I need a bailout, how about you?

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

How the stimulus plan will work....

Three contractors are bidding to fix a broken fence at the White House. One is from Chicago, another is from Tennessee, and the third is from Minnesota.

All three go with a White House official to examine the fence. The Minnesota contractor takes out a tape measure and does some measuring, then works some figures with a pencil. "Well," he says, "I figure the job will run about $900: $400 for materials, $400 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Tennessee contractor also does some measuring and figuring, then says, "I can do this job for $700: $300 for materials, $300 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Chicago contractor doesn't measure or figure, but leans over to the White House official and whispers, "$2,700."

The official, incredulous, says, "You didn't even measure like the other guys! How did you come up with such a high figure?"

The Chicago contractor whispers back, "$1000 for me, $1000 for you, and we hire the guy from Tennessee to fix the fence."

"Done!" replies the government official.

And that, my friends, is how the new stimulus plan will work

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

How the stimulus plan will work....

Three contractors are bidding to fix a broken fence at the White House. One is from Chicago, another is from Tennessee, and the third is from Minnesota.

All three go with a White House official to examine the fence. The Minnesota contractor takes out a tape measure and does some measuring, then works some figures with a pencil. "Well," he says, "I figure the job will run about $900: $400 for materials, $400 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Tennessee contractor also does some measuring and figuring, then says, "I can do this job for $700: $300 for materials, $300 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Chicago contractor doesn't measure or figure, but leans over to the White House official and whispers, "$2,700."

The official, incredulous, says, "You didn't even measure like the other guys! How did you come up with such a high figure?"

The Chicago contractor whispers back, "$1000 for me, $1000 for you, and we hire the guy from Tennessee to fix the fence."

"Done!" replies the government official.

And that, my friends, is how the new stimulus plan will work

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

How the stimulus plan will work....

Three contractors are bidding to fix a broken fence at the White House. One is from Chicago, another is from Tennessee, and the third is from Minnesota.

All three go with a White House official to examine the fence. The Minnesota contractor takes out a tape measure and does some measuring, then works some figures with a pencil. "Well," he says, "I figure the job will run about $900: $400 for materials, $400 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Tennessee contractor also does some measuring and figuring, then says, "I can do this job for $700: $300 for materials, $300 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Chicago contractor doesn't measure or figure, but leans over to the White House official and whispers, "$2,700."

The official, incredulous, says, "You didn't even measure like the other guys! How did you come up with such a high figure?"

The Chicago contractor whispers back, "$1000 for me, $1000 for you, and we hire the guy from Tennessee to fix the fence."

"Done!" replies the government official.

And that, my friends, is how the new stimulus plan will work

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

How the stimulus plan will work....

Three contractors are bidding to fix a broken fence at the White House. One is from Chicago, another is from Tennessee, and the third is from Minnesota.

All three go with a White House official to examine the fence. The Minnesota contractor takes out a tape measure and does some measuring, then works some figures with a pencil. "Well," he says, "I figure the job will run about $900: $400 for materials, $400 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Tennessee contractor also does some measuring and figuring, then says, "I can do this job for $700: $300 for materials, $300 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Chicago contractor doesn't measure or figure, but leans over to the White House official and whispers, "$2,700."

The official, incredulous, says, "You didn't even measure like the other guys! How did you come up with such a high figure?"

The Chicago contractor whispers back, "$1000 for me, $1000 for you, and we hire the guy from Tennessee to fix the fence."

"Done!" replies the government official.

And that, my friends, is how the new stimulus plan will work

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

How the stimulus plan will work....
 
 Three contractors are bidding to fix a broken fence at the White House. One is from Chicago, another is from Tennessee, and the third is from Minnesota.
 
 All three go with a White House official to examine the fence. The Minnesota contractor takes out a tape measure and does some measuring, then works some figures with a pencil. "Well," he says, "I figure the job will run about $900: $400 for materials, $400 for my crew and $100 profit for me."
 
 The Tennessee contractor also does some measuring and figuring, then says, "I can do this job for $700: $300 for materials, $300 for my crew and $100 profit for me."
 
 The Chicago contractor doesn't measure or figure, but leans over to the White House official and whispers, "$2,700."
 
 The official, incredulous, says, "You didn't even measure like the other guys! How did you come up with such a high figure?"
 
 The Chicago contractor whispers back, "$1000 for me, $1000 for you, and we hire the guy from Tennessee to fix the fence."
 
 "Done!" replies the government official.
 
