Viagra

[AimeeSue82]

Has anyone taken Viagra (drug name sildenafil) for mucus production? It's a vasodialator so it should open up the vessels in the lungs. I have a friend who was in a study for this but she wasn't able to stay in the study. They already use sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension, also. Thoughts?

 

[AimeeSue82]

Has anyone taken Viagra (drug name sildenafil) for mucus production? It's a vasodialator so it should open up the vessels in the lungs. I have a friend who was in a study for this but she wasn't able to stay in the study. They already use sildenafil for pulmonary hypertension, also. Thoughts?

 

[Incomudrox]

Viagra is also a potentiator of CFTR and DF508 trafficking correction. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">

 

[Incomudrox]

Viagra is also a potentiator of CFTR and DF508 trafficking correction. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">

 

[saveferris2009]

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Incomudrox</b></i> Viagra is also a potentiator of CFTR and DF508 trafficking correction. <img src=""></end quote>

All PDE5's are.....
I was thinking about trying it. Haven't yet, but I might give it a shot.
THey were doing Phase II trials on Levitra I believe somewhere in New Mexico and/or COlorado. Would love to see the results.

 

[saveferris2009]

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Incomudrox</b></i> Viagra is also a potentiator of CFTR and DF508 trafficking correction. <img src=""></end quote>

All PDE5's are.....
I was thinking about trying it. Haven't yet, but I might give it a shot.
THey were doing Phase II trials on Levitra I believe somewhere in New Mexico and/or COlorado. Would love to see the results.

 

[Incomudrox]

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i> <div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Incomudrox</b></i> Viagra is also a potentiator of CFTR and DF508 trafficking correction.

</end quote> All PDE5's are..... I was thinking about trying it. Haven't yet, but I might give it a shot. THey were doing Phase II trials on Levitra I believe somewhere in New Mexico and/or COlorado. Would love to see the results.</end quote>

Ditto on everything.

 

[Incomudrox]

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i> <div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Incomudrox</b></i> Viagra is also a potentiator of CFTR and DF508 trafficking correction.

</end quote> All PDE5's are..... I was thinking about trying it. Haven't yet, but I might give it a shot. THey were doing Phase II trials on Levitra I believe somewhere in New Mexico and/or COlorado. Would love to see the results.</end quote>

Ditto on everything.

 

[robert321]

So if the drug is used for its additional benefits, does that make its original purpose an undesired side effect?

Joking aside, that really does sound interesting. Does anyone know of anywhere it is being discussed in an article?

In the commercials it always says that women should not take nor handle the drug, anyone know why?

 

[robert321]

So if the drug is used for its additional benefits, does that make its original purpose an undesired side effect?

Joking aside, that really does sound interesting. Does anyone know of anywhere it is being discussed in an article?

In the commercials it always says that women should not take nor handle the drug, anyone know why?

 

[saveferris2009]

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><em>Originally posted by: <strong>robert321</strong></em> So if the drug is used for its additional benefits, does that make its original purpose an undesired side effect? </end quote>

You are actually correct. It was being tested for pulmonary hypertension origially and the correction of erectile dysfunction was a side effect they decided to get an indication for. Much more profitable.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><em>Originally posted by: <strong>robert321</strong></em>Joking aside, that really does sound interesting. Does anyone know of anywhere it is being discussed in an article? </end quote>
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=cystic+fibrosis+pde5

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><em>Originally posted by:<strong>robert321</strong></em>In the commercials it always says that women should not take nor handle the drug, anyone know why?</end quote>
That's actually not true. You are thinking of the AndroGel commercial - woman should not handle testosterone drugs. PDE5's are perfectly fine for women to handle.

 

[saveferris2009]

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><em>Originally posted by: <strong>robert321</strong></em> So if the drug is used for its additional benefits, does that make its original purpose an undesired side effect? </end quote>

You are actually correct. It was being tested for pulmonary hypertension origially and the correction of erectile dysfunction was a side effect they decided to get an indication for. Much more profitable.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><em>Originally posted by: <strong>robert321</strong></em>Joking aside, that really does sound interesting. Does anyone know of anywhere it is being discussed in an article? </end quote>
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=cystic+fibrosis+pde5

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><em>Originally posted by:<strong>robert321</strong></em>In the commercials it always says that women should not take nor handle the drug, anyone know why?</end quote>
That's actually not true. You are thinking of the AndroGel commercial - woman should not handle testosterone drugs. PDE5's are perfectly fine for women to handle.