"SIKO
Just curious - for those of you who believe Americans should take responsibility for their own health care costs, how many of you have insurance through your employer? Because if you're only paying a small deductible each month and small co-pays for prescriptions and dr. visits, then it could be argued that you're not really taking full responsibility for your health care at all; you're relying on your employer. In a truly free system, would your salary be enough to buy health insurance that was adequate to care for a person with CF?
Secondly, health insurance cannot be purchased by everyone in America as some have suggested in this thread. Sure, companies with over x number of employees are required by law to insure their employees, even those with CF or other pre-existing conditions. But that is if you are healthy enough to work, and work for a large enough company at that. In a truly free market, what would it be like for people with CF who were too sick to work but could only get insurance if they paid for it out of their own pockets? Could they even GET insured with a pre-existing condition? If they didn't have insurance, could they afford the multitude of prescriptions necessary? How could they afford to pay for any of this if they weren't able to work?
I'm all about personal responsibility - I just think some of the arguments presented along those lines are unrealistic when we're talking about caring for people Cystic Fibrosis. I chose to focus on CF as that is what this forum is primarily about. My comments don't even begin to address the multitude of other scenarios out there that are or could be affected by a lack of health insurance.
Like I said before, I'm not sure if "socialized medicine" is the answer, but I do believe the system needs to be reformed and I also believe that the "every man for himself" philosophy would be a step in the wrong direction.
Just curious - for those of you who believe Americans should take responsibility for their own health care costs, how many of you have insurance through your employer? Because if you're only paying a small deductible each month and small co-pays for prescriptions and dr. visits, then it could be argued that you're not really taking full responsibility for your health care at all; you're relying on your employer. In a truly free system, would your salary be enough to buy health insurance that was adequate to care for a person with CF?
Secondly, health insurance cannot be purchased by everyone in America as some have suggested in this thread. Sure, companies with over x number of employees are required by law to insure their employees, even those with CF or other pre-existing conditions. But that is if you are healthy enough to work, and work for a large enough company at that. In a truly free market, what would it be like for people with CF who were too sick to work but could only get insurance if they paid for it out of their own pockets? Could they even GET insured with a pre-existing condition? If they didn't have insurance, could they afford the multitude of prescriptions necessary? How could they afford to pay for any of this if they weren't able to work?
I'm all about personal responsibility - I just think some of the arguments presented along those lines are unrealistic when we're talking about caring for people Cystic Fibrosis. I chose to focus on CF as that is what this forum is primarily about. My comments don't even begin to address the multitude of other scenarios out there that are or could be affected by a lack of health insurance.
Like I said before, I'm not sure if "socialized medicine" is the answer, but I do believe the system needs to be reformed and I also believe that the "every man for himself" philosophy would be a step in the wrong direction.