Now is the Time

kayleesgrandma · Jan 20, 2009

First of all, Brad...

It was not attacks on AMERICAN SOIL that Bush protected us from--it was attacks on American's throughout the world. Untill 2002--we had been attacked roughly every 18 months...Jeez, you really have BDS bad, you are prctically foaming. You can't give Bush credit for anything at all--therfore showing how bad your illness is...Go get a drink and celebrate, I worry about your blood pressure...
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/07/22/two-staggering-lists-of-carnage/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...ing-lists-of-carnage/
</a><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/bg2085.cfm
">http://www.heritage.org/Resear...andDefense/bg2085.cfm
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
As for impeaching Bush--I wish they would try--get all this ***** out there for all of you libtards to see the truth for once...

"Now, I'm against the use of torture, starting with the fact that as Americans, we're supposed to be better than that. But when a total of three non-Geneva-protected prisoners, in a raging war zone, were threatened with fake drowning for a total of less than a minute, and valuable intelligence was obtained... well, that's not exactly up there with Jimmy Carter's abandonment of 52 American hostages to the likes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 1979." <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/impeach-bush-not-just-for-bumper-stickers-anymore/
">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/i...per-stickers-anymore/
</a>
Hell, it's not like we pulled out their fingernails, or gouged their eyes out, or raped their mothers, sisters, daughters in front of them--like Saddam...BOO FREAKING HOOO!!! lET'S JUST "SLEEP DEPRIVE THEM" OR WOULD YOU HAVE IN MIND THEM LISTENING TO BARRY MANILOWE FOR 24 HOURS--is that your idea of getting information? You forget what the mindset was in the nation during those early years, before we even went to war?

Oh--and if you must impeach Bush--then you better take certain members of Congress, as well as are former president (can a president get impeached twice???) Since they believed in the intelligence from not just Bush, but Clinton and various branches of the INTERNATIONAL intelligence agencies...

Please feel free to refute ANY of these links providing evidence that Al Qaeda waas linked to Saddam:
I won't blame you if you can't find/won't evidence to refute me, or the time--maybe you will want to read just this one article--and refute it. Or are you like all the other loudmouth liberals--all talk and no substance--thinking that an opinion against Bush is the same as FACTS?

Where did the WMD Intel come from?
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/11/02/where-did-the-wmd-intel-come-from/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...-wmd-intel-come-from/
</a>
"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors"
- President William Jefferson Clinton 12/16/98
Clinton-Era Reports Cited Saddam-bin Laden Ties
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
</a><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/7/16/123325">http://www.newsmax.com/showins...tml?a=2003/7/16/123325</a>

If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Maddie Albright agreed:
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Sec. of State Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

Tom Daschle and lots of other Democrats completely agreed.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

Sandy "Pants" Berger agreed(accused of stealing governemnt documents):
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

Nancy Pelosi agreed: "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Clinton outlining a policy of regime change in Iraq.
Sen. Jon Kyl, March 12, 2004
The policy to remove Saddam Hussein was not left over from the first Bush administration, but, rather, unfinished business from the Clinton administration. Upon entering office in January of 2001, President Bush inherited from the Clinton administration a policy of regime change. That policy was based upon the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act (P.L. 105-338), which stated, "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." This policy was unanimously approved by the Senate and strongly supported by the Clinton administration

-----------------------------------------------------------
In the nearly two years since President Bush named Iraq as part of the "Axis of Evil," the American press has been working overtime denying that there was ever any link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. But that's not what the same news outlets were saying before the 9/11 attacks, back when Bill Clinton was president and needed justification to attack Iraq. 

Just weeks after Clinton bombed the daylights out of suspected hideaways for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, he used his January 1999 State of the Union Address to warn America about both bin Laden and Saddam, mentioning the two terror kingpins almost in the same breath. "We will defend our security wherever we are threatened - as we did this summer when we struck at Osama bin Laden's network of terror," Clinton told Congress and the nation. "The bombing our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania reminds us again of the risks faced every day by those who represent America to the world." Moments later Clinton segued into the threat posed by Saddam:

"For nearly a decade, Iraq has defied its obligations to destroy its weapons of terror and the missiles to deliver them. America will continue to contain Saddam, and we will work for the day when Iraq has a government worthy of its people." But rather than launch an all out assault on what reporters now call the "dubious" assertion that Saddam and bin Laden had made common cause, the press took Clinton's ball and ran with it.

In fact, as researched and documented this week by FrontPageMagazine.com, in 1999 the national news media was replete with reports linking the Butcher of Baghdad and the man who masterminded the killing of 3,000 Americans almost two years ago.
Feb. 14, 1999 U.S. WORRIED ABOUT IRAQI, BIN LADEN TIES TERRORIST COULD GAIN EVEN DEADLIER WEAPONS U.S. intelligence officials are worried that a burgeoning alliance between terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein could make the fugitive Saudi's loose-knit organization much more dangerous ... In addition, the officials said, Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal is now in Iraq, as is a renowned Palestinian bomb designer, and both could make their expertise available to bin Laden
**National Public Radio MORNING EDITION (10:00 a.m.ET) Feb. 18, 1999 THOUGH AFGHANISTAN HAS PROVIDED OSAMA BIN LADEN WITH SANCTUARY, IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE HE IS NOW
**Agence France-Presse Feb. 17, 1999 Saddam plans to use bin Laden against Kuwait
**Deutsche Presse-Agentur Feb. 17, 1999, Wednesday, BC Cycle Opposition group says bin Laden in Iraq
**DATELINE: Kuwait City An Iraqi opposition group claimed in a published report Wednesday that Islamic milita 
----------------------------------------------------------
Saddam's Terror Ties
Iraq-war critics ignore ample evidence.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200310210934.asp
">http://www.nationalreview.com/...rdock200310210934.asp
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
Jordan WMD Plotter Confesses to Iraqi Involvement

