How many of you were breastfed?

lightNlife

New member
My mom was given the same "breast milk is better" hoopla from the lactivists. She was unable to breast feed me for as long as she wanted because I was in the hospital. With my sister (no CF) she breast fed her and she's got more food allergies than anyone in our family. So there goes that idea.

I wanted to point out also that from an evolutionary standpoint, our bodies are really only "programmed" to need a lot of milk at that very young age. That is why so many people become lactose intolerant. Over the centuries, as people have made milk a more prominent part of their diets, we have adapted.

There's not enough information either way to prove that breast feeding is better. Everyone's body is different, and the prevalence of allergies (particularly in industrialized countries) is largely an environmental response and not necessarily tied to nutrition or lack thereof. People who try to link breastfeeding with allergies should remember the first rule of statistics which is 'correlation does NOT imply causation."

While I'm glad there are some who happen to have fewer allergies associated with their CF, it's highly improbable (if not impossible) for something non-genetic to have any sort of impact on something genetic. If a person has fewer allergies and believes the cause to have been linked to breastfeeding, then the breastfeeding is having an impact on something secondary to the genetic predisposition of that person.

Sidebar: remember is that lactose intolerance and milk allergies are two different things.
 

lightNlife

New member
My mom was given the same "breast milk is better" hoopla from the lactivists. She was unable to breast feed me for as long as she wanted because I was in the hospital. With my sister (no CF) she breast fed her and she's got more food allergies than anyone in our family. So there goes that idea.

I wanted to point out also that from an evolutionary standpoint, our bodies are really only "programmed" to need a lot of milk at that very young age. That is why so many people become lactose intolerant. Over the centuries, as people have made milk a more prominent part of their diets, we have adapted.

There's not enough information either way to prove that breast feeding is better. Everyone's body is different, and the prevalence of allergies (particularly in industrialized countries) is largely an environmental response and not necessarily tied to nutrition or lack thereof. People who try to link breastfeeding with allergies should remember the first rule of statistics which is 'correlation does NOT imply causation."

While I'm glad there are some who happen to have fewer allergies associated with their CF, it's highly improbable (if not impossible) for something non-genetic to have any sort of impact on something genetic. If a person has fewer allergies and believes the cause to have been linked to breastfeeding, then the breastfeeding is having an impact on something secondary to the genetic predisposition of that person.

Sidebar: remember is that lactose intolerance and milk allergies are two different things.
 

lightNlife

New member
My mom was given the same "breast milk is better" hoopla from the lactivists. She was unable to breast feed me for as long as she wanted because I was in the hospital. With my sister (no CF) she breast fed her and she's got more food allergies than anyone in our family. So there goes that idea.

I wanted to point out also that from an evolutionary standpoint, our bodies are really only "programmed" to need a lot of milk at that very young age. That is why so many people become lactose intolerant. Over the centuries, as people have made milk a more prominent part of their diets, we have adapted.

There's not enough information either way to prove that breast feeding is better. Everyone's body is different, and the prevalence of allergies (particularly in industrialized countries) is largely an environmental response and not necessarily tied to nutrition or lack thereof. People who try to link breastfeeding with allergies should remember the first rule of statistics which is 'correlation does NOT imply causation."

While I'm glad there are some who happen to have fewer allergies associated with their CF, it's highly improbable (if not impossible) for something non-genetic to have any sort of impact on something genetic. If a person has fewer allergies and believes the cause to have been linked to breastfeeding, then the breastfeeding is having an impact on something secondary to the genetic predisposition of that person.

Sidebar: remember is that lactose intolerance and milk allergies are two different things.
 

lightNlife

New member
My mom was given the same "breast milk is better" hoopla from the lactivists. She was unable to breast feed me for as long as she wanted because I was in the hospital. With my sister (no CF) she breast fed her and she's got more food allergies than anyone in our family. So there goes that idea.

I wanted to point out also that from an evolutionary standpoint, our bodies are really only "programmed" to need a lot of milk at that very young age. That is why so many people become lactose intolerant. Over the centuries, as people have made milk a more prominent part of their diets, we have adapted.

There's not enough information either way to prove that breast feeding is better. Everyone's body is different, and the prevalence of allergies (particularly in industrialized countries) is largely an environmental response and not necessarily tied to nutrition or lack thereof. People who try to link breastfeeding with allergies should remember the first rule of statistics which is 'correlation does NOT imply causation."

While I'm glad there are some who happen to have fewer allergies associated with their CF, it's highly improbable (if not impossible) for something non-genetic to have any sort of impact on something genetic. If a person has fewer allergies and believes the cause to have been linked to breastfeeding, then the breastfeeding is having an impact on something secondary to the genetic predisposition of that person.

Sidebar: remember is that lactose intolerance and milk allergies are two different things.
 

lightNlife

New member
My mom was given the same "breast milk is better" hoopla from the lactivists. She was unable to breast feed me for as long as she wanted because I was in the hospital. With my sister (no CF) she breast fed her and she's got more food allergies than anyone in our family. So there goes that idea.

I wanted to point out also that from an evolutionary standpoint, our bodies are really only "programmed" to need a lot of milk at that very young age. That is why so many people become lactose intolerant. Over the centuries, as people have made milk a more prominent part of their diets, we have adapted.

There's not enough information either way to prove that breast feeding is better. Everyone's body is different, and the prevalence of allergies (particularly in industrialized countries) is largely an environmental response and not necessarily tied to nutrition or lack thereof. People who try to link breastfeeding with allergies should remember the first rule of statistics which is 'correlation does NOT imply causation."

While I'm glad there are some who happen to have fewer allergies associated with their CF, it's highly improbable (if not impossible) for something non-genetic to have any sort of impact on something genetic. If a person has fewer allergies and believes the cause to have been linked to breastfeeding, then the breastfeeding is having an impact on something secondary to the genetic predisposition of that person.

