"SIKO"

Emeraldmirror

New member
"SIKO

Actually many many countries including Canada and the UK have made many break through s when it comes to cf.. tons of breakthroughs for example i have copy pasted this from teh canadian cystic fibrosis website of their research history
Progress in Cystic Fibrosis Research Since 1985

* In 1985, Canadian scientists Drs. Lap-Chee Tsui and Manuel Buchwald trace the gene responsible for CF to chromosome 7. Over the following several years, the discovery of genetic "markers" helps researchers close in on the gene. The search is aided as well by an important new technique, developed by Dr. Francis Collins, called "chromosome jumping".


* In 1986, the CCFF launches its Research Development Program I (RDP I) in CF Genetics/Gene Expression, based at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children.


* In 1988, the CCFF launches its Research Development Program II (RDP II) focused on Lung Infection in CF, based at the University of Calgary's Health Sciences Centre.


* In the 1980s, significant progress is made in exploring the potential of a new class of drugs for treating faulty secretion in CF. One such drug, amiloride, alters the characteristics of fluid secretion by reducing the ability of cells in the lung to reabsorb sodium. The result is that the exterior of cells remains moist.


* Pioneering work is done in the field of heart/lung and double lung transplantation, which has now emerged as a viable option for people with cystic fibrosis. In 1988, at the Toronto General Hospital, the first successful double lung transplant is done on a patient with cystic fibrosis.


* In August 1989, CF research takes a huge step forward as Drs. Lap-Chee Tsui and Jack Riordan of the RDP I team, in collaboration with Dr.Francis Collins, announce the discovery of the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis.


* In September 1990, scientists succeeded in correcting the CF defect,under laboratory conditions. Canadian investigators in the RDP I program once again lead the way, successfully building a normal version (cDNA)of the gene responsible for CF. Collaborators in the United States then use a virus to place this normal gene in cells affected by CF. When they do, chloride begins to move normally across the cell membranes, thereby corecting the major defect in the disease.


* In 1990, significant progress is made in experiments with a potential new CF treatment: the aerosol administration of DNase, an enzyme that breaks down human genetic material. When DNase is administered to CF lungs, it breaks down much of the "junk" DNA in lung secretions, and reduces the thickness of these secretions, which otherwise plug the airways and encourage infection. DNase aerosol therapy is now commercially available.


* A potential new therapy emerges in 1990, called alpha-1-antitrypsin. Delivered in the form of an aerosol, alpha-1-antitrypsin suppresses the activities of an enzyme called elastase, which is highly destructive of lung tissue in CF. This new treatment may be able to limit the damage caused by elastase, and improve the ability of the immune system to kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria.


* In 1991, over 30% of patients registered at Canadian CF clinics were adults.


* In February 1991, CCFF-funded investigators announce important insights into the function of the CF gene protein, called CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator). By placing a normal version of the CF gene into cells which do not exhibit salt (chloride) channels like the one which is defective in CF, scientists are able to determine that the CF gene protein is, in all likelihood, itself the salt channel.


* Investigators at the University of North Carolina announce in August 1991 that certain naturally-occurring compounds, used in combination with amiloride, can increase the ability of epithelial cells to secrete chloride. This could significantly improve the ability of persons with CF to clear secretions from the lungs.


* In October 1991, CCFF-funded researchers identify precisely which cells in the body are affected by cystic fibrosis, showing that the normal counterpart of the gene responsible for CF is active in the cells lining the airways, and in the salivary glands, intestines, and reproductive tissues. The findings are of vital significance, since the development of effective pharmacological or genetic therapies for CF will depend upon knowing which cells represent the target for treatment.


* Two complementary papers in December 1991 demonstrate that the CF gene protein can be detected in the membranes of affected cells, and does have a limited ability to transport salt. These results overturn previous findings - according to which the CFTR protein did not reach the cell membrane and therefore could not transport chloride - and suggest that the defective protein may be prodded into service by chemical stimulation.


* In 1991, a significant step toward gene therapy for CF is reported. Researchers in the United States and France announce that they have modified an adenovirus, similar to the virus responsible for the common cold, so that it cannot reproduce, and then successfully used it to transport a normal version of the gene responsible for CF into the lungs of experimental rats. When this is done, the animals' respiratory cells began to produce a normal human CF protein, and continued to do so for two weeks. Subsequent studies suggest that the effect may last for more than a month.


* In February 1992, Drs. Christine Bear and Jack Riordan of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children effectively close the gap between the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis and the basic defect in the disease. By successfully purifying the CF gene's protein product, they obtain direct proof that CFTR is a chloride channel. In addition, by reconstituting the protein in a synthetic system, Drs. Bear and Riordan bring the possibility of treating CF through protein therapy one step closer.


* In August 1992, scientists at the University of North Carolina announce the development of an animal model of cystic fibrosis: the "CF mouse". This animal model is expected to shed light on the disease process, and provide an effective way to test and refine potential new treatments for CF.


* In April 1993, Dr. Christine Bear publishes findings indicating that the protein produced by the major CF mutation is capable of functioning normally. However, the protein fails to move as it should to the cell membrane, and is therefore unable to move chloride across the cell wall. Dr. Bear hypothesizes that specially-targeted drugs may be able to escort the protein to its proper location, thereby correcting the defect in CF-affected cells.


* In April 1993, scientists at the National Institutes of Health in the United States use a modified virus to administer a normal version of the gene responsible for CF to a human subject, as a first step toward exploring the viability of gene therapy for cystic fibrosis.


* In July 1993, the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation formally launches Research Development Program III: Beyond the Gene - from theory to therapy.


* In October 1993, Dr. Michael Welsh of the University of Iowa College of Medicine announces, that, using gene therapy techniques, he and his colleagues have reversed the basic defect in the nasal epithelia of three individuals with cystic fibrosis. While not amounting to a cure, Dr. Welsh's accomplishment indicates that gene therapy may eventually alleviate or eliminate abnormal lung function in cystic fibrosis.


* In September 1994, Dr. Ron Crystal of the National Institutes of Health in the United States, reports on the successful administration of a modified adenovirus containing a normal version of the gene responsible for CF to the lungs of four individuals with cystic fibrosis.


* In January 1995, investigators in Great Britain and the United States report promising preliminary results in their efforts to use liposomes, or small bubbles of fat, to transfer a normal version of the CF gene to the epithelial cells of nine individuals with cystic fibrosis.


* In October 1995, Dr. Christine Bear and other investigators funded through the Foundation's RDP III initiative demonstrate, in the mouse model of CF, that protein replacement may be a viable treatment for cystic fibrosis.


* In 1996, the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation launches SPARX, the Special Programme in Applied Research and Therapy, a $5 million dollar initiative designed to bring new forms of therapy to the point of clinical application within five years.


* In December 1997, Dr. Jim Hu of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children develops a novel way to 'turn on' the normal version of the gene responsible for CF, and control its activity, so that it will function properly. In order for genes to function, they need to be 'turned on' or expressed: Dr.Hu's "expression cassette" successfully turns on the CF gene in laboratory samples of human cells.


* In March 1998, Drs. Fred Zhang, Norbert Kartner, and Gergely Lukacs of the University of Toronto and The Hospital for Sick Children provide the first structural evidence that the defective cystic fibrosis gene leads to malformation of the protein that carries out the gene's specific function. Normally the protein acts as a channel, or pore at the cell surface, and permits the movement of salt and water across cell membranes. The most common defect in CF stops the protein from 'folding' normally; and consequently, the protein is retained in the cell, and fails to reach the cell surface to perform its function as a pore.


* In 1999, investigators with SPARX form an alliance with industry to bring DCF 987 (also known as dextran), a compound designed to combat lung infection, and enhance mucus clearance from lungs, to clinical trials.


* In 2000, SPARX realized major progress toward initiating Phase I clinical trials of aerosolized (inhaled) dextran.


* In 2000, thanks to improved clinical care and available treatments, over 45% of persons with CF in Canada are 18 years and older.

* In 2001, the CCFF announces a Special Initiative in CF Research - In Memory of Michael O'Reilly - a $1.05 million commitment over three years to explore and discover new approaches to treat cystic fibrosis patients who have Burkholderia cepacia and other multi-resistant bacteria in their airways.


* Dr. Shawn Aaron (University of Ottawa) initiates a clinical trial investigating whether patients with exacerbations of their cystic fibrosis lung disease will benefit from treatments with a combination of antibiotics used simultaneously. There are four CF centres in Canada participating in this study, which is partially funded by the CCFF.


* In 2002, SPARX realized successful completion of the Phase I clinical trial on dextran. The results indicated that inhaled dextran could be safely utilized in humans. Focus is now on initializing a Phase II clinical trial.


* In January 2002, the CCFF and the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research awarded a team of researchers led by Dr. Miguel Valvano (University of Western Ontario, London) over $1,000,000 in support of cystic fibrosis. The research is aimed at discovering new approaches for treating individuals with cystic fibrosis who have Burkholderia cepacia complex and other multi-resistant bacteria in their airways.


* In May 2002, the CCFF announced that the median age of survival for individuals with CF had risen from four years in 1960 to over 35 years(based on year 2000 data). The median age of survival is the age beyond which half of the affected population may be expected to live.

* In 2002, Genome Canada awarded Dr. Lap-Chee Tsui (The Hospital for Sick Children) and his colleagues $3.36 million over 3 years to supplement CCFF research funds (for a total grant of $7.01 million) to help researchers identify and understand the role of modifier genes in individuals with CF. Identification of genetic modifiers with various effects in CF will allow to more precisely determine CF disease outcome, and optimize the medical care and treatment.

* In January 2003, BCY LifeSciences Inc. reported that the first patients for the Phase II clinical trial of dextran were enrolled and treatment had started. This potential new treatment may prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia complex from adhering to lung cells, at the site of infection. Preliminary results of the trial were released in November 2003. Although dextran aerosol therapy was found to be very safe, and demonstrated trends towards improvements in lung function, more clinical trials are needed.The CCFF's Special Programme in Applied Research and Therapy (SPARX) funded the initial studies on dextran.