 And that, my friends, is how the new stimulus plan will work

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

John Kerry: You Know What's the Problem With Stimulus Tax Cuts? All That Freedom.
Sen. John Kerry took to the Senate floor today to pace, rant, and raise his voice in a monotone simulation of human passion as he spoke up for the massive spending bill the Democrats want to pass today under the guise of "stimulus."

During his speech, he addressed the argument made by fellow senators and many economists that tax cuts might be more helpful to stimulating the economy than long-term government spending. The American people are also coming around to that view, according to a recent CBS poll, which found only 22 percent of them favor more government spending over tax cuts as stimulus.

His argument against tax cuts for Americans during these hard economic times was illuminating: I've supported many tax cuts over the years, and there are tax cuts in this proposal. But a tax cut is non-targeted.

If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.

Indeed, people with their own hard-earned money in their own pockets are free to spend, save, invest, or not wherever they please. Kerry betrays the fear that haunts every good liberal - that the American people won't spend their money on exactly what good liberals would spend it on. Good liberals must, therefore, advocate for forcibly relieving the American people of the better part of a trillion dollars of their own money to fund things like STD education, welfare programs, and water parks.

Senators like Kerry have placed their own ideological desires over the right of the American people to a clean stimulus bill without the long-term spending even Obama himself admits is in it.

Kerry went on to declare with frightening candor his indifference to the waste of as much as $50-100 billion taxpayer dollars - the amount by which moderate senators are negotiating to cut the controversial bill.

"So frankly, you know, the difference between $50 billion on this bill or $100 billion -- let's get it moving. That is not going to make the difference to the economy."Kerry's priority is getting the bill moving, not quibbling over a $100 billion here or there.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/02/john_kerry_you_know_whats_the.asp
">http://www.weeklystandard.com/...ou_know_whats_the.asp
</a>

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

John Kerry: You Know What's the Problem With Stimulus Tax Cuts? All That Freedom.
Sen. John Kerry took to the Senate floor today to pace, rant, and raise his voice in a monotone simulation of human passion as he spoke up for the massive spending bill the Democrats want to pass today under the guise of "stimulus."

During his speech, he addressed the argument made by fellow senators and many economists that tax cuts might be more helpful to stimulating the economy than long-term government spending. The American people are also coming around to that view, according to a recent CBS poll, which found only 22 percent of them favor more government spending over tax cuts as stimulus.

His argument against tax cuts for Americans during these hard economic times was illuminating: I've supported many tax cuts over the years, and there are tax cuts in this proposal. But a tax cut is non-targeted.

If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.

Indeed, people with their own hard-earned money in their own pockets are free to spend, save, invest, or not wherever they please. Kerry betrays the fear that haunts every good liberal - that the American people won't spend their money on exactly what good liberals would spend it on. Good liberals must, therefore, advocate for forcibly relieving the American people of the better part of a trillion dollars of their own money to fund things like STD education, welfare programs, and water parks.

Senators like Kerry have placed their own ideological desires over the right of the American people to a clean stimulus bill without the long-term spending even Obama himself admits is in it.

Kerry went on to declare with frightening candor his indifference to the waste of as much as $50-100 billion taxpayer dollars - the amount by which moderate senators are negotiating to cut the controversial bill.

"So frankly, you know, the difference between $50 billion on this bill or $100 billion -- let's get it moving. That is not going to make the difference to the economy."Kerry's priority is getting the bill moving, not quibbling over a $100 billion here or there.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/02/john_kerry_you_know_whats_the.asp
">http://www.weeklystandard.com/...ou_know_whats_the.asp
</a>

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

John Kerry: You Know What's the Problem With Stimulus Tax Cuts? All That Freedom.
Sen. John Kerry took to the Senate floor today to pace, rant, and raise his voice in a monotone simulation of human passion as he spoke up for the massive spending bill the Democrats want to pass today under the guise of "stimulus."

During his speech, he addressed the argument made by fellow senators and many economists that tax cuts might be more helpful to stimulating the economy than long-term government spending. The American people are also coming around to that view, according to a recent CBS poll, which found only 22 percent of them favor more government spending over tax cuts as stimulus.

His argument against tax cuts for Americans during these hard economic times was illuminating: I've supported many tax cuts over the years, and there are tax cuts in this proposal. But a tax cut is non-targeted.

If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.

Indeed, people with their own hard-earned money in their own pockets are free to spend, save, invest, or not wherever they please. Kerry betrays the fear that haunts every good liberal - that the American people won't spend their money on exactly what good liberals would spend it on. Good liberals must, therefore, advocate for forcibly relieving the American people of the better part of a trillion dollars of their own money to fund things like STD education, welfare programs, and water parks.

