Manual CPT vs Vest

saveferris2009

New member
"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.respirtech.com/doctors/research/secretion-clearance.php
">http://www.respirtech.com/doct...cretion-clearance.php
</a>
 

saveferris2009

New member
"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.respirtech.com/doctors/research/secretion-clearance.php
">http://www.respirtech.com/doct...cretion-clearance.php
</a>
 

saveferris2009

New member
"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.respirtech.com/doctors/research/secretion-clearance.php
">http://www.respirtech.com/doct...cretion-clearance.php
</a>
 

saveferris2009

New member
"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.respirtech.com/doctors/research/secretion-clearance.php
">http://www.respirtech.com/doct...cretion-clearance.php
</a>
 

saveferris2009

New member
<br />
<br />"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "
<br />
<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.respirtech.com/doctors/research/secretion-clearance.php
">http://www.respirtech.com/doct...cretion-clearance.php
</a><br />
<br />
<br />
 

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>

There are a few issues w/ these studies.
1. One of them was conducted w/ Warick himself, so it was not done by an impartial 3rd party.

2. These are not "LARGE" trails, only had 5 patients in one and 29 in the other.

3. These were conducted in 1990 and 1996 and does not make a conclusive case when there is also a lot of other research out there that showed volume for volume mucus clearance equivalent to professionally administered CPT.
Scherer [1998]
Braggion [1995]
And Dozens of smaller studies show that HFCC is as effective as alternate airway clearance modalities.

So I would say one is as effective as another, it's just personally which one u get the most benefit from
 

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>

There are a few issues w/ these studies.
1. One of them was conducted w/ Warick himself, so it was not done by an impartial 3rd party.

2. These are not "LARGE" trails, only had 5 patients in one and 29 in the other.

3. These were conducted in 1990 and 1996 and does not make a conclusive case when there is also a lot of other research out there that showed volume for volume mucus clearance equivalent to professionally administered CPT.
Scherer [1998]
Braggion [1995]
And Dozens of smaller studies show that HFCC is as effective as alternate airway clearance modalities.

So I would say one is as effective as another, it's just personally which one u get the most benefit from
 

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>

There are a few issues w/ these studies.
1. One of them was conducted w/ Warick himself, so it was not done by an impartial 3rd party.

2. These are not "LARGE" trails, only had 5 patients in one and 29 in the other.

3. These were conducted in 1990 and 1996 and does not make a conclusive case when there is also a lot of other research out there that showed volume for volume mucus clearance equivalent to professionally administered CPT.
Scherer [1998]
Braggion [1995]
And Dozens of smaller studies show that HFCC is as effective as alternate airway clearance modalities.

So I would say one is as effective as another, it's just personally which one u get the most benefit from
 

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>

There are a few issues w/ these studies.
1. One of them was conducted w/ Warick himself, so it was not done by an impartial 3rd party.

2. These are not "LARGE" trails, only had 5 patients in one and 29 in the other.

3. These were conducted in 1990 and 1996 and does not make a conclusive case when there is also a lot of other research out there that showed volume for volume mucus clearance equivalent to professionally administered CPT.
Scherer [1998]
Braggion [1995]
And Dozens of smaller studies show that HFCC is as effective as alternate airway clearance modalities.

So I would say one is as effective as another, it's just personally which one u get the most benefit from
 

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>
<br />
<br />"Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed volume for volume mucus clearance results superior to professionally administered CPT. "
<br /><div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
<br />
<br />There are a few issues w/ these studies.
<br />1. One of them was conducted w/ Warick himself, so it was not done by an impartial 3rd party.
<br />
<br />2. These are not "LARGE" trails, only had 5 patients in one and 29 in the other.
<br />
<br />3. These were conducted in 1990 and 1996 and does not make a conclusive case when there is also a lot of other research out there that showed volume for volume mucus clearance equivalent to professionally administered CPT.
<br />Scherer [1998]
<br />Braggion [1995]
<br />And Dozens of smaller studies show that HFCC is as effective as alternate airway clearance modalities.
<br />
<br />So I would say one is as effective as another, it's just personally which one u get the most benefit from
<br />
<br />
 

JazzysMom

New member
Thats what I would come up with Sakem. Until such time that a larger study is done.

I would think given how frequently a vest system of some type is prescribed &/or used that it would be easier now a days to get this study done.

Thats JMO
 

JazzysMom

New member
Thats what I would come up with Sakem. Until such time that a larger study is done.

I would think given how frequently a vest system of some type is prescribed &/or used that it would be easier now a days to get this study done.

Thats JMO
 

JazzysMom

New member
Thats what I would come up with Sakem. Until such time that a larger study is done.

I would think given how frequently a vest system of some type is prescribed &/or used that it would be easier now a days to get this study done.

Thats JMO
 

JazzysMom

New member
Thats what I would come up with Sakem. Until such time that a larger study is done.

I would think given how frequently a vest system of some type is prescribed &/or used that it would be easier now a days to get this study done.

Thats JMO
 

JazzysMom

New member
Thats what I would come up with Sakem. Until such time that a larger study is done.
<br />
<br />I would think given how frequently a vest system of some type is prescribed &/or used that it would be easier now a days to get this study done.
<br />
<br />Thats JMO
 
R

rainsmom

Guest
ashley rain 1s almost 14 and we did cpt until she was about 4, when she got the vest. if she is sick we do cpt on her upper right lobe after the vest. her dr has her to do the drainage positions with the vest, not all of them, just the ones for the right upper lobe. it really seems to do a good job, and it really makes sense to me.
 
R

rainsmom

Guest
ashley rain 1s almost 14 and we did cpt until she was about 4, when she got the vest. if she is sick we do cpt on her upper right lobe after the vest. her dr has her to do the drainage positions with the vest, not all of them, just the ones for the right upper lobe. it really seems to do a good job, and it really makes sense to me.
 
R

rainsmom

Guest
ashley rain 1s almost 14 and we did cpt until she was about 4, when she got the vest. if she is sick we do cpt on her upper right lobe after the vest. her dr has her to do the drainage positions with the vest, not all of them, just the ones for the right upper lobe. it really seems to do a good job, and it really makes sense to me.
 
R

rainsmom

Guest
ashley rain 1s almost 14 and we did cpt until she was about 4, when she got the vest. if she is sick we do cpt on her upper right lobe after the vest. her dr has her to do the drainage positions with the vest, not all of them, just the ones for the right upper lobe. it really seems to do a good job, and it really makes sense to me.
 
R

rainsmom

Guest
ashley rain 1s almost 14 and we did cpt until she was about 4, when she got the vest. if she is sick we do cpt on her upper right lobe after the vest. her dr has her to do the drainage positions with the vest, not all of them, just the ones for the right upper lobe. it really seems to do a good job, and it really makes sense to me.
 
Top