* In March 2003, the CCFF and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the largest and most highly ambitious research program in the history of the Foundation. Breathe (Basic REsearch And THErapy), which is designed to target the basic defect in cystic fibrosis through the development of novel therapeutic approaches. This program intends to fund 1 or 2 groups in the range of $600,000 to $1,200,000 per year, for up to 5 years, beginning in April 2004.

* In December 2003, Dr. Jim Hu and colleagues in Toronto described a new gene delivery vehicle, or "vector", for CF lung gene therapy. This vector transfers a normal gene into targeted epithelial cells which line the airways, and produces a necessary protein, in place of a protein which is defective in CF. It may also have a positive, therapeutic effect in combatting a type of chronic lung infection that, in cystic fibrosis, can be life-threatening. This achievement was yet another "world first" for Canada, as this was the first time that CF gene therapy - albeit under laboratory conditions - had been observed to result in marked clinical benefit.

* In March 2003, the CCFF, together with the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health and the Institute of Infection and Immunity of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the two winning teams of a new, highly ambitious $6 million research program, Breathe (Basic Research and Therapy). The two teams, led by Dr. John Hanrahan (McGill University, Montreal) and Dr. Christine Bear (The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto) plan to develop innovative approaches to altering the course of CF disease.

* In April 2004, two research teams led by Dr. John Hanrahan (Quebec) and Dr. Christine Bear (Ontario) began work on an ambitious $6 million research program, under the banner Breathe (for Basic Research and Therapy). While CF research is often focused on finding new treatments for the disease, Breathe is unique because it targets the basic defect in cystic fibrosis.

* In May 2004, the CCFF announced that the median age of survival for Canadians with CF had risen once again from 35.9 (in 2001) to 37 years (based on year 2002 data).

* In May 2004, Dr. Richard Boucher from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill reports, for the very first time, on the successful creation of a mouse with lung pathology similar to human cystic fibrosis. These mice should be useful for evaluating some therapeutic interventions to treat CF lung disease.

* In March 2005, Dr. Jim Hu at The Hospital for Sick Children was awarded the Foundation's Zellers Senior Scientist Award. The Zellers Senior Scientist Award recognizes outstanding contributions of an established CF investigator, and pays tribute to Hbc's tremendous support of the work of the Foundation. Dr. Hu is focusing his research on CF gene therapy, where the normal version of the gene responsible for CF will be delivered to lung cells. Dr. Hu has developed a novel viral vector that is effective in expressing Cftr in mice, and has been shown to protect the mice from lung infections. Dr. Hu plans to develop methods of delivering the vector to larger animals, whose airways are more similar to humans.

* In July 2005, Dr. Bob Hancock from The University of British Columbia demonstrates that a novel class of antibiotics called "antimicrobial peptides" has the potential to attack two of the components responsible for the progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis: infection and inflammation.

* In August 2005, Dr. Rod Merrill from the University of Guelph discovers how the toxin produced by the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevents CF-infected cells from synthesising proteins, and kills the cell. The toxin disguises itself as part of the ribosome, the structure that acts as the cell's protein factory, and shuts down the ribosome, stopping protein production in the cell. This insight into how the toxin works will give researchers a better chance of finding out how to disable it.

* In October 2005, an international team of investigators, including Canadian researchers (British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec) found a correlation between a variant of the modifier gene TGF-ß1 (which plays a role in lung inflammation) and individuals with CF who experience an accelerated rate of decline in lung function. Identification of modifier genes allows doctors to tailor more aggressive therapies for higher risk patients, and creates new potential therapies to help regulate the expression of modifier genes such as TGF-?1.

* In October 2005, the two Breathe teams reported that during the summer of 2005, more than 50,000 substances were tested to determine which could help "fix" the basic defect in CF. Of the 50,000 substances tested, the teams were able to identify several that were effective in "fixing" CF cells. These substances are being studied further for their therapeutic potential.

and that's just from canada and i can't tell the amount of times that i read articles about places abroad that have come out with new things

Ashley 23 w/cf
 

Emeraldmirror

New member
"SIKO

Actually many many countries including Canada and the UK have made many break through s when it comes to cf.. tons of breakthroughs for example i have copy pasted this from teh canadian cystic fibrosis website of their research history
Progress in Cystic Fibrosis Research Since 1985

* In 1985, Canadian scientists Drs. Lap-Chee Tsui and Manuel Buchwald trace the gene responsible for CF to chromosome 7. Over the following several years, the discovery of genetic "markers" helps researchers close in on the gene. The search is aided as well by an important new technique, developed by Dr. Francis Collins, called "chromosome jumping".


* In 1986, the CCFF launches its Research Development Program I (RDP I) in CF Genetics/Gene Expression, based at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children.


* In 1988, the CCFF launches its Research Development Program II (RDP II) focused on Lung Infection in CF, based at the University of Calgary's Health Sciences Centre.


* In the 1980s, significant progress is made in exploring the potential of a new class of drugs for treating faulty secretion in CF. One such drug, amiloride, alters the characteristics of fluid secretion by reducing the ability of cells in the lung to reabsorb sodium. The result is that the exterior of cells remains moist.


* Pioneering work is done in the field of heart/lung and double lung transplantation, which has now emerged as a viable option for people with cystic fibrosis. In 1988, at the Toronto General Hospital, the first successful double lung transplant is done on a patient with cystic fibrosis.


* In August 1989, CF research takes a huge step forward as Drs. Lap-Chee Tsui and Jack Riordan of the RDP I team, in collaboration with Dr.Francis Collins, announce the discovery of the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis.


* In September 1990, scientists succeeded in correcting the CF defect,under laboratory conditions. Canadian investigators in the RDP I program once again lead the way, successfully building a normal version (cDNA)of the gene responsible for CF. Collaborators in the United States then use a virus to place this normal gene in cells affected by CF. When they do, chloride begins to move normally across the cell membranes, thereby corecting the major defect in the disease.


* In 1990, significant progress is made in experiments with a potential new CF treatment: the aerosol administration of DNase, an enzyme that breaks down human genetic material. When DNase is administered to CF lungs, it breaks down much of the "junk" DNA in lung secretions, and reduces the thickness of these secretions, which otherwise plug the airways and encourage infection. DNase aerosol therapy is now commercially available.


* A potential new therapy emerges in 1990, called alpha-1-antitrypsin. Delivered in the form of an aerosol, alpha-1-antitrypsin suppresses the activities of an enzyme called elastase, which is highly destructive of lung tissue in CF. This new treatment may be able to limit the damage caused by elastase, and improve the ability of the immune system to kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria.


* In 1991, over 30% of patients registered at Canadian CF clinics were adults.


* In February 1991, CCFF-funded investigators announce important insights into the function of the CF gene protein, called CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator). By placing a normal version of the CF gene into cells which do not exhibit salt (chloride) channels like the one which is defective in CF, scientists are able to determine that the CF gene protein is, in all likelihood, itself the salt channel.


* Investigators at the University of North Carolina announce in August 1991 that certain naturally-occurring compounds, used in combination with amiloride, can increase the ability of epithelial cells to secrete chloride. This could significantly improve the ability of persons with CF to clear secretions from the lungs.


* In October 1991, CCFF-funded researchers identify precisely which cells in the body are affected by cystic fibrosis, showing that the normal counterpart of the gene responsible for CF is active in the cells lining the airways, and in the salivary glands, intestines, and reproductive tissues. The findings are of vital significance, since the development of effective pharmacological or genetic therapies for CF will depend upon knowing which cells represent the target for treatment.


* Two complementary papers in December 1991 demonstrate that the CF gene protein can be detected in the membranes of affected cells, and does have a limited ability to transport salt. These results overturn previous findings - according to which the CFTR protein did not reach the cell membrane and therefore could not transport chloride - and suggest that the defective protein may be prodded into service by chemical stimulation.


* In 1991, a significant step toward gene therapy for CF is reported. Researchers in the United States and France announce that they have modified an adenovirus, similar to the virus responsible for the common cold, so that it cannot reproduce, and then successfully used it to transport a normal version of the gene responsible for CF into the lungs of experimental rats. When this is done, the animals' respiratory cells began to produce a normal human CF protein, and continued to do so for two weeks. Subsequent studies suggest that the effect may last for more than a month.


* In February 1992, Drs. Christine Bear and Jack Riordan of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children effectively close the gap between the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis and the basic defect in the disease. By successfully purifying the CF gene's protein product, they obtain direct proof that CFTR is a chloride channel. In addition, by reconstituting the protein in a synthetic system, Drs. Bear and Riordan bring the possibility of treating CF through protein therapy one step closer.


* In August 1992, scientists at the University of North Carolina announce the development of an animal model of cystic fibrosis: the "CF mouse". This animal model is expected to shed light on the disease process, and provide an effective way to test and refine potential new treatments for CF.


* In April 1993, Dr. Christine Bear publishes findings indicating that the protein produced by the major CF mutation is capable of functioning normally. However, the protein fails to move as it should to the cell membrane, and is therefore unable to move chloride across the cell wall. Dr. Bear hypothesizes that specially-targeted drugs may be able to escort the protein to its proper location, thereby correcting the defect in CF-affected cells.


* In April 1993, scientists at the National Institutes of Health in the United States use a modified virus to administer a normal version of the gene responsible for CF to a human subject, as a first step toward exploring the viability of gene therapy for cystic fibrosis.


* In July 1993, the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation formally launches Research Development Program III: Beyond the Gene - from theory to therapy.


* In October 1993, Dr. Michael Welsh of the University of Iowa College of Medicine announces, that, using gene therapy techniques, he and his colleagues have reversed the basic defect in the nasal epithelia of three individuals with cystic fibrosis. While not amounting to a cure, Dr. Welsh's accomplishment indicates that gene therapy may eventually alleviate or eliminate abnormal lung function in cystic fibrosis.


* In September 1994, Dr. Ron Crystal of the National Institutes of Health in the United States, reports on the successful administration of a modified adenovirus containing a normal version of the gene responsible for CF to the lungs of four individuals with cystic fibrosis.