Sidebar: remember is that lactose intolerance and milk allergies are two different things.
 

mom2lillian

New member
Lauren-you are normally a very helpful and factual person but this time I dare say you are going off 'feeling' and posting factually incorrect information. I am super busy right now and dont have links handy to prove it but I would LOVE to see a study supporting what you are saying (that is NOT produced by a formula manufacturer). If I can get out from under this pile of 'to-do's' I will post later I was just providing myself a brief distraction when I saw this post.
 

mom2lillian

New member
Lauren-you are normally a very helpful and factual person but this time I dare say you are going off 'feeling' and posting factually incorrect information. I am super busy right now and dont have links handy to prove it but I would LOVE to see a study supporting what you are saying (that is NOT produced by a formula manufacturer). If I can get out from under this pile of 'to-do's' I will post later I was just providing myself a brief distraction when I saw this post.
 

mom2lillian

New member
Lauren-you are normally a very helpful and factual person but this time I dare say you are going off 'feeling' and posting factually incorrect information. I am super busy right now and dont have links handy to prove it but I would LOVE to see a study supporting what you are saying (that is NOT produced by a formula manufacturer). If I can get out from under this pile of 'to-do's' I will post later I was just providing myself a brief distraction when I saw this post.
 

mom2lillian

New member
Lauren-you are normally a very helpful and factual person but this time I dare say you are going off 'feeling' and posting factually incorrect information. I am super busy right now and dont have links handy to prove it but I would LOVE to see a study supporting what you are saying (that is NOT produced by a formula manufacturer). If I can get out from under this pile of 'to-do's' I will post later I was just providing myself a brief distraction when I saw this post.
 

mom2lillian

New member
Lauren-you are normally a very helpful and factual person but this time I dare say you are going off 'feeling' and posting factually incorrect information. I am super busy right now and dont have links handy to prove it but I would LOVE to see a study supporting what you are saying (that is NOT produced by a formula manufacturer). If I can get out from under this pile of 'to-do's' I will post later I was just providing myself a brief distraction when I saw this post.
 
H

hopesiris

Guest
Statements on infant health and breastfeeding can be found on many websites including the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. Breast milk contains antibodies that pass from mother to baby. Formula does not contain antibodies.

I think that for CF babies, the reduction in risk for serious respiratory infections is a good consideration for mothers who *can* but decide not to provide their CF infant with breast milk. I remember looking into it when I was pregnant and didn't know if Amelia had CF or not. I found an Italian study that concluded that breastfeeding mild CF babies results in better long term health, including fewer respiratory infections. This is not what I remember reading but it is interesting:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/apa/2007/00000096/00000008/art00027
">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/...096/00000008/art00027
</a>
<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> My baby girl just dropped off my breast into peaceful sleep. So sweet.
 
H

hopesiris

Guest
Statements on infant health and breastfeeding can be found on many websites including the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. Breast milk contains antibodies that pass from mother to baby. Formula does not contain antibodies.

I think that for CF babies, the reduction in risk for serious respiratory infections is a good consideration for mothers who *can* but decide not to provide their CF infant with breast milk. I remember looking into it when I was pregnant and didn't know if Amelia had CF or not. I found an Italian study that concluded that breastfeeding mild CF babies results in better long term health, including fewer respiratory infections. This is not what I remember reading but it is interesting:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/apa/2007/00000096/00000008/art00027
">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/...096/00000008/art00027
</a>
<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> My baby girl just dropped off my breast into peaceful sleep. So sweet.
 
H

hopesiris

Guest
Statements on infant health and breastfeeding can be found on many websites including the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. Breast milk contains antibodies that pass from mother to baby. Formula does not contain antibodies.

I think that for CF babies, the reduction in risk for serious respiratory infections is a good consideration for mothers who *can* but decide not to provide their CF infant with breast milk. I remember looking into it when I was pregnant and didn't know if Amelia had CF or not. I found an Italian study that concluded that breastfeeding mild CF babies results in better long term health, including fewer respiratory infections. This is not what I remember reading but it is interesting:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/apa/2007/00000096/00000008/art00027
">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/...096/00000008/art00027
</a>
<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> My baby girl just dropped off my breast into peaceful sleep. So sweet.
 
H

hopesiris

Guest
Statements on infant health and breastfeeding can be found on many websites including the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. Breast milk contains antibodies that pass from mother to baby. Formula does not contain antibodies.

I think that for CF babies, the reduction in risk for serious respiratory infections is a good consideration for mothers who *can* but decide not to provide their CF infant with breast milk. I remember looking into it when I was pregnant and didn't know if Amelia had CF or not. I found an Italian study that concluded that breastfeeding mild CF babies results in better long term health, including fewer respiratory infections. This is not what I remember reading but it is interesting:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/apa/2007/00000096/00000008/art00027
">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/...096/00000008/art00027
</a>
<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> My baby girl just dropped off my breast into peaceful sleep. So sweet.
 
H

hopesiris

Guest
Statements on infant health and breastfeeding can be found on many websites including the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. Breast milk contains antibodies that pass from mother to baby. Formula does not contain antibodies.

I think that for CF babies, the reduction in risk for serious respiratory infections is a good consideration for mothers who *can* but decide not to provide their CF infant with breast milk. I remember looking into it when I was pregnant and didn't know if Amelia had CF or not. I found an Italian study that concluded that breastfeeding mild CF babies results in better long term health, including fewer respiratory infections. This is not what I remember reading but it is interesting:

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/apa/2007/00000096/00000008/art00027
">http://www.ingentaconnect.com/...096/00000008/art00027
</a>
<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> My baby girl just dropped off my breast into peaceful sleep. So sweet.
 
Top