<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>becca23</b></i>
I seriously believe that there will never be a cure. Medication that totally controls the disease yes,a cure NO. It all boils down to money and the pharmacuetical companies. Just imagine if there was a cure discovered for CF, cancer or any other life threatening disease they would be out of business.</end quote></div>
Let's review.
A cure for a genetic illness like CF would need to be taken for the rest of the CFer's life, most likely.
This logic of pharma comapnies don't want to make a cure because it won't result in $ is bogus.
Where did the polio vaccine come from? If your theory was correct, then those vaccines such as polio would not have been invented.
There's no money to be made from CF patients.... that's why the CFF has to coax pharma companies with free $$$ to develop drugs.
Pharma companies don't care if CF is cured or not.... they're not making money off of us now to be concerned about a revenue stream from CF patients in the future.
Your theory would hold up if pharma companies were making millions of dollars off of CF patients every year and faced losing that money if CF was eliminated.
The only companies that could face losing a TINY bit of revenue would be Genentech and Chiron (now Novartis). Their pulmozyme and TOBI patents will expire in the next few years.... and it's not very significant anyhow because there are only 30,000 patients in the US who use the drug at most (and socialist governments overseas don't pay for it as frequently). These companies make muliple billions of dollars a year - a CF drug is pretty insignificant.
So if a cure is found, Genetech and Chiron won't feel it.
I think your argument is hopelessly flawed.
I seriously believe that there will never be a cure. Medication that totally controls the disease yes,a cure NO. It all boils down to money and the pharmacuetical companies. Just imagine if there was a cure discovered for CF, cancer or any other life threatening disease they would be out of business.</end quote></div>
Let's review.
A cure for a genetic illness like CF would need to be taken for the rest of the CFer's life, most likely.
This logic of pharma comapnies don't want to make a cure because it won't result in $ is bogus.
Where did the polio vaccine come from? If your theory was correct, then those vaccines such as polio would not have been invented.
There's no money to be made from CF patients.... that's why the CFF has to coax pharma companies with free $$$ to develop drugs.
Pharma companies don't care if CF is cured or not.... they're not making money off of us now to be concerned about a revenue stream from CF patients in the future.
Your theory would hold up if pharma companies were making millions of dollars off of CF patients every year and faced losing that money if CF was eliminated.
The only companies that could face losing a TINY bit of revenue would be Genentech and Chiron (now Novartis). Their pulmozyme and TOBI patents will expire in the next few years.... and it's not very significant anyhow because there are only 30,000 patients in the US who use the drug at most (and socialist governments overseas don't pay for it as frequently). These companies make muliple billions of dollars a year - a CF drug is pretty insignificant.
So if a cure is found, Genetech and Chiron won't feel it.
I think your argument is hopelessly flawed.