* In January 1995, investigators in Great Britain and the United States report promising preliminary results in their efforts to use liposomes, or small bubbles of fat, to transfer a normal version of the CF gene to the epithelial cells of nine individuals with cystic fibrosis.


* In October 1995, Dr. Christine Bear and other investigators funded through the Foundation's RDP III initiative demonstrate, in the mouse model of CF, that protein replacement may be a viable treatment for cystic fibrosis.


* In 1996, the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation launches SPARX, the Special Programme in Applied Research and Therapy, a $5 million dollar initiative designed to bring new forms of therapy to the point of clinical application within five years.


* In December 1997, Dr. Jim Hu of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children develops a novel way to 'turn on' the normal version of the gene responsible for CF, and control its activity, so that it will function properly. In order for genes to function, they need to be 'turned on' or expressed: Dr.Hu's "expression cassette" successfully turns on the CF gene in laboratory samples of human cells.


* In March 1998, Drs. Fred Zhang, Norbert Kartner, and Gergely Lukacs of the University of Toronto and The Hospital for Sick Children provide the first structural evidence that the defective cystic fibrosis gene leads to malformation of the protein that carries out the gene's specific function. Normally the protein acts as a channel, or pore at the cell surface, and permits the movement of salt and water across cell membranes. The most common defect in CF stops the protein from 'folding' normally; and consequently, the protein is retained in the cell, and fails to reach the cell surface to perform its function as a pore.


* In 1999, investigators with SPARX form an alliance with industry to bring DCF 987 (also known as dextran), a compound designed to combat lung infection, and enhance mucus clearance from lungs, to clinical trials.


* In 2000, SPARX realized major progress toward initiating Phase I clinical trials of aerosolized (inhaled) dextran.


* In 2000, thanks to improved clinical care and available treatments, over 45% of persons with CF in Canada are 18 years and older.

* In 2001, the CCFF announces a Special Initiative in CF Research - In Memory of Michael O'Reilly - a $1.05 million commitment over three years to explore and discover new approaches to treat cystic fibrosis patients who have Burkholderia cepacia and other multi-resistant bacteria in their airways.


* Dr. Shawn Aaron (University of Ottawa) initiates a clinical trial investigating whether patients with exacerbations of their cystic fibrosis lung disease will benefit from treatments with a combination of antibiotics used simultaneously. There are four CF centres in Canada participating in this study, which is partially funded by the CCFF.


* In 2002, SPARX realized successful completion of the Phase I clinical trial on dextran. The results indicated that inhaled dextran could be safely utilized in humans. Focus is now on initializing a Phase II clinical trial.


* In January 2002, the CCFF and the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research awarded a team of researchers led by Dr. Miguel Valvano (University of Western Ontario, London) over $1,000,000 in support of cystic fibrosis. The research is aimed at discovering new approaches for treating individuals with cystic fibrosis who have Burkholderia cepacia complex and other multi-resistant bacteria in their airways.


* In May 2002, the CCFF announced that the median age of survival for individuals with CF had risen from four years in 1960 to over 35 years(based on year 2000 data). The median age of survival is the age beyond which half of the affected population may be expected to live.

* In 2002, Genome Canada awarded Dr. Lap-Chee Tsui (The Hospital for Sick Children) and his colleagues $3.36 million over 3 years to supplement CCFF research funds (for a total grant of $7.01 million) to help researchers identify and understand the role of modifier genes in individuals with CF. Identification of genetic modifiers with various effects in CF will allow to more precisely determine CF disease outcome, and optimize the medical care and treatment.

* In January 2003, BCY LifeSciences Inc. reported that the first patients for the Phase II clinical trial of dextran were enrolled and treatment had started. This potential new treatment may prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia complex from adhering to lung cells, at the site of infection. Preliminary results of the trial were released in November 2003. Although dextran aerosol therapy was found to be very safe, and demonstrated trends towards improvements in lung function, more clinical trials are needed.The CCFF's Special Programme in Applied Research and Therapy (SPARX) funded the initial studies on dextran.

* In March 2003, the CCFF and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the largest and most highly ambitious research program in the history of the Foundation. Breathe (Basic REsearch And THErapy), which is designed to target the basic defect in cystic fibrosis through the development of novel therapeutic approaches. This program intends to fund 1 or 2 groups in the range of $600,000 to $1,200,000 per year, for up to 5 years, beginning in April 2004.

* In December 2003, Dr. Jim Hu and colleagues in Toronto described a new gene delivery vehicle, or "vector", for CF lung gene therapy. This vector transfers a normal gene into targeted epithelial cells which line the airways, and produces a necessary protein, in place of a protein which is defective in CF. It may also have a positive, therapeutic effect in combatting a type of chronic lung infection that, in cystic fibrosis, can be life-threatening. This achievement was yet another "world first" for Canada, as this was the first time that CF gene therapy - albeit under laboratory conditions - had been observed to result in marked clinical benefit.

* In March 2003, the CCFF, together with the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health and the Institute of Infection and Immunity of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the two winning teams of a new, highly ambitious $6 million research program, Breathe (Basic Research and Therapy). The two teams, led by Dr. John Hanrahan (McGill University, Montreal) and Dr. Christine Bear (The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto) plan to develop innovative approaches to altering the course of CF disease.

* In April 2004, two research teams led by Dr. John Hanrahan (Quebec) and Dr. Christine Bear (Ontario) began work on an ambitious $6 million research program, under the banner Breathe (for Basic Research and Therapy). While CF research is often focused on finding new treatments for the disease, Breathe is unique because it targets the basic defect in cystic fibrosis.

* In May 2004, the CCFF announced that the median age of survival for Canadians with CF had risen once again from 35.9 (in 2001) to 37 years (based on year 2002 data).

* In May 2004, Dr. Richard Boucher from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill reports, for the very first time, on the successful creation of a mouse with lung pathology similar to human cystic fibrosis. These mice should be useful for evaluating some therapeutic interventions to treat CF lung disease.

* In March 2005, Dr. Jim Hu at The Hospital for Sick Children was awarded the Foundation's Zellers Senior Scientist Award. The Zellers Senior Scientist Award recognizes outstanding contributions of an established CF investigator, and pays tribute to Hbc's tremendous support of the work of the Foundation. Dr. Hu is focusing his research on CF gene therapy, where the normal version of the gene responsible for CF will be delivered to lung cells. Dr. Hu has developed a novel viral vector that is effective in expressing Cftr in mice, and has been shown to protect the mice from lung infections. Dr. Hu plans to develop methods of delivering the vector to larger animals, whose airways are more similar to humans.

* In July 2005, Dr. Bob Hancock from The University of British Columbia demonstrates that a novel class of antibiotics called "antimicrobial peptides" has the potential to attack two of the components responsible for the progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis: infection and inflammation.

* In August 2005, Dr. Rod Merrill from the University of Guelph discovers how the toxin produced by the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevents CF-infected cells from synthesising proteins, and kills the cell. The toxin disguises itself as part of the ribosome, the structure that acts as the cell's protein factory, and shuts down the ribosome, stopping protein production in the cell. This insight into how the toxin works will give researchers a better chance of finding out how to disable it.

* In October 2005, an international team of investigators, including Canadian researchers (British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec) found a correlation between a variant of the modifier gene TGF-ß1 (which plays a role in lung inflammation) and individuals with CF who experience an accelerated rate of decline in lung function. Identification of modifier genes allows doctors to tailor more aggressive therapies for higher risk patients, and creates new potential therapies to help regulate the expression of modifier genes such as TGF-?1.

* In October 2005, the two Breathe teams reported that during the summer of 2005, more than 50,000 substances were tested to determine which could help "fix" the basic defect in CF. Of the 50,000 substances tested, the teams were able to identify several that were effective in "fixing" CF cells. These substances are being studied further for their therapeutic potential.

and that's just from canada and i can't tell the amount of times that i read articles about places abroad that have come out with new things

Ashley 23 w/cf
 

Emeraldmirror

New member
"SIKO

Actually many many countries including Canada and the UK have made many break through s when it comes to cf.. tons of breakthroughs for example i have copy pasted this from teh canadian cystic fibrosis website of their research history
Progress in Cystic Fibrosis Research Since 1985

* In 1985, Canadian scientists Drs. Lap-Chee Tsui and Manuel Buchwald trace the gene responsible for CF to chromosome 7. Over the following several years, the discovery of genetic "markers" helps researchers close in on the gene. The search is aided as well by an important new technique, developed by Dr. Francis Collins, called "chromosome jumping".


* In 1986, the CCFF launches its Research Development Program I (RDP I) in CF Genetics/Gene Expression, based at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children.


* In 1988, the CCFF launches its Research Development Program II (RDP II) focused on Lung Infection in CF, based at the University of Calgary's Health Sciences Centre.


* In the 1980s, significant progress is made in exploring the potential of a new class of drugs for treating faulty secretion in CF. One such drug, amiloride, alters the characteristics of fluid secretion by reducing the ability of cells in the lung to reabsorb sodium. The result is that the exterior of cells remains moist.


* Pioneering work is done in the field of heart/lung and double lung transplantation, which has now emerged as a viable option for people with cystic fibrosis. In 1988, at the Toronto General Hospital, the first successful double lung transplant is done on a patient with cystic fibrosis.


* In August 1989, CF research takes a huge step forward as Drs. Lap-Chee Tsui and Jack Riordan of the RDP I team, in collaboration with Dr.Francis Collins, announce the discovery of the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis.


* In September 1990, scientists succeeded in correcting the CF defect,under laboratory conditions. Canadian investigators in the RDP I program once again lead the way, successfully building a normal version (cDNA)of the gene responsible for CF. Collaborators in the United States then use a virus to place this normal gene in cells affected by CF. When they do, chloride begins to move normally across the cell membranes, thereby corecting the major defect in the disease.


* In 1990, significant progress is made in experiments with a potential new CF treatment: the aerosol administration of DNase, an enzyme that breaks down human genetic material. When DNase is administered to CF lungs, it breaks down much of the "junk" DNA in lung secretions, and reduces the thickness of these secretions, which otherwise plug the airways and encourage infection. DNase aerosol therapy is now commercially available.


