NEW YORK STATE CHANGES MANDATES OF SWINE FLU VACCINE

J

JazzysMom

New member
The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a>
 
J

JazzysMom

New member
The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a>
 
J

JazzysMom

New member
The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a>
 
J

JazzysMom

New member
The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a>
 
J

JazzysMom

New member
The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....
<br />
<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a>
 
H

hmw

New member
Hmmmmmph. I'm glad they changed the ruling, but it was definitely for the WRONG REASON. It is ridiculous to force a vaccine on people as a condition to keeping their jobs...

(I personally think penalties when they catch healthcare workers being unsanitary would be a much more effective way of reducing transmission of the flu and other infections.)
 
H

hmw

New member
Hmmmmmph. I'm glad they changed the ruling, but it was definitely for the WRONG REASON. It is ridiculous to force a vaccine on people as a condition to keeping their jobs...

(I personally think penalties when they catch healthcare workers being unsanitary would be a much more effective way of reducing transmission of the flu and other infections.)
 
H

hmw

New member
Hmmmmmph. I'm glad they changed the ruling, but it was definitely for the WRONG REASON. It is ridiculous to force a vaccine on people as a condition to keeping their jobs...

(I personally think penalties when they catch healthcare workers being unsanitary would be a much more effective way of reducing transmission of the flu and other infections.)
 
H

hmw

New member
Hmmmmmph. I'm glad they changed the ruling, but it was definitely for the WRONG REASON. It is ridiculous to force a vaccine on people as a condition to keeping their jobs...

(I personally think penalties when they catch healthcare workers being unsanitary would be a much more effective way of reducing transmission of the flu and other infections.)
 
H

hmw

New member
Hmmmmmph. I'm glad they changed the ruling, but it was definitely for the WRONG REASON. It is ridiculous to force a vaccine on people as a condition to keeping their jobs...
<br />
<br />(I personally think penalties when they catch healthcare workers being unsanitary would be a much more effective way of reducing transmission of the flu and other infections.)
 
L

Landy

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>JazzysMom</b></i>

The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a></end quote></div>

You mean there is "not" enough, right <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">

It's weird that we're not in the top high risk category, huh??

I like hmw's idea of penalizing for unsanitation.

edited to add: by "we", I mean CFs of Mels & my age group<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-blush.gif" border="0">
 
L

Landy

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>JazzysMom</b></i>

The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a></end quote></div>

You mean there is "not" enough, right <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">

It's weird that we're not in the top high risk category, huh??

I like hmw's idea of penalizing for unsanitation.

edited to add: by "we", I mean CFs of Mels & my age group<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-blush.gif" border="0">
 
L

Landy

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>JazzysMom</b></i>

The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a></end quote></div>

You mean there is "not" enough, right <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">

It's weird that we're not in the top high risk category, huh??

I like hmw's idea of penalizing for unsanitation.

edited to add: by "we", I mean CFs of Mels & my age group<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-blush.gif" border="0">
 
L

Landy

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>JazzysMom</b></i>

The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a></end quote>

You mean there is "not" enough, right <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">

It's weird that we're not in the top high risk category, huh??

I like hmw's idea of penalizing for unsanitation.

edited to add: by "we", I mean CFs of Mels & my age group<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-blush.gif" border="0">
 
L

Landy

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>JazzysMom</b></i>
<br />
<br />The way I am reading this article is that the ONLY reason for it is that there is enough vaccines to cover the medical profession AND the high risk patients.....
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091023/NEWS90/910239986/-1/NEWS">http://www.recordonline.com/ap...WS90/910239986/-1/NEWS</a></end quote>
<br />
<br />You mean there is "not" enough, right <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">
<br />
<br />It's weird that we're not in the top high risk category, huh??
<br />
<br />I like hmw's idea of penalizing for unsanitation.
<br />
<br />edited to add: by "we", I mean CFs of Mels & my age group<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-blush.gif" border="0">
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top