Fair and Balanced...

K

kayleesgrandma

New member
In 2001, during the confirmation of John Ashcroft to be attorney general, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee forced a one-week delay in the committee's vote on Ashcroft, saying there had not been enough time to answer all the questions about the nomination. On January 24, 2001, the Washington Post reported the story under the following headline:

<i>Vote On Ashcroft Is <b>Delayed</b> A Week; Democrats Cite Need for More Review</i>

Yesterday, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee did precisely the same thing for the nomination of Eric Holder to be attorney general. Today, the Washington Post is reporting the story under the following headline:

<i>Republicans <b>Obstruct</b> Holder's Path to Justice Department</i>

2008--year journalism died...
2009--more of the same
 
K

kayleesgrandma

New member
In 2001, during the confirmation of John Ashcroft to be attorney general, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee forced a one-week delay in the committee's vote on Ashcroft, saying there had not been enough time to answer all the questions about the nomination. On January 24, 2001, the Washington Post reported the story under the following headline:

<i>Vote On Ashcroft Is <b>Delayed</b> A Week; Democrats Cite Need for More Review</i>

Yesterday, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee did precisely the same thing for the nomination of Eric Holder to be attorney general. Today, the Washington Post is reporting the story under the following headline:

<i>Republicans <b>Obstruct</b> Holder's Path to Justice Department</i>

2008--year journalism died...
2009--more of the same
 
K

kayleesgrandma

New member
In 2001, during the confirmation of John Ashcroft to be attorney general, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee forced a one-week delay in the committee's vote on Ashcroft, saying there had not been enough time to answer all the questions about the nomination. On January 24, 2001, the Washington Post reported the story under the following headline:

<i>Vote On Ashcroft Is <b>Delayed</b> A Week; Democrats Cite Need for More Review</i>

Yesterday, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee did precisely the same thing for the nomination of Eric Holder to be attorney general. Today, the Washington Post is reporting the story under the following headline:

<i>Republicans <b>Obstruct</b> Holder's Path to Justice Department</i>

2008--year journalism died...
2009--more of the same
 
K

kayleesgrandma

New member
In 2001, during the confirmation of John Ashcroft to be attorney general, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee forced a one-week delay in the committee's vote on Ashcroft, saying there had not been enough time to answer all the questions about the nomination. On January 24, 2001, the Washington Post reported the story under the following headline:

<i>Vote On Ashcroft Is <b>Delayed</b> A Week; Democrats Cite Need for More Review</i>

Yesterday, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee did precisely the same thing for the nomination of Eric Holder to be attorney general. Today, the Washington Post is reporting the story under the following headline:

<i>Republicans <b>Obstruct</b> Holder's Path to Justice Department</i>

2008--year journalism died...
2009--more of the same
 
K

kayleesgrandma

New member
In 2001, during the confirmation of John Ashcroft to be attorney general, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee forced a one-week delay in the committee's vote on Ashcroft, saying there had not been enough time to answer all the questions about the nomination. On January 24, 2001, the Washington Post reported the story under the following headline:
<br />
<br /><i>Vote On Ashcroft Is <b>Delayed</b> A Week; Democrats Cite Need for More Review</i>
<br />
<br />Yesterday, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee did precisely the same thing for the nomination of Eric Holder to be attorney general. Today, the Washington Post is reporting the story under the following headline:
<br />
<br /><i>Republicans <b>Obstruct</b> Holder's Path to Justice Department</i>
<br />
<br />2008--year journalism died...
<br />2009--more of the same
<br />
 
B

Brad

New member
It's ok.. People are just so P i ss ed off over the underhanded Politics of the
Republicans over the last 12 years , Now they are going to Get some of
there Own Medicine.. It doesn't seem fair, Does it ? But as they say,turn around is fair play.

A Spoon full of Sugar Helps the Medicine go down.....
 
B

Brad

New member
It's ok.. People are just so P i ss ed off over the underhanded Politics of the
Republicans over the last 12 years , Now they are going to Get some of
there Own Medicine.. It doesn't seem fair, Does it ? But as they say,turn around is fair play.

A Spoon full of Sugar Helps the Medicine go down.....
 
B

Brad

New member
It's ok.. People are just so P i ss ed off over the underhanded Politics of the
Republicans over the last 12 years , Now they are going to Get some of
there Own Medicine.. It doesn't seem fair, Does it ? But as they say,turn around is fair play.

A Spoon full of Sugar Helps the Medicine go down.....
 
B

Brad

New member
It's ok.. People are just so P i ss ed off over the underhanded Politics of the
Republicans over the last 12 years , Now they are going to Get some of
there Own Medicine.. It doesn't seem fair, Does it ? But as they say,turn around is fair play.

A Spoon full of Sugar Helps the Medicine go down.....
 
B

Brad

New member
It's ok.. People are just so P i ss ed off over the underhanded Politics of the
<br /> Republicans over the last 12 years , Now they are going to Get some of
<br /> there Own Medicine.. It doesn't seem fair, Does it ? But as they say,turn around is fair play.
<br />
<br /> A Spoon full of Sugar Helps the Medicine go down.....
 