* A potential new therapy emerges in 1990, called alpha-1-antitrypsin. Delivered in the form of an aerosol, alpha-1-antitrypsin suppresses the activities of an enzyme called elastase, which is highly destructive of lung tissue in CF. This new treatment may be able to limit the damage caused by elastase, and improve the ability of the immune system to kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria.


* In 1991, over 30% of patients registered at Canadian CF clinics were adults.


* In February 1991, CCFF-funded investigators announce important insights into the function of the CF gene protein, called CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator). By placing a normal version of the CF gene into cells which do not exhibit salt (chloride) channels like the one which is defective in CF, scientists are able to determine that the CF gene protein is, in all likelihood, itself the salt channel.


* Investigators at the University of North Carolina announce in August 1991 that certain naturally-occurring compounds, used in combination with amiloride, can increase the ability of epithelial cells to secrete chloride. This could significantly improve the ability of persons with CF to clear secretions from the lungs.


* In October 1991, CCFF-funded researchers identify precisely which cells in the body are affected by cystic fibrosis, showing that the normal counterpart of the gene responsible for CF is active in the cells lining the airways, and in the salivary glands, intestines, and reproductive tissues. The findings are of vital significance, since the development of effective pharmacological or genetic therapies for CF will depend upon knowing which cells represent the target for treatment.


* Two complementary papers in December 1991 demonstrate that the CF gene protein can be detected in the membranes of affected cells, and does have a limited ability to transport salt. These results overturn previous findings - according to which the CFTR protein did not reach the cell membrane and therefore could not transport chloride - and suggest that the defective protein may be prodded into service by chemical stimulation.


* In 1991, a significant step toward gene therapy for CF is reported. Researchers in the United States and France announce that they have modified an adenovirus, similar to the virus responsible for the common cold, so that it cannot reproduce, and then successfully used it to transport a normal version of the gene responsible for CF into the lungs of experimental rats. When this is done, the animals' respiratory cells began to produce a normal human CF protein, and continued to do so for two weeks. Subsequent studies suggest that the effect may last for more than a month.


* In February 1992, Drs. Christine Bear and Jack Riordan of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children effectively close the gap between the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis and the basic defect in the disease. By successfully purifying the CF gene's protein product, they obtain direct proof that CFTR is a chloride channel. In addition, by reconstituting the protein in a synthetic system, Drs. Bear and Riordan bring the possibility of treating CF through protein therapy one step closer.


* In August 1992, scientists at the University of North Carolina announce the development of an animal model of cystic fibrosis: the "CF mouse". This animal model is expected to shed light on the disease process, and provide an effective way to test and refine potential new treatments for CF.


* In April 1993, Dr. Christine Bear publishes findings indicating that the protein produced by the major CF mutation is capable of functioning normally. However, the protein fails to move as it should to the cell membrane, and is therefore unable to move chloride across the cell wall. Dr. Bear hypothesizes that specially-targeted drugs may be able to escort the protein to its proper location, thereby correcting the defect in CF-affected cells.


* In April 1993, scientists at the National Institutes of Health in the United States use a modified virus to administer a normal version of the gene responsible for CF to a human subject, as a first step toward exploring the viability of gene therapy for cystic fibrosis.


* In July 1993, the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation formally launches Research Development Program III: Beyond the Gene - from theory to therapy.


* In October 1993, Dr. Michael Welsh of the University of Iowa College of Medicine announces, that, using gene therapy techniques, he and his colleagues have reversed the basic defect in the nasal epithelia of three individuals with cystic fibrosis. While not amounting to a cure, Dr. Welsh's accomplishment indicates that gene therapy may eventually alleviate or eliminate abnormal lung function in cystic fibrosis.


* In September 1994, Dr. Ron Crystal of the National Institutes of Health in the United States, reports on the successful administration of a modified adenovirus containing a normal version of the gene responsible for CF to the lungs of four individuals with cystic fibrosis.


* In January 1995, investigators in Great Britain and the United States report promising preliminary results in their efforts to use liposomes, or small bubbles of fat, to transfer a normal version of the CF gene to the epithelial cells of nine individuals with cystic fibrosis.


* In October 1995, Dr. Christine Bear and other investigators funded through the Foundation's RDP III initiative demonstrate, in the mouse model of CF, that protein replacement may be a viable treatment for cystic fibrosis.


* In 1996, the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation launches SPARX, the Special Programme in Applied Research and Therapy, a $5 million dollar initiative designed to bring new forms of therapy to the point of clinical application within five years.


* In December 1997, Dr. Jim Hu of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children develops a novel way to 'turn on' the normal version of the gene responsible for CF, and control its activity, so that it will function properly. In order for genes to function, they need to be 'turned on' or expressed: Dr.Hu's "expression cassette" successfully turns on the CF gene in laboratory samples of human cells.


* In March 1998, Drs. Fred Zhang, Norbert Kartner, and Gergely Lukacs of the University of Toronto and The Hospital for Sick Children provide the first structural evidence that the defective cystic fibrosis gene leads to malformation of the protein that carries out the gene's specific function. Normally the protein acts as a channel, or pore at the cell surface, and permits the movement of salt and water across cell membranes. The most common defect in CF stops the protein from 'folding' normally; and consequently, the protein is retained in the cell, and fails to reach the cell surface to perform its function as a pore.


* In 1999, investigators with SPARX form an alliance with industry to bring DCF 987 (also known as dextran), a compound designed to combat lung infection, and enhance mucus clearance from lungs, to clinical trials.


* In 2000, SPARX realized major progress toward initiating Phase I clinical trials of aerosolized (inhaled) dextran.


* In 2000, thanks to improved clinical care and available treatments, over 45% of persons with CF in Canada are 18 years and older.

* In 2001, the CCFF announces a Special Initiative in CF Research - In Memory of Michael O'Reilly - a $1.05 million commitment over three years to explore and discover new approaches to treat cystic fibrosis patients who have Burkholderia cepacia and other multi-resistant bacteria in their airways.


* Dr. Shawn Aaron (University of Ottawa) initiates a clinical trial investigating whether patients with exacerbations of their cystic fibrosis lung disease will benefit from treatments with a combination of antibiotics used simultaneously. There are four CF centres in Canada participating in this study, which is partially funded by the CCFF.


* In 2002, SPARX realized successful completion of the Phase I clinical trial on dextran. The results indicated that inhaled dextran could be safely utilized in humans. Focus is now on initializing a Phase II clinical trial.


* In January 2002, the CCFF and the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research awarded a team of researchers led by Dr. Miguel Valvano (University of Western Ontario, London) over $1,000,000 in support of cystic fibrosis. The research is aimed at discovering new approaches for treating individuals with cystic fibrosis who have Burkholderia cepacia complex and other multi-resistant bacteria in their airways.


* In May 2002, the CCFF announced that the median age of survival for individuals with CF had risen from four years in 1960 to over 35 years(based on year 2000 data). The median age of survival is the age beyond which half of the affected population may be expected to live.

* In 2002, Genome Canada awarded Dr. Lap-Chee Tsui (The Hospital for Sick Children) and his colleagues $3.36 million over 3 years to supplement CCFF research funds (for a total grant of $7.01 million) to help researchers identify and understand the role of modifier genes in individuals with CF. Identification of genetic modifiers with various effects in CF will allow to more precisely determine CF disease outcome, and optimize the medical care and treatment.

* In January 2003, BCY LifeSciences Inc. reported that the first patients for the Phase II clinical trial of dextran were enrolled and treatment had started. This potential new treatment may prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia complex from adhering to lung cells, at the site of infection. Preliminary results of the trial were released in November 2003. Although dextran aerosol therapy was found to be very safe, and demonstrated trends towards improvements in lung function, more clinical trials are needed.The CCFF's Special Programme in Applied Research and Therapy (SPARX) funded the initial studies on dextran.

* In March 2003, the CCFF and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the largest and most highly ambitious research program in the history of the Foundation. Breathe (Basic REsearch And THErapy), which is designed to target the basic defect in cystic fibrosis through the development of novel therapeutic approaches. This program intends to fund 1 or 2 groups in the range of $600,000 to $1,200,000 per year, for up to 5 years, beginning in April 2004.

* In December 2003, Dr. Jim Hu and colleagues in Toronto described a new gene delivery vehicle, or "vector", for CF lung gene therapy. This vector transfers a normal gene into targeted epithelial cells which line the airways, and produces a necessary protein, in place of a protein which is defective in CF. It may also have a positive, therapeutic effect in combatting a type of chronic lung infection that, in cystic fibrosis, can be life-threatening. This achievement was yet another "world first" for Canada, as this was the first time that CF gene therapy - albeit under laboratory conditions - had been observed to result in marked clinical benefit.

* In March 2003, the CCFF, together with the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health and the Institute of Infection and Immunity of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the two winning teams of a new, highly ambitious $6 million research program, Breathe (Basic Research and Therapy). The two teams, led by Dr. John Hanrahan (McGill University, Montreal) and Dr. Christine Bear (The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto) plan to develop innovative approaches to altering the course of CF disease.

* In April 2004, two research teams led by Dr. John Hanrahan (Quebec) and Dr. Christine Bear (Ontario) began work on an ambitious $6 million research program, under the banner Breathe (for Basic Research and Therapy). While CF research is often focused on finding new treatments for the disease, Breathe is unique because it targets the basic defect in cystic fibrosis.

* In May 2004, the CCFF announced that the median age of survival for Canadians with CF had risen once again from 35.9 (in 2001) to 37 years (based on year 2002 data).

* In May 2004, Dr. Richard Boucher from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill reports, for the very first time, on the successful creation of a mouse with lung pathology similar to human cystic fibrosis. These mice should be useful for evaluating some therapeutic interventions to treat CF lung disease.

* In March 2005, Dr. Jim Hu at The Hospital for Sick Children was awarded the Foundation's Zellers Senior Scientist Award. The Zellers Senior Scientist Award recognizes outstanding contributions of an established CF investigator, and pays tribute to Hbc's tremendous support of the work of the Foundation. Dr. Hu is focusing his research on CF gene therapy, where the normal version of the gene responsible for CF will be delivered to lung cells. Dr. Hu has developed a novel viral vector that is effective in expressing Cftr in mice, and has been shown to protect the mice from lung infections. Dr. Hu plans to develop methods of delivering the vector to larger animals, whose airways are more similar to humans.

