Interesting developments in science regarding lung growth

bkc3

New member
Scientists grow new lungs using 'skeletons' of old ones

Published: Thursday, June 24, 2010 - 09:35 in Biology & Nature
For someone with a severe, incurable lung disorder such as cystic fibrosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a lung transplant may be the only chance for survival. Unfortunately, it's often not a very good chance. Matching donor lungs are rare, and many would-be recipients die waiting for the transplants that could save their lives. Such deaths could be prevented if it were possible to use stem cells to grow new lungs or lung tissue. Specialists in the emerging field of tissue engineering have been hard at work on this for years. But they've been frustrated by the problem of coaxing undifferentiated stem cells to develop into the specific cell types that populate different locations in the lung.

Now, researchers from the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston have demonstrated a potentially revolutionary solution to this problem. As they describe in an article published electronically ahead of print by the journal Tissue Engineering Part A, they seeded mouse embryonic stem cells into "acellular" rat lungs - organs whose original cells had been destroyed by repeated cycles of freezing and thawing and exposure to detergent.

The result: empty lung-shaped scaffolds of structural proteins on which the mouse stem cells thrived and differentiated into new cells appropriate to their specific locations.

"In terms of different cell types, the lung is probably the most complex of all organs - the cells near the entrance are very different from those deep in the lung," said Dr. Joaquin Cortiella, one of the article's lead authors. "Our natural matrix generated the same pattern, with tracheal cells only in the trachea, alveoli-like cells in the alveoli, pneumocytes only in the distal lung, and definite transition zones between the bronchi and the alveoli."

Such "site-specific" cell development has never been seen before in a natural matrix, said professor Joan Nichols, another of the paper's lead authors. The complexity gives the researchers hope that the concept could be scaled up to produce replacement tissues for humans - or used to create models to test therapies and diagnostic techniques for a variety of lung diseases.

"If we can make a good lung for people, we can also make a good model for injury," Nichols said. "We can create a fibrotic lung, or an emphysematous lung, and evaluate what's happening with those, what the cells are doing, how well stem cell or other therapy works. We can see what happens in pneumonia, or what happens when you've got a hemorrhagic fever, or tuberculosis, or hantavirus - all the agents that target the lung and cause damage in the lung."

The researchers have already begun work on large-scale experiments, "decellularizing" pig lungs with an eye toward using them to produce larger samples of lung tissue that could lead to applications in humans. They're also taking on the challenge of vascularization - stimulating the growth of blood vessels that will enable the engineered tissues to survive outside the special bioreactors that the researchers now use to keep them alive by bathing them in a life-sustaining cocktail of nutrients and oxygen.

"People ask us why we're doing the lung, because it's so hard," Cortiella said. "But the potential is so great, and the technology is here. It's going to take time, but I think we're going to create a system that works."

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/06/24/scientists.grow.new.lungs.using.skeletons.old.ones">http://esciencenews.com/articl...ing.skeletons.old.ones</a>
 

bkc3

New member
Scientists grow new lungs using 'skeletons' of old ones

Published: Thursday, June 24, 2010 - 09:35 in Biology & Nature
For someone with a severe, incurable lung disorder such as cystic fibrosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a lung transplant may be the only chance for survival. Unfortunately, it's often not a very good chance. Matching donor lungs are rare, and many would-be recipients die waiting for the transplants that could save their lives. Such deaths could be prevented if it were possible to use stem cells to grow new lungs or lung tissue. Specialists in the emerging field of tissue engineering have been hard at work on this for years. But they've been frustrated by the problem of coaxing undifferentiated stem cells to develop into the specific cell types that populate different locations in the lung.

Now, researchers from the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston have demonstrated a potentially revolutionary solution to this problem. As they describe in an article published electronically ahead of print by the journal Tissue Engineering Part A, they seeded mouse embryonic stem cells into "acellular" rat lungs - organs whose original cells had been destroyed by repeated cycles of freezing and thawing and exposure to detergent.

The result: empty lung-shaped scaffolds of structural proteins on which the mouse stem cells thrived and differentiated into new cells appropriate to their specific locations.

"In terms of different cell types, the lung is probably the most complex of all organs - the cells near the entrance are very different from those deep in the lung," said Dr. Joaquin Cortiella, one of the article's lead authors. "Our natural matrix generated the same pattern, with tracheal cells only in the trachea, alveoli-like cells in the alveoli, pneumocytes only in the distal lung, and definite transition zones between the bronchi and the alveoli."

Such "site-specific" cell development has never been seen before in a natural matrix, said professor Joan Nichols, another of the paper's lead authors. The complexity gives the researchers hope that the concept could be scaled up to produce replacement tissues for humans - or used to create models to test therapies and diagnostic techniques for a variety of lung diseases.