At least one of the al-Qaida plotters arrested in Jordan earlier this month as part of a weapons of mass destruction plot that Jordanian officials say could have killed 80,000 people revealed on Monday that he was trained in Iraq before the U.S. invaded in March 2003.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/4/27/164917.shtml
">http://archive.newsmax.com/arc...004/4/27/164917.shtml
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
The Clinton View of Iraq-al Qaeda Ties
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
">http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
Facing Down A Despot?(GEE THIS ONE HAS A COVER OF A MAGAZINE SHOWING CLINTON FACING SADDAM...)
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/10/facing-down-a-despot/
">http://www.floppingaces.net/20...facing-down-a-despot/
</a>1997--My, what a difference a few years and a Republican in office makes huh?
His strongest words last week came when he said he wanted to "wipe the prospect of chemical warfare off the face of the earth...I don't want a bunch of terrorists with laboratories in their briefcases going from airport to airport wreaking havoc in the world."

[...]Washington believes it has all the authority it needs to attack Iraq under existing U.N. resolutions. Security Council sources believe it is unlikely that Washington will go back to the Council for authorization since France and Russia would probably exercise their veto power.

Clinton was prepared to "go it alone" against Saddam because he didn't want to take the chance that he indeed did have WMD's. BUT.....6 years later, in a post 9/11 world, Bush was wrong to go into Iraq
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is just the tip of the iceberg if you want to have Bush impeached--GO AHEAD--LET'S HAVE IT OUT IN COURT!!!!!

kayleesgrandma · Jan 20, 2009

First of all, Brad...

It was not attacks on AMERICAN SOIL that Bush protected us from--it was attacks on American's throughout the world. Untill 2002--we had been attacked roughly every 18 months...Jeez, you really have BDS bad, you are prctically foaming. You can't give Bush credit for anything at all--therfore showing how bad your illness is...Go get a drink and celebrate, I worry about your blood pressure...
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/07/22/two-staggering-lists-of-carnage/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...ing-lists-of-carnage/
</a><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/bg2085.cfm
">http://www.heritage.org/Resear...andDefense/bg2085.cfm
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
As for impeaching Bush--I wish they would try--get all this ***** out there for all of you libtards to see the truth for once...

"Now, I'm against the use of torture, starting with the fact that as Americans, we're supposed to be better than that. But when a total of three non-Geneva-protected prisoners, in a raging war zone, were threatened with fake drowning for a total of less than a minute, and valuable intelligence was obtained... well, that's not exactly up there with Jimmy Carter's abandonment of 52 American hostages to the likes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 1979." <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/impeach-bush-not-just-for-bumper-stickers-anymore/
">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/i...per-stickers-anymore/
</a>
Hell, it's not like we pulled out their fingernails, or gouged their eyes out, or raped their mothers, sisters, daughters in front of them--like Saddam...BOO FREAKING HOOO!!! lET'S JUST "SLEEP DEPRIVE THEM" OR WOULD YOU HAVE IN MIND THEM LISTENING TO BARRY MANILOWE FOR 24 HOURS--is that your idea of getting information? You forget what the mindset was in the nation during those early years, before we even went to war?

Oh--and if you must impeach Bush--then you better take certain members of Congress, as well as are former president (can a president get impeached twice???) Since they believed in the intelligence from not just Bush, but Clinton and various branches of the INTERNATIONAL intelligence agencies...

Please feel free to refute ANY of these links providing evidence that Al Qaeda waas linked to Saddam:
I won't blame you if you can't find/won't evidence to refute me, or the time--maybe you will want to read just this one article--and refute it. Or are you like all the other loudmouth liberals--all talk and no substance--thinking that an opinion against Bush is the same as FACTS?

Where did the WMD Intel come from?
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/11/02/where-did-the-wmd-intel-come-from/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...-wmd-intel-come-from/
</a>
"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors"
- President William Jefferson Clinton 12/16/98
Clinton-Era Reports Cited Saddam-bin Laden Ties
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
</a><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/7/16/123325">http://www.newsmax.com/showins...tml?a=2003/7/16/123325</a>

If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Maddie Albright agreed:
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Sec. of State Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

Tom Daschle and lots of other Democrats completely agreed.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

Sandy "Pants" Berger agreed(accused of stealing governemnt documents):
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

Nancy Pelosi agreed: "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Clinton outlining a policy of regime change in Iraq.
Sen. Jon Kyl, March 12, 2004
The policy to remove Saddam Hussein was not left over from the first Bush administration, but, rather, unfinished business from the Clinton administration. Upon entering office in January of 2001, President Bush inherited from the Clinton administration a policy of regime change. That policy was based upon the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act (P.L. 105-338), which stated, "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." This policy was unanimously approved by the Senate and strongly supported by the Clinton administration

-----------------------------------------------------------
In the nearly two years since President Bush named Iraq as part of the "Axis of Evil," the American press has been working overtime denying that there was ever any link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. But that's not what the same news outlets were saying before the 9/11 attacks, back when Bill Clinton was president and needed justification to attack Iraq. 

Just weeks after Clinton bombed the daylights out of suspected hideaways for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, he used his January 1999 State of the Union Address to warn America about both bin Laden and Saddam, mentioning the two terror kingpins almost in the same breath. "We will defend our security wherever we are threatened - as we did this summer when we struck at Osama bin Laden's network of terror," Clinton told Congress and the nation. "The bombing our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania reminds us again of the risks faced every day by those who represent America to the world." Moments later Clinton segued into the threat posed by Saddam:

"For nearly a decade, Iraq has defied its obligations to destroy its weapons of terror and the missiles to deliver them. America will continue to contain Saddam, and we will work for the day when Iraq has a government worthy of its people." But rather than launch an all out assault on what reporters now call the "dubious" assertion that Saddam and bin Laden had made common cause, the press took Clinton's ball and ran with it.

