I have a question.... For medical drugs such as chemo meds, etc. for cancer that get PASSED regardless of the many terrible side effects, would an opthamologist hold up THAT sort of drug making it to the millions of people with cancer cause it MAY hurt someone's eyes?
I seem to remember that there is tons of research out there about cancer meds that really wreak havoc on one's system and I can't imagine random (NOT oncologists) docs didn't express worry at some point. Yet, such drugs still got passed and its up to the consumer and their doc to weigh the pros and cons. Why is that not the case with Azli?
This just really p&*%$$es me off!
I seem to remember that there is tons of research out there about cancer meds that really wreak havoc on one's system and I can't imagine random (NOT oncologists) docs didn't express worry at some point. Yet, such drugs still got passed and its up to the consumer and their doc to weigh the pros and cons. Why is that not the case with Azli?
This just really p&*%$$es me off!