Senators like Kerry have placed their own ideological desires over the right of the American people to a clean stimulus bill without the long-term spending even Obama himself admits is in it.

Kerry went on to declare with frightening candor his indifference to the waste of as much as $50-100 billion taxpayer dollars - the amount by which moderate senators are negotiating to cut the controversial bill.

"So frankly, you know, the difference between $50 billion on this bill or $100 billion -- let's get it moving. That is not going to make the difference to the economy."Kerry's priority is getting the bill moving, not quibbling over a $100 billion here or there.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/02/john_kerry_you_know_whats_the.asp
">http://www.weeklystandard.com/...ou_know_whats_the.asp
</a>

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

John Kerry: You Know What's the Problem With Stimulus Tax Cuts? All That Freedom.
Sen. John Kerry took to the Senate floor today to pace, rant, and raise his voice in a monotone simulation of human passion as he spoke up for the massive spending bill the Democrats want to pass today under the guise of "stimulus."

During his speech, he addressed the argument made by fellow senators and many economists that tax cuts might be more helpful to stimulating the economy than long-term government spending. The American people are also coming around to that view, according to a recent CBS poll, which found only 22 percent of them favor more government spending over tax cuts as stimulus.

His argument against tax cuts for Americans during these hard economic times was illuminating: I've supported many tax cuts over the years, and there are tax cuts in this proposal. But a tax cut is non-targeted.

If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.

Indeed, people with their own hard-earned money in their own pockets are free to spend, save, invest, or not wherever they please. Kerry betrays the fear that haunts every good liberal - that the American people won't spend their money on exactly what good liberals would spend it on. Good liberals must, therefore, advocate for forcibly relieving the American people of the better part of a trillion dollars of their own money to fund things like STD education, welfare programs, and water parks.

Senators like Kerry have placed their own ideological desires over the right of the American people to a clean stimulus bill without the long-term spending even Obama himself admits is in it.

Kerry went on to declare with frightening candor his indifference to the waste of as much as $50-100 billion taxpayer dollars - the amount by which moderate senators are negotiating to cut the controversial bill.

"So frankly, you know, the difference between $50 billion on this bill or $100 billion -- let's get it moving. That is not going to make the difference to the economy."Kerry's priority is getting the bill moving, not quibbling over a $100 billion here or there.

<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/02/john_kerry_you_know_whats_the.asp
">http://www.weeklystandard.com/...ou_know_whats_the.asp
</a>

kayleesgrandma · Feb 7, 2009

John Kerry: You Know What's the Problem With Stimulus Tax Cuts? All That Freedom.
 Sen. John Kerry took to the Senate floor today to pace, rant, and raise his voice in a monotone simulation of human passion as he spoke up for the massive spending bill the Democrats want to pass today under the guise of "stimulus."
 
 During his speech, he addressed the argument made by fellow senators and many economists that tax cuts might be more helpful to stimulating the economy than long-term government spending. The American people are also coming around to that view, according to a recent CBS poll, which found only 22 percent of them favor more government spending over tax cuts as stimulus.
 
 His argument against tax cuts for Americans during these hard economic times was illuminating: I've supported many tax cuts over the years, and there are tax cuts in this proposal. But a tax cut is non-targeted.
 
 If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.
 
 Indeed, people with their own hard-earned money in their own pockets are free to spend, save, invest, or not wherever they please. Kerry betrays the fear that haunts every good liberal - that the American people won't spend their money on exactly what good liberals would spend it on. Good liberals must, therefore, advocate for forcibly relieving the American people of the better part of a trillion dollars of their own money to fund things like STD education, welfare programs, and water parks.
 
 Senators like Kerry have placed their own ideological desires over the right of the American people to a clean stimulus bill without the long-term spending even Obama himself admits is in it.
 
 Kerry went on to declare with frightening candor his indifference to the waste of as much as $50-100 billion taxpayer dollars - the amount by which moderate senators are negotiating to cut the controversial bill.
 
 "So frankly, you know, the difference between $50 billion on this bill or $100 billion -- let's get it moving. That is not going to make the difference to the economy."Kerry's priority is getting the bill moving, not quibbling over a $100 billion here or there.
 