In fact, as researched and documented this week by FrontPageMagazine.com, in 1999 the national news media was replete with reports linking the Butcher of Baghdad and the man who masterminded the killing of 3,000 Americans almost two years ago.
Feb. 14, 1999 U.S. WORRIED ABOUT IRAQI, BIN LADEN TIES TERRORIST COULD GAIN EVEN DEADLIER WEAPONS U.S. intelligence officials are worried that a burgeoning alliance between terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein could make the fugitive Saudi's loose-knit organization much more dangerous ... In addition, the officials said, Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal is now in Iraq, as is a renowned Palestinian bomb designer, and both could make their expertise available to bin Laden
**National Public Radio MORNING EDITION (10:00 a.m.ET) Feb. 18, 1999 THOUGH AFGHANISTAN HAS PROVIDED OSAMA BIN LADEN WITH SANCTUARY, IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE HE IS NOW
**Agence France-Presse Feb. 17, 1999 Saddam plans to use bin Laden against Kuwait
**Deutsche Presse-Agentur Feb. 17, 1999, Wednesday, BC Cycle Opposition group says bin Laden in Iraq
**DATELINE: Kuwait City An Iraqi opposition group claimed in a published report Wednesday that Islamic milita 
----------------------------------------------------------
Saddam's Terror Ties
Iraq-war critics ignore ample evidence.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200310210934.asp
">http://www.nationalreview.com/...rdock200310210934.asp
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
Jordan WMD Plotter Confesses to Iraqi Involvement

At least one of the al-Qaida plotters arrested in Jordan earlier this month as part of a weapons of mass destruction plot that Jordanian officials say could have killed 80,000 people revealed on Monday that he was trained in Iraq before the U.S. invaded in March 2003.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/4/27/164917.shtml
">http://archive.newsmax.com/arc...004/4/27/164917.shtml
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
The Clinton View of Iraq-al Qaeda Ties
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
">http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
Facing Down A Despot?(GEE THIS ONE HAS A COVER OF A MAGAZINE SHOWING CLINTON FACING SADDAM...)
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/10/facing-down-a-despot/
">http://www.floppingaces.net/20...facing-down-a-despot/
</a>1997--My, what a difference a few years and a Republican in office makes huh?
His strongest words last week came when he said he wanted to "wipe the prospect of chemical warfare off the face of the earth...I don't want a bunch of terrorists with laboratories in their briefcases going from airport to airport wreaking havoc in the world."

[...]Washington believes it has all the authority it needs to attack Iraq under existing U.N. resolutions. Security Council sources believe it is unlikely that Washington will go back to the Council for authorization since France and Russia would probably exercise their veto power.

Clinton was prepared to "go it alone" against Saddam because he didn't want to take the chance that he indeed did have WMD's. BUT.....6 years later, in a post 9/11 world, Bush was wrong to go into Iraq
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is just the tip of the iceberg if you want to have Bush impeached--GO AHEAD--LET'S HAVE IT OUT IN COURT!!!!!

kayleesgrandma · Jan 20, 2009

First of all, Brad...

It was not attacks on AMERICAN SOIL that Bush protected us from--it was attacks on American's throughout the world. Untill 2002--we had been attacked roughly every 18 months...Jeez, you really have BDS bad, you are prctically foaming. You can't give Bush credit for anything at all--therfore showing how bad your illness is...Go get a drink and celebrate, I worry about your blood pressure...
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/07/22/two-staggering-lists-of-carnage/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...ing-lists-of-carnage/
</a><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/bg2085.cfm
">http://www.heritage.org/Resear...andDefense/bg2085.cfm
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
As for impeaching Bush--I wish they would try--get all this ***** out there for all of you libtards to see the truth for once...

"Now, I'm against the use of torture, starting with the fact that as Americans, we're supposed to be better than that. But when a total of three non-Geneva-protected prisoners, in a raging war zone, were threatened with fake drowning for a total of less than a minute, and valuable intelligence was obtained... well, that's not exactly up there with Jimmy Carter's abandonment of 52 American hostages to the likes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 1979." <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/impeach-bush-not-just-for-bumper-stickers-anymore/
">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/i...per-stickers-anymore/
</a>
Hell, it's not like we pulled out their fingernails, or gouged their eyes out, or raped their mothers, sisters, daughters in front of them--like Saddam...BOO FREAKING HOOO!!! lET'S JUST "SLEEP DEPRIVE THEM" OR WOULD YOU HAVE IN MIND THEM LISTENING TO BARRY MANILOWE FOR 24 HOURS--is that your idea of getting information? You forget what the mindset was in the nation during those early years, before we even went to war?

Oh--and if you must impeach Bush--then you better take certain members of Congress, as well as are former president (can a president get impeached twice???) Since they believed in the intelligence from not just Bush, but Clinton and various branches of the INTERNATIONAL intelligence agencies...

Please feel free to refute ANY of these links providing evidence that Al Qaeda waas linked to Saddam:
I won't blame you if you can't find/won't evidence to refute me, or the time--maybe you will want to read just this one article--and refute it. Or are you like all the other loudmouth liberals--all talk and no substance--thinking that an opinion against Bush is the same as FACTS?

