HollyCatheryn
New member
Just to throw this into the mix...I know that there are a lot of researchers on this board so I'll be interested to see what you come up with if you pursue this. I have come acros some research that indicates that germs are not the cause of disease. In these studies, the information that comes to light is that germs are an integral par of living cells (Dr. Antoine Bechamp). It is presented that if a germ causes a disease a) it must be found in every case of the disease and b) not be found apart from the disease (Dr. Robert Koch). But, this doesn't hold true. According to German bacteriologist, Geunther Enderlein, some microbes are associated with many of the worst chronic diseases known, but only under specific circumstances. In a healthy person these microbes actually benefit them and work in symbiosis with other cells.Rudolph Virchow, German pathologist and founder of cellular medicine is quoted as saying, "If I could live my life over again I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat--diseased tissue--rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue."It is pointed out that germs may be relatively insignificant in the state of a person's health. Rather, a person's health would be determined by nutrition, a strong, healthy, properly developed immune system and a balanced functioning of the various systems of the body. In this way, even when exposed to germs, a person's health remains stable. Evidence exists that there are many things that prevent the body from functioning properly to avoid and combat illness. Among these things are consumption of refined sugars (those not found naturally in fruits, vegetables and grains), consumption of and exposure to preservatives and chemicals, feeding infants with artificial foods (things other than human breastmilk), casual and over-use of antibiotics, and vaccines (which stimulate one part of the immune system over the other and can cause a gross imbalance). Dr. George White is quoted saying, "if the germ theory were founded on facts, there would be no living being to read what's written."Information taken from:<EM>Vaccines Do Not Protect</EM> by Eleanor McBean, PhD<EM>Bechamp or Pasteur</EM> by Douglas E. Hume"Was Pasteur Wrong?" by Michael Sheehan in <EM>Natural Health</EM> (Jan/Feb 1992)Anyway, I know that this is not a widely accepted view. But, the reading has been interesting and provocative. I'm sure there's more out there and this has been just from my initial introduction to this idea.