Now is the Time

[Brad]

How in the world did bush Keep anyone Safe ???

He brags that we have not had an attack on the US soil for 7 years< He thinks this is a
big deal. Well before 9/11 it had been 60 years since Pearl Harbor.

Bush has not kept me you or any one else safe,He is a boob,a flunkie, just admit it
and forget him. He will go down in history as the worst president in out history.
He will also be remembered as a joke.
Do you realize he was not elected twice. Now thats a real shame.

 

[Brad]

How in the world did bush Keep anyone Safe ???

He brags that we have not had an attack on the US soil for 7 years< He thinks this is a
big deal. Well before 9/11 it had been 60 years since Pearl Harbor.

Bush has not kept me you or any one else safe,He is a boob,a flunkie, just admit it
and forget him. He will go down in history as the worst president in out history.
He will also be remembered as a joke.
Do you realize he was not elected twice. Now thats a real shame.

 

[Brad]

How in the world did bush Keep anyone Safe ???

He brags that we have not had an attack on the US soil for 7 years< He thinks this is a
big deal. Well before 9/11 it had been 60 years since Pearl Harbor.

Bush has not kept me you or any one else safe,He is a boob,a flunkie, just admit it
and forget him. He will go down in history as the worst president in out history.
He will also be remembered as a joke.
Do you realize he was not elected twice. Now thats a real shame.

 

[Brad]

How in the world did bush Keep anyone Safe ???

He brags that we have not had an attack on the US soil for 7 years< He thinks this is a
big deal. Well before 9/11 it had been 60 years since Pearl Harbor.

Bush has not kept me you or any one else safe,He is a boob,a flunkie, just admit it
and forget him. He will go down in history as the worst president in out history.
He will also be remembered as a joke.
Do you realize he was not elected twice. Now thats a real shame.

 

[Brad]

<br />
<br /> How in the world did bush Keep anyone Safe ???
<br />
<br /> He brags that we have not had an attack on the US soil for 7 years< He thinks this is a
<br /> big deal. Well before 9/11 it had been 60 years since Pearl Harbor.
<br />
<br /> Bush has not kept me you or any one else safe,He is a boob,a flunkie, just admit it
<br /> and forget him. He will go down in history as the worst president in out history.
<br /> He will also be remembered as a joke.
<br /> Do you realize he was not elected twice. Now thats a real shame.
<br />
<br />

 

[Solo]

Well Terri if you ask me I would say that the Democrats are the real conservatives. The extreme right of the Republithug Party is turning or already is in the process of being a radical fringe group. For the past 8 years, the leader of the neo cons came up with "The Ownership Society"- give more to the people who already have much and watch the prosperity trickle down. Boy, as we can see, that sure worked out great!<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif" border="0"> Neo-cons like Bush and Co. all desire wealth and power, no matter what the cost, a far cry from the true conservative.

Terri, you have defended the Iraq "war" previously. Ergo, how in the world do you square your blatant defense of this pre-emptive military strike with conservatism? A true conservative is opposed to nation-building and pre-emptive strikes.

When will the GOP stop producing these redneck politicians (Cough, Palin), they're all cut from the same mold as Jeff Foxworthy, and don't represent any Americans except those in trailer parks.

The truth of the matter is George W was such a God awful President and like Brad said he should have been impeached years ago. Never in my lifetime has an incoming President been left such a heap of mess, Bush was left a pot of gold from Clinton, but turned it into coal. Just think if the Supreme Court didn't play partisan politics in 2000 and picked the true winner, Al Gore. There's no doubt in my mind that the world would be a better place.

 

[Solo]

Well Terri if you ask me I would say that the Democrats are the real conservatives. The extreme right of the Republithug Party is turning or already is in the process of being a radical fringe group. For the past 8 years, the leader of the neo cons came up with "The Ownership Society"- give more to the people who already have much and watch the prosperity trickle down. Boy, as we can see, that sure worked out great!<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif" border="0"> Neo-cons like Bush and Co. all desire wealth and power, no matter what the cost, a far cry from the true conservative.

Terri, you have defended the Iraq "war" previously. Ergo, how in the world do you square your blatant defense of this pre-emptive military strike with conservatism? A true conservative is opposed to nation-building and pre-emptive strikes.

