seandavis

Faust

New member
<blockquote>Quote<br><hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>65rosessamurai</b></i><br>Odd!! I could pronounce "Shawn-a" as soon as I saw your name, Seana!! (Must be an Irish related thing!)



Sean, with your degree in criminal justice, and background which suggests becoming a police officer, doesn't your CF cause a problem with becoming one, or can a CF'r pass the physical tests without disclosing their CF? Why I ask is because next to military, I was contemplating on becoming an enforcement officer when I was 18, but was discouraged due to the physical qualifications. (Just curious)



Regards!<hr></blockquote>


I passed all their tests with flying colors, especially the physical assessment course/test, which is pretty rough on people. When I ran the course, out of maybe 20 or 30 people who ran it, maybe 6 failed to complete it, or failed due to taking way too long (and many of those who failed looked to be in great shape, including muscle building jocks). It starts out where you are seated in the vehicle and they start the time. You have to start with your hands at like 3 o'clock and noon, and when they start the clock you have to put the car in park, remove your seatbelt, and leave the vehicle in a particular way, run around to the trunk, open the trunk, retrieve imaginary cuffs, close the trunk, and then start the physical part of the course. You have to sprint a very long distance (cant recall how far, can't recall the #'s, but it is a VERY long sprint), go around a parking cone, and then sprint back to where you started. Then you have to traverse an annoying course consisting of hurdles, a side stepping rope course, and then belly crawl quite a ways and then run some more to go and touch the wall, and then turn around and go back through the course the same exact way, the way you came (exactly the same, so you gotta do the whole course over again, including both long runs). Then when you get back to the car (if you havent already run out of time or fallen over due to exhaustion/not being able to breath) you have to run to the trunk, open the trunk, take the imaginary handcuffs off the back of your belt, put the imaginary handcuffs back into the trunk, shut the trunk, return to the drivers seat of the vehicle, put your seatbelt back on, take the car out of park, and then return your hands to 3 o'clock and 12 noon. THEN that is the end of your course test.


The statewide limit on it back then was like 6 minutes and 10 seconds maybe (been a while but I know it was atleast 6 mins). I finished the course @ like 4 mins and 20 seconds. I could have finished faster, but i ran the course with a stopwatch timed to the instructors start of the course, and when i came back to the final second part of the second run part, I saw I had a TON of time left, so I said screw it and briskly walked the last part to the car. Noone was going to reward me with sex or a cookie for finishing faster, so I didn't care.

Before you even are allowed to take the test you have to do a ton of civil servant testing, and a brief physical assessment before the course (consisting of a few questions/form to fill out, and blood pressure/heart rate checks...two people failed just to those checks). Before that there is the initial interview, and then quite a few civil servant county tests you have to pass, like math, reading comprehension and other cognitive ability tests (for the most part, idiot tests). The real big one that is a pain though, just due to it's sheer amount of questions and reading is the huge detention deputy test you take at your local jail (here anyway). You get something like 3 hours to take a test that has something like 800 (just an educated guess, I can't remember exactly, but it was gigantic) questions.

I've always been a pretty bright guy, and good at test taking, so I thought nothing of it and figured to get done with tons of time to spare. Overconfident was I. The test (due to you probably working in the jails to start out cause you are a noob) consists primarily of reading gigantic multi page prisoner sheet information, and trying to figure out who can't do work with who and who has certain personalities and history with others who shouldn't be cell mates and all that crap. One question can take you a long time to read the question, read the ton of information following the question, and then take a ton of time to cross reference the data to the particular question. That was the most annoying part. Aside from that massive time sink part, the other parts are about military time recognition, and some other questions pertanent to what your job would be.

Then after that you have to go to a local college (or wherever it's offered for you) and the county pays for you to take an audio/visual test, that asks you questions, and flashes crap on the screen and you have to respond within a quick time and be accurate with your answers. The whole jist of the test is to test your perception and common sense judgement calls regarding prisoners trying to "pull one over on you".

Then after that (might have the order out of whack, but it's all needed regardless) you have another interview, and atleast one lie detector test to take. The interview with the polygraph conductor before the test is enough to make you change ambient traces of carbon on your winky into diamonds. Then the test goes on, and you can either be 100% honest (depending on how bad of a s*ithead you have been in real life), or use certain techniques to trick the polygraph machine. I didn't have much to fear, the majority of my misdeeds (pretty much all of them) were vandalism/destruction of private property type of offenses, so I didn't concern myself with the techniques to fool the polygraph.


