culture results - anyone treat?

point

New member
Hello JoAnn - -
I can reply with very little info. It is known to colonize CF patients. It is a pretty "strong" bacteria, similar to Psuedomonas in that sense. It can actually live in alcohol.

I will post some things from the internet.
You may want to search not under achromobacter, but under alcaligenes xylosoxidans. It was historically under alcaligenes and you will probably find more information using that search info.

Here is the full link to some info listed below... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol12no11/06-0143.htm
">http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol12no11/06-0143.htm
</a>
Achromobacter (formerly Alcaligenes) xylosoxidans is a newly emerging microorganism isolated with increased frequency from the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), but information about its clinical relevance is limited (1). A. xylosoxidans is innately resistant to many antimicrobial drugs (2), except piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and imipenem, and moderately susceptible to ceftazidime (45% of susceptible isolates), which is widely used to treat infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3,4). The mechanisms involved in cases of high-level resistance to ceftazidime have not been described for A. xylosoxidans. Possible mechanisms for ceftazidime resistance among gram-negative bacilli are alterations in outer membrane proteins, overproduction of cephalosporinase, or production of an extended-spectrum ?-lactamase (ESBL). ESBLs are enzymes distributed worldwide (5) that hydrolyze oxyimino-cephalosporins and monobactams and are susceptible to ?-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanic acid and tazobactam. We report on the isolation from a CF patient of A. xylosoxidans that produced the VEB-1 ESBL. This is the first report of ESBL production in A. xylosoxidans and the first report of a VEB-1 - producing isolate from a CF patient.

<b>Conclusions</b>
This finding of a VEB-1 - producing A. xylosoxidans from a CF patient enhances the scant information available to laboratorians and clinicians about ESBL production by isolates from CF patients. A very recent study reports 3 ESBL-positive isolates of P. aeruginosa from CF patients in New Delhi, but the ESBL has not been characterized (14). Resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins mediated by ESBLs has never been described in A. xylosoxidans. The detection of the ESBL production was difficult in AX476; therefore, the frequency of A. xylosoxidans isolates that produce an ESBL might be underestimated. We recommend the use of BioRad combination disks, especially for isolates that are highly resistant to ceftazidime and susceptible to piperacillin or when synergy exists between ticarcillin and ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid.

The origin of the strain remains unclear. Because A. xylosoxidans is widely encountered in the environment, acquisition of AX476 by our patient may have resulted from poor adherence to handwashing, contamination of respiratory therapy equipment (nebulizer), or contaminated water. We can exclude nosocomial acquisition because our patient had never been hospitalized.

The location of blaVEB-1 on an easily transferable plasmid might represent a clinical threat if spread among other species widely encountered among CF patients, especially P. aeruginosa. Such a transfer would create serious therapeutic problems. Therefore, to prevent person-to-person transmission, our patient visits the physician on different days than the other CF patients. If he needs to be hospitalized, our patient may not share a room with immunocompromised patients or with other CF patients anywhere in the hospital, which is the recommendation for patients with other multidrug-resistant pathogens (15). In conclusion, this first finding of a VEB-1 - producing A. xylosoxidans from a CF patient emphasizes the need to study the mechanism(s) of resistance to ceftazidime among a wide collection of isolates originated from different centers. The sequence of the class 1 integron reported in this paper has been assigned GenBank accession no. DQ393569.
 

point

New member
Hello JoAnn - -
I can reply with very little info. It is known to colonize CF patients. It is a pretty "strong" bacteria, similar to Psuedomonas in that sense. It can actually live in alcohol.

I will post some things from the internet.
You may want to search not under achromobacter, but under alcaligenes xylosoxidans. It was historically under alcaligenes and you will probably find more information using that search info.

Here is the full link to some info listed below... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol12no11/06-0143.htm
">http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol12no11/06-0143.htm
</a>
Achromobacter (formerly Alcaligenes) xylosoxidans is a newly emerging microorganism isolated with increased frequency from the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), but information about its clinical relevance is limited (1). A. xylosoxidans is innately resistant to many antimicrobial drugs (2), except piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and imipenem, and moderately susceptible to ceftazidime (45% of susceptible isolates), which is widely used to treat infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3,4). The mechanisms involved in cases of high-level resistance to ceftazidime have not been described for A. xylosoxidans. Possible mechanisms for ceftazidime resistance among gram-negative bacilli are alterations in outer membrane proteins, overproduction of cephalosporinase, or production of an extended-spectrum ?-lactamase (ESBL). ESBLs are enzymes distributed worldwide (5) that hydrolyze oxyimino-cephalosporins and monobactams and are susceptible to ?-lactamase inhibitors such as clavulanic acid and tazobactam. We report on the isolation from a CF patient of A. xylosoxidans that produced the VEB-1 ESBL. This is the first report of ESBL production in A. xylosoxidans and the first report of a VEB-1 - producing isolate from a CF patient.