Where did the WMD Intel come from?
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/11/02/where-did-the-wmd-intel-come-from/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...-wmd-intel-come-from/
</a>
"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors"
- President William Jefferson Clinton 12/16/98
Clinton-Era Reports Cited Saddam-bin Laden Ties
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
</a><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/7/16/123325">http://www.newsmax.com/showins...tml?a=2003/7/16/123325</a>

If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Maddie Albright agreed:
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Sec. of State Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

Tom Daschle and lots of other Democrats completely agreed.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

Sandy "Pants" Berger agreed(accused of stealing governemnt documents):
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

Nancy Pelosi agreed: "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Clinton outlining a policy of regime change in Iraq.
Sen. Jon Kyl, March 12, 2004
The policy to remove Saddam Hussein was not left over from the first Bush administration, but, rather, unfinished business from the Clinton administration. Upon entering office in January of 2001, President Bush inherited from the Clinton administration a policy of regime change. That policy was based upon the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act (P.L. 105-338), which stated, "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." This policy was unanimously approved by the Senate and strongly supported by the Clinton administration

-----------------------------------------------------------
In the nearly two years since President Bush named Iraq as part of the "Axis of Evil," the American press has been working overtime denying that there was ever any link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. But that's not what the same news outlets were saying before the 9/11 attacks, back when Bill Clinton was president and needed justification to attack Iraq. 

Just weeks after Clinton bombed the daylights out of suspected hideaways for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, he used his January 1999 State of the Union Address to warn America about both bin Laden and Saddam, mentioning the two terror kingpins almost in the same breath. "We will defend our security wherever we are threatened - as we did this summer when we struck at Osama bin Laden's network of terror," Clinton told Congress and the nation. "The bombing our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania reminds us again of the risks faced every day by those who represent America to the world." Moments later Clinton segued into the threat posed by Saddam:

"For nearly a decade, Iraq has defied its obligations to destroy its weapons of terror and the missiles to deliver them. America will continue to contain Saddam, and we will work for the day when Iraq has a government worthy of its people." But rather than launch an all out assault on what reporters now call the "dubious" assertion that Saddam and bin Laden had made common cause, the press took Clinton's ball and ran with it.

In fact, as researched and documented this week by FrontPageMagazine.com, in 1999 the national news media was replete with reports linking the Butcher of Baghdad and the man who masterminded the killing of 3,000 Americans almost two years ago.
Feb. 14, 1999 U.S. WORRIED ABOUT IRAQI, BIN LADEN TIES TERRORIST COULD GAIN EVEN DEADLIER WEAPONS U.S. intelligence officials are worried that a burgeoning alliance between terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein could make the fugitive Saudi's loose-knit organization much more dangerous ... In addition, the officials said, Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal is now in Iraq, as is a renowned Palestinian bomb designer, and both could make their expertise available to bin Laden
**National Public Radio MORNING EDITION (10:00 a.m.ET) Feb. 18, 1999 THOUGH AFGHANISTAN HAS PROVIDED OSAMA BIN LADEN WITH SANCTUARY, IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE HE IS NOW
**Agence France-Presse Feb. 17, 1999 Saddam plans to use bin Laden against Kuwait
**Deutsche Presse-Agentur Feb. 17, 1999, Wednesday, BC Cycle Opposition group says bin Laden in Iraq
**DATELINE: Kuwait City An Iraqi opposition group claimed in a published report Wednesday that Islamic milita 
----------------------------------------------------------
Saddam's Terror Ties
Iraq-war critics ignore ample evidence.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200310210934.asp
">http://www.nationalreview.com/...rdock200310210934.asp
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
Jordan WMD Plotter Confesses to Iraqi Involvement

At least one of the al-Qaida plotters arrested in Jordan earlier this month as part of a weapons of mass destruction plot that Jordanian officials say could have killed 80,000 people revealed on Monday that he was trained in Iraq before the U.S. invaded in March 2003.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/4/27/164917.shtml
">http://archive.newsmax.com/arc...004/4/27/164917.shtml
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
The Clinton View of Iraq-al Qaeda Ties
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
">http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
Facing Down A Despot?(GEE THIS ONE HAS A COVER OF A MAGAZINE SHOWING CLINTON FACING SADDAM...)
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/10/facing-down-a-despot/
">http://www.floppingaces.net/20...facing-down-a-despot/
</a>1997--My, what a difference a few years and a Republican in office makes huh?
His strongest words last week came when he said he wanted to "wipe the prospect of chemical warfare off the face of the earth...I don't want a bunch of terrorists with laboratories in their briefcases going from airport to airport wreaking havoc in the world."

[...]Washington believes it has all the authority it needs to attack Iraq under existing U.N. resolutions. Security Council sources believe it is unlikely that Washington will go back to the Council for authorization since France and Russia would probably exercise their veto power.

Clinton was prepared to "go it alone" against Saddam because he didn't want to take the chance that he indeed did have WMD's. BUT.....6 years later, in a post 9/11 world, Bush was wrong to go into Iraq
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is just the tip of the iceberg if you want to have Bush impeached--GO AHEAD--LET'S HAVE IT OUT IN COURT!!!!!

kayleesgrandma · Jan 20, 2009

First of all, Brad...

It was not attacks on AMERICAN SOIL that Bush protected us from--it was attacks on American's throughout the world. Untill 2002--we had been attacked roughly every 18 months...Jeez, you really have BDS bad, you are prctically foaming. You can't give Bush credit for anything at all--therfore showing how bad your illness is...Go get a drink and celebrate, I worry about your blood pressure...
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/07/22/two-staggering-lists-of-carnage/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...ing-lists-of-carnage/
</a><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/bg2085.cfm
">http://www.heritage.org/Resear...andDefense/bg2085.cfm
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
As for impeaching Bush--I wish they would try--get all this ***** out there for all of you libtards to see the truth for once...

"Now, I'm against the use of torture, starting with the fact that as Americans, we're supposed to be better than that. But when a total of three non-Geneva-protected prisoners, in a raging war zone, were threatened with fake drowning for a total of less than a minute, and valuable intelligence was obtained... well, that's not exactly up there with Jimmy Carter's abandonment of 52 American hostages to the likes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 1979." <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/impeach-bush-not-just-for-bumper-stickers-anymore/
">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/i...per-stickers-anymore/
</a>
Hell, it's not like we pulled out their fingernails, or gouged their eyes out, or raped their mothers, sisters, daughters in front of them--like Saddam...BOO FREAKING HOOO!!! lET'S JUST "SLEEP DEPRIVE THEM" OR WOULD YOU HAVE IN MIND THEM LISTENING TO BARRY MANILOWE FOR 24 HOURS--is that your idea of getting information? You forget what the mindset was in the nation during those early years, before we even went to war?