When will the GOP stop producing these redneck politicians (Cough, Palin), they're all cut from the same mold as Jeff Foxworthy, and don't represent any Americans except those in trailer parks.

The truth of the matter is George W was such a God awful President and like Brad said he should have been impeached years ago. Never in my lifetime has an incoming President been left such a heap of mess, Bush was left a pot of gold from Clinton, but turned it into coal. Just think if the Supreme Court didn't play partisan politics in 2000 and picked the true winner, Al Gore. There's no doubt in my mind that the world would be a better place.

 

[Solo]

Well Terri if you ask me I would say that the Democrats are the real conservatives. The extreme right of the Republithug Party is turning or already is in the process of being a radical fringe group. For the past 8 years, the leader of the neo cons came up with "The Ownership Society"- give more to the people who already have much and watch the prosperity trickle down. Boy, as we can see, that sure worked out great!<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif" border="0"> Neo-cons like Bush and Co. all desire wealth and power, no matter what the cost, a far cry from the true conservative.

Terri, you have defended the Iraq "war" previously. Ergo, how in the world do you square your blatant defense of this pre-emptive military strike with conservatism? A true conservative is opposed to nation-building and pre-emptive strikes.

When will the GOP stop producing these redneck politicians (Cough, Palin), they're all cut from the same mold as Jeff Foxworthy, and don't represent any Americans except those in trailer parks.

The truth of the matter is George W was such a God awful President and like Brad said he should have been impeached years ago. Never in my lifetime has an incoming President been left such a heap of mess, Bush was left a pot of gold from Clinton, but turned it into coal. Just think if the Supreme Court didn't play partisan politics in 2000 and picked the true winner, Al Gore. There's no doubt in my mind that the world would be a better place.

 

[Solo]

Well Terri if you ask me I would say that the Democrats are the real conservatives. The extreme right of the Republithug Party is turning or already is in the process of being a radical fringe group. For the past 8 years, the leader of the neo cons came up with "The Ownership Society"- give more to the people who already have much and watch the prosperity trickle down. Boy, as we can see, that sure worked out great!<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif" border="0"> Neo-cons like Bush and Co. all desire wealth and power, no matter what the cost, a far cry from the true conservative.

Terri, you have defended the Iraq "war" previously. Ergo, how in the world do you square your blatant defense of this pre-emptive military strike with conservatism? A true conservative is opposed to nation-building and pre-emptive strikes.

When will the GOP stop producing these redneck politicians (Cough, Palin), they're all cut from the same mold as Jeff Foxworthy, and don't represent any Americans except those in trailer parks.

The truth of the matter is George W was such a God awful President and like Brad said he should have been impeached years ago. Never in my lifetime has an incoming President been left such a heap of mess, Bush was left a pot of gold from Clinton, but turned it into coal. Just think if the Supreme Court didn't play partisan politics in 2000 and picked the true winner, Al Gore. There's no doubt in my mind that the world would be a better place.

 

[Solo]

Well Terri if you ask me I would say that the Democrats are the real conservatives. The extreme right of the Republithug Party is turning or already is in the process of being a radical fringe group. For the past 8 years, the leader of the neo cons came up with "The Ownership Society"- give more to the people who already have much and watch the prosperity trickle down. Boy, as we can see, that sure worked out great!<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif" border="0"> Neo-cons like Bush and Co. all desire wealth and power, no matter what the cost, a far cry from the true conservative.
<br />
<br />Terri, you have defended the Iraq "war" previously. Ergo, how in the world do you square your blatant defense of this pre-emptive military strike with conservatism? A true conservative is opposed to nation-building and pre-emptive strikes.
<br />
<br />When will the GOP stop producing these redneck politicians (Cough, Palin), they're all cut from the same mold as Jeff Foxworthy, and don't represent any Americans except those in trailer parks.
<br />
<br />The truth of the matter is George W was such a God awful President and like Brad said he should have been impeached years ago. Never in my lifetime has an incoming President been left such a heap of mess, Bush was left a pot of gold from Clinton, but turned it into coal. Just think if the Supreme Court didn't play partisan politics in 2000 and picked the true winner, Al Gore. There's no doubt in my mind that the world would be a better place.
<br />

 

[65rosessamurai]

Only question that comes to my mind is why wasn't Bush impeached, if you and "cough cough" says so?! I never once heard the word "impeachment" during the Bush years, but heard it more than once during the Clinton years.