<b>Conclusions</b>
This finding of a VEB-1 - producing A. xylosoxidans from a CF patient enhances the scant information available to laboratorians and clinicians about ESBL production by isolates from CF patients. A very recent study reports 3 ESBL-positive isolates of P. aeruginosa from CF patients in New Delhi, but the ESBL has not been characterized (14). Resistance to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins mediated by ESBLs has never been described in A. xylosoxidans. The detection of the ESBL production was difficult in AX476; therefore, the frequency of A. xylosoxidans isolates that produce an ESBL might be underestimated. We recommend the use of BioRad combination disks, especially for isolates that are highly resistant to ceftazidime and susceptible to piperacillin or when synergy exists between ticarcillin and ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid.

The origin of the strain remains unclear. Because A. xylosoxidans is widely encountered in the environment, acquisition of AX476 by our patient may have resulted from poor adherence to handwashing, contamination of respiratory therapy equipment (nebulizer), or contaminated water. We can exclude nosocomial acquisition because our patient had never been hospitalized.

The location of blaVEB-1 on an easily transferable plasmid might represent a clinical threat if spread among other species widely encountered among CF patients, especially P. aeruginosa. Such a transfer would create serious therapeutic problems. Therefore, to prevent person-to-person transmission, our patient visits the physician on different days than the other CF patients. If he needs to be hospitalized, our patient may not share a room with immunocompromised patients or with other CF patients anywhere in the hospital, which is the recommendation for patients with other multidrug-resistant pathogens (15). In conclusion, this first finding of a VEB-1 - producing A. xylosoxidans from a CF patient emphasizes the need to study the mechanism(s) of resistance to ceftazidime among a wide collection of isolates originated from different centers. The sequence of the class 1 integron reported in this paper has been assigned GenBank accession no. DQ393569.
 

point

New member
Also found this....

Lung and Respiratory Diseases Treatment for achromobacter xylosoxidans
06/07/2005 08:32AM

Question:
what kind of treatment is available for patients with CF and a new lung transplant. Pt.has been on a vent for the past 72 hours.Pt.is a 24 year old male. transplant done on Feb.15,2005.The only information I have was from 11/15/2001.Please help. Thank you

Answer:
This question has been forwarded by Help:

Achromobacter xylosoxidans is a bacterium that is increasingly being identified as a cause of lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis.

In general, lung infections are treated with antibiotics. Cultures of the organism are grown in the presence of antibiotics, either alone or in combination. When the organism is killed by the antibiotics in culture it is susceptible to that antibiotic; whereas, if the organism lives or grows in the presence of the antibiotic, it is resistant to the antibiotic. The choice of antibiotic is usually based upon the results of the culture and susceptibility testing. Often, two antibiotics that kill the organism are used to reduce the chance of developing organisms with antibiotic resistance.

In addition to antibiotics, bronchodilators and clearance techniques such as chest physiotherapy are used to help clear secretions. Oxygen is often given to improve tissued oxygen levels. Mechanical ventilation is used when the patient is unable to maintain adequate oxygenation or ventilation on their own. It is removed when the patient is able to breath spontaneously without any assistance.
 

point

New member
Also found this....

Lung and Respiratory Diseases Treatment for achromobacter xylosoxidans
06/07/2005 08:32AM

Question:
what kind of treatment is available for patients with CF and a new lung transplant. Pt.has been on a vent for the past 72 hours.Pt.is a 24 year old male. transplant done on Feb.15,2005.The only information I have was from 11/15/2001.Please help. Thank you

Answer:
This question has been forwarded by Help:

Achromobacter xylosoxidans is a bacterium that is increasingly being identified as a cause of lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis.

In general, lung infections are treated with antibiotics. Cultures of the organism are grown in the presence of antibiotics, either alone or in combination. When the organism is killed by the antibiotics in culture it is susceptible to that antibiotic; whereas, if the organism lives or grows in the presence of the antibiotic, it is resistant to the antibiotic. The choice of antibiotic is usually based upon the results of the culture and susceptibility testing. Often, two antibiotics that kill the organism are used to reduce the chance of developing organisms with antibiotic resistance.

In addition to antibiotics, bronchodilators and clearance techniques such as chest physiotherapy are used to help clear secretions. Oxygen is often given to improve tissued oxygen levels. Mechanical ventilation is used when the patient is unable to maintain adequate oxygenation or ventilation on their own. It is removed when the patient is able to breath spontaneously without any assistance.
 

point

New member
Also found this....

Lung and Respiratory Diseases Treatment for achromobacter xylosoxidans
06/07/2005 08:32AM

Question:
what kind of treatment is available for patients with CF and a new lung transplant. Pt.has been on a vent for the past 72 hours.Pt.is a 24 year old male. transplant done on Feb.15,2005.The only information I have was from 11/15/2001.Please help. Thank you

Answer:
This question has been forwarded by Help:

Achromobacter xylosoxidans is a bacterium that is increasingly being identified as a cause of lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis.

