"You can get those bacteria's from anything. My doctor said there really is no way of avoiding it."
Burkholderia is a plant pathogen. It's often in the soil. It's hard to avoid being around any soil whatsoever, but that doesn't mean I'm going to keep a bag of rotting onions around. "You can get it anywhere, so why even bother limiting potential exposure" is a really dangerous attitude to have. They used to have CF camps where kids with CF would stay in close quarters for weeks on end. This lead to a huge spike in B. Cepacia cases and a lot of deaths. Stopping the camps (i.e. reducing the risk of exposure) resulted in much fewer infections. Your doctor probably said it's ubiquitous in the environment and you took this to mean you shouldn't even bother trying to reduce exposure. You are wrong, if that is the case.
"Love your sarcasm though! That's the thing about this site, people tend to be very rude for anything outside the box."
That's because the vast majority of us are alive because of actual science and not hokey old folk remedies that have been disproved. Let me show you how ridiculous most of this "outside the box" thinking is. Let's compare legitimate science (in this case, the antibiotic penicillin) with homeopathy.
Penicillin works by binding to receptors in the bacterial cell wall and preventing cross-linking which compromises cell wall integrity and leads to bacterial death from lysis due to osmotic pressure acting against the damaged cell wall. We can take a petri dish of bacteria and add penicillin to it and watch this happen via a microscope.
Homeopathy says that if you take a substance that causes the disease you're trying to cure in the first place and then dilute the substance over and over again until very little to none of the substance actually remains and then give it to the patient, it will magically cure the patient because some dude who lived hundreds of years ago thought that two similar diseases couldn't exist in the same body at the same time - an observation that has been proven (with science!) to be false.
Which one of these methods sounds like a good way to cure a disease and which one sounds silly?
"I have seen a lot of negativity on this site and, im so over it."
And we're "so over" quackery and false hope.
"The site is intended to take notes from others to learn about our disease and further our knowledge."
Okay then, here. Let me "further your knowledge": alternative/holistic/homeopathic/naturalistic "cures" don't work and often have severe side effects. That is why doctors don't prescribe them and the FDA doesn't approve them. knowitall was 100 right.
"I don't think the site was intended for the peope who THINK they are "all knowing" to give their rude comments."
I trust science backed up by empirical data, peer reviewed experimentation that follows the scientific method, etc. And it tells me you're wrong.
If your problem is with how the message was delivered, allow me to help: "burkholderia is a pathogen that infects plants such as onions and garlic and you should probably be careful handling those things; also, tea tree oil can be toxic".
"Listen, Im not sick, I live a normal life, but I like to come on here to try to help others."
All help is not created equally and you don't deserve a gold star for offering bad advice. Hey, guess what! Nebulizing pure, industrial-grade hydrogen peroxide will absolutely eradicate pseudomonas infections. Unfortunately, it will also eradicate you. Is my "help" worth defending?
"Im doing something right, because I don't take any cf meds."
I didn't culture PA until I was 15 and didn't have lung problems until I was 28. Some people will culture BCC when they're 4. Some will be so healthy that they won't even get diagnosed until they're middle aged and often over a "side" issue of CF such as digestive problems. CF is not a one-size fits all disease. You are practicing a logical fallacy when you say that your mild disease progression was caused by your "natural cures "THEY" don't want you to know about" treatment regimen: correlation does not equal causation.
"Actually no meds at all. No pain med, no enzymes, no inhaler, ....nothing."
That's because you're lucky. Up until I was 28, I had 120% FEV1/FVC. I religiously did my treatments. If high PFTs are your proof that your advice works, then why were mine higher? I didn't do any weird, naturalist remedies. I alternated Tobi and Cirpo, did Pulmazyme and my vest, etc. Seems like my treatment regiment works better than yours, no?
"I have 83% pft when I don't work out, 96% when I do. Im ddf508, I work full time, go to school full time, and Im a happy person. "
I'm homozygous DDF508 myself, work, etc. etc. Up until I was 28, my PFTs were around 120% (for both FVC and FEV1). See above. Looks like my "normal" therapy trumps your "alternative" therapy if we're basing this on results.
"I would like to better understand this disease, why don't you go check yourself, and your intensions."
His intentions are to not provide false hope or see someone end up hurt, sick or dead. These should be your intentions, too. They should be everyone's intentions.