Oh--and if you must impeach Bush--then you better take certain members of Congress, as well as are former president (can a president get impeached twice???) Since they believed in the intelligence from not just Bush, but Clinton and various branches of the INTERNATIONAL intelligence agencies...

Please feel free to refute ANY of these links providing evidence that Al Qaeda waas linked to Saddam:
I won't blame you if you can't find/won't evidence to refute me, or the time--maybe you will want to read just this one article--and refute it. Or are you like all the other loudmouth liberals--all talk and no substance--thinking that an opinion against Bush is the same as FACTS?

Where did the WMD Intel come from?
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/11/02/where-did-the-wmd-intel-come-from/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...-wmd-intel-come-from/
</a>
"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors"
- President William Jefferson Clinton 12/16/98
Clinton-Era Reports Cited Saddam-bin Laden Ties
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
</a><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/7/16/123325">http://www.newsmax.com/showins...tml?a=2003/7/16/123325</a>

If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Maddie Albright agreed:
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
- Sec. of State Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

Tom Daschle and lots of other Democrats completely agreed.
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

Sandy "Pants" Berger agreed(accused of stealing governemnt documents):
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

Nancy Pelosi agreed: "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

Clinton outlining a policy of regime change in Iraq.
Sen. Jon Kyl, March 12, 2004
The policy to remove Saddam Hussein was not left over from the first Bush administration, but, rather, unfinished business from the Clinton administration. Upon entering office in January of 2001, President Bush inherited from the Clinton administration a policy of regime change. That policy was based upon the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act (P.L. 105-338), which stated, "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." This policy was unanimously approved by the Senate and strongly supported by the Clinton administration

-----------------------------------------------------------
In the nearly two years since President Bush named Iraq as part of the "Axis of Evil," the American press has been working overtime denying that there was ever any link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. But that's not what the same news outlets were saying before the 9/11 attacks, back when Bill Clinton was president and needed justification to attack Iraq. 

Just weeks after Clinton bombed the daylights out of suspected hideaways for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, he used his January 1999 State of the Union Address to warn America about both bin Laden and Saddam, mentioning the two terror kingpins almost in the same breath. "We will defend our security wherever we are threatened - as we did this summer when we struck at Osama bin Laden's network of terror," Clinton told Congress and the nation. "The bombing our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania reminds us again of the risks faced every day by those who represent America to the world." Moments later Clinton segued into the threat posed by Saddam:

"For nearly a decade, Iraq has defied its obligations to destroy its weapons of terror and the missiles to deliver them. America will continue to contain Saddam, and we will work for the day when Iraq has a government worthy of its people." But rather than launch an all out assault on what reporters now call the "dubious" assertion that Saddam and bin Laden had made common cause, the press took Clinton's ball and ran with it.

In fact, as researched and documented this week by FrontPageMagazine.com, in 1999 the national news media was replete with reports linking the Butcher of Baghdad and the man who masterminded the killing of 3,000 Americans almost two years ago.
Feb. 14, 1999 U.S. WORRIED ABOUT IRAQI, BIN LADEN TIES TERRORIST COULD GAIN EVEN DEADLIER WEAPONS U.S. intelligence officials are worried that a burgeoning alliance between terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein could make the fugitive Saudi's loose-knit organization much more dangerous ... In addition, the officials said, Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal is now in Iraq, as is a renowned Palestinian bomb designer, and both could make their expertise available to bin Laden
**National Public Radio MORNING EDITION (10:00 a.m.ET) Feb. 18, 1999 THOUGH AFGHANISTAN HAS PROVIDED OSAMA BIN LADEN WITH SANCTUARY, IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE HE IS NOW
**Agence France-Presse Feb. 17, 1999 Saddam plans to use bin Laden against Kuwait
**Deutsche Presse-Agentur Feb. 17, 1999, Wednesday, BC Cycle Opposition group says bin Laden in Iraq
**DATELINE: Kuwait City An Iraqi opposition group claimed in a published report Wednesday that Islamic milita 
----------------------------------------------------------
Saddam's Terror Ties
Iraq-war critics ignore ample evidence.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200310210934.asp
">http://www.nationalreview.com/...rdock200310210934.asp
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
Jordan WMD Plotter Confesses to Iraqi Involvement

At least one of the al-Qaida plotters arrested in Jordan earlier this month as part of a weapons of mass destruction plot that Jordanian officials say could have killed 80,000 people revealed on Monday that he was trained in Iraq before the U.S. invaded in March 2003.
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/4/27/164917.shtml
">http://archive.newsmax.com/arc...004/4/27/164917.shtml
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
The Clinton View of Iraq-al Qaeda Ties
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
">http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
</a>-----------------------------------------------------------
Facing Down A Despot?(GEE THIS ONE HAS A COVER OF A MAGAZINE SHOWING CLINTON FACING SADDAM...)
<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/10/facing-down-a-despot/
">http://www.floppingaces.net/20...facing-down-a-despot/
</a>1997--My, what a difference a few years and a Republican in office makes huh?
His strongest words last week came when he said he wanted to "wipe the prospect of chemical warfare off the face of the earth...I don't want a bunch of terrorists with laboratories in their briefcases going from airport to airport wreaking havoc in the world."

[...]Washington believes it has all the authority it needs to attack Iraq under existing U.N. resolutions. Security Council sources believe it is unlikely that Washington will go back to the Council for authorization since France and Russia would probably exercise their veto power.