R

robert321

New member
what? i thought the media was unbiased!?!?! i wonder what the difference here is? but i'm sure it was just a typo

hopefully everyone can hear the sarcasm...

you know i'm watching a popular cable channel right now that specializes in historical programing, they're doing a thing over all the past presidents. from washington to obama, i find it funny that the first 35 or so of the presidents they focus mostly on their accomplishments, what defined their presidency, and maybe a few tidbits about what they did to the whitehouse or something like that, but the more recent ones, they seem to lean more towards their politics and less on what they accomplished. especially the republicans, i mean they practically make regan look like some guy who just happened upon the end of the cold war and screwed everything up, but all clinton did was tell a little white lie but made up for it by "hanging the moon"
 
R

robert321

New member
what? i thought the media was unbiased!?!?! i wonder what the difference here is? but i'm sure it was just a typo

hopefully everyone can hear the sarcasm...

you know i'm watching a popular cable channel right now that specializes in historical programing, they're doing a thing over all the past presidents. from washington to obama, i find it funny that the first 35 or so of the presidents they focus mostly on their accomplishments, what defined their presidency, and maybe a few tidbits about what they did to the whitehouse or something like that, but the more recent ones, they seem to lean more towards their politics and less on what they accomplished. especially the republicans, i mean they practically make regan look like some guy who just happened upon the end of the cold war and screwed everything up, but all clinton did was tell a little white lie but made up for it by "hanging the moon"
 
R

robert321

New member
what? i thought the media was unbiased!?!?! i wonder what the difference here is? but i'm sure it was just a typo

hopefully everyone can hear the sarcasm...

you know i'm watching a popular cable channel right now that specializes in historical programing, they're doing a thing over all the past presidents. from washington to obama, i find it funny that the first 35 or so of the presidents they focus mostly on their accomplishments, what defined their presidency, and maybe a few tidbits about what they did to the whitehouse or something like that, but the more recent ones, they seem to lean more towards their politics and less on what they accomplished. especially the republicans, i mean they practically make regan look like some guy who just happened upon the end of the cold war and screwed everything up, but all clinton did was tell a little white lie but made up for it by "hanging the moon"
 
R

robert321

New member
what? i thought the media was unbiased!?!?! i wonder what the difference here is? but i'm sure it was just a typo

hopefully everyone can hear the sarcasm...

you know i'm watching a popular cable channel right now that specializes in historical programing, they're doing a thing over all the past presidents. from washington to obama, i find it funny that the first 35 or so of the presidents they focus mostly on their accomplishments, what defined their presidency, and maybe a few tidbits about what they did to the whitehouse or something like that, but the more recent ones, they seem to lean more towards their politics and less on what they accomplished. especially the republicans, i mean they practically make regan look like some guy who just happened upon the end of the cold war and screwed everything up, but all clinton did was tell a little white lie but made up for it by "hanging the moon"
 
R

robert321

New member
what? i thought the media was unbiased!?!?! i wonder what the difference here is? but i'm sure it was just a typo
<br />
<br />hopefully everyone can hear the sarcasm...
<br />
<br />you know i'm watching a popular cable channel right now that specializes in historical programing, they're doing a thing over all the past presidents. from washington to obama, i find it funny that the first 35 or so of the presidents they focus mostly on their accomplishments, what defined their presidency, and maybe a few tidbits about what they did to the whitehouse or something like that, but the more recent ones, they seem to lean more towards their politics and less on what they accomplished. especially the republicans, i mean they practically make regan look like some guy who just happened upon the end of the cold war and screwed everything up, but all clinton did was tell a little white lie but made up for it by "hanging the moon"
 
B

Brad

New member
Well there was No Moon until Bill : }

Reagan did kinda fall into history at the right time.
A lot of things did fall into his lap. Good Times and a few white house aides ha, but nothing
has ever been said about that Hmm.. I wonder why...lol
 
B

Brad

New member
Well there was No Moon until Bill : }

Reagan did kinda fall into history at the right time.
A lot of things did fall into his lap. Good Times and a few white house aides ha, but nothing
has ever been said about that Hmm.. I wonder why...lol
 
B

Brad

New member
Well there was No Moon until Bill : }

Reagan did kinda fall into history at the right time.
A lot of things did fall into his lap. Good Times and a few white house aides ha, but nothing
has ever been said about that Hmm.. I wonder why...lol
 
B

Brad

New member
Well there was No Moon until Bill : }

Reagan did kinda fall into history at the right time.
A lot of things did fall into his lap. Good Times and a few white house aides ha, but nothing
has ever been said about that Hmm.. I wonder why...lol
 
B

Brad

New member
Well there was No Moon until Bill : }
<br />
<br /> Reagan did kinda fall into history at the right time.
<br /> A lot of things did fall into his lap. Good Times and a few white house aides ha, but nothing
<br /> has ever been said about that Hmm.. I wonder why...lol
<br />
<br />
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top