"If we can make a good lung for people, we can also make a good model for injury," Nichols said. "We can create a fibrotic lung, or an emphysematous lung, and evaluate what's happening with those, what the cells are doing, how well stem cell or other therapy works. We can see what happens in pneumonia, or what happens when you've got a hemorrhagic fever, or tuberculosis, or hantavirus - all the agents that target the lung and cause damage in the lung."

The researchers have already begun work on large-scale experiments, "decellularizing" pig lungs with an eye toward using them to produce larger samples of lung tissue that could lead to applications in humans. They're also taking on the challenge of vascularization - stimulating the growth of blood vessels that will enable the engineered tissues to survive outside the special bioreactors that the researchers now use to keep them alive by bathing them in a life-sustaining cocktail of nutrients and oxygen.

"People ask us why we're doing the lung, because it's so hard," Cortiella said. "But the potential is so great, and the technology is here. It's going to take time, but I think we're going to create a system that works."

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/06/24/scientists.grow.new.lungs.using.skeletons.old.ones">http://esciencenews.com/articl...ing.skeletons.old.ones</a>
 

bkc3

New member
Scientists grow new lungs using 'skeletons' of old ones
<br />
<br />Published: Thursday, June 24, 2010 - 09:35 in Biology & Nature
<br />For someone with a severe, incurable lung disorder such as cystic fibrosis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a lung transplant may be the only chance for survival. Unfortunately, it's often not a very good chance. Matching donor lungs are rare, and many would-be recipients die waiting for the transplants that could save their lives. Such deaths could be prevented if it were possible to use stem cells to grow new lungs or lung tissue. Specialists in the emerging field of tissue engineering have been hard at work on this for years. But they've been frustrated by the problem of coaxing undifferentiated stem cells to develop into the specific cell types that populate different locations in the lung.
<br />
<br />Now, researchers from the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston have demonstrated a potentially revolutionary solution to this problem. As they describe in an article published electronically ahead of print by the journal Tissue Engineering Part A, they seeded mouse embryonic stem cells into "acellular" rat lungs - organs whose original cells had been destroyed by repeated cycles of freezing and thawing and exposure to detergent.
<br />
<br />The result: empty lung-shaped scaffolds of structural proteins on which the mouse stem cells thrived and differentiated into new cells appropriate to their specific locations.
<br />
<br />"In terms of different cell types, the lung is probably the most complex of all organs - the cells near the entrance are very different from those deep in the lung," said Dr. Joaquin Cortiella, one of the article's lead authors. "Our natural matrix generated the same pattern, with tracheal cells only in the trachea, alveoli-like cells in the alveoli, pneumocytes only in the distal lung, and definite transition zones between the bronchi and the alveoli."
<br />
<br />Such "site-specific" cell development has never been seen before in a natural matrix, said professor Joan Nichols, another of the paper's lead authors. The complexity gives the researchers hope that the concept could be scaled up to produce replacement tissues for humans - or used to create models to test therapies and diagnostic techniques for a variety of lung diseases.
<br />
<br />"If we can make a good lung for people, we can also make a good model for injury," Nichols said. "We can create a fibrotic lung, or an emphysematous lung, and evaluate what's happening with those, what the cells are doing, how well stem cell or other therapy works. We can see what happens in pneumonia, or what happens when you've got a hemorrhagic fever, or tuberculosis, or hantavirus - all the agents that target the lung and cause damage in the lung."
<br />
<br />The researchers have already begun work on large-scale experiments, "decellularizing" pig lungs with an eye toward using them to produce larger samples of lung tissue that could lead to applications in humans. They're also taking on the challenge of vascularization - stimulating the growth of blood vessels that will enable the engineered tissues to survive outside the special bioreactors that the researchers now use to keep them alive by bathing them in a life-sustaining cocktail of nutrients and oxygen.
<br />
<br />"People ask us why we're doing the lung, because it's so hard," Cortiella said. "But the potential is so great, and the technology is here. It's going to take time, but I think we're going to create a system that works."
<br />
<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/06/24/scientists.grow.new.lungs.using.skeletons.old.ones">http://esciencenews.com/articl...ing.skeletons.old.ones</a>
 

bkc3

New member
Here is another article about similar developments
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/25/science/la-sci-lungs-20100625">http://articles.latimes.com/20.../la-sci-lungs-20100625</a>
 

bkc3

New member
Here is another article about similar developments
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/25/science/la-sci-lungs-20100625">http://articles.latimes.com/20.../la-sci-lungs-20100625</a>
 

bkc3

New member
Here is another article about similar developments
<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/25/science/la-sci-lungs-20100625">http://articles.latimes.com/20.../la-sci-lungs-20100625</a>
 

static

New member
I'm a little confused: would this fit better in the transplant catagory or repairing your own lungs that are already damaged as progression continues?

Personally I would rather keep my own lungs for as long as I can (and transplants are rare enough as it is). I would like to see some development on the latter portion although both would be great.
 

static

New member
I'm a little confused: would this fit better in the transplant catagory or repairing your own lungs that are already damaged as progression continues?