Clinton was prepared to "go it alone" against Saddam because he didn't want to take the chance that he indeed did have WMD's. BUT.....6 years later, in a post 9/11 world, Bush was wrong to go into Iraq
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is just the tip of the iceberg if you want to have Bush impeached--GO AHEAD--LET'S HAVE IT OUT IN COURT!!!!!

kayleesgrandma · Jan 20, 2009

First of all, Brad...
 
 It was not attacks on AMERICAN SOIL that Bush protected us from--it was attacks on American's throughout the world. Untill 2002--we had been attacked roughly every 18 months...Jeez, you really have BDS bad, you are prctically foaming. You can't give Bush credit for anything at all--therfore showing how bad your illness is...Go get a drink and celebrate, I worry about your blood pressure...
 <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/07/22/two-staggering-lists-of-carnage/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...ing-lists-of-carnage/
</a> <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/bg2085.cfm
">http://www.heritage.org/Resear...andDefense/bg2085.cfm
</a> -----------------------------------------------------------
 As for impeaching Bush--I wish they would try--get all this ***** out there for all of you libtards to see the truth for once...
 
 "Now, I'm against the use of torture, starting with the fact that as Americans, we're supposed to be better than that. But when a total of three non-Geneva-protected prisoners, in a raging war zone, were threatened with fake drowning for a total of less than a minute, and valuable intelligence was obtained... well, that's not exactly up there with Jimmy Carter's abandonment of 52 American hostages to the likes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 1979." <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/impeach-bush-not-just-for-bumper-stickers-anymore/
">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/i...per-stickers-anymore/
</a> 
 Hell, it's not like we pulled out their fingernails, or gouged their eyes out, or raped their mothers, sisters, daughters in front of them--like Saddam...BOO FREAKING HOOO!!! lET'S JUST "SLEEP DEPRIVE THEM" OR WOULD YOU HAVE IN MIND THEM LISTENING TO BARRY MANILOWE FOR 24 HOURS--is that your idea of getting information? You forget what the mindset was in the nation during those early years, before we even went to war?
 
 Oh--and if you must impeach Bush--then you better take certain members of Congress, as well as are former president (can a president get impeached twice???) Since they believed in the intelligence from not just Bush, but Clinton and various branches of the INTERNATIONAL intelligence agencies...
 
 Please feel free to refute ANY of these links providing evidence that Al Qaeda waas linked to Saddam:
 I won't blame you if you can't find/won't evidence to refute me, or the time--maybe you will want to read just this one article--and refute it. Or are you like all the other loudmouth liberals--all talk and no substance--thinking that an opinion against Bush is the same as FACTS?
 
 Where did the WMD Intel come from?
 <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/11/02/where-did-the-wmd-intel-come-from/
">http://theanchoressonline.com/...-wmd-intel-come-from/
</a> 
 "Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors"
 - President William Jefferson Clinton 12/16/98
 Clinton-Era Reports Cited Saddam-bin Laden Ties
 <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/947627/posts
</a> <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/7/16/123325">http://www.newsmax.com/showins...tml?a=2003/7/16/123325</a>
 
 If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
 - President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
 
 Maddie Albright agreed:
 "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
 - Sec. of State Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
 
 Tom Daschle and lots of other Democrats completely agreed.
 "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
 Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
 - Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
 
 Sandy "Pants" Berger agreed(accused of stealing governemnt documents):
 "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
 
 Nancy Pelosi agreed: "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
 -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
 
 Clinton outlining a policy of regime change in Iraq.
 Sen. Jon Kyl, March 12, 2004
 The policy to remove Saddam Hussein was not left over from the first Bush administration, but, rather, unfinished business from the Clinton administration. Upon entering office in January of 2001, President Bush inherited from the Clinton administration a policy of regime change. That policy was based upon the 1998 Iraq Liberation Act (P.L. 105-338), which stated, "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." This policy was unanimously approved by the Senate and strongly supported by the Clinton administration
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 In the nearly two years since President Bush named Iraq as part of the "Axis of Evil," the American press has been working overtime denying that there was ever any link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. But that's not what the same news outlets were saying before the 9/11 attacks, back when Bill Clinton was president and needed justification to attack Iraq. 
 
 Just weeks after Clinton bombed the daylights out of suspected hideaways for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, he used his January 1999 State of the Union Address to warn America about both bin Laden and Saddam, mentioning the two terror kingpins almost in the same breath. "We will defend our security wherever we are threatened - as we did this summer when we struck at Osama bin Laden's network of terror," Clinton told Congress and the nation. "The bombing our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania reminds us again of the risks faced every day by those who represent America to the world." Moments later Clinton segued into the threat posed by Saddam:
 
 "For nearly a decade, Iraq has defied its obligations to destroy its weapons of terror and the missiles to deliver them. America will continue to contain Saddam, and we will work for the day when Iraq has a government worthy of its people." But rather than launch an all out assault on what reporters now call the "dubious" assertion that Saddam and bin Laden had made common cause, the press took Clinton's ball and ran with it.
 
