I wonder if those hospitalizations related to non compliance issues were actually because the patient could not afford the medication? As a former nurse, I saw non compliance issues, especially with the elderly, but it was because they had to choose between food and meds. Meds are so expensive as we know all too well, those on a fixed budget (such as those who are disabled or on social security) really feel the financial crunch when they go to pay for these drugs. For example, insulin costs me nearly 80$ for one vial. That's quite a bit of money. Singulair, nearly 100 for 30 days. That's because I am in the doughnut hole and brand name drugs I have to pay full price until I hit catastrophic coverage. Luckily, my doctor will hold samples for me so I don't have to pay for the brand name meds that I take (which if I paid for them out of pocket would be nearly 500 a month). I am sensing that many disabled/seniors are having this same problem. Of course they are going to choose shelter and food over meds.
Of course, there were those patients who just didn't take their meds, were totally non compliant in all aspects of their health care. We would see revolving door type admissions, where we would treat a person who would come in for their condition, such as diabetes, that would be out of control, we would regulate them, send them home only to see them on our doorstep again within weeks in the same condition.
I am not sure if I like the pay for compliance deal...maybe if it is for true forgetfulness and not sheer non compliance. But then again, what is stopping them from tossing the pill as Harriet pointed out. The system can always be outsmarted and you would still have a non compliant patient with a few more dollars to his or her name. I think the researchers have to look more into the causes of non compliance.
Jenn