After reading the later replies on this thread and mention of the insurance issues, it really bothers me and convinces me that, similar to other posts, the ONLY ones that stand to benefit in the long run to the 'atypical' and other such labels are the insurance companies.
These labels certainly haven't helped all the people here who saw, in the long run, the inevitable progression that this disease caused and who weren't taken seriously by doctors who saw it in their charts.
Many of us have enough trouble as it is getting necessary treatment covered thanks to insurance companies trying to play God (or at the very least, a suit with NO medical degree trying to play doctor); imagine the field day they could start having denying us/our children care at cf centers, vests, medications, etc based simply on what mutations they have or what they will deem to be 'too mild a condition to treat as CF.' Be careful what you wish for, indeed!
Let us all hope such a thing NEVER comes to pass!
These labels certainly haven't helped all the people here who saw, in the long run, the inevitable progression that this disease caused and who weren't taken seriously by doctors who saw it in their charts.
Many of us have enough trouble as it is getting necessary treatment covered thanks to insurance companies trying to play God (or at the very least, a suit with NO medical degree trying to play doctor); imagine the field day they could start having denying us/our children care at cf centers, vests, medications, etc based simply on what mutations they have or what they will deem to be 'too mild a condition to treat as CF.' Be careful what you wish for, indeed!
Let us all hope such a thing NEVER comes to pass!