 In fact, as researched and documented this week by FrontPageMagazine.com, in 1999 the national news media was replete with reports linking the Butcher of Baghdad and the man who masterminded the killing of 3,000 Americans almost two years ago.
 Feb. 14, 1999 U.S. WORRIED ABOUT IRAQI, BIN LADEN TIES TERRORIST COULD GAIN EVEN DEADLIER WEAPONS U.S. intelligence officials are worried that a burgeoning alliance between terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and Iraqi President Saddam Hussein could make the fugitive Saudi's loose-knit organization much more dangerous ... In addition, the officials said, Palestinian terrorist Abu Nidal is now in Iraq, as is a renowned Palestinian bomb designer, and both could make their expertise available to bin Laden
 **National Public Radio MORNING EDITION (10:00 a.m.ET) Feb. 18, 1999 THOUGH AFGHANISTAN HAS PROVIDED OSAMA BIN LADEN WITH SANCTUARY, IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE HE IS NOW
 **Agence France-Presse Feb. 17, 1999 Saddam plans to use bin Laden against Kuwait
 **Deutsche Presse-Agentur Feb. 17, 1999, Wednesday, BC Cycle Opposition group says bin Laden in Iraq
 **DATELINE: Kuwait City An Iraqi opposition group claimed in a published report Wednesday that Islamic milita 
 ----------------------------------------------------------
 Saddam's Terror Ties
 Iraq-war critics ignore ample evidence.
 <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock200310210934.asp
">http://www.nationalreview.com/...rdock200310210934.asp
</a> -----------------------------------------------------------
 Jordan WMD Plotter Confesses to Iraqi Involvement
 
 At least one of the al-Qaida plotters arrested in Jordan earlier this month as part of a weapons of mass destruction plot that Jordanian officials say could have killed 80,000 people revealed on Monday that he was trained in Iraq before the U.S. invaded in March 2003.
 <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/4/27/164917.shtml
">http://archive.newsmax.com/arc...004/4/27/164917.shtml
</a> -----------------------------------------------------------
 The Clinton View of Iraq-al Qaeda Ties
 <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
">http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/clintvon.htm
</a> -----------------------------------------------------------
 Facing Down A Despot?(GEE THIS ONE HAS A COVER OF A MAGAZINE SHOWING CLINTON FACING SADDAM...)
 <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.floppingaces.net/2006/09/10/facing-down-a-despot/
">http://www.floppingaces.net/20...facing-down-a-despot/
</a> 1997--My, what a difference a few years and a Republican in office makes huh?
 His strongest words last week came when he said he wanted to "wipe the prospect of chemical warfare off the face of the earth...I don't want a bunch of terrorists with laboratories in their briefcases going from airport to airport wreaking havoc in the world."
 
 [...]Washington believes it has all the authority it needs to attack Iraq under existing U.N. resolutions. Security Council sources believe it is unlikely that Washington will go back to the Council for authorization since France and Russia would probably exercise their veto power.
 
 Clinton was prepared to "go it alone" against Saddam because he didn't want to take the chance that he indeed did have WMD's. BUT.....6 years later, in a post 9/11 world, Bush was wrong to go into Iraq
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 This is just the tip of the iceberg if you want to have Bush impeached--GO AHEAD--LET'S HAVE IT OUT IN COURT!!!!!

Brad · Jan 20, 2009

Come on Terri... Bush did Nothing....
He protected No one... Stop drinking the Kool Aid now, He is GONE !!!

Thank God he is Gone ,,Terri, He was a Moron. Just let it Go.

BTW my BP is just fine thank you..110/63 . I bet Yours Is way Up though...

It is really strange that RePs believe something can Only
be True IF they Believe in It.. As If a Democrat could Never speak Truth. How obtuse can you be.

The Democrats Won this Time. Just stop whinning and live with it like we did for 8 years.
But I am sure the REPS wil stop at nothing to make this
President fail.
Damn the Country as long as Reps SEEM right,, Is that the
Rep/ mind set?

Brad · Jan 20, 2009

Come on Terri... Bush did Nothing....
He protected No one... Stop drinking the Kool Aid now, He is GONE !!!

Thank God he is Gone ,,Terri, He was a Moron. Just let it Go.

BTW my BP is just fine thank you..110/63 . I bet Yours Is way Up though...

It is really strange that RePs believe something can Only
be True IF they Believe in It.. As If a Democrat could Never speak Truth. How obtuse can you be.

The Democrats Won this Time. Just stop whinning and live with it like we did for 8 years.
But I am sure the REPS wil stop at nothing to make this
President fail.
Damn the Country as long as Reps SEEM right,, Is that the
Rep/ mind set?

Brad · Jan 20, 2009

Come on Terri... Bush did Nothing....
He protected No one... Stop drinking the Kool Aid now, He is GONE !!!

Thank God he is Gone ,,Terri, He was a Moron. Just let it Go.

BTW my BP is just fine thank you..110/63 . I bet Yours Is way Up though...

It is really strange that RePs believe something can Only
be True IF they Believe in It.. As If a Democrat could Never speak Truth. How obtuse can you be.

The Democrats Won this Time. Just stop whinning and live with it like we did for 8 years.
But I am sure the REPS wil stop at nothing to make this
President fail.
Damn the Country as long as Reps SEEM right,, Is that the
Rep/ mind set?

Brad · Jan 20, 2009

Come on Terri... Bush did Nothing....
He protected No one... Stop drinking the Kool Aid now, He is GONE !!!

Thank God he is Gone ,,Terri, He was a Moron. Just let it Go.

BTW my BP is just fine thank you..110/63 . I bet Yours Is way Up though...

It is really strange that RePs believe something can Only
be True IF they Believe in It.. As If a Democrat could Never speak Truth. How obtuse can you be.

The Democrats Won this Time. Just stop whinning and live with it like we did for 8 years.
But I am sure the REPS wil stop at nothing to make this
President fail.
Damn the Country as long as Reps SEEM right,, Is that the
Rep/ mind set?

Brad · Jan 20, 2009

Come on Terri... Bush did Nothing....
 He protected No one... Stop drinking the Kool Aid now, He is GONE !!!
 
 Thank God he is Gone ,,Terri, He was a Moron. Just let it Go.
 
 BTW my BP is just fine thank you..110/63 . I bet Yours Is way Up though...
 
 
 It is really strange that RePs believe something can Only
 be True IF they Believe in It.. As If a Democrat could Never speak Truth. How obtuse can you be.
 
 The Democrats Won this Time. Just stop whinning and live with it like we did for 8 years.
 But I am sure the REPS wil stop at nothing to make this
 President fail.
 Damn the Country as long as Reps SEEM right,, Is that the
 Rep/ mind set?

