I am a bit confused - yesterday I went to the allergist and they had my do PFTs and use a peak flow meter. I'm not very experienced using peak flow meters, so I don't know a lot about them. <br><br>My PFTs were good - FEV1 115%. However, my peak flow was not so good - according to the nurse, my peak flow should have been around 488 (for my age and height), and I could not get that thing above 400 for the life of me. Can anyone explain to me why this might be?<br>
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Peak Flow vs PFTs
- Thread starter Kristen
- Start date
I am a bit confused - yesterday I went to the allergist and they had my do PFTs and use a peak flow meter. I'm not very experienced using peak flow meters, so I don't know a lot about them. <br><br>My PFTs were good - FEV1 115%. However, my peak flow was not so good - according to the nurse, my peak flow should have been around 488 (for my age and height), and I could not get that thing above 400 for the life of me. Can anyone explain to me why this might be?<br>
I am a bit confused - yesterday I went to the allergist and they had my do PFTs and use a peak flow meter. I'm not very experienced using peak flow meters, so I don't know a lot about them. <br><br>My PFTs were good - FEV1 115%. However, my peak flow was not so good - according to the nurse, my peak flow should have been around 488 (for my age and height), and I could not get that thing above 400 for the life of me. Can anyone explain to me why this might be?<br>
Whereas peak flow and FEV1 are very similar, PFTs give you more information, FEV 25/75 for example. The difference may be from calibration of the machine, the calculation method used, or the scale used to measure what should be normal. I would give your clinic a call and ask how many L/min your FEV1 was and compare that to what you had on the peak flow at your allergist. If the numbers are similar, then you know. I would also stress to anybody that it's more important to look at the actual numbers rather than the % predicted on a PFT report.<br>
Whereas peak flow and FEV1 are very similar, PFTs give you more information, FEV 25/75 for example. The difference may be from calibration of the machine, the calculation method used, or the scale used to measure what should be normal. I would give your clinic a call and ask how many L/min your FEV1 was and compare that to what you had on the peak flow at your allergist. If the numbers are similar, then you know. I would also stress to anybody that it's more important to look at the actual numbers rather than the % predicted on a PFT report.<br>
Whereas peak flow and FEV1 are very similar, PFTs give you more information, FEV 25/75 for example. The difference may be from calibration of the machine, the calculation method used, or the scale used to measure what should be normal. I would give your clinic a call and ask how many L/min your FEV1 was and compare that to what you had on the peak flow at your allergist. If the numbers are similar, then you know. I would also stress to anybody that it's more important to look at the actual numbers rather than the % predicted on a PFT report.<br>
B
BreathinSteven
Guest
I agree with Havoc -- he generally seems to have well thought-out guidance and has a broad knowledge base...
My experience with peak-flow meters is that they are an inexpensive tool for measuring lung function -- they're generally plastic things and I found them rather easy to "game" -- with certain techniques, I could make them read much higher than they should have -- though that can probably be said for many devices... They might be a good guide if you use them consistently, but since I found them so easy to manipulate, I've never placed a lot of faith in them...
Also -- a full-blown Pulmonary Function Test in the PFT lab in a hospital or office can have substantially different readings than taking a PFT at home, or at your doctor's office... The smaller, portable units are often good for providing more information, as Havoc mentioned -- but they are more appropriate for showing trends than they are for accurate measurements... And, so many factors can come into play when you're using either a spirometer or a peak-flow meter... Beyond height and age, weight can quickly become an issue if you're overweight (not a problem for too many of us CFers -- but it can be -- and gaining some belly-fat can have a strong impact on my spirometry readings...)
Love, STeve
My experience with peak-flow meters is that they are an inexpensive tool for measuring lung function -- they're generally plastic things and I found them rather easy to "game" -- with certain techniques, I could make them read much higher than they should have -- though that can probably be said for many devices... They might be a good guide if you use them consistently, but since I found them so easy to manipulate, I've never placed a lot of faith in them...
Also -- a full-blown Pulmonary Function Test in the PFT lab in a hospital or office can have substantially different readings than taking a PFT at home, or at your doctor's office... The smaller, portable units are often good for providing more information, as Havoc mentioned -- but they are more appropriate for showing trends than they are for accurate measurements... And, so many factors can come into play when you're using either a spirometer or a peak-flow meter... Beyond height and age, weight can quickly become an issue if you're overweight (not a problem for too many of us CFers -- but it can be -- and gaining some belly-fat can have a strong impact on my spirometry readings...)
Love, STeve
B
BreathinSteven
Guest
I agree with Havoc -- he generally seems to have well thought-out guidance and has a broad knowledge base...
My experience with peak-flow meters is that they are an inexpensive tool for measuring lung function -- they're generally plastic things and I found them rather easy to "game" -- with certain techniques, I could make them read much higher than they should have -- though that can probably be said for many devices... They might be a good guide if you use them consistently, but since I found them so easy to manipulate, I've never placed a lot of faith in them...
Also -- a full-blown Pulmonary Function Test in the PFT lab in a hospital or office can have substantially different readings than taking a PFT at home, or at your doctor's office... The smaller, portable units are often good for providing more information, as Havoc mentioned -- but they are more appropriate for showing trends than they are for accurate measurements... And, so many factors can come into play when you're using either a spirometer or a peak-flow meter... Beyond height and age, weight can quickly become an issue if you're overweight (not a problem for too many of us CFers -- but it can be -- and gaining some belly-fat can have a strong impact on my spirometry readings...)
Love, STeve
My experience with peak-flow meters is that they are an inexpensive tool for measuring lung function -- they're generally plastic things and I found them rather easy to "game" -- with certain techniques, I could make them read much higher than they should have -- though that can probably be said for many devices... They might be a good guide if you use them consistently, but since I found them so easy to manipulate, I've never placed a lot of faith in them...