I performed and passed with flying colors, everything they threw at me. I didn't get any of the positions I applied for, even though I was WAY beyond qualified (theres some real crappy detention deputies and even worse community services officer which I also applied for) with a degree in criminal justice where I graduated with high honors (cum laude), had a very successful collegiate internship program with the sheriff's dept, and several glowing letters of recommendation from a very well known officer (now detective), and a successful lawyer I have known for a very long time (for character affirmation), and never having done anything beyond petty juvenile things, I didn't get crap and I became very depressed afterwards. I was also treated by my background investigator like I was always lieing, because he didn't believe how an almost 34 year old strapping guy never had a job before. That's what I told him at the original application turnin/interview, because I hadn't had a "regular job" before, only 3 or 4 jobs that were mostly restaurant work and "under the table". I told him it wasn't me attempting to be deceptive, I was just basing it on a "real job" as in I never turned in a W-2 form before.
 

Faust

New member
<blockquote>Quote<br><hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>65rosessamurai</b></i><br>Odd!! I could pronounce "Shawn-a" as soon as I saw your name, Seana!! (Must be an Irish related thing!)



Sean, with your degree in criminal justice, and background which suggests becoming a police officer, doesn't your CF cause a problem with becoming one, or can a CF'r pass the physical tests without disclosing their CF? Why I ask is because next to military, I was contemplating on becoming an enforcement officer when I was 18, but was discouraged due to the physical qualifications. (Just curious)



Regards!<hr></blockquote>


I passed all their tests with flying colors, especially the physical assessment course/test, which is pretty rough on people. When I ran the course, out of maybe 20 or 30 people who ran it, maybe 6 failed to complete it, or failed due to taking way too long (and many of those who failed looked to be in great shape, including muscle building jocks). It starts out where you are seated in the vehicle and they start the time. You have to start with your hands at like 3 o'clock and noon, and when they start the clock you have to put the car in park, remove your seatbelt, and leave the vehicle in a particular way, run around to the trunk, open the trunk, retrieve imaginary cuffs, close the trunk, and then start the physical part of the course. You have to sprint a very long distance (cant recall how far, can't recall the #'s, but it is a VERY long sprint), go around a parking cone, and then sprint back to where you started. Then you have to traverse an annoying course consisting of hurdles, a side stepping rope course, and then belly crawl quite a ways and then run some more to go and touch the wall, and then turn around and go back through the course the same exact way, the way you came (exactly the same, so you gotta do the whole course over again, including both long runs). Then when you get back to the car (if you havent already run out of time or fallen over due to exhaustion/not being able to breath) you have to run to the trunk, open the trunk, take the imaginary handcuffs off the back of your belt, put the imaginary handcuffs back into the trunk, shut the trunk, return to the drivers seat of the vehicle, put your seatbelt back on, take the car out of park, and then return your hands to 3 o'clock and 12 noon. THEN that is the end of your course test.


The statewide limit on it back then was like 6 minutes and 10 seconds maybe (been a while but I know it was atleast 6 mins). I finished the course @ like 4 mins and 20 seconds. I could have finished faster, but i ran the course with a stopwatch timed to the instructors start of the course, and when i came back to the final second part of the second run part, I saw I had a TON of time left, so I said screw it and briskly walked the last part to the car. Noone was going to reward me with sex or a cookie for finishing faster, so I didn't care.

Before you even are allowed to take the test you have to do a ton of civil servant testing, and a brief physical assessment before the course (consisting of a few questions/form to fill out, and blood pressure/heart rate checks...two people failed just to those checks). Before that there is the initial interview, and then quite a few civil servant county tests you have to pass, like math, reading comprehension and other cognitive ability tests (for the most part, idiot tests). The real big one that is a pain though, just due to it's sheer amount of questions and reading is the huge detention deputy test you take at your local jail (here anyway). You get something like 3 hours to take a test that has something like 800 (just an educated guess, I can't remember exactly, but it was gigantic) questions.

I've always been a pretty bright guy, and good at test taking, so I thought nothing of it and figured to get done with tons of time to spare. Overconfident was I. The test (due to you probably working in the jails to start out cause you are a noob) consists primarily of reading gigantic multi page prisoner sheet information, and trying to figure out who can't do work with who and who has certain personalities and history with others who shouldn't be cell mates and all that crap. One question can take you a long time to read the question, read the ton of information following the question, and then take a ton of time to cross reference the data to the particular question. That was the most annoying part. Aside from that massive time sink part, the other parts are about military time recognition, and some other questions pertanent to what your job would be.

Then after that you have to go to a local college (or wherever it's offered for you) and the county pays for you to take an audio/visual test, that asks you questions, and flashes crap on the screen and you have to respond within a quick time and be accurate with your answers. The whole jist of the test is to test your perception and common sense judgement calls regarding prisoners trying to "pull one over on you".

Then after that (might have the order out of whack, but it's all needed regardless) you have another interview, and atleast one lie detector test to take. The interview with the polygraph conductor before the test is enough to make you change ambient traces of carbon on your winky into diamonds. Then the test goes on, and you can either be 100% honest (depending on how bad of a s*ithead you have been in real life), or use certain techniques to trick the polygraph machine. I didn't have much to fear, the majority of my misdeeds (pretty much all of them) were vandalism/destruction of private property type of offenses, so I didn't concern myself with the techniques to fool the polygraph.


