General Debate

AnD

New member
That would be the <i>equivalent</i> of forced sterilization for people who are deemed "not good enough" to be parents by the government. And what would happen if they did get pregnant? Forced abortion? Take the child away the day it is born based on a form? Can you imagine the waiting list to get government approval to be parents?!?

Nobody is the "perfect parent" and few even come close, but most people seem to turn out okay <img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif" border="0"> . And, as was said, what happens if your circumstances change when the child is 6 (divorce, job loss, health issues, etc.)? Do they come and take your child(ren) away and give her to a "better" family? It's a nice thought, in theory, but in practical application, it's not ethical or practical, IMO.
 

Lilith

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pete</b></i>

I firmly believe that people considering creating a child should be licenced to do so. They should prove stability in the home and prove the ability to be able to make the home financially, and emotionally secure.</end quote></div>

Pete, I've been saying the same thing for years and years. If you need a license to drive a car (which also requires responsibility), you should have to get a license for becoming a parent. It would dramatically cut down abuse of the welfare system, and many other issues. Except I'll go so far as to add an extra criteria; you have to take a general common sense test before you can get a parenting license!!
 

Lilith

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pete</b></i>

I firmly believe that people considering creating a child should be licenced to do so. They should prove stability in the home and prove the ability to be able to make the home financially, and emotionally secure.</end quote></div>

Pete, I've been saying the same thing for years and years. If you need a license to drive a car (which also requires responsibility), you should have to get a license for becoming a parent. It would dramatically cut down abuse of the welfare system, and many other issues. Except I'll go so far as to add an extra criteria; you have to take a general common sense test before you can get a parenting license!!
 

Lilith

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pete</b></i>

I firmly believe that people considering creating a child should be licenced to do so. They should prove stability in the home and prove the ability to be able to make the home financially, and emotionally secure.</end quote></div>

Pete, I've been saying the same thing for years and years. If you need a license to drive a car (which also requires responsibility), you should have to get a license for becoming a parent. It would dramatically cut down abuse of the welfare system, and many other issues. Except I'll go so far as to add an extra criteria; you have to take a general common sense test before you can get a parenting license!!
 

LisaV

New member
Hmmmm....
taking this to logical conclusion...

I suppose before you get a license you would need to pass a genetic test and "pass" (no genetic abnormalities, no genes for , say, CF), no deafness, IQ above somethingorother ?

And if you fail you would be sterilized, right?

Hmmm....
Well, that would work out just fine. We did that before in Nazi Germany and in some parts of the US (for IQ of women).

Why didn't I think of that?
 

LisaV

New member
Hmmmm....
taking this to logical conclusion...

I suppose before you get a license you would need to pass a genetic test and "pass" (no genetic abnormalities, no genes for , say, CF), no deafness, IQ above somethingorother ?

And if you fail you would be sterilized, right?

Hmmm....
Well, that would work out just fine. We did that before in Nazi Germany and in some parts of the US (for IQ of women).

Why didn't I think of that?
 

LisaV

New member
Hmmmm....
taking this to logical conclusion...

I suppose before you get a license you would need to pass a genetic test and "pass" (no genetic abnormalities, no genes for , say, CF), no deafness, IQ above somethingorother ?

And if you fail you would be sterilized, right?

Hmmm....
Well, that would work out just fine. We did that before in Nazi Germany and in some parts of the US (for IQ of women).

Why didn't I think of that?
 

Lilith

New member
I wouldn't go so far as to say genetics and IQ would need to be taken into consideration. Even though I am against CFers having kids personally (unless IVF or adoption are involved), I still believe that is a personal choice and would not descriminate against it.

With IQ, I don't believe it matters. Having all the book sense in the world does nothing for you if you don't have common sense. I believe that to be more important than a college degree (I know a lot of people in college, some of which are friends, who could recite the periodic table backwards and forwards and yet haven't changed the oil in their cars since they bought it, and lend their cell phones out to any Joe who askes, who later steals it...if you couldn't tell, those were specific experiences...).
 