* In July 2005, Dr. Bob Hancock from The University of British Columbia demonstrates that a novel class of antibiotics called "antimicrobial peptides" has the potential to attack two of the components responsible for the progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis: infection and inflammation.

* In August 2005, Dr. Rod Merrill from the University of Guelph discovers how the toxin produced by the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevents CF-infected cells from synthesising proteins, and kills the cell. The toxin disguises itself as part of the ribosome, the structure that acts as the cell's protein factory, and shuts down the ribosome, stopping protein production in the cell. This insight into how the toxin works will give researchers a better chance of finding out how to disable it.

* In October 2005, an international team of investigators, including Canadian researchers (British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec) found a correlation between a variant of the modifier gene TGF-ß1 (which plays a role in lung inflammation) and individuals with CF who experience an accelerated rate of decline in lung function. Identification of modifier genes allows doctors to tailor more aggressive therapies for higher risk patients, and creates new potential therapies to help regulate the expression of modifier genes such as TGF-?1.

* In October 2005, the two Breathe teams reported that during the summer of 2005, more than 50,000 substances were tested to determine which could help "fix" the basic defect in CF. Of the 50,000 substances tested, the teams were able to identify several that were effective in "fixing" CF cells. These substances are being studied further for their therapeutic potential.

and that's just from canada and i can't tell the amount of times that i read articles about places abroad that have come out with new things

Ashley 23 w/cf
 

Emeraldmirror

New member
"SIKO

Actually many many countries including Canada and the UK have made many break through s when it comes to cf.. tons of breakthroughs for example i have copy pasted this from teh canadian cystic fibrosis website of their research history
Progress in Cystic Fibrosis Research Since 1985

* In 1985, Canadian scientists Drs. Lap-Chee Tsui and Manuel Buchwald trace the gene responsible for CF to chromosome 7. Over the following several years, the discovery of genetic "markers" helps researchers close in on the gene. The search is aided as well by an important new technique, developed by Dr. Francis Collins, called "chromosome jumping".


* In 1986, the CCFF launches its Research Development Program I (RDP I) in CF Genetics/Gene Expression, based at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children.


* In 1988, the CCFF launches its Research Development Program II (RDP II) focused on Lung Infection in CF, based at the University of Calgary's Health Sciences Centre.


* In the 1980s, significant progress is made in exploring the potential of a new class of drugs for treating faulty secretion in CF. One such drug, amiloride, alters the characteristics of fluid secretion by reducing the ability of cells in the lung to reabsorb sodium. The result is that the exterior of cells remains moist.


* Pioneering work is done in the field of heart/lung and double lung transplantation, which has now emerged as a viable option for people with cystic fibrosis. In 1988, at the Toronto General Hospital, the first successful double lung transplant is done on a patient with cystic fibrosis.


* In August 1989, CF research takes a huge step forward as Drs. Lap-Chee Tsui and Jack Riordan of the RDP I team, in collaboration with Dr.Francis Collins, announce the discovery of the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis.


* In September 1990, scientists succeeded in correcting the CF defect,under laboratory conditions. Canadian investigators in the RDP I program once again lead the way, successfully building a normal version (cDNA)of the gene responsible for CF. Collaborators in the United States then use a virus to place this normal gene in cells affected by CF. When they do, chloride begins to move normally across the cell membranes, thereby corecting the major defect in the disease.


* In 1990, significant progress is made in experiments with a potential new CF treatment: the aerosol administration of DNase, an enzyme that breaks down human genetic material. When DNase is administered to CF lungs, it breaks down much of the "junk" DNA in lung secretions, and reduces the thickness of these secretions, which otherwise plug the airways and encourage infection. DNase aerosol therapy is now commercially available.


* A potential new therapy emerges in 1990, called alpha-1-antitrypsin. Delivered in the form of an aerosol, alpha-1-antitrypsin suppresses the activities of an enzyme called elastase, which is highly destructive of lung tissue in CF. This new treatment may be able to limit the damage caused by elastase, and improve the ability of the immune system to kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria.


* In 1991, over 30% of patients registered at Canadian CF clinics were adults.


* In February 1991, CCFF-funded investigators announce important insights into the function of the CF gene protein, called CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator). By placing a normal version of the CF gene into cells which do not exhibit salt (chloride) channels like the one which is defective in CF, scientists are able to determine that the CF gene protein is, in all likelihood, itself the salt channel.


* Investigators at the University of North Carolina announce in August 1991 that certain naturally-occurring compounds, used in combination with amiloride, can increase the ability of epithelial cells to secrete chloride. This could significantly improve the ability of persons with CF to clear secretions from the lungs.


* In October 1991, CCFF-funded researchers identify precisely which cells in the body are affected by cystic fibrosis, showing that the normal counterpart of the gene responsible for CF is active in the cells lining the airways, and in the salivary glands, intestines, and reproductive tissues. The findings are of vital significance, since the development of effective pharmacological or genetic therapies for CF will depend upon knowing which cells represent the target for treatment.


* Two complementary papers in December 1991 demonstrate that the CF gene protein can be detected in the membranes of affected cells, and does have a limited ability to transport salt. These results overturn previous findings - according to which the CFTR protein did not reach the cell membrane and therefore could not transport chloride - and suggest that the defective protein may be prodded into service by chemical stimulation.


* In 1991, a significant step toward gene therapy for CF is reported. Researchers in the United States and France announce that they have modified an adenovirus, similar to the virus responsible for the common cold, so that it cannot reproduce, and then successfully used it to transport a normal version of the gene responsible for CF into the lungs of experimental rats. When this is done, the animals' respiratory cells began to produce a normal human CF protein, and continued to do so for two weeks. Subsequent studies suggest that the effect may last for more than a month.


* In February 1992, Drs. Christine Bear and Jack Riordan of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children effectively close the gap between the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis and the basic defect in the disease. By successfully purifying the CF gene's protein product, they obtain direct proof that CFTR is a chloride channel. In addition, by reconstituting the protein in a synthetic system, Drs. Bear and Riordan bring the possibility of treating CF through protein therapy one step closer.


* In August 1992, scientists at the University of North Carolina announce the development of an animal model of cystic fibrosis: the "CF mouse". This animal model is expected to shed light on the disease process, and provide an effective way to test and refine potential new treatments for CF.


* In April 1993, Dr. Christine Bear publishes findings indicating that the protein produced by the major CF mutation is capable of functioning normally. However, the protein fails to move as it should to the cell membrane, and is therefore unable to move chloride across the cell wall. Dr. Bear hypothesizes that specially-targeted drugs may be able to escort the protein to its proper location, thereby correcting the defect in CF-affected cells.


* In April 1993, scientists at the National Institutes of Health in the United States use a modified virus to administer a normal version of the gene responsible for CF to a human subject, as a first step toward exploring the viability of gene therapy for cystic fibrosis.


* In July 1993, the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation formally launches Research Development Program III: Beyond the Gene - from theory to therapy.


* In October 1993, Dr. Michael Welsh of the University of Iowa College of Medicine announces, that, using gene therapy techniques, he and his colleagues have reversed the basic defect in the nasal epithelia of three individuals with cystic fibrosis. While not amounting to a cure, Dr. Welsh's accomplishment indicates that gene therapy may eventually alleviate or eliminate abnormal lung function in cystic fibrosis.


* In September 1994, Dr. Ron Crystal of the National Institutes of Health in the United States, reports on the successful administration of a modified adenovirus containing a normal version of the gene responsible for CF to the lungs of four individuals with cystic fibrosis.


* In January 1995, investigators in Great Britain and the United States report promising preliminary results in their efforts to use liposomes, or small bubbles of fat, to transfer a normal version of the CF gene to the epithelial cells of nine individuals with cystic fibrosis.


* In October 1995, Dr. Christine Bear and other investigators funded through the Foundation's RDP III initiative demonstrate, in the mouse model of CF, that protein replacement may be a viable treatment for cystic fibrosis.


* In 1996, the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation launches SPARX, the Special Programme in Applied Research and Therapy, a $5 million dollar initiative designed to bring new forms of therapy to the point of clinical application within five years.


* In December 1997, Dr. Jim Hu of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children develops a novel way to 'turn on' the normal version of the gene responsible for CF, and control its activity, so that it will function properly. In order for genes to function, they need to be 'turned on' or expressed: Dr.Hu's "expression cassette" successfully turns on the CF gene in laboratory samples of human cells.


* In March 1998, Drs. Fred Zhang, Norbert Kartner, and Gergely Lukacs of the University of Toronto and The Hospital for Sick Children provide the first structural evidence that the defective cystic fibrosis gene leads to malformation of the protein that carries out the gene's specific function. Normally the protein acts as a channel, or pore at the cell surface, and permits the movement of salt and water across cell membranes. The most common defect in CF stops the protein from 'folding' normally; and consequently, the protein is retained in the cell, and fails to reach the cell surface to perform its function as a pore.


* In 1999, investigators with SPARX form an alliance with industry to bring DCF 987 (also known as dextran), a compound designed to combat lung infection, and enhance mucus clearance from lungs, to clinical trials.


* In 2000, SPARX realized major progress toward initiating Phase I clinical trials of aerosolized (inhaled) dextran.


* In 2000, thanks to improved clinical care and available treatments, over 45% of persons with CF in Canada are 18 years and older.

* In 2001, the CCFF announces a Special Initiative in CF Research - In Memory of Michael O'Reilly - a $1.05 million commitment over three years to explore and discover new approaches to treat cystic fibrosis patients who have Burkholderia cepacia and other multi-resistant bacteria in their airways.


* Dr. Shawn Aaron (University of Ottawa) initiates a clinical trial investigating whether patients with exacerbations of their cystic fibrosis lung disease will benefit from treatments with a combination of antibiotics used simultaneously. There are four CF centres in Canada participating in this study, which is partially funded by the CCFF.