I performed and passed with flying colors, everything they threw at me. I didn't get any of the positions I applied for, even though I was WAY beyond qualified (theres some real crappy detention deputies and even worse community services officer which I also applied for) with a degree in criminal justice where I graduated with high honors (cum laude), had a very successful collegiate internship program with the sheriff's dept, and several glowing letters of recommendation from a very well known officer (now detective), and a successful lawyer I have known for a very long time (for character affirmation), and never having done anything beyond petty juvenile things, I didn't get crap and I became very depressed afterwards. I was also treated by my background investigator like I was always lieing, because he didn't believe how an almost 34 year old strapping guy never had a job before. That's what I told him at the original application turnin/interview, because I hadn't had a "regular job" before, only 3 or 4 jobs that were mostly restaurant work and "under the table". I told him it wasn't me attempting to be deceptive, I was just basing it on a "real job" as in I never turned in a W-2 form before.
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Well, Sean, that reply definitely indicates that a CF'r who's physically aptable (real word?) can take the test...next curious question...does this mean you are still pursuing some sort of job which your background qualifies you for, or something similar to it in the criminal justice field?? BTW, do you also have firearms as one of your hobbies (or, as a kid might ask, "how many 'guns' do you have?), or do you have a concealed firearms permit, but no firearms (some people will acutally put out the money for a license and have no intention to carry a concealed firearm)
(Still curious..cause this may lead up to a potential common interest...again, your reply would be appreciated) <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Well, Sean, that reply definitely indicates that a CF'r who's physically aptable (real word?) can take the test...next curious question...does this mean you are still pursuing some sort of job which your background qualifies you for, or something similar to it in the criminal justice field?? BTW, do you also have firearms as one of your hobbies (or, as a kid might ask, "how many 'guns' do you have?), or do you have a concealed firearms permit, but no firearms (some people will acutally put out the money for a license and have no intention to carry a concealed firearm)
(Still curious..cause this may lead up to a potential common interest...again, your reply would be appreciated) <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">
 

Faust

New member
<blockquote>Quote<br><hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>65rosessamurai</b></i><br>Well, Sean, that reply definitely indicates that a CF'r who's physically aptable (real word?) can take the test...next curious question...does this mean you are still pursuing some sort of job which your background qualifies you for, or something similar to it in the criminal justice field?? BTW, do you also have firearms as one of your hobbies (or, as a kid might ask, "how many 'guns' do you have?), or do you have a concealed firearms permit, but no firearms (some people will acutally put out the money for a license and have no intention to carry a concealed firearm)

(Still curious..cause this may lead up to a potential common interest...)<hr></blockquote>


If you are willing to read through my newly posted thread here asking for serious advice, you will see the situation I am currently in, and need advice to get out of and attain my goals. As for guns, no I'm not a gun freak, but I am into ballistics and think firearms are neat in general. I do have a main weapon, it's a taurus PT 24/7 9mm stainless. Used to go to the range quite often with friends, but haven't gone in a while. I scored high with the 9mm but just barely with the .38 revolver. I usually carry my firearm with me wherever I go accept for a few places barred by law to carry in, or if it's at say a party at someones house I don't know, and think there might be a possibility of then finding out and making it an issue. I currently "carry" in a regular outdoors fanny pack that is pretty concealable, but I plan on getting a professional firearm concealer carry pouch from possibly Bianci (they have some real sweet stuff that's not too expensive).


In Florida now we now have the "stand your ground" and "castle doctrine" laws. Which basically states if you have legitimate fear for your life/well being, with some circumstances applied of course, you are allowed to use deadly force on others. That is why I carry my firearm most anywhere I go. One of the first steps in getting your armed security certification is asking yourself if you would be ok with taking someone elses life if they intended serious harm to you or others near you. While many people will automatically say yes, you really have to give it VERY serious thought, because killing someone can be extremely damaging to the human psyche unless you have given it tons of intraspective thought, and "allowed" your inner self to do so and not be internally destroyed by such a decision. Not fully reaching inside yourself and making sure you are ok with taking someones life who is intending to seriously harm you or others near you, has ruined many a law enforcement officers life/career.
 

