J
jennylivingston
Guest
I was told by an OB specializing in high-risk pregnancies that her "magic number" was 70%, but my doctor at the CF clinic strongly disagreed. She seemed to think there were other factors that played a bigger role in pregnancy than any specific number.
For me personally (which is not to say it would be the case for everyone) my lung function dropped a LITTLE during pregnancy, but it was the demands of taking care of a newborn (among other things) that really took a toll on my body. I spent most of my life with an FEV1 in the high 90's, but by the time my baby was 3 months old I was at 27%. I'm doing A LOT BETTER now, but I'm still nowhere near that 90%...
There are a lot of things to think about when it comes to such a big decision. Best of luck in your research and decision making! <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">
For me personally (which is not to say it would be the case for everyone) my lung function dropped a LITTLE during pregnancy, but it was the demands of taking care of a newborn (among other things) that really took a toll on my body. I spent most of my life with an FEV1 in the high 90's, but by the time my baby was 3 months old I was at 27%. I'm doing A LOT BETTER now, but I'm still nowhere near that 90%...
There are a lot of things to think about when it comes to such a big decision. Best of luck in your research and decision making! <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">