Search results

Emily recently started it and they had her trial it in a Pari LC at clinic. She uses a Sprint at home and that is a little faster.

Oh... a few more of your questions. Emily's has never been pulled out and she plays pretty rough sometimes (bounce house, playscape, sledding, bellyflop onto the floor rollerskating...) The only time she really seemed to hurt was falling hard on her belly while on the trampoline but I think it...

Oh... a few more of your questions. Emily's has never been pulled out and she plays pretty rough sometimes (bounce house, playscape, sledding, bellyflop onto the floor rollerskating...) The only time she really seemed to hurt was falling hard on her belly while on the trampoline but I think it...

Oh... a few more of your questions. <br /> <br />Emily's has never been pulled out and she plays pretty rough sometimes (bounce house, playscape, sledding, bellyflop onto the floor rollerskating...) The only time she really seemed to hurt was falling hard on her belly while on the trampoline...

I'm sorry~ I didn't see your reply to me until now. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> Emily is allowed to go in any water deemed safe for swimming. Water getting into the tube is no different than swallowing it, which all kids do when swimming. I wouldn't let any...

I'm sorry~ I didn't see your reply to me until now. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> Emily is allowed to go in any water deemed safe for swimming. Water getting into the tube is no different than swallowing it, which all kids do when swimming. I wouldn't let any...

I'm sorry~ I didn't see your reply to me until now. <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0"> <br /> <br />Emily is allowed to go in any water deemed safe for swimming. Water getting into the tube is no different than swallowing it, which all kids do when swimming. I...

Thanks Tom. Hmmm. I like that and i don't like that. It sounds like for many people, then, results could be quite good, even better than the 'average' most widely published. On the other hand, for those two numbers to differ by so much, there is clearly a lot of variability in response...

Thanks Tom. Hmmm. I like that and i don't like that. It sounds like for many people, then, results could be quite good, even better than the 'average' most widely published. On the other hand, for those two numbers to differ by so much, there is clearly a lot of variability in response...

Thanks Tom. <br /> <br />Hmmm. I like that and i don't like that. It sounds like for many people, then, results could be quite good, even better than the 'average' most widely published. <br /> <br />On the other hand, for those two numbers to differ by so much, there is clearly a lot of...

I tried looking it up and could not understand the math at all- none of the examples I could find involved 'real' numbers. The 16% would be more exciting to me if they could tell us exactly what was seen- the 10.6% increase in fev1 that I can mathematically apply to their starting baseline is...

I tried looking it up and could not understand the math at all- none of the examples I could find involved 'real' numbers. The 16% would be more exciting to me if they could tell us exactly what was seen- the 10.6% increase in fev1 that I can mathematically apply to their starting baseline is...

I tried looking it up and could not understand the math at all- none of the examples I could find involved 'real' numbers. <br /> <br />The 16% would be more exciting to me if they could tell us exactly what was seen- the 10.6% increase in fev1 that I can mathematically apply to their starting...

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>In addition FEV1 for the study group was ~63.5 (so ~50 pre-treatment??)</end quote></div> No... it looks like the average fev1 of both trial groups was in that range... the article states this: "Baseline lung function in STRIVE was 63.5 percent predicted for...

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>In addition FEV1 for the study group was ~63.5 (so ~50 pre-treatment??)</end quote> No... it looks like the average fev1 of both trial groups was in that range... the article states this: "Baseline lung function in STRIVE was 63.5 percent predicted for patients...

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>In addition FEV1 for the study group was ~63.5 (so ~50 pre-treatment??)</end quote> <br />No... it looks like the average fev1 of both trial groups was in that range... the article states this: <br />"Baseline lung function in STRIVE was 63.5 percent predicted...

The cultures you see referred to here are sputum cultures. They are tested for bugs like pseudomonas aeruginosa, staph, and other bugs that are sometimes seen in the respiratory tract of those that have cf. They would NOT be picked up on a test like a strep test or rapid flu test, blood test...

The cultures you see referred to here are sputum cultures. They are tested for bugs like pseudomonas aeruginosa, staph, and other bugs that are sometimes seen in the respiratory tract of those that have cf. They would NOT be picked up on a test like a strep test or rapid flu test, blood test...

The cultures you see referred to here are sputum cultures. They are tested for bugs like pseudomonas aeruginosa, staph, and other bugs that are sometimes seen in the respiratory tract of those that have cf. They would NOT be picked up on a test like a strep test or rapid flu test, blood test...

Thank you SO much for posting this! It is difficult to find information about this as it relates to CF that doesn't assume the person is diabetic. Emily has post-breakfast levels shown a couple times on labs in the past in the low 50's and her 2-hr post on the ogtt was 45! She was so jittery...