Faust

New member
<blockquote>Quote<br><hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>65rosessamurai</b></i><br>Well, Sean, that reply definitely indicates that a CF'r who's physically aptable (real word?) can take the test...next curious question...does this mean you are still pursuing some sort of job which your background qualifies you for, or something similar to it in the criminal justice field?? BTW, do you also have firearms as one of your hobbies (or, as a kid might ask, "how many 'guns' do you have?), or do you have a concealed firearms permit, but no firearms (some people will acutally put out the money for a license and have no intention to carry a concealed firearm)

(Still curious..cause this may lead up to a potential common interest...)<hr></blockquote>


If you are willing to read through my newly posted thread here asking for serious advice, you will see the situation I am currently in, and need advice to get out of and attain my goals. As for guns, no I'm not a gun freak, but I am into ballistics and think firearms are neat in general. I do have a main weapon, it's a taurus PT 24/7 9mm stainless. Used to go to the range quite often with friends, but haven't gone in a while. I scored high with the 9mm but just barely with the .38 revolver. I usually carry my firearm with me wherever I go accept for a few places barred by law to carry in, or if it's at say a party at someones house I don't know, and think there might be a possibility of then finding out and making it an issue. I currently "carry" in a regular outdoors fanny pack that is pretty concealable, but I plan on getting a professional firearm concealer carry pouch from possibly Bianci (they have some real sweet stuff that's not too expensive).


In Florida now we now have the "stand your ground" and "castle doctrine" laws. Which basically states if you have legitimate fear for your life/well being, with some circumstances applied of course, you are allowed to use deadly force on others. That is why I carry my firearm most anywhere I go. One of the first steps in getting your armed security certification is asking yourself if you would be ok with taking someone elses life if they intended serious harm to you or others near you. While many people will automatically say yes, you really have to give it VERY serious thought, because killing someone can be extremely damaging to the human psyche unless you have given it tons of intraspective thought, and "allowed" your inner self to do so and not be internally destroyed by such a decision. Not fully reaching inside yourself and making sure you are ok with taking someones life who is intending to seriously harm you or others near you, has ruined many a law enforcement officers life/career.
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Ok, I looked through, and even added some ideas for your other post.
As for me, I had fired BB guns from my childhood, into my late 20's. It started when I was going to CF camp, and found what a challenge it was to hit the target (My second year, I actually hit the outer ring!!)
Because I was also a "struggling professional" during my college years, I never had the money for anything more than BB guns, though wanted a "real firearm", even after I realized that 28 was WAY past the legal age for owning a firearm.
I didn't get back into the firearms til May of 2004, when I could go to the range with my brother-in-law (BIL), an Army Retired Seargent (also a male nurse). Basically, after the "rush" I got from the firearms, I wanted to get back into it, but it wasn't until last Sept., when I went with my (new) wife to the range (my BIL is also certified to teach firearm use, and taught her how to fire a .357 Mag, and his Beretta .45).
As you may know, firearms in Japan are illegal, and the best I could do was the "soft air-rifles", which my BIL and I agreed, was better than nothing.
Now, one thing I don't think is a good idea, are the "war games" they play here in Japan, where they shoot at each other...already I think it's messing up thier already warped "psyche" way of thinking. Adding the fact that "killing" someone on the "honor" system sounds too dangerous for me. Changes a person's frame of mind to fire a weapon (dangerous or not) at someone and see them laughing about it (which I would guess goes on because it"s all in play!) This comes to mind the days of playing "cops and robbers", or "cowboys and indians", but the fantasy sounds to "immature" for those over 12 or so years, wouldn't you agree?
I agree with you, Sean, abut the consideration for taking a life, and it was the same question my BIL had given me, and I couldn't say that based on the circumstances, whether I'd hesitate or not. However, if I was without weapon, and used my Martial Arts skills (this is a scenario in which they have weapons, but no firearms), and was capable, I would take a life with my bare hands if it were life or death (mostly cause if it was 50/50 I wouldn't make it, I wouldn't go without any fight).
So, anyway, since firearms are illegal here, I'm trying to get some self study into what weapons are what; which ones would I find of interest, the safety of using firearms, and which ones would fit my style, (so to say) for when that big day comes that I'm back in the U.S of A, and looking to legally purchase my first firearm.
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Ok, I looked through, and even added some ideas for your other post.
As for me, I had fired BB guns from my childhood, into my late 20's. It started when I was going to CF camp, and found what a challenge it was to hit the target (My second year, I actually hit the outer ring!!)
Because I was also a "struggling professional" during my college years, I never had the money for anything more than BB guns, though wanted a "real firearm", even after I realized that 28 was WAY past the legal age for owning a firearm.
I didn't get back into the firearms til May of 2004, when I could go to the range with my brother-in-law (BIL), an Army Retired Seargent (also a male nurse). Basically, after the "rush" I got from the firearms, I wanted to get back into it, but it wasn't until last Sept., when I went with my (new) wife to the range (my BIL is also certified to teach firearm use, and taught her how to fire a .357 Mag, and his Beretta .45).
As you may know, firearms in Japan are illegal, and the best I could do was the "soft air-rifles", which my BIL and I agreed, was better than nothing.
Now, one thing I don't think is a good idea, are the "war games" they play here in Japan, where they shoot at each other...already I think it's messing up thier already warped "psyche" way of thinking. Adding the fact that "killing" someone on the "honor" system sounds too dangerous for me. Changes a person's frame of mind to fire a weapon (dangerous or not) at someone and see them laughing about it (which I would guess goes on because it"s all in play!) This comes to mind the days of playing "cops and robbers", or "cowboys and indians", but the fantasy sounds to "immature" for those over 12 or so years, wouldn't you agree?
I agree with you, Sean, abut the consideration for taking a life, and it was the same question my BIL had given me, and I couldn't say that based on the circumstances, whether I'd hesitate or not. However, if I was without weapon, and used my Martial Arts skills (this is a scenario in which they have weapons, but no firearms), and was capable, I would take a life with my bare hands if it were life or death (mostly cause if it was 50/50 I wouldn't make it, I wouldn't go without any fight).
So, anyway, since firearms are illegal here, I'm trying to get some self study into what weapons are what; which ones would I find of interest, the safety of using firearms, and which ones would fit my style, (so to say) for when that big day comes that I'm back in the U.S of A, and looking to legally purchase my first firearm.
 

