<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Juliet</b></i>
It sounds like at least to the IV ABX question an earlier DX probably wouldn't have made any difference since I haven't been in the situation where I've needed anything more that oral ABX at this point.</end quote></div>
Just wanted to say, this sounds about right. I wasn't originally 100% clear on why you were asking about this. I got the late dx thing, I just wondered what the rationale behind asking was. Now that I'm clearer on it (and you probably said it before, I was just being a numbskull), I think that's a very accurate conclusion you've come to. IVs wouldn't have helped you any, because if you had needed them, CF dx or not, you would've known. If the oral abx have been working, then you're good. Again, CF dx or not.
And I know this is easier said than done by a long shot, but don't worry about the what ifs... it'll drive you batsh*t insane. Hah. I knew I had CF when I was 2 days old... but the gene wasn't discovered until I was 5. What if it had been discovered sooner? ...But Pulmozyme wasn't out until I was 9 years old. What if it had come out earlier? You know. Even those of us who've known could do that stuff and it's lame. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif" border="0"> I understand the natural urge to do it... but... don't. lol
<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0">