 <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/02/john_kerry_you_know_whats_the.asp
">http://www.weeklystandard.com/...ou_know_whats_the.asp
</a>

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

Terri, now keep in mind that in this election, Barack Obama got nearly 53% of the vote- that entails that nearly half of the country is republithug. So, Obama figuratively bitch slapped half of the country by literally annihilating the other guy. And even within the Democratic party, a small percentage are probably still pissed because their candidate didn't get the nomination. Now that is a hell of a lot of infuriated people, and keep in mind that's before Obama even enters the White House. So the current predicament is that half the country is mad, and the other half of the country is in an assortment of states of climax, ranging from orgasms when they hear Obama's name, to the "can't ***** up more than Bush" crowd. Now I personally feel Terri, that instead of attacking our newly democratically elected President, you and your ilk should just sit back and relax a bit, and let Obama actually do something noteworthy before people like you jump all over him.

After reading the first paragraph of your initial post, do you even have to wonder why I call them "Republithugs?"<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif" border="0"> I think the readers can decide who the one filled with hate is.

On the tax dodger thing, I am not even going to try to defend Obama there, because I agree with you, that is clear hypocrisy.

When you said the GOP wants to go back to their roots, surely you don't mean tax cuts, do ya? Because if you aren't aware, we tried that, hence we are here. If your blood sugars are in disarray, sound judgment and a heaping bit of level headedness would suggest to change your insulin program. I don't know what the GOP will do come 2012 if they return to true conservatism, because that hillbilly Palin has quite a following (not to mention Joe the news reporter/plumber/uncle fester wannabe/war correspondent), and if they don't revert back to neo-conservatism, it might indeed be the detrimental nail in their coffin.

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

Terri, now keep in mind that in this election, Barack Obama got nearly 53% of the vote- that entails that nearly half of the country is republithug. So, Obama figuratively bitch slapped half of the country by literally annihilating the other guy. And even within the Democratic party, a small percentage are probably still pissed because their candidate didn't get the nomination. Now that is a hell of a lot of infuriated people, and keep in mind that's before Obama even enters the White House. So the current predicament is that half the country is mad, and the other half of the country is in an assortment of states of climax, ranging from orgasms when they hear Obama's name, to the "can't ***** up more than Bush" crowd. Now I personally feel Terri, that instead of attacking our newly democratically elected President, you and your ilk should just sit back and relax a bit, and let Obama actually do something noteworthy before people like you jump all over him.

After reading the first paragraph of your initial post, do you even have to wonder why I call them "Republithugs?"<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif" border="0"> I think the readers can decide who the one filled with hate is.

On the tax dodger thing, I am not even going to try to defend Obama there, because I agree with you, that is clear hypocrisy.

When you said the GOP wants to go back to their roots, surely you don't mean tax cuts, do ya? Because if you aren't aware, we tried that, hence we are here. If your blood sugars are in disarray, sound judgment and a heaping bit of level headedness would suggest to change your insulin program. I don't know what the GOP will do come 2012 if they return to true conservatism, because that hillbilly Palin has quite a following (not to mention Joe the news reporter/plumber/uncle fester wannabe/war correspondent), and if they don't revert back to neo-conservatism, it might indeed be the detrimental nail in their coffin.

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

Terri, now keep in mind that in this election, Barack Obama got nearly 53% of the vote- that entails that nearly half of the country is republithug. So, Obama figuratively bitch slapped half of the country by literally annihilating the other guy. And even within the Democratic party, a small percentage are probably still pissed because their candidate didn't get the nomination. Now that is a hell of a lot of infuriated people, and keep in mind that's before Obama even enters the White House. So the current predicament is that half the country is mad, and the other half of the country is in an assortment of states of climax, ranging from orgasms when they hear Obama's name, to the "can't ***** up more than Bush" crowd. Now I personally feel Terri, that instead of attacking our newly democratically elected President, you and your ilk should just sit back and relax a bit, and let Obama actually do something noteworthy before people like you jump all over him.

After reading the first paragraph of your initial post, do you even have to wonder why I call them "Republithugs?"<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif" border="0"> I think the readers can decide who the one filled with hate is.

On the tax dodger thing, I am not even going to try to defend Obama there, because I agree with you, that is clear hypocrisy.

When you said the GOP wants to go back to their roots, surely you don't mean tax cuts, do ya? Because if you aren't aware, we tried that, hence we are here. If your blood sugars are in disarray, sound judgment and a heaping bit of level headedness would suggest to change your insulin program. I don't know what the GOP will do come 2012 if they return to true conservatism, because that hillbilly Palin has quite a following (not to mention Joe the news reporter/plumber/uncle fester wannabe/war correspondent), and if they don't revert back to neo-conservatism, it might indeed be the detrimental nail in their coffin.