In general, lung infections are treated with antibiotics. Cultures of the organism are grown in the presence of antibiotics, either alone or in combination. When the organism is killed by the antibiotics in culture it is susceptible to that antibiotic; whereas, if the organism lives or grows in the presence of the antibiotic, it is resistant to the antibiotic. The choice of antibiotic is usually based upon the results of the culture and susceptibility testing. Often, two antibiotics that kill the organism are used to reduce the chance of developing organisms with antibiotic resistance.

In addition to antibiotics, bronchodilators and clearance techniques such as chest physiotherapy are used to help clear secretions. Oxygen is often given to improve tissued oxygen levels. Mechanical ventilation is used when the patient is unable to maintain adequate oxygenation or ventilation on their own. It is removed when the patient is able to breath spontaneously without any assistance.
 

lovemygirl

New member
Wow, what an interesting topic. My daughter cultured PA a few years ago and was on tobramycin for quite some time. She came off the nebulizer in June and then cultured Staph in Sept., which they didn't treat. I had never heard of staph until that time so I figured it was ok to leave it untreated. Then she got a whole lot of infections (eyes, ears, sinus and throat) and that has been going on for over a month.
When it first started they treated it as an addition to the staph. The antibiotics didn't work for the 'infections' so they tried a different kind and they didn't work either. Yesterday we started yet a different antibiotic and hopefully this will take care of it.
I didn't realize that staph had anything to do with PA, but I am certainly going to come back to this posting later and read some of the links.
 

lovemygirl

New member
Wow, what an interesting topic. My daughter cultured PA a few years ago and was on tobramycin for quite some time. She came off the nebulizer in June and then cultured Staph in Sept., which they didn't treat. I had never heard of staph until that time so I figured it was ok to leave it untreated. Then she got a whole lot of infections (eyes, ears, sinus and throat) and that has been going on for over a month.
When it first started they treated it as an addition to the staph. The antibiotics didn't work for the 'infections' so they tried a different kind and they didn't work either. Yesterday we started yet a different antibiotic and hopefully this will take care of it.
I didn't realize that staph had anything to do with PA, but I am certainly going to come back to this posting later and read some of the links.
 

lovemygirl

New member
Wow, what an interesting topic. My daughter cultured PA a few years ago and was on tobramycin for quite some time. She came off the nebulizer in June and then cultured Staph in Sept., which they didn't treat. I had never heard of staph until that time so I figured it was ok to leave it untreated. Then she got a whole lot of infections (eyes, ears, sinus and throat) and that has been going on for over a month.
When it first started they treated it as an addition to the staph. The antibiotics didn't work for the 'infections' so they tried a different kind and they didn't work either. Yesterday we started yet a different antibiotic and hopefully this will take care of it.
I didn't realize that staph had anything to do with PA, but I am certainly going to come back to this posting later and read some of the links.
 

lovemygirl

New member
Forgot to mention that she had another culture done last week and it came out clean for staph and PA, but she still has all these infections.
 

lovemygirl

New member
Forgot to mention that she had another culture done last week and it came out clean for staph and PA, but she still has all these infections.
 

lovemygirl

New member
Forgot to mention that she had another culture done last week and it came out clean for staph and PA, but she still has all these infections.
 
2

2perfectboys

Guest
AMY - still waiting for those studies to show Staph keeps Pseduo at bay
 
2

2perfectboys

Guest
AMY - still waiting for those studies to show Staph keeps Pseduo at bay
 
2

2perfectboys

Guest
AMY - still waiting for those studies to show Staph keeps Pseduo at bay
 

MargaritaChic

New member
My daughter just cultured Staphylococcus aureus. Our clinic does treat it (with antibiotics) but they told me that many clinics do not treat it.
 

MargaritaChic

New member
My daughter just cultured Staphylococcus aureus. Our clinic does treat it (with antibiotics) but they told me that many clinics do not treat it.
 

MargaritaChic

New member
My daughter just cultured Staphylococcus aureus. Our clinic does treat it (with antibiotics) but they told me that many clinics do not treat it.
 

MargaritaChic

New member
My daughter just cultured Staphylococcus aureus. Our clinic does treat it (with antibiotics) but they told me that many clinics do not treat it.
 

MargaritaChic

New member
My daughter just cultured Staphylococcus aureus. Our clinic does treat it (with antibiotics) but they told me that many clinics do not treat it.
<br />
<br />
 

taraann

New member
Hi, I have a 9yo with CF. He has cultured nothing but MRSA for about 4 years. I have begun to think the MRSA is kicking everything else out. His lung infections are slowly becoming more frequent. Before he was colonized with MRSA he grew out psuedamonas and staph. I don't know about not treating staph. If we don't treat my sons lung infections he will get really sick. And MRSA is the only thing to treat.
 
Top