H
Hail2Pitt
Guest
My employer is now offering a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) in addition to a traditional health plan. The premium for the HDHP is considerably lower, and also my employer makes a sizeable contribution to an HSA if I go with the HDHP. So, they try to make it very tempting, but I'm not sure I understand which plan is better for my situation.
My family has very large medical bills - I have CF, and my wife and son both have chronic issues as well. Every year, we easily exceed both our deductible and out-of-pocket max. I've always had a traditional plan, but as I compare the two, it appears I may save money by going with the HDHP. With the traditional plan, we get co-paid to death on doctor appointments and prescription drugs after we meet the out-of-pocket max. With the HDHP, it seems that once you hit the out-of-pocket max, you don't pay any coinsurance for either doctor appointments or prescription drugs anymore. So, it appears my costs would actually be $0 once I hit the max, and not $100s to $1000s more due to co-pays.
Does anyone have any experience with this? Since I always hit the out-of-pocket max, I'm not worried about the higher deductible with the HDHP. But, my fear is that I am misunderstanding the plan, and I would continue to pay coinsurance on prescription drugs after hitting the out-of-pocket max. Since I'm used to always paying co-pays, I'm having trouble believing I would pay $0 on prescriptions after hitting the max. If I make a mistake here, it would be really bad for us. For example, if in the near future I'd be able to take Kalydeco, the $50 monthly co-pay with the traditional plan would be doable. But, if I actually had to pay coinsurance on the Kalydeco after hitting the out-of-pocket max, the $30,000 coinsurance would make it cost prohibitive.
Any advice you can provide would be great.
Thanks!
My family has very large medical bills - I have CF, and my wife and son both have chronic issues as well. Every year, we easily exceed both our deductible and out-of-pocket max. I've always had a traditional plan, but as I compare the two, it appears I may save money by going with the HDHP. With the traditional plan, we get co-paid to death on doctor appointments and prescription drugs after we meet the out-of-pocket max. With the HDHP, it seems that once you hit the out-of-pocket max, you don't pay any coinsurance for either doctor appointments or prescription drugs anymore. So, it appears my costs would actually be $0 once I hit the max, and not $100s to $1000s more due to co-pays.
Does anyone have any experience with this? Since I always hit the out-of-pocket max, I'm not worried about the higher deductible with the HDHP. But, my fear is that I am misunderstanding the plan, and I would continue to pay coinsurance on prescription drugs after hitting the out-of-pocket max. Since I'm used to always paying co-pays, I'm having trouble believing I would pay $0 on prescriptions after hitting the max. If I make a mistake here, it would be really bad for us. For example, if in the near future I'd be able to take Kalydeco, the $50 monthly co-pay with the traditional plan would be doable. But, if I actually had to pay coinsurance on the Kalydeco after hitting the out-of-pocket max, the $30,000 coinsurance would make it cost prohibitive.
Any advice you can provide would be great.
Thanks!