Faust

New member
<blockquote>Quote<br><hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>65rosessamurai</b></i><br>Ok, I looked through, and even added some ideas for your other post.

As for me, I had fired BB guns from my childhood, into my late 20's. It started when I was going to CF camp, and found what a challenge it was to hit the target (My second year, I actually hit the outer ring!!)

Because I was also a "struggling professional" during my college years, I never had the money for anything more than BB guns, though wanted a "real firearm", even after I realized that 28 was WAY past the legal age for owning a firearm.

I didn't get back into the firearms til May of 2004, when I could go to the range with my brother-in-law (BIL), an Army Retired Seargent (also a male nurse). Basically, after the "rush" I got from the firearms, I wanted to get back into it, but it wasn't until last Sept., when I went with my (new) wife to the range (my BIL is also certified to teach firearm use, and taught her how to fire a .357 Mag, and his Beretta .45).

As you may know, firearms in Japan are illegal, and the best I could do was the "soft air-rifles", which my BIL and I agreed, was better than nothing.

Now, one thing I don't think is a good idea, are the "war games" they play here in Japan, where they shoot at each other...already I think it's messing up thier already warped "psyche" way of thinking. Adding the fact that "killing" someone on the "honor" system sounds too dangerous for me. Changes a person's frame of mind to fire a weapon (dangerous or not) at someone and see them laughing about it (which I would guess goes on because it"s all in play!) This comes to mind the days of playing "cops and robbers", or "cowboys and indians", but the fantasy sounds to "immature" for those over 12 or so years, wouldn't you agree?

I agree with you, Sean, abut the consideration for taking a life, and it was the same question my BIL had given me, and I couldn't say that based on the circumstances, whether I'd hesitate or not. However, if I was without weapon, and used my Martial Arts skills (this is a scenario in which they have weapons, but no firearms), and was capable, I would take a life with my bare hands if it were life or death (mostly cause if it was 50/50 I wouldn't make it, I wouldn't go without any fight).

So, anyway, since firearms are illegal here, I'm trying to get some self study into what weapons are what; which ones would I find of interest, the safety of using firearms, and which ones would fit my style, (so to say) for when that big day comes that I'm back in the U.S of A, and looking to legally purchase my first firearm.<hr></blockquote>


heh it's funny you mention the air soft players...I played on the international amateur/professional paintball circuit for quite a while, started using them around 16 or so, and then went on to recreational play with friends and then onto organized tournament play for prizes and cash winnings. I've played in the Florida State Championships several times, The World Cup 2 or 3 times, and the International Masters atleast once. I haven't played in probably 4 years or so after coming to blows with my ahole team captain/good friend (back then) at the World Cup, and I also quit in large part due to burning out on the highly competitive and costly nature of tournament ball. By the time I got interested in paintball again, my once "wow" high tech uber gun of destruction was now an antique that the guys at the pro shop "hadn't seen in many years". The cost to seriously get back into the sport with the proper gear was extremely high, so I said screw it. I accepted i'd never do it competitively again and called it quits for good. Paintball though isn't how you make it out to be, psyche/kill wise. If anything Paintball teaches you why war is a VERY bad thing, and shows you just how easy it is to get shot in real combat - and how easy you could die. It seriously gives you much more appreciation for people who turn their lives over to their cause in real combat, and especially makes you feel reverance for those who died paying the ultimate price for our liberties (i'm a HUGE crying little girl when it comes to veterans day, etc).

Paintball to those who aren't psycho's, is more about hide and seek + a modern version of "tag" thrown in, to make a very cool game that anyone can play. It's also very strong at building comraderie between parents and their children, couples, and employees. I learned more about human psychology from playing paintball than I ever learned in any of my psychology, philosophy, or sociology classes combined.


