<b>No, in no way did I want to jump down their throats</b> -- and I just returned to the computer to clarify what I had said (hopefully before anyone saw it) because it swirled in my head more after I walked away to do something else.....
<u>The connection I was having a hard time making was why would a hospital have anything to do with a patent</u>.... then it dawned on me how much research Children's does -- my brain was focused on the treatment & care we received at Children's, not the research they participate in. I had always envisioned when a patent was issued for a drug it was owned solely by the drug manufacturers. I now have a better understanding.
You are correct - I'm sure it was their involvement in the research and development of the drug years ago and I don't dispute the fact they deserve or are entitled to recoup their expenses -- I just never thought of them as being involved in patents before -- but it's not like I've ever really looked into it before - so it's probably very common for a research hospital... I'm just saying I never really thought about it before.
<u>The connection I was having a hard time making was why would a hospital have anything to do with a patent</u>.... then it dawned on me how much research Children's does -- my brain was focused on the treatment & care we received at Children's, not the research they participate in. I had always envisioned when a patent was issued for a drug it was owned solely by the drug manufacturers. I now have a better understanding.
You are correct - I'm sure it was their involvement in the research and development of the drug years ago and I don't dispute the fact they deserve or are entitled to recoup their expenses -- I just never thought of them as being involved in patents before -- but it's not like I've ever really looked into it before - so it's probably very common for a research hospital... I'm just saying I never really thought about it before.