I strongly disagree with the wording in the article that Lauren posted, where they say sweat test under 40 is "highly unlikely." The most I would say is somewhat less likely but even that I couldn't confidently say, when a person is also showing symptoms of CF.
<b>The truth is MANY people who have CF, have sweat test numbers in the 20's and 30's. </b>
My daughter has been testing out at 38 since she was 5 years old, we now know she has two CF mutations because of genetic testing. My son test out at 41 and also has both mutations. There are many other people on this site who test out even lower than my kids - if you want to hear from them try searching the subject or better yet start a new post in the adult section and the family section asking people to respond if they have sweat test numbers under 40.
My daughter was clearly misdiagnosed and we were mislead for 8 years because the doctors relied on sweat test numbers only. <b>It is especially important that you continue to pursue possible CF diagnosis or treatment because you have some CF symptoms</b> and in my opinion a very near positive sweat test number. The number 40 is just not that perfect of a cut off.
Don't be fooled just because you do not have digestive issues, a small percentage (I think 20%, but I could be wrong) of people with CF are pancreatic sufficient, so it is just not part of the disease for them.
Best wishes, and please continue to post and give us updates
edited to add: Well, on second thought, I guess using the words "highly unlikely" is actually better than "negative" so the wording they use is better than the standard "negative" "borderline" "positive" but the point I am making is the number scale cannot be used as absolutes - there are many cases of people having sweat test numbers well below 40.
<b>The truth is MANY people who have CF, have sweat test numbers in the 20's and 30's. </b>
My daughter has been testing out at 38 since she was 5 years old, we now know she has two CF mutations because of genetic testing. My son test out at 41 and also has both mutations. There are many other people on this site who test out even lower than my kids - if you want to hear from them try searching the subject or better yet start a new post in the adult section and the family section asking people to respond if they have sweat test numbers under 40.
My daughter was clearly misdiagnosed and we were mislead for 8 years because the doctors relied on sweat test numbers only. <b>It is especially important that you continue to pursue possible CF diagnosis or treatment because you have some CF symptoms</b> and in my opinion a very near positive sweat test number. The number 40 is just not that perfect of a cut off.
Don't be fooled just because you do not have digestive issues, a small percentage (I think 20%, but I could be wrong) of people with CF are pancreatic sufficient, so it is just not part of the disease for them.
Best wishes, and please continue to post and give us updates
edited to add: Well, on second thought, I guess using the words "highly unlikely" is actually better than "negative" so the wording they use is better than the standard "negative" "borderline" "positive" but the point I am making is the number scale cannot be used as absolutes - there are many cases of people having sweat test numbers well below 40.