<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pumuckl</b></i>
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Lilith</b></i>
<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>Pumuckl</b></i>
Now, to clarify do I think smokers are totally none deserving of another chance for life? Of course not, but I do think that something needs to be done about folks that intentionally harm themselves. Suicide is against the law in most states however smoking is not illegal... smoking is just another way of killing yourself (granted very slowly, but still). Perhaps smokers should be asked to do some type of community service (either pre or post tx) to speak to groups of younger ppl and explain to them the risks of smoking... sometimes it takes the direct approach to show folks the reality of life (perhaps that is a silly idea who knows).
</end quote></div>
Again, just wanted to bring up the idea that if you think people who don't take care of their bodies or do things they know will harm them in the long run should have to "give back" to the community, do you also feel this way toward CFers who do not take care of their CF or do things they know will harm them in the long run? Where do you draw the line?
I totally agree with the smoking thing. I cannot stand smoking, and living in Vegas (where they're bringing up class action lawsuits now against the recently passed law to ban smoking in restaurants.. ridiculous), I suffer when my friends/family want to take in the sites and sounds of vegas leaving me with the choice of whether I go out and feel like crap for days after or stay in and watch my friends/family do things without me participating. So, I totally agree with your arguments against smoke. You walk down the strip or at outdoor malls here and its sometimes WORSE than a casino cause people are smoking and blowing it all around you. Its crazy.
But, I just thought I'd remind everyone to think of what you're saying when you bring up smokers hurting themselves or not doing what they should and also maybe apply that to CFers hurting themselves and not doing what they should. Is it a double standard to think this way about one group of people but not another? Just something to ponder. Maybe, with reference to the post above, CFers who don't exercise, should have to go and speak at seminars to CF people about the benefits of exercise with CF pre or post tx? Maybe this IS a good idea, I don't know, but just remember when you talk about the general population doing something to harm themselves, some CFers do things that harm themselves as well (or aren't good for them). If you apply these criteria to the general public, wouldn't you also have to apply them to CFers, diabetics, etc...?