Good news about Glutathione

S

saveferris2009

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Sakem</b></i>

i've also heard that no one is willing to spend the money to do the research because this is not some type of drug that big drug companies could make lots of money from because it is sold over the counter....hmmm</end quote></div>


not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.

Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
</a>
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Sakem</b></i>

i've also heard that no one is willing to spend the money to do the research because this is not some type of drug that big drug companies could make lots of money from because it is sold over the counter....hmmm</end quote></div>


not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.

Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
</a>
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Sakem</b></i>

i've also heard that no one is willing to spend the money to do the research because this is not some type of drug that big drug companies could make lots of money from because it is sold over the counter....hmmm</end quote></div>


not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.

Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
</a>
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Sakem</b></i>

i've also heard that no one is willing to spend the money to do the research because this is not some type of drug that big drug companies could make lots of money from because it is sold over the counter....hmmm</end quote>


not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.

Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
</a>
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Sakem</b></i>
<br />
<br /> i've also heard that no one is willing to spend the money to do the research because this is not some type of drug that big drug companies could make lots of money from because it is sold over the counter....hmmm</end quote>
<br />
<br />
<br />not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.
<br />
<br />Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
</a><br />
<br />
<br />
 
S

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.

Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/Dr...opmentPipeline/
</a></end quote></div>

The GSH study is still listed as Phase I and it was being done in Germany in 2007. And the FDA will not regulate these supplements. As much as I think or would like to believe GSH is helpful, there is still not anything currently going on that can prove this. The closest thing is in Stanford and they are testing NAC.
 
S

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.

Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/Dr...opmentPipeline/
</a></end quote></div>

The GSH study is still listed as Phase I and it was being done in Germany in 2007. And the FDA will not regulate these supplements. As much as I think or would like to believe GSH is helpful, there is still not anything currently going on that can prove this. The closest thing is in Stanford and they are testing NAC.
 
S

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.

Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/Dr...opmentPipeline/
</a></end quote></div>

The GSH study is still listed as Phase I and it was being done in Germany in 2007. And the FDA will not regulate these supplements. As much as I think or would like to believe GSH is helpful, there is still not anything currently going on that can prove this. The closest thing is in Stanford and they are testing NAC.
 
S

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>

not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.

Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
">http://www.cff.org/research/Dr...opmentPipeline/
</a></end quote>

The GSH study is still listed as Phase I and it was being done in Germany in 2007. And the FDA will not regulate these supplements. As much as I think or would like to believe GSH is helpful, there is still not anything currently going on that can prove this. The closest thing is in Stanford and they are testing NAC.
 
S

Sakem

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>saveferris2009</b></i>
<br />
<br />not true at all. Look at BioAdvantex that Dr. Moss has invested in for oral/fizzy NAC. "Supplements" aren' regulated in the US therefore there is a huge biz opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement.
<br />
<br />Inhaled GSH is in Phase II trials so clearly it's moving forward... <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cff.org/research/DrugDevelopmentPipeline/
<br />">http://www.cff.org/research/Dr...opmentPipeline/
<br /></a></end quote>
<br />
<br />The GSH study is still listed as Phase I and it was being done in Germany in 2007. And the FDA will not regulate these supplements. As much as I think or would like to believe GSH is helpful, there is still not anything currently going on that can prove this. The closest thing is in Stanford and they are testing NAC.
<br />
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
if you look at the graph, it's Phase II. The CFF site is notorious for not updating the text to keep up with the graph for drug development states.

as with what Dr. Moss is doing at Stanford with NAC as I mentioned above, the same could occur with GSH. As I said, there is an opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement. You incorrectly assumed that would mean FDA regulation.

If you take the time to examine where Moss gets his NAC for his studies, and how he has filed his patent, you'll see that this can be applied to GSH again.

Again, your statement about the lack of opportunity due to OTC status is wrong. OTC doesn't mean lack of sales or lack of biz opportunity in the least.
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
if you look at the graph, it's Phase II. The CFF site is notorious for not updating the text to keep up with the graph for drug development states.

as with what Dr. Moss is doing at Stanford with NAC as I mentioned above, the same could occur with GSH. As I said, there is an opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement. You incorrectly assumed that would mean FDA regulation.

If you take the time to examine where Moss gets his NAC for his studies, and how he has filed his patent, you'll see that this can be applied to GSH again.

Again, your statement about the lack of opportunity due to OTC status is wrong. OTC doesn't mean lack of sales or lack of biz opportunity in the least.
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
if you look at the graph, it's Phase II. The CFF site is notorious for not updating the text to keep up with the graph for drug development states.

as with what Dr. Moss is doing at Stanford with NAC as I mentioned above, the same could occur with GSH. As I said, there is an opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement. You incorrectly assumed that would mean FDA regulation.

If you take the time to examine where Moss gets his NAC for his studies, and how he has filed his patent, you'll see that this can be applied to GSH again.

Again, your statement about the lack of opportunity due to OTC status is wrong. OTC doesn't mean lack of sales or lack of biz opportunity in the least.
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
if you look at the graph, it's Phase II. The CFF site is notorious for not updating the text to keep up with the graph for drug development states.

as with what Dr. Moss is doing at Stanford with NAC as I mentioned above, the same could occur with GSH. As I said, there is an opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement. You incorrectly assumed that would mean FDA regulation.

If you take the time to examine where Moss gets his NAC for his studies, and how he has filed his patent, you'll see that this can be applied to GSH again.

Again, your statement about the lack of opportunity due to OTC status is wrong. OTC doesn't mean lack of sales or lack of biz opportunity in the least.
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
if you look at the graph, it's Phase II. The CFF site is notorious for not updating the text to keep up with the graph for drug development states.
<br />
<br />as with what Dr. Moss is doing at Stanford with NAC as I mentioned above, the same could occur with GSH. As I said, there is an opportunity for a regulated, guaranteed quality supplement. You incorrectly assumed that would mean FDA regulation.
<br />
<br />If you take the time to examine where Moss gets his NAC for his studies, and how he has filed his patent, you'll see that this can be applied to GSH again.
<br />
<br />Again, your statement about the lack of opportunity due to OTC status is wrong. OTC doesn't mean lack of sales or lack of biz opportunity in the least.
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00506688?term=cystic+fibrosis+phase+2&recr=Open&rank=26
">http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/...e+2&recr=Open&rank=26
</a>

as i mentioned, the drug is in phase II trials.

no funding due to lack of biz interest? you must have heard wrong....
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00506688?term=cystic+fibrosis+phase+2&recr=Open&rank=26
">http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/...e+2&recr=Open&rank=26
</a>

as i mentioned, the drug is in phase II trials.

no funding due to lack of biz interest? you must have heard wrong....
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00506688?term=cystic+fibrosis+phase+2&recr=Open&rank=26
">http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/...e+2&recr=Open&rank=26
</a>

as i mentioned, the drug is in phase II trials.

no funding due to lack of biz interest? you must have heard wrong....
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00506688?term=cystic+fibrosis+phase+2&recr=Open&rank=26
">http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/...e+2&recr=Open&rank=26
</a>

as i mentioned, the drug is in phase II trials.

no funding due to lack of biz interest? you must have heard wrong....
 
S

saveferris2009

New member
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00506688?term=cystic+fibrosis+phase+2&recr=Open&rank=26
">http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/...e+2&recr=Open&rank=26
</a><br />
<br />
<br />as i mentioned, the drug is in phase II trials.
<br />
<br />no funding due to lack of biz interest? you must have heard wrong....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top