I have considered an eflow but since it was so controversial I thought it was best to wait. My doctor said he would prescribe it but cautioned me that it may not work well. For example, the studies with HS were done with an inhalation time of 15 minutes. The eflow would administer medication faster than that but you may actually need the 15 minutes to get the benefit. I am curious if the people who switched to the eflow feel they get the same benefit? I cough up a lot when doing HS....did anyone see a change in that? I just do not want to take any risks...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
my experience with pari
- Thread starter mjhut999
- Start date
I have considered an eflow but since it was so controversial I thought it was best to wait. My doctor said he would prescribe it but cautioned me that it may not work well. For example, the studies with HS were done with an inhalation time of 15 minutes. The eflow would administer medication faster than that but you may actually need the 15 minutes to get the benefit. I am curious if the people who switched to the eflow feel they get the same benefit? I cough up a lot when doing HS....did anyone see a change in that? I just do not want to take any risks...
I have considered an eflow but since it was so controversial I thought it was best to wait. My doctor said he would prescribe it but cautioned me that it may not work well. For example, the studies with HS were done with an inhalation time of 15 minutes. The eflow would administer medication faster than that but you may actually need the 15 minutes to get the benefit. I am curious if the people who switched to the eflow feel they get the same benefit? I cough up a lot when doing HS....did anyone see a change in that? I just do not want to take any risks...
if you what to read about the benefits i've received with the eFLow, i'll refer you to my eFlow blog (scroll down to categories, click eFlow).
i'd love to see the study about HTS that your doctor is talking about....
bottomline : eFlow is great. works better than old neb/compressors.
i'd love to see the study about HTS that your doctor is talking about....
bottomline : eFlow is great. works better than old neb/compressors.
if you what to read about the benefits i've received with the eFLow, i'll refer you to my eFlow blog (scroll down to categories, click eFlow).
i'd love to see the study about HTS that your doctor is talking about....
bottomline : eFlow is great. works better than old neb/compressors.
i'd love to see the study about HTS that your doctor is talking about....
bottomline : eFlow is great. works better than old neb/compressors.
if you what to read about the benefits i've received with the eFLow, i'll refer you to my eFlow blog (scroll down to categories, click eFlow).
i'd love to see the study about HTS that your doctor is talking about....
bottomline : eFlow is great. works better than old neb/compressors.
i'd love to see the study about HTS that your doctor is talking about....
bottomline : eFlow is great. works better than old neb/compressors.
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Chaggie</b></i>
If you're looking for speed that's the way to go, and as a bonus it's quite. </end quote></div>
As another bonus, it gets the med deeper into the lower part of your lungs.
eFlow just isn't about time .... it's about efficacy
If you're looking for speed that's the way to go, and as a bonus it's quite. </end quote></div>
As another bonus, it gets the med deeper into the lower part of your lungs.
eFlow just isn't about time .... it's about efficacy
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Chaggie</b></i>
If you're looking for speed that's the way to go, and as a bonus it's quite. </end quote></div>
As another bonus, it gets the med deeper into the lower part of your lungs.
eFlow just isn't about time .... it's about efficacy
If you're looking for speed that's the way to go, and as a bonus it's quite. </end quote></div>
As another bonus, it gets the med deeper into the lower part of your lungs.
eFlow just isn't about time .... it's about efficacy
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Chaggie</b></i>
If you're looking for speed that's the way to go, and as a bonus it's quite. </end quote></div>
As another bonus, it gets the med deeper into the lower part of your lungs.
eFlow just isn't about time .... it's about efficacy
If you're looking for speed that's the way to go, and as a bonus it's quite. </end quote></div>
As another bonus, it gets the med deeper into the lower part of your lungs.
eFlow just isn't about time .... it's about efficacy
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>mjhut999</b></i>
I wish my MD's office had told me that when I first got the original pari trek 2 years ago.
</end quote></div>
If he did this to you about the Trek 2 years ago, do you think he's giving you accurate informatoin about the eFlow today?????
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
try an ultrasonic nebulizer. Are the ultrasonic nebulizer's just as good/safe? </end quote></div>
also a no-no with pulmozyme & TOBI
I wish my MD's office had told me that when I first got the original pari trek 2 years ago.
</end quote></div>
If he did this to you about the Trek 2 years ago, do you think he's giving you accurate informatoin about the eFlow today?????
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
try an ultrasonic nebulizer. Are the ultrasonic nebulizer's just as good/safe? </end quote></div>
also a no-no with pulmozyme & TOBI
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>mjhut999</b></i>
I wish my MD's office had told me that when I first got the original pari trek 2 years ago.
</end quote></div>
If he did this to you about the Trek 2 years ago, do you think he's giving you accurate informatoin about the eFlow today?????
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
try an ultrasonic nebulizer. Are the ultrasonic nebulizer's just as good/safe? </end quote></div>
also a no-no with pulmozyme & TOBI
I wish my MD's office had told me that when I first got the original pari trek 2 years ago.
</end quote></div>
If he did this to you about the Trek 2 years ago, do you think he's giving you accurate informatoin about the eFlow today?????
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
try an ultrasonic nebulizer. Are the ultrasonic nebulizer's just as good/safe? </end quote></div>
also a no-no with pulmozyme & TOBI
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>mjhut999</b></i>
I wish my MD's office had told me that when I first got the original pari trek 2 years ago.
</end quote></div>
If he did this to you about the Trek 2 years ago, do you think he's giving you accurate informatoin about the eFlow today?????
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
try an ultrasonic nebulizer. Are the ultrasonic nebulizer's just as good/safe? </end quote></div>
also a no-no with pulmozyme & TOBI
I wish my MD's office had told me that when I first got the original pari trek 2 years ago.
</end quote></div>
If he did this to you about the Trek 2 years ago, do you think he's giving you accurate informatoin about the eFlow today?????
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
try an ultrasonic nebulizer. Are the ultrasonic nebulizer's just as good/safe? </end quote></div>
also a no-no with pulmozyme & TOBI