Also -- a full-blown Pulmonary Function Test in the PFT lab in a hospital or office can have substantially different readings than taking a PFT at home, or at your doctor's office... The smaller, portable units are often good for providing more information, as Havoc mentioned -- but they are more appropriate for showing trends than they are for accurate measurements... And, so many factors can come into play when you're using either a spirometer or a peak-flow meter... Beyond height and age, weight can quickly become an issue if you're overweight (not a problem for too many of us CFers -- but it can be -- and gaining some belly-fat can have a strong impact on my spirometry readings...)
Love, STeve
B
BreathinSteven
Guest
I agree with Havoc -- he generally seems to have well thought-out guidance and has a broad knowledge base...
My experience with peak-flow meters is that they are an inexpensive tool for measuring lung function -- they're generally plastic things and I found them rather easy to "game" -- with certain techniques, I could make them read much higher than they should have -- though that can probably be said for many devices... They might be a good guide if you use them consistently, but since I found them so easy to manipulate, I've never placed a lot of faith in them...
Also -- a full-blown Pulmonary Function Test in the PFT lab in a hospital or office can have substantially different readings than taking a PFT at home, or at your doctor's office... The smaller, portable units are often good for providing more information, as Havoc mentioned -- but they are more appropriate for showing trends than they are for accurate measurements... And, so many factors can come into play when you're using either a spirometer or a peak-flow meter... Beyond height and age, weight can quickly become an issue if you're overweight (not a problem for too many of us CFers -- but it can be -- and gaining some belly-fat can have a strong impact on my spirometry readings...)
Love, STeve
My experience with peak-flow meters is that they are an inexpensive tool for measuring lung function -- they're generally plastic things and I found them rather easy to "game" -- with certain techniques, I could make them read much higher than they should have -- though that can probably be said for many devices... They might be a good guide if you use them consistently, but since I found them so easy to manipulate, I've never placed a lot of faith in them...
Also -- a full-blown Pulmonary Function Test in the PFT lab in a hospital or office can have substantially different readings than taking a PFT at home, or at your doctor's office... The smaller, portable units are often good for providing more information, as Havoc mentioned -- but they are more appropriate for showing trends than they are for accurate measurements... And, so many factors can come into play when you're using either a spirometer or a peak-flow meter... Beyond height and age, weight can quickly become an issue if you're overweight (not a problem for too many of us CFers -- but it can be -- and gaining some belly-fat can have a strong impact on my spirometry readings...)
Love, STeve
tesorotiffa
New member
I'm not sure, but my FEV1 is around 66% and my Peak Flow reading hovers between 450-480. I don't really know what the correlation is!
tesorotiffa
New member
I'm not sure, but my FEV1 is around 66% and my Peak Flow reading hovers between 450-480. I don't really know what the correlation is!
tesorotiffa
New member
I'm not sure, but my FEV1 is around 66% and my Peak Flow reading hovers between 450-480. I don't really know what the correlation is!
Thanks for the responses. I am definitely going to ask my CF doctor about it at my next clinic visit.
I found a spirometery print-out from about two years ago, and it says my FEV1 was 110%, but my FEF 25% was only 87% predicted (about 300 L/sec compared to the 400 L/sec I blow in the peak flow meter). Then my FEF goes up (in terms of % predicted) - FEF 50% was 91%, and FEF 75% was 138%. I'm not quite sure how this correlates to my FEV1 and Peak Flow, but it seems like I might have something going on when I first blow out.
I found a spirometery print-out from about two years ago, and it says my FEV1 was 110%, but my FEF 25% was only 87% predicted (about 300 L/sec compared to the 400 L/sec I blow in the peak flow meter). Then my FEF goes up (in terms of % predicted) - FEF 50% was 91%, and FEF 75% was 138%. I'm not quite sure how this correlates to my FEV1 and Peak Flow, but it seems like I might have something going on when I first blow out.
Thanks for the responses. I am definitely going to ask my CF doctor about it at my next clinic visit.
I found a spirometery print-out from about two years ago, and it says my FEV1 was 110%, but my FEF 25% was only 87% predicted (about 300 L/sec compared to the 400 L/sec I blow in the peak flow meter). Then my FEF goes up (in terms of % predicted) - FEF 50% was 91%, and FEF 75% was 138%. I'm not quite sure how this correlates to my FEV1 and Peak Flow, but it seems like I might have something going on when I first blow out.
I found a spirometery print-out from about two years ago, and it says my FEV1 was 110%, but my FEF 25% was only 87% predicted (about 300 L/sec compared to the 400 L/sec I blow in the peak flow meter). Then my FEF goes up (in terms of % predicted) - FEF 50% was 91%, and FEF 75% was 138%. I'm not quite sure how this correlates to my FEV1 and Peak Flow, but it seems like I might have something going on when I first blow out.
Thanks for the responses. I am definitely going to ask my CF doctor about it at my next clinic visit.
I found a spirometery print-out from about two years ago, and it says my FEV1 was 110%, but my FEF 25% was only 87% predicted (about 300 L/sec compared to the 400 L/sec I blow in the peak flow meter). Then my FEF goes up (in terms of % predicted) - FEF 50% was 91%, and FEF 75% was 138%. I'm not quite sure how this correlates to my FEV1 and Peak Flow, but it seems like I might have something going on when I first blow out.
I found a spirometery print-out from about two years ago, and it says my FEV1 was 110%, but my FEF 25% was only 87% predicted (about 300 L/sec compared to the 400 L/sec I blow in the peak flow meter). Then my FEF goes up (in terms of % predicted) - FEF 50% was 91%, and FEF 75% was 138%. I'm not quite sure how this correlates to my FEV1 and Peak Flow, but it seems like I might have something going on when I first blow out.