things easyer. But remember that the closer the frequencer is from an area to treat, the best results you get out of it... That is because the sound wave looses great deal of kynetic energy while travelling.

Louis
 

Louis

New member
Hey!
Well, as I mention, the Frequencer generates low acoustic frequency. When I was doing my treatment I used between 30Hz - 45Hz.

The ultrasound spectrum starts over 20 000Hz. Basicaly the normal human ear don't hear these vibration. see <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound">Wikipedia information on ultrasound</a>

As for ElectroMagnetic Energy it is generated through any wire that act as an antena. Just like a CB, Radio, Cell Phones... It's not the case with the Frequencer.

On the contrary, the Frequencer generates frequency in the acoustic range of 20Hz to 100Hz. The normal human ear usualy starts to perceive sounds around 35Hz.

I had the idea when I remembered -years after- when I was young, sitting in front of a VERY loud speaker that was generating low frequency and me coughing like crazy - It's a very long story made very short here... You're right about the resonant frequency. The closer to the resonant frequency you get, the easyest is the treatment...

Since the sound wave goes through the body, you can treat the back from the front... it makes things easyer. But remember that the closer the frequencer is from an area to treat, the best results you get out of it... That is because the sound wave looses great deal of kynetic energy while travelling.

Louis
 

Louis

New member
Hey!
Well, as I mention, the Frequencer generates low acoustic frequency. When I was doing my treatment I used between 30Hz - 45Hz.

The ultrasound spectrum starts over 20 000Hz. Basicaly the normal human ear don't hear these vibration. see <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound">Wikipedia information on ultrasound</a>

As for ElectroMagnetic Energy it is generated through any wire that act as an antena. Just like a CB, Radio, Cell Phones... It's not the case with the Frequencer.

On the contrary, the Frequencer generates frequency in the acoustic range of 20Hz to 100Hz. The normal human ear usualy starts to perceive sounds around 35Hz.

I had the idea when I remembered -years after- when I was young, sitting in front of a VERY loud speaker that was generating low frequency and me coughing like crazy - It's a very long story made very short here... You're right about the resonant frequency. The closer to the resonant frequency you get, the easyest is the treatment...

Since the sound wave goes through the body, you can treat the back from the front... it makes things easyer. But remember that the closer the frequencer is from an area to treat, the best results you get out of it... That is because the sound wave looses great deal of kynetic energy while travelling.

Louis
 

Louis

New member
Hey!
Well, as I mention, the Frequencer generates low acoustic frequency. When I was doing my treatment I used between 30Hz - 45Hz.

The ultrasound spectrum starts over 20 000Hz. Basicaly the normal human ear don't hear these vibration. see <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound">Wikipedia information on ultrasound</a>

As for ElectroMagnetic Energy it is generated through any wire that act as an antena. Just like a CB, Radio, Cell Phones... It's not the case with the Frequencer.

On the contrary, the Frequencer generates frequency in the acoustic range of 20Hz to 100Hz. The normal human ear usualy starts to perceive sounds around 35Hz.

I had the idea when I remembered -years after- when I was young, sitting in front of a VERY loud speaker that was generating low frequency and me coughing like crazy - It's a very long story made very short here... You're right about the resonant frequency. The closer to the resonant frequency you get, the easyest is the treatment...

Since the sound wave goes through the body, you can treat the back from the front... it makes things easyer. But remember that the closer the frequencer is from an area to treat, the best results you get out of it... That is because the sound wave looses great deal of kynetic energy while travelling.

Louis
 

Louis

New member
Hey!
Well, as I mention, the Frequencer generates low acoustic frequency. When I was doing my treatment I used between 30Hz - 45Hz.

The ultrasound spectrum starts over 20 000Hz. Basicaly the normal human ear don't hear these vibration. see <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound">Wikipedia information on ultrasound</a>

As for ElectroMagnetic Energy it is generated through any wire that act as an antena. Just like a CB, Radio, Cell Phones... It's not the case with the Frequencer.

On the contrary, the Frequencer generates frequency in the acoustic range of 20Hz to 100Hz. The normal human ear usualy starts to perceive sounds around 35Hz.

I had the idea when I remembered -years after- when I was young, sitting in front of a VERY loud speaker that was generating low frequency and me coughing like crazy - It's a very long story made very short here... You're right about the resonant frequency. The closer to the resonant frequency you get, the easyest is the treatment...

Since the sound wave goes through the body, you can treat the back from the front... it makes things easyer. But remember that the closer the frequencer is from an area to treat, the best results you get out of it... That is because the sound wave looses great deal of kynetic energy while travelling.

Louis
 

rvm1212

New member
Hi Louis!

I live in Spain, I was wondering. Do you know if the frecuencer will be available in Europe soon?. How much does it cost?
Rita
 

rvm1212

New member
Hi Louis!

I live in Spain, I was wondering. Do you know if the frecuencer will be available in Europe soon?. How much does it cost?
Rita
 

rvm1212

New member
Hi Louis!

I live in Spain, I was wondering. Do you know if the frecuencer will be available in Europe soon?. How much does it cost?
Rita
 

rvm1212

New member
Hi Louis!

I live in Spain, I was wondering. Do you know if the frecuencer will be available in Europe soon?. How much does it cost?
Rita
 
Top