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

Terri, now keep in mind that in this election, Barack Obama got nearly 53% of the vote- that entails that nearly half of the country is republithug. So, Obama figuratively bitch slapped half of the country by literally annihilating the other guy. And even within the Democratic party, a small percentage are probably still pissed because their candidate didn't get the nomination. Now that is a hell of a lot of infuriated people, and keep in mind that's before Obama even enters the White House. So the current predicament is that half the country is mad, and the other half of the country is in an assortment of states of climax, ranging from orgasms when they hear Obama's name, to the "can't ***** up more than Bush" crowd. Now I personally feel Terri, that instead of attacking our newly democratically elected President, you and your ilk should just sit back and relax a bit, and let Obama actually do something noteworthy before people like you jump all over him.

After reading the first paragraph of your initial post, do you even have to wonder why I call them "Republithugs?"<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif" border="0"> I think the readers can decide who the one filled with hate is.

On the tax dodger thing, I am not even going to try to defend Obama there, because I agree with you, that is clear hypocrisy.

When you said the GOP wants to go back to their roots, surely you don't mean tax cuts, do ya? Because if you aren't aware, we tried that, hence we are here. If your blood sugars are in disarray, sound judgment and a heaping bit of level headedness would suggest to change your insulin program. I don't know what the GOP will do come 2012 if they return to true conservatism, because that hillbilly Palin has quite a following (not to mention Joe the news reporter/plumber/uncle fester wannabe/war correspondent), and if they don't revert back to neo-conservatism, it might indeed be the detrimental nail in their coffin.

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

Terri, now keep in mind that in this election, Barack Obama got nearly 53% of the vote- that entails that nearly half of the country is republithug. So, Obama figuratively bitch slapped half of the country by literally annihilating the other guy. And even within the Democratic party, a small percentage are probably still pissed because their candidate didn't get the nomination. Now that is a hell of a lot of infuriated people, and keep in mind that's before Obama even enters the White House. So the current predicament is that half the country is mad, and the other half of the country is in an assortment of states of climax, ranging from orgasms when they hear Obama's name, to the "can't ***** up more than Bush" crowd. Now I personally feel Terri, that instead of attacking our newly democratically elected President, you and your ilk should just sit back and relax a bit, and let Obama actually do something noteworthy before people like you jump all over him.
 
 After reading the first paragraph of your initial post, do you even have to wonder why I call them "Republithugs?"<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif" border="0"> I think the readers can decide who the one filled with hate is.
 
 On the tax dodger thing, I am not even going to try to defend Obama there, because I agree with you, that is clear hypocrisy.
 
 When you said the GOP wants to go back to their roots, surely you don't mean tax cuts, do ya? Because if you aren't aware, we tried that, hence we are here. If your blood sugars are in disarray, sound judgment and a heaping bit of level headedness would suggest to change your insulin program. I don't know what the GOP will do come 2012 if they return to true conservatism, because that hillbilly Palin has quite a following (not to mention Joe the news reporter/plumber/uncle fester wannabe/war correspondent), and if they don't revert back to neo-conservatism, it might indeed be the detrimental nail in their coffin.

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: kayleesgrandma

If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.
[/L]</end quote></div>

The thing about tax cuts is, while they are generally a good idea, there's so many people unemployed right now. Almost 600,000 people lost their jobs last month, so please explain to me how a "tax cut" will help them?

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: kayleesgrandma

If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.
[/L]</end quote></div>

The thing about tax cuts is, while they are generally a good idea, there's so many people unemployed right now. Almost 600,000 people lost their jobs last month, so please explain to me how a "tax cut" will help them?

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: kayleesgrandma

If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.
[/L]</end quote></div>

The thing about tax cuts is, while they are generally a good idea, there's so many people unemployed right now. Almost 600,000 people lost their jobs last month, so please explain to me how a "tax cut" will help them?

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: kayleesgrandma

If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.
[/L]</end quote>

The thing about tax cuts is, while they are generally a good idea, there's so many people unemployed right now. Almost 600,000 people lost their jobs last month, so please explain to me how a "tax cut" will help them?

Solo · Feb 7, 2009

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: kayleesgrandma
 
 If you put a tax cut into the hands of a business or family, there's no guarantee that they're going to invest that or invest it in America. They're free to go invest anywhere that they want if they choose to invest.
 [/L]</end quote>
 
 The thing about tax cuts is, while they are generally a good idea, there's so many people unemployed right now. Almost 600,000 people lost their jobs last month, so please explain to me how a "tax cut" will help them?

I need a bailout, how about you?

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member

New member