As per your inquiry as to what firearm to look into, I personally really like my Taurus 24/7. Here is a review on the gun and it shows pics of it, and if you google up the gun you can find many pics on it: http://www.taurususa.com/newsreviews/CombatHandguns0804.cfm

Also another good gun brand is Glock: http://www.taurususa.com/newsreviews/CombatHandguns0804.cfm

Both of my friends own different glocks, and they are extremely reliable guns. The only thing I can't stand about them is the field stripping lever, it kills my fingers. Where as the taurus 24/7 has a simple lever/pin release that to me is 1000 times better than the Glocks. Only potential downside to the Taurus line of guns is that the Taurus guns typically have a very long trigger pull, which is an added safety precaution (they want you to be SURE you want to pull that trigger, and not have it accidently go off). I personally am a very safe gun owner, so I prefer a shorter crisp trigger pull for tigher groupings at the range. At first I had very wide groupings at the range with my Taurus (down and to the right), which I assumed was due to movement during trigger pull. After paying more attention to my grip and trigger pull, I was able to make it much tighter. Also for the sexiness aspect, Glock looks VERY vanilla. I dont think they make anything but all black guns that show no real personality in the looks dept, while some other good gun manufacturers can make a firearm look so sexy you start to get dirty thoughts <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">
 

Faust

New member
<blockquote>Quote<br><hr><i>Originally posted by: <b>65rosessamurai</b></i><br>Ok, I looked through, and even added some ideas for your other post.

As for me, I had fired BB guns from my childhood, into my late 20's. It started when I was going to CF camp, and found what a challenge it was to hit the target (My second year, I actually hit the outer ring!!)

Because I was also a "struggling professional" during my college years, I never had the money for anything more than BB guns, though wanted a "real firearm", even after I realized that 28 was WAY past the legal age for owning a firearm.

I didn't get back into the firearms til May of 2004, when I could go to the range with my brother-in-law (BIL), an Army Retired Seargent (also a male nurse). Basically, after the "rush" I got from the firearms, I wanted to get back into it, but it wasn't until last Sept., when I went with my (new) wife to the range (my BIL is also certified to teach firearm use, and taught her how to fire a .357 Mag, and his Beretta .45).

As you may know, firearms in Japan are illegal, and the best I could do was the "soft air-rifles", which my BIL and I agreed, was better than nothing.

Now, one thing I don't think is a good idea, are the "war games" they play here in Japan, where they shoot at each other...already I think it's messing up thier already warped "psyche" way of thinking. Adding the fact that "killing" someone on the "honor" system sounds too dangerous for me. Changes a person's frame of mind to fire a weapon (dangerous or not) at someone and see them laughing about it (which I would guess goes on because it"s all in play!) This comes to mind the days of playing "cops and robbers", or "cowboys and indians", but the fantasy sounds to "immature" for those over 12 or so years, wouldn't you agree?

I agree with you, Sean, abut the consideration for taking a life, and it was the same question my BIL had given me, and I couldn't say that based on the circumstances, whether I'd hesitate or not. However, if I was without weapon, and used my Martial Arts skills (this is a scenario in which they have weapons, but no firearms), and was capable, I would take a life with my bare hands if it were life or death (mostly cause if it was 50/50 I wouldn't make it, I wouldn't go without any fight).

So, anyway, since firearms are illegal here, I'm trying to get some self study into what weapons are what; which ones would I find of interest, the safety of using firearms, and which ones would fit my style, (so to say) for when that big day comes that I'm back in the U.S of A, and looking to legally purchase my first firearm.<hr></blockquote>


heh it's funny you mention the air soft players...I played on the international amateur/professional paintball circuit for quite a while, started using them around 16 or so, and then went on to recreational play with friends and then onto organized tournament play for prizes and cash winnings. I've played in the Florida State Championships several times, The World Cup 2 or 3 times, and the International Masters atleast once. I haven't played in probably 4 years or so after coming to blows with my ahole team captain/good friend (back then) at the World Cup, and I also quit in large part due to burning out on the highly competitive and costly nature of tournament ball. By the time I got interested in paintball again, my once "wow" high tech uber gun of destruction was now an antique that the guys at the pro shop "hadn't seen in many years". The cost to seriously get back into the sport with the proper gear was extremely high, so I said screw it. I accepted i'd never do it competitively again and called it quits for good. Paintball though isn't how you make it out to be, psyche/kill wise. If anything Paintball teaches you why war is a VERY bad thing, and shows you just how easy it is to get shot in real combat - and how easy you could die. It seriously gives you much more appreciation for people who turn their lives over to their cause in real combat, and especially makes you feel reverance for those who died paying the ultimate price for our liberties (i'm a HUGE crying little girl when it comes to veterans day, etc).

Paintball to those who aren't psycho's, is more about hide and seek + a modern version of "tag" thrown in, to make a very cool game that anyone can play. It's also very strong at building comraderie between parents and their children, couples, and employees. I learned more about human psychology from playing paintball than I ever learned in any of my psychology, philosophy, or sociology classes combined.