Since Obama was chosen by the majority, why didn't the "majority" file for impeachment, and on what grounds would that intail, since impeachment isn't based on popularity, but on a President breaking laws that are made for all Presidents to abide by.

 

[65rosessamurai]

Only question that comes to my mind is why wasn't Bush impeached, if you and "cough cough" says so?! I never once heard the word "impeachment" during the Bush years, but heard it more than once during the Clinton years.

Since Obama was chosen by the majority, why didn't the "majority" file for impeachment, and on what grounds would that intail, since impeachment isn't based on popularity, but on a President breaking laws that are made for all Presidents to abide by.

 

[65rosessamurai]

Only question that comes to my mind is why wasn't Bush impeached, if you and "cough cough" says so?! I never once heard the word "impeachment" during the Bush years, but heard it more than once during the Clinton years.

Since Obama was chosen by the majority, why didn't the "majority" file for impeachment, and on what grounds would that intail, since impeachment isn't based on popularity, but on a President breaking laws that are made for all Presidents to abide by.

 

[65rosessamurai]

Only question that comes to my mind is why wasn't Bush impeached, if you and "cough cough" says so?! I never once heard the word "impeachment" during the Bush years, but heard it more than once during the Clinton years.

Since Obama was chosen by the majority, why didn't the "majority" file for impeachment, and on what grounds would that intail, since impeachment isn't based on popularity, but on a President breaking laws that are made for all Presidents to abide by.

 

[65rosessamurai]

Only question that comes to my mind is why wasn't Bush impeached, if you and "cough cough" says so?! I never once heard the word "impeachment" during the Bush years, but heard it more than once during the Clinton years.
<br />
<br />Since Obama was chosen by the majority, why didn't the "majority" file for impeachment, and on what grounds would that intail, since impeachment isn't based on popularity, but on a President breaking laws that are made for all Presidents to abide by.
<br />
<br />

 

[Solo]

Actually, there's a good chance that criminal W will not be held accountable for his crimes, thanks to Gerald Ford who pardoned Richard Nixon, and set a precedent that no American President shall be held accountable for his crimes. Your'e right, impeachment isn't based on popularity, as impeachment isn't a civil or criminal thing, it's pure politics. But war crimes is drastically different. I don't get where the "majority" fits in?


Fred, quick question. Eric Holder, Obama's "lawyer", said that waterboarding is torture. Now if it is found that torture tactics are indeed illegal and criminal, do you not think that those who authorized, designed and carried them out should be punished?

Now what Bill Clinton did is drastically different, and to equate what he did with what Emperor Bush did is nothing but silly sophistry. Did Bill Clinton hurt anyone by lying under oath about personal relations? Kenneth Starr and his cohort Newt led a witch hunt against Clinton. Anyway, if joe six pack goes on a killing spree, the police will be quiet and not tip Joe off until they have concrete evidence that he committed those acts. Hence, criminals are usually suprised when they get nabbed. The prosecution needs to build a case.

I think it was a huge mistake NOT prosecuting Bush these last years, as Pelosi said since I think 2005 "Impeachment is off the table", if Congress sought impeachment, I tell ya what, it would set a unmistakable precedent that any future President doesn't have carte blanche to do whatever they please.

 

[Solo]

Actually, there's a good chance that criminal W will not be held accountable for his crimes, thanks to Gerald Ford who pardoned Richard Nixon, and set a precedent that no American President shall be held accountable for his crimes. Your'e right, impeachment isn't based on popularity, as impeachment isn't a civil or criminal thing, it's pure politics. But war crimes is drastically different. I don't get where the "majority" fits in?


Fred, quick question. Eric Holder, Obama's "lawyer", said that waterboarding is torture. Now if it is found that torture tactics are indeed illegal and criminal, do you not think that those who authorized, designed and carried them out should be punished?

Now what Bill Clinton did is drastically different, and to equate what he did with what Emperor Bush did is nothing but silly sophistry. Did Bill Clinton hurt anyone by lying under oath about personal relations? Kenneth Starr and his cohort Newt led a witch hunt against Clinton. Anyway, if joe six pack goes on a killing spree, the police will be quiet and not tip Joe off until they have concrete evidence that he committed those acts. Hence, criminals are usually suprised when they get nabbed. The prosecution needs to build a case.

