<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>silverbliss</b></i>
Ok I spoke w/ the nurse they DID do the wrong test. Should have taken simple blood work :::rolls eyes::
"The lab tech who did the sweat test said she'd never done one on an adult" so that sent up a red flag then..
*Jazzy* this is just my obgyn this is not a CF Center.
What my blood work showed and I asked for clarification on this. Was that the BABY showed a gene for CF, and it wasn't in me so I'm NOT a "carrier". I'm 31 yrs old and knew I didn't have actual CF myself.
I also have 2 other children from a previous marriage w/ no cf and I was never told I was a carrier in those pregnancy's.
So where we stand now is they need BLOOD WORK on the father to see if he in fact carries the gene. Which means another week of waiting, on the count of someones mistake.
But wouldn't both parents need to carry the CF gene in order to have CF? So if they are telling me I don't have a gene why would they be concerned with testing my husband? Are there other risk or other ways to pass it to the unborn baby that I might be missing?
thx a bunch for your help
Kerrie</end quote>
This makes more sense! Phew!
First question is how do you know that the gene they detected with the baby is not one that you carry? Were you tested for being a carrier? If so do you know if the extended panel was done or just the basic which only covers 32 of the known CF mutations?
You are correct in the fact that for a child to have a chance of having CF itself that both parents need to be carriers & then there is a 25% chance of the baby having CF, 50% chance of the baby being a carrier, but not having CF & 25% of neither.
Ok I spoke w/ the nurse they DID do the wrong test. Should have taken simple blood work :::rolls eyes::
"The lab tech who did the sweat test said she'd never done one on an adult" so that sent up a red flag then..
*Jazzy* this is just my obgyn this is not a CF Center.
What my blood work showed and I asked for clarification on this. Was that the BABY showed a gene for CF, and it wasn't in me so I'm NOT a "carrier". I'm 31 yrs old and knew I didn't have actual CF myself.
I also have 2 other children from a previous marriage w/ no cf and I was never told I was a carrier in those pregnancy's.
So where we stand now is they need BLOOD WORK on the father to see if he in fact carries the gene. Which means another week of waiting, on the count of someones mistake.
But wouldn't both parents need to carry the CF gene in order to have CF? So if they are telling me I don't have a gene why would they be concerned with testing my husband? Are there other risk or other ways to pass it to the unborn baby that I might be missing?
thx a bunch for your help
Kerrie</end quote>
This makes more sense! Phew!
First question is how do you know that the gene they detected with the baby is not one that you carry? Were you tested for being a carrier? If so do you know if the extended panel was done or just the basic which only covers 32 of the known CF mutations?
You are correct in the fact that for a child to have a chance of having CF itself that both parents need to be carriers & then there is a 25% chance of the baby having CF, 50% chance of the baby being a carrier, but not having CF & 25% of neither.