As per your inquiry as to what firearm to look into, I personally really like my Taurus 24/7. Here is a review on the gun and it shows pics of it, and if you google up the gun you can find many pics on it: http://www.taurususa.com/newsreviews/CombatHandguns0804.cfm

Also another good gun brand is Glock: http://www.taurususa.com/newsreviews/CombatHandguns0804.cfm

Both of my friends own different glocks, and they are extremely reliable guns. The only thing I can't stand about them is the field stripping lever, it kills my fingers. Where as the taurus 24/7 has a simple lever/pin release that to me is 1000 times better than the Glocks. Only potential downside to the Taurus line of guns is that the Taurus guns typically have a very long trigger pull, which is an added safety precaution (they want you to be SURE you want to pull that trigger, and not have it accidently go off). I personally am a very safe gun owner, so I prefer a shorter crisp trigger pull for tigher groupings at the range. At first I had very wide groupings at the range with my Taurus (down and to the right), which I assumed was due to movement during trigger pull. After paying more attention to my grip and trigger pull, I was able to make it much tighter. Also for the sexiness aspect, Glock looks VERY vanilla. I dont think they make anything but all black guns that show no real personality in the looks dept, while some other good gun manufacturers can make a firearm look so sexy you start to get dirty thoughts <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">
 

Vampy

New member
I loved the one with long hair. I have a thing for long hair...my fiance' had long hair thats what attracted me to him the first time i saw him. He said that he was attracted to me by my certain..."gothness" he said it was dark and sexy. *shrugs lol* i dunno

heres a picture of me its a little old <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://us.f2.yahoofs.com/users/41958cdfz6755f234/legolasbabe85/__sr_/a88f.jpg?pfVh95DBmtrF2FHC">picture of me</a>
 

Vampy

New member
I loved the one with long hair. I have a thing for long hair...my fiance' had long hair thats what attracted me to him the first time i saw him. He said that he was attracted to me by my certain..."gothness" he said it was dark and sexy. *shrugs lol* i dunno

heres a picture of me its a little old <a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://us.f2.yahoofs.com/users/41958cdfz6755f234/legolasbabe85/__sr_/a88f.jpg?pfVh95DBmtrF2FHC">picture of me</a>
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Thanks for the feedback, Sean.
I heard about some handguns that look sexy, and heard a comment that the Sig Saur is not a sexy gun, but quite "dynamic", I was contemplating on one of those for "home security". I'll definitely take a look at your links for the Taurus and look at the Glocks, again. (Actually, I thought the Glocks were too "Government", and something just as good would have a little more sex appeal)
As for psyche, I really think because of the culture, the Japanese psyche is totally different from Americans, and I actually feel a bit uncomfortable in the fact they know I'm an American; how do I know some may take pleasure in targeting me??
Though I agree with the patriotism, I also have relatives who have been in the service, my BIL's little brother was in Iraq for several months during the war.
And, for some who have lived in other countries, and learn the freedoms (or lack of which) available for the citizens tend to appreciate the freedoms of thier own country.
Anyway, I am still doing research on what firearms are available for citizens, and which ones attract me. My BIL had told me that the important thing is, finding a weapon which fits in your hand, and you find comfortable in using. Considering I have an average sized hand, I don't have the kind of strenght I used to, and would need a handgun which I can easily eject the mag from, and other operations necessary. My BIL's Beretta had a handle just a little too wide for me to do that with.(nice weapon, though!) I liked his .357 Mag, but that would be a second, or third weapon for range use, only. I'm interested in finding a semi-auto pistol, and a few rifles.
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
Thanks for the feedback, Sean.
I heard about some handguns that look sexy, and heard a comment that the Sig Saur is not a sexy gun, but quite "dynamic", I was contemplating on one of those for "home security". I'll definitely take a look at your links for the Taurus and look at the Glocks, again. (Actually, I thought the Glocks were too "Government", and something just as good would have a little more sex appeal)
As for psyche, I really think because of the culture, the Japanese psyche is totally different from Americans, and I actually feel a bit uncomfortable in the fact they know I'm an American; how do I know some may take pleasure in targeting me??
Though I agree with the patriotism, I also have relatives who have been in the service, my BIL's little brother was in Iraq for several months during the war.
And, for some who have lived in other countries, and learn the freedoms (or lack of which) available for the citizens tend to appreciate the freedoms of thier own country.
Anyway, I am still doing research on what firearms are available for citizens, and which ones attract me. My BIL had told me that the important thing is, finding a weapon which fits in your hand, and you find comfortable in using. Considering I have an average sized hand, I don't have the kind of strenght I used to, and would need a handgun which I can easily eject the mag from, and other operations necessary. My BIL's Beretta had a handle just a little too wide for me to do that with.(nice weapon, though!) I liked his .357 Mag, but that would be a second, or third weapon for range use, only. I'm interested in finding a semi-auto pistol, and a few rifles.
 