JazzysMom · Jan 20, 2009

SIGHS

Sits back & watches.......

JazzysMom · Jan 20, 2009

SIGHS

Sits back & watches.......

JazzysMom · Jan 20, 2009

SIGHS

Sits back & watches.......

JazzysMom · Jan 20, 2009

SIGHS

Sits back & watches.......

JazzysMom · Jan 20, 2009

SIGHS
 
 
 Sits back & watches.......

SarahJean1976 · Jan 20, 2009

I stay out of this stuff as much as I can, but I have to just say this... I hate all the Rs and Ds... we are Americans and THAT is what it comes down to... At the end of the day we have America's best interest at heart... we want America to prosper and succeed... We want our children safe, we want our elderly fed... we want our criminals paying the price... we want the fighting to end... I am a compassionate, educated, God fearing woman... Some mistake my compassion for weakness, I assure you I am not... I am so tired of the judging and the "facts" that people try and quote... when their "facts" are nothing but their perspective opinion... Believe what you want, that is what being American is about... take one second, close your eyes, rejoice in the fact that we are Americans and we have the freedom to come on here and share our beliefs... and then take a second and remember the one bond other than the fact we are Americans that binds us all... We are all touched by Cystic Fibrosis...
Quit fighting... if you want to fight, fight FOR something!!! Fight for something that needs you to fight for it!!! Realize religion and polotics are 2 things that you will seldomly change others views on... it is not worthing fighting over...
Just my opinion...
Today is a new day!!!

SarahJean1976 · Jan 20, 2009

I stay out of this stuff as much as I can, but I have to just say this... I hate all the Rs and Ds... we are Americans and THAT is what it comes down to... At the end of the day we have America's best interest at heart... we want America to prosper and succeed... We want our children safe, we want our elderly fed... we want our criminals paying the price... we want the fighting to end... I am a compassionate, educated, God fearing woman... Some mistake my compassion for weakness, I assure you I am not... I am so tired of the judging and the "facts" that people try and quote... when their "facts" are nothing but their perspective opinion... Believe what you want, that is what being American is about... take one second, close your eyes, rejoice in the fact that we are Americans and we have the freedom to come on here and share our beliefs... and then take a second and remember the one bond other than the fact we are Americans that binds us all... We are all touched by Cystic Fibrosis...
Quit fighting... if you want to fight, fight FOR something!!! Fight for something that needs you to fight for it!!! Realize religion and polotics are 2 things that you will seldomly change others views on... it is not worthing fighting over...
Just my opinion...
Today is a new day!!!

SarahJean1976 · Jan 20, 2009

I stay out of this stuff as much as I can, but I have to just say this... I hate all the Rs and Ds... we are Americans and THAT is what it comes down to... At the end of the day we have America's best interest at heart... we want America to prosper and succeed... We want our children safe, we want our elderly fed... we want our criminals paying the price... we want the fighting to end... I am a compassionate, educated, God fearing woman... Some mistake my compassion for weakness, I assure you I am not... I am so tired of the judging and the "facts" that people try and quote... when their "facts" are nothing but their perspective opinion... Believe what you want, that is what being American is about... take one second, close your eyes, rejoice in the fact that we are Americans and we have the freedom to come on here and share our beliefs... and then take a second and remember the one bond other than the fact we are Americans that binds us all... We are all touched by Cystic Fibrosis...
Quit fighting... if you want to fight, fight FOR something!!! Fight for something that needs you to fight for it!!! Realize religion and polotics are 2 things that you will seldomly change others views on... it is not worthing fighting over...
Just my opinion...
Today is a new day!!!

SarahJean1976 · Jan 20, 2009

I stay out of this stuff as much as I can, but I have to just say this... I hate all the Rs and Ds... we are Americans and THAT is what it comes down to... At the end of the day we have America's best interest at heart... we want America to prosper and succeed... We want our children safe, we want our elderly fed... we want our criminals paying the price... we want the fighting to end... I am a compassionate, educated, God fearing woman... Some mistake my compassion for weakness, I assure you I am not... I am so tired of the judging and the "facts" that people try and quote... when their "facts" are nothing but their perspective opinion... Believe what you want, that is what being American is about... take one second, close your eyes, rejoice in the fact that we are Americans and we have the freedom to come on here and share our beliefs... and then take a second and remember the one bond other than the fact we are Americans that binds us all... We are all touched by Cystic Fibrosis...
Quit fighting... if you want to fight, fight FOR something!!! Fight for something that needs you to fight for it!!! Realize religion and polotics are 2 things that you will seldomly change others views on... it is not worthing fighting over...
Just my opinion...
Today is a new day!!!

SarahJean1976 · Jan 20, 2009

I stay out of this stuff as much as I can, but I have to just say this... I hate all the Rs and Ds... we are Americans and THAT is what it comes down to... At the end of the day we have America's best interest at heart... we want America to prosper and succeed... We want our children safe, we want our elderly fed... we want our criminals paying the price... we want the fighting to end... I am a compassionate, educated, God fearing woman... Some mistake my compassion for weakness, I assure you I am not... I am so tired of the judging and the "facts" that people try and quote... when their "facts" are nothing but their perspective opinion... Believe what you want, that is what being American is about... take one second, close your eyes, rejoice in the fact that we are Americans and we have the freedom to come on here and share our beliefs... and then take a second and remember the one bond other than the fact we are Americans that binds us all... We are all touched by Cystic Fibrosis...
 Quit fighting... if you want to fight, fight FOR something!!! Fight for something that needs you to fight for it!!! Realize religion and polotics are 2 things that you will seldomly change others views on... it is not worthing fighting over...
 Just my opinion...
 Today is a new day!!!

Now is the Time

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member