I think it was a huge mistake NOT prosecuting Bush these last years, as Pelosi said since I think 2005 "Impeachment is off the table", if Congress sought impeachment, I tell ya what, it would set a unmistakable precedent that any future President doesn't have carte blanche to do whatever they please.

 

[Solo]

Actually, there's a good chance that criminal W will not be held accountable for his crimes, thanks to Gerald Ford who pardoned Richard Nixon, and set a precedent that no American President shall be held accountable for his crimes. Your'e right, impeachment isn't based on popularity, as impeachment isn't a civil or criminal thing, it's pure politics. But war crimes is drastically different. I don't get where the "majority" fits in?


Fred, quick question. Eric Holder, Obama's "lawyer", said that waterboarding is torture. Now if it is found that torture tactics are indeed illegal and criminal, do you not think that those who authorized, designed and carried them out should be punished?

Now what Bill Clinton did is drastically different, and to equate what he did with what Emperor Bush did is nothing but silly sophistry. Did Bill Clinton hurt anyone by lying under oath about personal relations? Kenneth Starr and his cohort Newt led a witch hunt against Clinton. Anyway, if joe six pack goes on a killing spree, the police will be quiet and not tip Joe off until they have concrete evidence that he committed those acts. Hence, criminals are usually suprised when they get nabbed. The prosecution needs to build a case.

I think it was a huge mistake NOT prosecuting Bush these last years, as Pelosi said since I think 2005 "Impeachment is off the table", if Congress sought impeachment, I tell ya what, it would set a unmistakable precedent that any future President doesn't have carte blanche to do whatever they please.

 

[Solo]

Actually, there's a good chance that criminal W will not be held accountable for his crimes, thanks to Gerald Ford who pardoned Richard Nixon, and set a precedent that no American President shall be held accountable for his crimes. Your'e right, impeachment isn't based on popularity, as impeachment isn't a civil or criminal thing, it's pure politics. But war crimes is drastically different. I don't get where the "majority" fits in?


Fred, quick question. Eric Holder, Obama's "lawyer", said that waterboarding is torture. Now if it is found that torture tactics are indeed illegal and criminal, do you not think that those who authorized, designed and carried them out should be punished?

Now what Bill Clinton did is drastically different, and to equate what he did with what Emperor Bush did is nothing but silly sophistry. Did Bill Clinton hurt anyone by lying under oath about personal relations? Kenneth Starr and his cohort Newt led a witch hunt against Clinton. Anyway, if joe six pack goes on a killing spree, the police will be quiet and not tip Joe off until they have concrete evidence that he committed those acts. Hence, criminals are usually suprised when they get nabbed. The prosecution needs to build a case.

I think it was a huge mistake NOT prosecuting Bush these last years, as Pelosi said since I think 2005 "Impeachment is off the table", if Congress sought impeachment, I tell ya what, it would set a unmistakable precedent that any future President doesn't have carte blanche to do whatever they please.

 

[Solo]

Actually, there's a good chance that criminal W will not be held accountable for his crimes, thanks to Gerald Ford who pardoned Richard Nixon, and set a precedent that no American President shall be held accountable for his crimes. Your'e right, impeachment isn't based on popularity, as impeachment isn't a civil or criminal thing, it's pure politics. But war crimes is drastically different. I don't get where the "majority" fits in?
<br />
<br />
<br />Fred, quick question. Eric Holder, Obama's "lawyer", said that waterboarding is torture. Now if it is found that torture tactics are indeed illegal and criminal, do you not think that those who authorized, designed and carried them out should be punished?
<br />
<br />Now what Bill Clinton did is drastically different, and to equate what he did with what Emperor Bush did is nothing but silly sophistry. Did Bill Clinton hurt anyone by lying under oath about personal relations? Kenneth Starr and his cohort Newt led a witch hunt against Clinton. Anyway, if joe six pack goes on a killing spree, the police will be quiet and not tip Joe off until they have concrete evidence that he committed those acts. Hence, criminals are usually suprised when they get nabbed. The prosecution needs to build a case.
<br />
<br />I think it was a huge mistake NOT prosecuting Bush these last years, as Pelosi said since I think 2005 "Impeachment is off the table", if Congress sought impeachment, I tell ya what, it would set a unmistakable precedent that any future President doesn't have carte blanche to do whatever they please.
<br />
<br />
<br />