Faust

New member
In all seriousness Samurai, if all you want is "home protection", save yourself some money and make sure it's 100% effective and nearly idiot proff, and just get yourself a decent shotgun. Shotguns are fun, 100% effective in close range (the range it would be used in your home), and has absolutely no comparison in "stopping power" handgun wise. I'm not saying don't get a handgun to carry on your person via concealed carry permit and go to the range with, but shotguns are the ultimate home defense weapon. I'ts one of those "point it in general direction and shoot" type weapons, where there pretty much isn't any way to miss. Eventually i'm going to get a shotgun also. You can find shotguns pretty cheap even at walmart, that will do the job of "home defense".


For a handgun I would probably go for a .40 cal. Anything higher is just a rediculously kicking hand cannon, where if you have to fire more than one round (trying to stop someone running around for example) your grouping will be horrible due to the kick of the gun.



And Vampy, your pic wouldn't allow me to view it because I have a modified host file on this PC for security. Anyway you can attach it on this site? It works fine that way.
 

Faust

New member
In all seriousness Samurai, if all you want is "home protection", save yourself some money and make sure it's 100% effective and nearly idiot proff, and just get yourself a decent shotgun. Shotguns are fun, 100% effective in close range (the range it would be used in your home), and has absolutely no comparison in "stopping power" handgun wise. I'm not saying don't get a handgun to carry on your person via concealed carry permit and go to the range with, but shotguns are the ultimate home defense weapon. I'ts one of those "point it in general direction and shoot" type weapons, where there pretty much isn't any way to miss. Eventually i'm going to get a shotgun also. You can find shotguns pretty cheap even at walmart, that will do the job of "home defense".


For a handgun I would probably go for a .40 cal. Anything higher is just a rediculously kicking hand cannon, where if you have to fire more than one round (trying to stop someone running around for example) your grouping will be horrible due to the kick of the gun.



And Vampy, your pic wouldn't allow me to view it because I have a modified host file on this PC for security. Anyway you can attach it on this site? It works fine that way.
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
yea, I forgot to mention, I had fired a few shotguns (Did some skeet shooting a few times), before, too! I'm totally aware of the "point and shoot" vs. the "aim and shoot"! (hehe)
However, the disadvantage is, depending on the range and "spread", there may be more property damage than necessary, and that "evil doer" who's now splattered all over that room ain't gonna pay for any of it!!
First, I think I recall "sawed off shotguns" as being illegal, or if not, that would seem to be the most effective for "home protection", eh?
Second, I had fired a .40 cal (in fact it had a "duty load") from my BIL's friend, who was a former SWAT. He had a S&W (I think, it was last year Feb, so hard to recal full details) .40 cal and another one that was either a 10, or 9mm. Those actually felt better in my hand than the Beretta!
 
6

65rosessamurai

Guest
yea, I forgot to mention, I had fired a few shotguns (Did some skeet shooting a few times), before, too! I'm totally aware of the "point and shoot" vs. the "aim and shoot"! (hehe)
However, the disadvantage is, depending on the range and "spread", there may be more property damage than necessary, and that "evil doer" who's now splattered all over that room ain't gonna pay for any of it!!
First, I think I recall "sawed off shotguns" as being illegal, or if not, that would seem to be the most effective for "home protection", eh?
Second, I had fired a .40 cal (in fact it had a "duty load") from my BIL's friend, who was a former SWAT. He had a S&W (I think, it was last year Feb, so hard to recal full details) .40 cal and another one that was either a 10, or 9mm. Those actually felt better in my hand than the Beretta!
 

Faust

New member
Yeah 10mm is right up there with the .45 in the realm of REALLY big hand cannon. I'd go .40 if I were buying another non duty related firearm, and just keep a shotgun by the bed. Also if you are worried about "spread" and property damage, just use a solid slug. Even King Kong won't get up after taking a .68 caliber solid slug of lead to any part of their body. Besides, if you are shooting at someone in/around your home, the spread on a regular buckshot shotgun is very marginal within those ranges.


Plus with a shotgun, you have the MASSIVELY effect psychological "oh crap" factor associated with the sound the slide cocking back to load a round with a shotgun gives "chik-chik". If people still hang around after hearing THAT, they deserve to die anyway.
 

Faust

New member
Yeah 10mm is right up there with the .45 in the realm of REALLY big hand cannon. I'd go .40 if I were buying another non duty related firearm, and just keep a shotgun by the bed. Also if you are worried about "spread" and property damage, just use a solid slug. Even King Kong won't get up after taking a .68 caliber solid slug of lead to any part of their body. Besides, if you are shooting at someone in/around your home, the spread on a regular buckshot shotgun is very marginal within those ranges.


Plus with a shotgun, you have the MASSIVELY effect psychological "oh crap" factor associated with the sound the slide cocking back to load a round with a shotgun gives "chik-chik". If people still hang around after hearing THAT, they deserve to die anyway.
 
Top