* In 2002, SPARX realized successful completion of the Phase I clinical trial on dextran. The results indicated that inhaled dextran could be safely utilized in humans. Focus is now on initializing a Phase II clinical trial.


* In January 2002, the CCFF and the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research awarded a team of researchers led by Dr. Miguel Valvano (University of Western Ontario, London) over $1,000,000 in support of cystic fibrosis. The research is aimed at discovering new approaches for treating individuals with cystic fibrosis who have Burkholderia cepacia complex and other multi-resistant bacteria in their airways.


* In May 2002, the CCFF announced that the median age of survival for individuals with CF had risen from four years in 1960 to over 35 years(based on year 2000 data). The median age of survival is the age beyond which half of the affected population may be expected to live.

* In 2002, Genome Canada awarded Dr. Lap-Chee Tsui (The Hospital for Sick Children) and his colleagues $3.36 million over 3 years to supplement CCFF research funds (for a total grant of $7.01 million) to help researchers identify and understand the role of modifier genes in individuals with CF. Identification of genetic modifiers with various effects in CF will allow to more precisely determine CF disease outcome, and optimize the medical care and treatment.

* In January 2003, BCY LifeSciences Inc. reported that the first patients for the Phase II clinical trial of dextran were enrolled and treatment had started. This potential new treatment may prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia complex from adhering to lung cells, at the site of infection. Preliminary results of the trial were released in November 2003. Although dextran aerosol therapy was found to be very safe, and demonstrated trends towards improvements in lung function, more clinical trials are needed.The CCFF's Special Programme in Applied Research and Therapy (SPARX) funded the initial studies on dextran.

* In March 2003, the CCFF and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the largest and most highly ambitious research program in the history of the Foundation. Breathe (Basic REsearch And THErapy), which is designed to target the basic defect in cystic fibrosis through the development of novel therapeutic approaches. This program intends to fund 1 or 2 groups in the range of $600,000 to $1,200,000 per year, for up to 5 years, beginning in April 2004.

* In December 2003, Dr. Jim Hu and colleagues in Toronto described a new gene delivery vehicle, or "vector", for CF lung gene therapy. This vector transfers a normal gene into targeted epithelial cells which line the airways, and produces a necessary protein, in place of a protein which is defective in CF. It may also have a positive, therapeutic effect in combatting a type of chronic lung infection that, in cystic fibrosis, can be life-threatening. This achievement was yet another "world first" for Canada, as this was the first time that CF gene therapy - albeit under laboratory conditions - had been observed to result in marked clinical benefit.

* In March 2003, the CCFF, together with the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health and the Institute of Infection and Immunity of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the two winning teams of a new, highly ambitious $6 million research program, Breathe (Basic Research and Therapy). The two teams, led by Dr. John Hanrahan (McGill University, Montreal) and Dr. Christine Bear (The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto) plan to develop innovative approaches to altering the course of CF disease.

* In April 2004, two research teams led by Dr. John Hanrahan (Quebec) and Dr. Christine Bear (Ontario) began work on an ambitious $6 million research program, under the banner Breathe (for Basic Research and Therapy). While CF research is often focused on finding new treatments for the disease, Breathe is unique because it targets the basic defect in cystic fibrosis.

* In May 2004, the CCFF announced that the median age of survival for Canadians with CF had risen once again from 35.9 (in 2001) to 37 years (based on year 2002 data).

* In May 2004, Dr. Richard Boucher from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill reports, for the very first time, on the successful creation of a mouse with lung pathology similar to human cystic fibrosis. These mice should be useful for evaluating some therapeutic interventions to treat CF lung disease.

* In March 2005, Dr. Jim Hu at The Hospital for Sick Children was awarded the Foundation's Zellers Senior Scientist Award. The Zellers Senior Scientist Award recognizes outstanding contributions of an established CF investigator, and pays tribute to Hbc's tremendous support of the work of the Foundation. Dr. Hu is focusing his research on CF gene therapy, where the normal version of the gene responsible for CF will be delivered to lung cells. Dr. Hu has developed a novel viral vector that is effective in expressing Cftr in mice, and has been shown to protect the mice from lung infections. Dr. Hu plans to develop methods of delivering the vector to larger animals, whose airways are more similar to humans.

* In July 2005, Dr. Bob Hancock from The University of British Columbia demonstrates that a novel class of antibiotics called "antimicrobial peptides" has the potential to attack two of the components responsible for the progression of lung disease in cystic fibrosis: infection and inflammation.

* In August 2005, Dr. Rod Merrill from the University of Guelph discovers how the toxin produced by the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevents CF-infected cells from synthesising proteins, and kills the cell. The toxin disguises itself as part of the ribosome, the structure that acts as the cell's protein factory, and shuts down the ribosome, stopping protein production in the cell. This insight into how the toxin works will give researchers a better chance of finding out how to disable it.

* In October 2005, an international team of investigators, including Canadian researchers (British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec) found a correlation between a variant of the modifier gene TGF-ß1 (which plays a role in lung inflammation) and individuals with CF who experience an accelerated rate of decline in lung function. Identification of modifier genes allows doctors to tailor more aggressive therapies for higher risk patients, and creates new potential therapies to help regulate the expression of modifier genes such as TGF-?1.

* In October 2005, the two Breathe teams reported that during the summer of 2005, more than 50,000 substances were tested to determine which could help "fix" the basic defect in CF. Of the 50,000 substances tested, the teams were able to identify several that were effective in "fixing" CF cells. These substances are being studied further for their therapeutic potential.

and that's just from canada and i can't tell the amount of times that i read articles about places abroad that have come out with new things

Ashley 23 w/cf
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

We have many patients who pay cash at my hospital from Canada because they aren't willing to wait for life-saving surgery for 6 months.

I know physicians who used to work in Canada. They left because the government kept paying them lower and lower rates. What happens if you have specialists who aren't getting the pay that they deserve? The either quit or they do a poor job.

The reality is that when people hear free they don't think of where the money is coming from and who will be in charge of saying what is approved and what is not. Because no matter what anyone says, not every single service is available in socialized medicine. There is never enough money....

<u> Do you really want the same people who run the DMV and the Post Office in charge of your healthcare? </u>

The government doesn't want to pay. That's the reality. There isn't unlimited money!
</end quote></div>


You would NEVER wait 6 months for a "life-threatening" surgery. Elective ones, yes.

I know plenty of physicians that have left certain areas of our countries, because there compensation from private insurance companies are not what they deserve. Or else they change specialites. Plastic Surgery pays way better than Ortho. There is a current shortage of certain specialties in the US, so we do suffer from the current private industry system. And a lot of HMOs don't allow u to go to other areas for treatment. Many OBGYNs are just going to GYNs, because of the malpractice insurance cost.

The DMV and the post office are not run by our government, but are rather private. But really the US already has socialized medicence in exsistance, it's called Medicare and Medicaid, and it is draining our economy, while big insurance companies, roll in the dough.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

We have many patients who pay cash at my hospital from Canada because they aren't willing to wait for life-saving surgery for 6 months.

I know physicians who used to work in Canada. They left because the government kept paying them lower and lower rates. What happens if you have specialists who aren't getting the pay that they deserve? The either quit or they do a poor job.

The reality is that when people hear free they don't think of where the money is coming from and who will be in charge of saying what is approved and what is not. Because no matter what anyone says, not every single service is available in socialized medicine. There is never enough money....

<u> Do you really want the same people who run the DMV and the Post Office in charge of your healthcare? </u>

The government doesn't want to pay. That's the reality. There isn't unlimited money!
</end quote></div>


You would NEVER wait 6 months for a "life-threatening" surgery. Elective ones, yes.

I know plenty of physicians that have left certain areas of our countries, because there compensation from private insurance companies are not what they deserve. Or else they change specialites. Plastic Surgery pays way better than Ortho. There is a current shortage of certain specialties in the US, so we do suffer from the current private industry system. And a lot of HMOs don't allow u to go to other areas for treatment. Many OBGYNs are just going to GYNs, because of the malpractice insurance cost.

The DMV and the post office are not run by our government, but are rather private. But really the US already has socialized medicence in exsistance, it's called Medicare and Medicaid, and it is draining our economy, while big insurance companies, roll in the dough.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

We have many patients who pay cash at my hospital from Canada because they aren't willing to wait for life-saving surgery for 6 months.

I know physicians who used to work in Canada. They left because the government kept paying them lower and lower rates. What happens if you have specialists who aren't getting the pay that they deserve? The either quit or they do a poor job.

The reality is that when people hear free they don't think of where the money is coming from and who will be in charge of saying what is approved and what is not. Because no matter what anyone says, not every single service is available in socialized medicine. There is never enough money....

<u> Do you really want the same people who run the DMV and the Post Office in charge of your healthcare? </u>

The government doesn't want to pay. That's the reality. There isn't unlimited money!
</end quote></div>


You would NEVER wait 6 months for a "life-threatening" surgery. Elective ones, yes.

I know plenty of physicians that have left certain areas of our countries, because there compensation from private insurance companies are not what they deserve. Or else they change specialites. Plastic Surgery pays way better than Ortho. There is a current shortage of certain specialties in the US, so we do suffer from the current private industry system. And a lot of HMOs don't allow u to go to other areas for treatment. Many OBGYNs are just going to GYNs, because of the malpractice insurance cost.

The DMV and the post office are not run by our government, but are rather private. But really the US already has socialized medicence in exsistance, it's called Medicare and Medicaid, and it is draining our economy, while big insurance companies, roll in the dough.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

We have many patients who pay cash at my hospital from Canada because they aren't willing to wait for life-saving surgery for 6 months.

I know physicians who used to work in Canada. They left because the government kept paying them lower and lower rates. What happens if you have specialists who aren't getting the pay that they deserve? The either quit or they do a poor job.

The reality is that when people hear free they don't think of where the money is coming from and who will be in charge of saying what is approved and what is not. Because no matter what anyone says, not every single service is available in socialized medicine. There is never enough money....