Lilith

New member
I wouldn't go so far as to say genetics and IQ would need to be taken into consideration. Even though I am against CFers having kids personally (unless IVF or adoption are involved), I still believe that is a personal choice and would not descriminate against it.

With IQ, I don't believe it matters. Having all the book sense in the world does nothing for you if you don't have common sense. I believe that to be more important than a college degree (I know a lot of people in college, some of which are friends, who could recite the periodic table backwards and forwards and yet haven't changed the oil in their cars since they bought it, and lend their cell phones out to any Joe who askes, who later steals it...if you couldn't tell, those were specific experiences...).
 

Lilith

New member
I wouldn't go so far as to say genetics and IQ would need to be taken into consideration. Even though I am against CFers having kids personally (unless IVF or adoption are involved), I still believe that is a personal choice and would not descriminate against it.

With IQ, I don't believe it matters. Having all the book sense in the world does nothing for you if you don't have common sense. I believe that to be more important than a college degree (I know a lot of people in college, some of which are friends, who could recite the periodic table backwards and forwards and yet haven't changed the oil in their cars since they bought it, and lend their cell phones out to any Joe who askes, who later steals it...if you couldn't tell, those were specific experiences...).
 

welshgirl

New member
i'm sorry but this whole thread is ridiculous in the extreme!!!! ( thats my opinion)what ever happened to mother nature.<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">
 

welshgirl

New member
i'm sorry but this whole thread is ridiculous in the extreme!!!! ( thats my opinion)what ever happened to mother nature.<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">
 

welshgirl

New member
i'm sorry but this whole thread is ridiculous in the extreme!!!! ( thats my opinion)what ever happened to mother nature.<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif" border="0">
 

CFHockeyMom

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pete</b></i>

I firmly believe that people considering creating a child should be licenced to do so. They should prove stability in the home and prove the ability to be able to make the home financially, and emotionally secure.

</end quote></div>


I don't support the government regulating these types of things because lets face it, they'd screw it up.

However, before anyone has a child/chooses to be a parent these issues should be considered. It is irresposible to bring a child into an unstable situation whether it be financial, emotional, etc. Granted all of these things can, and do, change over time but decisions should be made in the here and now.
 

CFHockeyMom

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pete</b></i>

I firmly believe that people considering creating a child should be licenced to do so. They should prove stability in the home and prove the ability to be able to make the home financially, and emotionally secure.

</end quote></div>


I don't support the government regulating these types of things because lets face it, they'd screw it up.

However, before anyone has a child/chooses to be a parent these issues should be considered. It is irresposible to bring a child into an unstable situation whether it be financial, emotional, etc. Granted all of these things can, and do, change over time but decisions should be made in the here and now.
 

CFHockeyMom

New member
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pete</b></i>

I firmly believe that people considering creating a child should be licenced to do so. They should prove stability in the home and prove the ability to be able to make the home financially, and emotionally secure.

</end quote></div>


I don't support the government regulating these types of things because lets face it, they'd screw it up.

However, before anyone has a child/chooses to be a parent these issues should be considered. It is irresposible to bring a child into an unstable situation whether it be financial, emotional, etc. Granted all of these things can, and do, change over time but decisions should be made in the here and now.
 

Vampy

New member
welshgirl

Posts: 514
Joined: 06/04/2006

i'm sorry but this whole thread is ridiculous in the extreme!!!! ( thats my opinion)what ever happened to mother nature.


-------------------------
janet, mum to adam 20yrs old no cf and joe 9yrs old with cf.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with her 100 percent.
 

Vampy

New member
welshgirl

Posts: 514
Joined: 06/04/2006

i'm sorry but this whole thread is ridiculous in the extreme!!!! ( thats my opinion)what ever happened to mother nature.


-------------------------
janet, mum to adam 20yrs old no cf and joe 9yrs old with cf.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with her 100 percent.
 

Vampy

New member
welshgirl

Posts: 514
Joined: 06/04/2006

i'm sorry but this whole thread is ridiculous in the extreme!!!! ( thats my opinion)what ever happened to mother nature.


-------------------------
janet, mum to adam 20yrs old no cf and joe 9yrs old with cf.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with her 100 percent.
 
Top