Personally I would rather keep my own lungs for as long as I can (and transplants are rare enough as it is). I would like to see some development on the latter portion although both would be great.
 

static

New member
I'm a little confused: would this fit better in the transplant catagory or repairing your own lungs that are already damaged as progression continues?
<br />
<br />Personally I would rather keep my own lungs for as long as I can (and transplants are rare enough as it is). I would like to see some development on the latter portion although both would be great.
 

bkc3

New member
I'm not sure what section it would do better in. I Just thought it was interesting that the development is as far along as it is. I thought the key in the first section was:

"If we can make a good lung for people, we can also make a good model for injury," Nichols said. "We can create a fibrotic lung, or an emphysematous lung, and evaluate what's happening with those, what the cells are doing, how well stem cell or other therapy works. We can see what happens in pneumonia, or what happens when you've got a hemorrhagic fever, or tuberculosis, or hantavirus - all the agents that target the lung and cause damage in the lung."

Imagine a time where some clinical testing could be done without putting patients at risk, or waiting for enrollment to finish.
From a transplant perspective I would love to never see another person pass while on a waiting list. Or be given a barely functioning lung because that's whats available. I hope one day all CF patients can keep their lungs and that therapies are developed to allow that to happen.

I don't think the applications are all stated, the things that are learned through developing this technology may yield benefits that they have not thought of yet.
 

bkc3

New member
I'm not sure what section it would do better in. I Just thought it was interesting that the development is as far along as it is. I thought the key in the first section was:

"If we can make a good lung for people, we can also make a good model for injury," Nichols said. "We can create a fibrotic lung, or an emphysematous lung, and evaluate what's happening with those, what the cells are doing, how well stem cell or other therapy works. We can see what happens in pneumonia, or what happens when you've got a hemorrhagic fever, or tuberculosis, or hantavirus - all the agents that target the lung and cause damage in the lung."

Imagine a time where some clinical testing could be done without putting patients at risk, or waiting for enrollment to finish.
From a transplant perspective I would love to never see another person pass while on a waiting list. Or be given a barely functioning lung because that's whats available. I hope one day all CF patients can keep their lungs and that therapies are developed to allow that to happen.

I don't think the applications are all stated, the things that are learned through developing this technology may yield benefits that they have not thought of yet.
 

bkc3

New member
I'm not sure what section it would do better in. I Just thought it was interesting that the development is as far along as it is. I thought the key in the first section was:
<br />
<br />"If we can make a good lung for people, we can also make a good model for injury," Nichols said. "We can create a fibrotic lung, or an emphysematous lung, and evaluate what's happening with those, what the cells are doing, how well stem cell or other therapy works. We can see what happens in pneumonia, or what happens when you've got a hemorrhagic fever, or tuberculosis, or hantavirus - all the agents that target the lung and cause damage in the lung."
<br />
<br />Imagine a time where some clinical testing could be done without putting patients at risk, or waiting for enrollment to finish.
<br />From a transplant perspective I would love to never see another person pass while on a waiting list. Or be given a barely functioning lung because that's whats available. I hope one day all CF patients can keep their lungs and that therapies are developed to allow that to happen.
<br />
<br />I don't think the applications are all stated, the things that are learned through developing this technology may yield benefits that they have not thought of yet.
 

PatrickM

New member
This is very interesting. I totally agree that all we can learn through research may lead to treatments we haven't even thought of. Thank you for posting, and as an aside I don't usually read the transplant section so I am happy it was posted here.
 

PatrickM

New member
This is very interesting. I totally agree that all we can learn through research may lead to treatments we haven't even thought of. Thank you for posting, and as an aside I don't usually read the transplant section so I am happy it was posted here.
 

PatrickM

New member
This is very interesting. I totally agree that all we can learn through research may lead to treatments we haven't even thought of. Thank you for posting, and as an aside I don't usually read the transplant section so I am happy it was posted here.
 

peter

New member
Really interesting article. I also read the LA Times one. The end of that article has a stem cell link to Germany where people can go for stem cell therapy. "3,000" to date. Not likely USA FDA would be that far along in the context of the article.
I think you posted it well but could also be a transplant post. I'm with PatrickM on this one. I might have missed it there.

Thanks for posting.
 

peter

New member
Really interesting article. I also read the LA Times one. The end of that article has a stem cell link to Germany where people can go for stem cell therapy. "3,000" to date. Not likely USA FDA would be that far along in the context of the article.
I think you posted it well but could also be a transplant post. I'm with PatrickM on this one. I might have missed it there.

Thanks for posting.
 

peter

New member
Really interesting article. I also read the LA Times one. The end of that article has a stem cell link to Germany where people can go for stem cell therapy. "3,000" to date. Not likely USA FDA would be that far along in the context of the article.
<br />I think you posted it well but could also be a transplant post. I'm with PatrickM on this one. I might have missed it there.
<br />
<br />Thanks for posting.
 
Top