<u> Do you really want the same people who run the DMV and the Post Office in charge of your healthcare? </u>

The government doesn't want to pay. That's the reality. There isn't unlimited money!
</end quote></div>


You would NEVER wait 6 months for a "life-threatening" surgery. Elective ones, yes.

I know plenty of physicians that have left certain areas of our countries, because there compensation from private insurance companies are not what they deserve. Or else they change specialites. Plastic Surgery pays way better than Ortho. There is a current shortage of certain specialties in the US, so we do suffer from the current private industry system. And a lot of HMOs don't allow u to go to other areas for treatment. Many OBGYNs are just going to GYNs, because of the malpractice insurance cost.

The DMV and the post office are not run by our government, but are rather private. But really the US already has socialized medicence in exsistance, it's called Medicare and Medicaid, and it is draining our economy, while big insurance companies, roll in the dough.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

We have many patients who pay cash at my hospital from Canada because they aren't willing to wait for life-saving surgery for 6 months.

I know physicians who used to work in Canada. They left because the government kept paying them lower and lower rates. What happens if you have specialists who aren't getting the pay that they deserve? The either quit or they do a poor job.

The reality is that when people hear free they don't think of where the money is coming from and who will be in charge of saying what is approved and what is not. Because no matter what anyone says, not every single service is available in socialized medicine. There is never enough money....

<u> Do you really want the same people who run the DMV and the Post Office in charge of your healthcare? </u>

The government doesn't want to pay. That's the reality. There isn't unlimited money!
</end quote>


You would NEVER wait 6 months for a "life-threatening" surgery. Elective ones, yes.

I know plenty of physicians that have left certain areas of our countries, because there compensation from private insurance companies are not what they deserve. Or else they change specialites. Plastic Surgery pays way better than Ortho. There is a current shortage of certain specialties in the US, so we do suffer from the current private industry system. And a lot of HMOs don't allow u to go to other areas for treatment. Many OBGYNs are just going to GYNs, because of the malpractice insurance cost.

The DMV and the post office are not run by our government, but are rather private. But really the US already has socialized medicence in exsistance, it's called Medicare and Medicaid, and it is draining our economy, while big insurance companies, roll in the dough.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

We have many patients who pay cash at my hospital from Canada because they aren't willing to wait for life-saving surgery for 6 months.

I know physicians who used to work in Canada. They left because the government kept paying them lower and lower rates. What happens if you have specialists who aren't getting the pay that they deserve? The either quit or they do a poor job.

The reality is that when people hear free they don't think of where the money is coming from and who will be in charge of saying what is approved and what is not. Because no matter what anyone says, not every single service is available in socialized medicine. There is never enough money....

<u> Do you really want the same people who run the DMV and the Post Office in charge of your healthcare? </u>

The government doesn't want to pay. That's the reality. There isn't unlimited money!
</end quote>


You would NEVER wait 6 months for a "life-threatening" surgery. Elective ones, yes.

I know plenty of physicians that have left certain areas of our countries, because there compensation from private insurance companies are not what they deserve. Or else they change specialites. Plastic Surgery pays way better than Ortho. There is a current shortage of certain specialties in the US, so we do suffer from the current private industry system. And a lot of HMOs don't allow u to go to other areas for treatment. Many OBGYNs are just going to GYNs, because of the malpractice insurance cost.

The DMV and the post office are not run by our government, but are rather private. But really the US already has socialized medicence in exsistance, it's called Medicare and Medicaid, and it is draining our economy, while big insurance companies, roll in the dough.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

Jo, hospitals can't turn people away and they don't. That's completely bogus.</end quote></div>

Yes u can. Legally all hospitals are required to do is to stabilize people in EMERGENCY cases. If u come in gushing blood from your jugular, any hospital has to provide care, but once u are stable, they can transfer u to a county hospital. There are plenty of private hospitals!!! Plus if u go to the ER and get admitted, u better bet if u don't have insurance u r going to be shown your discharge papers way before anyone w/ insurance would.

Ambulances can also refuse to provide transportation if it is deemed not an emergency, like a hangnail, and the ambulence is only being used as a taxi.
Most County hospitals are too liberal.....and will see u for a hangnail, when they should not be. But then with our great government system that has allowed the court system to be destryed with bogus lawsuits, I can undertand why some are afraid to refuse care. Plus county hospitals have a lot of money to spend....tax levies for hospitals are always approved by die hard liberals, but try and get these same people to pass a school levy. With the way our educational system is headed, we wont' be able to turn out enough smart people to staff all these county hospitals.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

Jo, hospitals can't turn people away and they don't. That's completely bogus.</end quote></div>

Yes u can. Legally all hospitals are required to do is to stabilize people in EMERGENCY cases. If u come in gushing blood from your jugular, any hospital has to provide care, but once u are stable, they can transfer u to a county hospital. There are plenty of private hospitals!!! Plus if u go to the ER and get admitted, u better bet if u don't have insurance u r going to be shown your discharge papers way before anyone w/ insurance would.

Ambulances can also refuse to provide transportation if it is deemed not an emergency, like a hangnail, and the ambulence is only being used as a taxi.
Most County hospitals are too liberal.....and will see u for a hangnail, when they should not be. But then with our great government system that has allowed the court system to be destryed with bogus lawsuits, I can undertand why some are afraid to refuse care. Plus county hospitals have a lot of money to spend....tax levies for hospitals are always approved by die hard liberals, but try and get these same people to pass a school levy. With the way our educational system is headed, we wont' be able to turn out enough smart people to staff all these county hospitals.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

Jo, hospitals can't turn people away and they don't. That's completely bogus.</end quote></div>

Yes u can. Legally all hospitals are required to do is to stabilize people in EMERGENCY cases. If u come in gushing blood from your jugular, any hospital has to provide care, but once u are stable, they can transfer u to a county hospital. There are plenty of private hospitals!!! Plus if u go to the ER and get admitted, u better bet if u don't have insurance u r going to be shown your discharge papers way before anyone w/ insurance would.

Ambulances can also refuse to provide transportation if it is deemed not an emergency, like a hangnail, and the ambulence is only being used as a taxi.
Most County hospitals are too liberal.....and will see u for a hangnail, when they should not be. But then with our great government system that has allowed the court system to be destryed with bogus lawsuits, I can undertand why some are afraid to refuse care. Plus county hospitals have a lot of money to spend....tax levies for hospitals are always approved by die hard liberals, but try and get these same people to pass a school levy. With the way our educational system is headed, we wont' be able to turn out enough smart people to staff all these county hospitals.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

Jo, hospitals can't turn people away and they don't. That's completely bogus.</end quote></div>

Yes u can. Legally all hospitals are required to do is to stabilize people in EMERGENCY cases. If u come in gushing blood from your jugular, any hospital has to provide care, but once u are stable, they can transfer u to a county hospital. There are plenty of private hospitals!!! Plus if u go to the ER and get admitted, u better bet if u don't have insurance u r going to be shown your discharge papers way before anyone w/ insurance would.

Ambulances can also refuse to provide transportation if it is deemed not an emergency, like a hangnail, and the ambulence is only being used as a taxi.
Most County hospitals are too liberal.....and will see u for a hangnail, when they should not be. But then with our great government system that has allowed the court system to be destryed with bogus lawsuits, I can undertand why some are afraid to refuse care. Plus county hospitals have a lot of money to spend....tax levies for hospitals are always approved by die hard liberals, but try and get these same people to pass a school levy. With the way our educational system is headed, we wont' be able to turn out enough smart people to staff all these county hospitals.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

Jo, hospitals can't turn people away and they don't. That's completely bogus.</end quote>

Yes u can. Legally all hospitals are required to do is to stabilize people in EMERGENCY cases. If u come in gushing blood from your jugular, any hospital has to provide care, but once u are stable, they can transfer u to a county hospital. There are plenty of private hospitals!!! Plus if u go to the ER and get admitted, u better bet if u don't have insurance u r going to be shown your discharge papers way before anyone w/ insurance would.

Ambulances can also refuse to provide transportation if it is deemed not an emergency, like a hangnail, and the ambulence is only being used as a taxi.
Most County hospitals are too liberal.....and will see u for a hangnail, when they should not be. But then with our great government system that has allowed the court system to be destryed with bogus lawsuits, I can undertand why some are afraid to refuse care. Plus county hospitals have a lot of money to spend....tax levies for hospitals are always approved by die hard liberals, but try and get these same people to pass a school levy. With the way our educational system is headed, we wont' be able to turn out enough smart people to staff all these county hospitals.
 

Sakem

New member
"SIKO

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>sakasuka</b></i>

Jo, hospitals can't turn people away and they don't. That's completely bogus.</end quote>

Yes u can. Legally all hospitals are required to do is to stabilize people in EMERGENCY cases. If u come in gushing blood from your jugular, any hospital has to provide care, but once u are stable, they can transfer u to a county hospital. There are plenty of private hospitals!!! Plus if u go to the ER and get admitted, u better bet if u don't have insurance u r going to be shown your discharge papers way before anyone w/ insurance would.

Ambulances can also refuse to provide transportation if it is deemed not an emergency, like a hangnail, and the ambulence is only being used as a taxi.
Most County hospitals are too liberal.....and will see u for a hangnail, when they should not be. But then with our great government system that has allowed the court system to be destryed with bogus lawsuits, I can undertand why some are afraid to refuse care. Plus county hospitals have a lot of money to spend....tax levies for hospitals are always approved by die hard liberals, but try and get these same people to pass a school levy. With the way our educational system is headed, we wont' be able to turn out enough smart people to staff all these county hospitals.
 

NoExcuses

New member
"SIKO

Peter, you are way out of line.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>PeterC</b></i>

Sakasuka:



You have not been fully informed!!! Read the attached article posted on CBS News web site 5/17/07. Or just Google "Kaiser dumps patients on skid row"



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/17/60minutes/main2823079.shtml
">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories...in2823079.shtml
</a>


Kaiser has been dumping homeless and poor people on skid row in LA for some time. It seems the law has finally caught up with them.

</end quote></div>

I never said that patients weren't dumped. I said that legally ER's can't turn people alway.

Lot of people break rules in this country, but as you said, the law catches up with you.

I'm fully aware of this story....

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>obvious biased towards big Pharma and your rather Right leaning opinions that stand out in your comments. </end quote></div>

I am entitled to any opinion that I want.

If you're a card carrying socialist, so be it. If you're a commie, then you are what you are. No opinions are out-lawed here, whether they're right or left.



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> You should make it clear to people by stating up front that you are a current or former employee of the Pharmaceutical industry, </end quote></div>

You're getting your cause and effect relationship mixed up. I'm in the industry because I believe in what they do. My opinions were such way before I even left college. And who the hell cares who I'm employed by? I'm allowed to have any opinion that I want.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> a card carrying Republican </end quote></div>

You are making a <b> COMPLETE FOOL OF YOURSELF </b> because I have never stated that I belonged to a political party. Get your facts straight before you speak. In fact I don't and I have voted for many different parties over the years.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>and that you whole heartedly support our current Fascist government. </end quote></div>

Where did this come from? Where did I say that I support our fascist government?

You're coming off like an idiot. If you recall my blogs from a few weeks ago, i was fighting against Bush's immigrant plan.

You sir, are a moron.


<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>If you put this little piece of biographical info at the top of your posts people would have a much clearer sense of who you are and what you stand for. </end quote></div>

Scarlet letter, eh, just because I don't hold the same views as you? My opinions are my opinions and so are yours.

And you've been wrong on almost everyone one of your comments. What is your deal?



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
I financially supported five key democrats across the country that ran against the republican establishment last fall and they all won. I also write letters and send emails to congressmen and senators on a regular basis in regards to important issues facing our country. </end quote></div>



I have great health care coverage right now! The state of California covers me with its GHPP (Genetically Handicapped Persons Program) coverage. That's right a state government funded and run program!! It often isn't the most responsive health care I have received but the care is excellent none the less.



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> Sakasuka, don't you live in California and have GHPP? </end quote></div>

Get your facts straing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <b> I DON'T HAVE GHPP </b>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>You have strong opinions about things but people can be mislead by your words. Full disclosure would go a long way in making things clear to people!! </end quote></div>

You're an idiot.
 

NoExcuses

New member
"SIKO

Peter, you are way out of line.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>PeterC</b></i>

Sakasuka:



You have not been fully informed!!! Read the attached article posted on CBS News web site 5/17/07. Or just Google "Kaiser dumps patients on skid row"



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/17/60minutes/main2823079.shtml
">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories...in2823079.shtml
</a>


Kaiser has been dumping homeless and poor people on skid row in LA for some time. It seems the law has finally caught up with them.

</end quote></div>

I never said that patients weren't dumped. I said that legally ER's can't turn people alway.

Lot of people break rules in this country, but as you said, the law catches up with you.

I'm fully aware of this story....

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>obvious biased towards big Pharma and your rather Right leaning opinions that stand out in your comments. </end quote></div>

I am entitled to any opinion that I want.

If you're a card carrying socialist, so be it. If you're a commie, then you are what you are. No opinions are out-lawed here, whether they're right or left.



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> You should make it clear to people by stating up front that you are a current or former employee of the Pharmaceutical industry, </end quote></div>

You're getting your cause and effect relationship mixed up. I'm in the industry because I believe in what they do. My opinions were such way before I even left college. And who the hell cares who I'm employed by? I'm allowed to have any opinion that I want.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> a card carrying Republican </end quote></div>

You are making a <b> COMPLETE FOOL OF YOURSELF </b> because I have never stated that I belonged to a political party. Get your facts straight before you speak. In fact I don't and I have voted for many different parties over the years.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>and that you whole heartedly support our current Fascist government. </end quote></div>

Where did this come from? Where did I say that I support our fascist government?

You're coming off like an idiot. If you recall my blogs from a few weeks ago, i was fighting against Bush's immigrant plan.

You sir, are a moron.


<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>If you put this little piece of biographical info at the top of your posts people would have a much clearer sense of who you are and what you stand for. </end quote></div>

Scarlet letter, eh, just because I don't hold the same views as you? My opinions are my opinions and so are yours.

And you've been wrong on almost everyone one of your comments. What is your deal?



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
I financially supported five key democrats across the country that ran against the republican establishment last fall and they all won. I also write letters and send emails to congressmen and senators on a regular basis in regards to important issues facing our country. </end quote></div>



I have great health care coverage right now! The state of California covers me with its GHPP (Genetically Handicapped Persons Program) coverage. That's right a state government funded and run program!! It often isn't the most responsive health care I have received but the care is excellent none the less.



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> Sakasuka, don't you live in California and have GHPP? </end quote></div>

Get your facts straing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <b> I DON'T HAVE GHPP </b>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>You have strong opinions about things but people can be mislead by your words. Full disclosure would go a long way in making things clear to people!! </end quote></div>

You're an idiot.
 

NoExcuses

New member
"SIKO

Peter, you are way out of line.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>PeterC</b></i>

Sakasuka:



You have not been fully informed!!! Read the attached article posted on CBS News web site 5/17/07. Or just Google "Kaiser dumps patients on skid row"



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/17/60minutes/main2823079.shtml
">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories...in2823079.shtml
</a>


Kaiser has been dumping homeless and poor people on skid row in LA for some time. It seems the law has finally caught up with them.

</end quote></div>

I never said that patients weren't dumped. I said that legally ER's can't turn people alway.

Lot of people break rules in this country, but as you said, the law catches up with you.

I'm fully aware of this story....

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>obvious biased towards big Pharma and your rather Right leaning opinions that stand out in your comments. </end quote></div>

I am entitled to any opinion that I want.

If you're a card carrying socialist, so be it. If you're a commie, then you are what you are. No opinions are out-lawed here, whether they're right or left.



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> You should make it clear to people by stating up front that you are a current or former employee of the Pharmaceutical industry, </end quote></div>

You're getting your cause and effect relationship mixed up. I'm in the industry because I believe in what they do. My opinions were such way before I even left college. And who the hell cares who I'm employed by? I'm allowed to have any opinion that I want.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> a card carrying Republican </end quote></div>

You are making a <b> COMPLETE FOOL OF YOURSELF </b> because I have never stated that I belonged to a political party. Get your facts straight before you speak. In fact I don't and I have voted for many different parties over the years.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>and that you whole heartedly support our current Fascist government. </end quote></div>

Where did this come from? Where did I say that I support our fascist government?

You're coming off like an idiot. If you recall my blogs from a few weeks ago, i was fighting against Bush's immigrant plan.

You sir, are a moron.


<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>If you put this little piece of biographical info at the top of your posts people would have a much clearer sense of who you are and what you stand for. </end quote></div>

Scarlet letter, eh, just because I don't hold the same views as you? My opinions are my opinions and so are yours.

And you've been wrong on almost everyone one of your comments. What is your deal?



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
I financially supported five key democrats across the country that ran against the republican establishment last fall and they all won. I also write letters and send emails to congressmen and senators on a regular basis in regards to important issues facing our country. </end quote></div>



I have great health care coverage right now! The state of California covers me with its GHPP (Genetically Handicapped Persons Program) coverage. That's right a state government funded and run program!! It often isn't the most responsive health care I have received but the care is excellent none the less.



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> Sakasuka, don't you live in California and have GHPP? </end quote></div>

Get your facts straing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <b> I DON'T HAVE GHPP </b>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>You have strong opinions about things but people can be mislead by your words. Full disclosure would go a long way in making things clear to people!! </end quote></div>

You're an idiot.
 

NoExcuses

New member
"SIKO

Peter, you are way out of line.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>PeterC</b></i>

Sakasuka:



You have not been fully informed!!! Read the attached article posted on CBS News web site 5/17/07. Or just Google "Kaiser dumps patients on skid row"



<a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/17/60minutes/main2823079.shtml
">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories...in2823079.shtml
</a>


Kaiser has been dumping homeless and poor people on skid row in LA for some time. It seems the law has finally caught up with them.

</end quote></div>

I never said that patients weren't dumped. I said that legally ER's can't turn people alway.

Lot of people break rules in this country, but as you said, the law catches up with you.

I'm fully aware of this story....

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>obvious biased towards big Pharma and your rather Right leaning opinions that stand out in your comments. </end quote></div>

I am entitled to any opinion that I want.

If you're a card carrying socialist, so be it. If you're a commie, then you are what you are. No opinions are out-lawed here, whether they're right or left.



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> You should make it clear to people by stating up front that you are a current or former employee of the Pharmaceutical industry, </end quote></div>

You're getting your cause and effect relationship mixed up. I'm in the industry because I believe in what they do. My opinions were such way before I even left college. And who the hell cares who I'm employed by? I'm allowed to have any opinion that I want.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> a card carrying Republican </end quote></div>

You are making a <b> COMPLETE FOOL OF YOURSELF </b> because I have never stated that I belonged to a political party. Get your facts straight before you speak. In fact I don't and I have voted for many different parties over the years.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>and that you whole heartedly support our current Fascist government. </end quote></div>

Where did this come from? Where did I say that I support our fascist government?

You're coming off like an idiot. If you recall my blogs from a few weeks ago, i was fighting against Bush's immigrant plan.

You sir, are a moron.


<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>If you put this little piece of biographical info at the top of your posts people would have a much clearer sense of who you are and what you stand for. </end quote></div>

Scarlet letter, eh, just because I don't hold the same views as you? My opinions are my opinions and so are yours.

And you've been wrong on almost everyone one of your comments. What is your deal?



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
I financially supported five key democrats across the country that ran against the republican establishment last fall and they all won. I also write letters and send emails to congressmen and senators on a regular basis in regards to important issues facing our country. </end quote></div>



I have great health care coverage right now! The state of California covers me with its GHPP (Genetically Handicapped Persons Program) coverage. That's right a state government funded and run program!! It often isn't the most responsive health care I have received but the care is excellent none the less.



<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote> Sakasuka, don't you live in California and have GHPP? </end quote></div>

Get your facts straing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! <b> I DON'T HAVE GHPP </b>

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>You have strong opinions about things but people can be mislead by your words. Full disclosure would go a long way in making things clear to people!! </end quote></div>

You're an idiot.
 
Top